Motivation and preferences of cancer patients to perform physical training.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this cross-sectional study were to investigate the knowledge about and experience with exercise as well as the motivation and preferences (e.g. availability) of cancer patients to participate in training groups. METHODS: From 11/2017-06/2018, 181 cancer patients undergoing or completing treatment responded to a compiled questionnaire. The stage of motivation (transtheoretical model of behavioural change), exercise-related knowledge, experience and preferences were evaluated. RESULTS: Knowledge about the positive effects of exercise was not associated with higher motivation stages. Higher motivation stages showed significant correlations with age (p = 0.044), exercise experience before cancer disease onset (p = 0.022) and exercise experience during cancer therapy (p = 0.013). For 59% of patients, group offers were an attractive option. Physically inactive patients preferred specialised cancer exercise groups (p = 0.002), whereas physically active patients preferred cross-disease rehabilitation exercise groups (p = 0.034) and exercise groups with healthy people (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that motivation of cancer patients for exercise depends on their experiences with physical training before and during disease treatment. Motivation could be increased by integrating exercise programmes during cancer therapy. These programmes should focus on patients inexperienced in physical training.

Western and Chinese medicine in oncology and hematology.

Based on a conclusive theoretical background, both Western and Chinese Medicine have developed diagnostic and therapeutic procedures which lead to reproducible treatment results. Whilst Western Medicine focuses on a most precise diagnosis of tumor histology and the extend of dissemination, Chinese Medicine has developed tools for a functional diagnoses of disturbed body functions. And as Western Medicine aims at producing most specific targeted drugs, Chinese Medicine intends to stabilize disturbed body functions mostly with decoctions. A combined treatment which synergizes specific tumor attack and patient stabilization seems promising. However, the different cultural backgrounds have led to different standards of evaluation. Although the scientific evaluation of Chinese Medicine has led to the development of new drugs, the majority of treatments with decoctions are not evaluated according to the accepted standards. As of today, modern research could only occasionally find explanations for the longstanding experience, but new research ideas have resulted from this confrontation. The approach of combining standard treatments with Chinese treatment concepts only started a few decades ago. The experiences and promising results from smaller studies stand against possible risks of unknown interactions with proven treatment concepts. Pharmacokinetic and clinical studies will be necessary to evaluate these combined treatment concepts. In everyday life, Western and Chinese Medicine should be used in sequence, whereas in studies and special situations the combined approach should be applied to offer possible benefits without causing unnecessary risks to the patients.