Assessment of function and muscle strength after endoscopic iliopsoas tenotomy to treat iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome during follow-up (FU) after endoscopic tenotomy for iliopsoas (IP)-cup impingement and to quantitatively analyze the hip flexion strength. METHODS: This was a monocentric, retrospective cohort study of a single surgeon series. Functional assessment was based on the modified Harris score, the Oxford score and the visual analog scale score. Strength was measured with a handheld dynamometer in the sitting and lying position. RESULTS: Thirty-six IP tenotomies for cup impingement were performed between May 2013 and November 2021. Seven (19%) patients were lost to FU. At the time of tenotomy, the mean (standard deviation) age was 62,6 (12,2) and BMI was 26,5 (4,1). The mean FU time after tenotomy to the last FU was 3,6 (0,8) years. All three outcome scores improved from preoperatively to six months postoperatively (p < 0.001). There were no significant change from six months to last FU. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the modified Harris score was set at 25. 20 (69%) patients had values that exceeded the threshold at one month and six months and neutral 19 (65.5%) had values that exceeded the threshold at the last FU. The limp symmetry index concerning hip flexion strength was 63% at 90° and 40% at 30° at the last FU. CONCLUSION: Most patients significantly improved their outcome scores after endoscopic iliopsoas tenotomy, with results remaining consistently stable over time. Despite a significant loss in hip flexion strength, the majority of patients did not report any impairment of their quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Risk factors and prevalence of ramp lesions in ACL ruptures: An analysis from the registry of the Francophone Arthroscopic Society.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and identify risk factors associated with these lesions. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry, including 5359 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) from June 2020 to June 2023. Potential risk factors for ramp lesion such as patient demographics, revision surgery, pivot shift, side-to-side anteroposterior laxity, medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, lateral meniscal tear and the volume of ligament remnant were evaluated using multivariate regression analyses. BMI and delay to surgery were also assessed. RESULTS: Ramp lesions were identified in 822 patients (15.3%). Univariate analysis identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury, percentage of ACL remnant (all p < 0.0001) and pivot shift (p = 0.0103) as significant risk factors. MCL injury was associated with a lower risk (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and percentage of ACL remnants remained significant risk factors, while MCL injury remained a protective factor. The anteroposterior laxity wasn't a significant predictor in either analysis. In subgroup analysis, there were differences concerning body mass index (n.s) and the delay to surgery (n.s). CONCLUSION: The study identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and pourcentage of ACL remnant as significant risk factors for ramp lesions, with MCL injury acting as a protective factor. This will help regarding the suspicion and identification of ramp lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Patient-specific cutting guides increase accuracy of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy procedure: A retrospective case-control study.

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of patient-specific guides (PSCG) to the standard technique in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). Secondary objectives were to evaluate factors that could influence accuracy and to compare the complication rate and operating time for both procedures. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospective collected data was performed. Between March 2011 and May 2018, 49 patients with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis who were operated for OWHTO using PSCG and 38 patients using the standard technique were included. Preoperative and postoperative deformities were evaluated on long leg radiographs by measuring the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, hip knee ankle angle (HKA), and joint line convergence angle. Pre- and postoperative posterior tibial slope was also evaluated. Accuracy was evaluated by analysing the difference between the preoperative planned and the actual postoperative HKA. Operating time and complication rate were also recorded in both groups. Results: The mean preoperative HKA was 173.4° (±3.1°) in the PSCG group and 173.3° (±2.4°) in the standard group (p = 0.8416). Mean planned HKA were 182.8° (±1.1°) and 184.0° (±0°) respectively for the PSCG and the standard group. Mean postoperative HKA were 181.9° (±1.9°) and 182.6° (±3.1°) respectively for the PSCG and the standard group. An accuracy of ±2° in the HKA was achieved in 44 (90%) in the PSCG group and 24 (65%) in the standard group (p = 0.006). The probability of achieving a HKA accuracy was four times higher for patients in the PSCG group (odds ratio [OR] = 4.06, [1.1; 15.3], p = 0.038). Also, higher preoperative Ahlback grade was associated with precision, all other parameters being equal (OR = 4.2, [0.13; 0.97], p = 0.04). Conclusion: In this study, the PSCG technique was significantly more accurate for achieving the planned HKA in OWHTO. Complication rates and operating times were comparable between groups. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case-control study.

Short-term functional outcomes of Whiteside transfer for massive rupture of gluteus medius tendon in native hips.

PURPOSE: To assess the functional and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either open or endoscopic Whiteside transfer of gluteus maximus and tensor fascia lata muscles in cases of massive rupture of gluteus medius tendon associated with muscle atrophy on a native hip METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive, single-centre study was conducted by a single operator with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. All Whiteside palliative transfers performed on patients with Type 5 gluteus medius tendon rupture, according to Lall's classification, resulting in painful and treatment-resistant Trendeleburg gait between 2017 and 2022 were included. Functional evaluation was based on modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), iHOT-12, Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and the pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Muscle strength was clinically assessed using the MRC classification. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and January 2022, a total of 15 Whiteside palliative transfers were identified, including nine (60%) open procedures and 6 (40%) endoscopic procedures, performed on 13 patients. One patient was excluded, and none were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up period was 41 (12; 59) months. The median age at the time of surgery was 74 (66; 76) years. The male-to-female sex ratio was 0.27. Functional results demonstrated a significant improvement in all scores: NAHS (45 vs. 72, p = 0.002), mHHS (22 vs. 55, p = 0.002), iHOT-12 (101 vs. 56, p = 0.002), and VAS (8 vs. 3, p = 0.002). Clinical outcomes also showed improvements in muscle strength (p = 0.003), single-leg stance (p = 0.01), and gait (p = 0.02). No significant differences were found in the various scores between the endoscopic and open techniques. CONCLUSION: Whiteside transfer surgery, whether performed through open surgery or endoscopically, is a palliative surgical approach that should be considered for patients with irreparable gluteus medius tendon tears, where the main symptom is trochanteric pain. This procedure yields satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes, although the gains in abduction strength recovery and gait improvement are modest.

What happens to endoscopic/arthroscopic tenotomies with iliopsoas impingement in the medium term? Review of a prospective cohort of 64 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of iliopsoas impingement (IPI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a proven risk factor for negative outcomes. Endoscopic or arthroscopic tenotomies of the iliopsoas offer a surgical solution with short-term results that have already been validated in prospective multicenter series. We carried out a review of the patients at more than 5 years of follow-up in order to assess the stability of the results over time. HYPOTHESIS: Our main hypothesis was that endoscopic/arthroscopic tenotomies allow stable medium-term resolution of the painful symptoms of IPI. Our secondary hypothesis was that medium-term survival was satisfactory. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study is a continuation of a multicenter prospective series. Patients were contacted through multiple channels in order to: obtain an Oxford score, assess for satisfaction, psoas irritation, and daily pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Of 64 patients in the original study, 57 were contacted. The Oxford score at the last follow-up was 40.7±7.7 [12-48]. There was a significant difference between the Oxford scores preoperatively, at 8 months and at the last follow-up. The mean satisfaction out of 10 was 8.0±2.1 [1-10]. We found 84% satisfaction at 5 years against 83% at 8 months. The VAS was 2.1±2.3 [0-10]. A straight leg psoas sign was present in 19.6% (10/51) of patients at 5 years, compared to 15.6% (8/51) at 8 months. The sign disappeared in four cases, while it reappeared during the interval in six cases. Survival was 91.2% (95% CI: 80.2-96.3) at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic/arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies represent a permanent medium-term solution to treat IPI after THA. The existence of a force differential or an acetabular overhang does not seem, within a certain limit, to impact the results in the medium term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; prospective series without control group.

Will videoteleconsultation have been just a stopgap in French orthopedics-traumatology? A national survey of 280 surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: There have been no studies assessing French orthopedic surgeons' satisfaction with video and telephone consultations. These were encouraged during the coronavirus pandemic. We therefore performed a prospective study to assess (1) the profile of physicians using videoteleconsultation (VTC) during the pandemic and factors influencing use, (2) satisfaction with VTC, and (3) the pros, cons and prospects of VTC. HYPOTHESIS: The study hypothesis was that VTC in orthopedics-traumatology is sufficiently satisfying to be used in everyday practice outside of pandemic contexts. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A French nationwide survey was conducted in the form of an assessment of professional practices. Orthopedic and traumatology surgeons were sent a digital questionnaire, using the mailing lists of some of the French professional and scientific societies, with an estimate of 2000 practitioners who could be reached. The survey concerned use of VTC, modalities and satisfaction and the practitioner's profile. On the basis of the questionnaire responses, a Net Promoter Score (NPS) was calculated, evaluating the number (from -100 to +100) of respondents likely to recommend VTC. RESULTS: In total 280 of the estimated 2000 practitioners who were contacted (14.0%) responded. Their mean age was 47.7±10.0years (range: 30-84years). The rate of use of VTC rose from 8.9% (n=25/280) before the pandemic to 55.3% (n=155/280) during it. In the 155 practitioners who had used VTC, NPS was -46.4. Only 51% (n=79/155) were in favor of continuing VTCs outside of pandemic settings. Likewise, 50.3% (n=78/155) reported that clinical examination was more time-consuming via VTC than in face-to-face consultation, and 57.4% (n=89/155) said the same about visualizing complementary examinations. Finally, 98.1% (n=152/155) found VTC less satisfying than face-to-face consultation for clinical examination, and only 18.1% (n=28/155) scheduled surgery after VTC alone. CONCLUSION: To date in French orthopedics-traumatology, VTC does not satisfy surgeons, with its virtual rather than physical clinical examination; even so, it offers a solution in pandemic settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; prospective study without control group.