Electron microscopy study of tubular crystals (BiS)1+delta(NbS2)n

Big crystals (mm-sized) with anomalous tubular morphology were synthesised in the Bi-Nb-S system. Their structural study by electron microscopy and related techniques revealed that they can be described as misfit layer structures, a type of composite modulated structures. The misfit monolayer approximately BiNbS3 and bilayer approximately BiNb2S5 phases appear as well in the preparation but with lamellar morphology as it is typical for these kind of compounds. They consist of periodical intergrowth of pseudotetragonal layers BiS (Q) with pseudohexagonal layers NbS2 (H). approximately BiNbS3 has a stacking sequence ...Q,H,Q,H,... and approximately BiNb2S5 has a stacking sequence ...Q,H,H,Q,H,H,... Backscattered electron imaging, wavelength dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy of transversal cross-sections of single tubular crystals showed that these crystals present a strong compositional and inter-laminar stacking disorder along the tube radius. This disorder is suggested to be the cause for the original wrapping of the layers that gives rise to the tubes. Besides the disordered areas, some ordered slabs have been found with stacking sequences corresponding to binary 3R-NbS2 (approximately 6 A), approximately BiNb2S5 (approximately 17.4 A) (which dominate in the crystal) and to a new related phase approximately BiNb4S9 with a stacking sequence ...Q,H,H,H,H,Q,H,H,H,H,... and a periodicity of approximately 29.2 A.

A TEM and XRD study of the SbNbSe3 misfit layer structures

Two new misfit layer structures have been synthesized within the Sb-Nb-Se system. Powder X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy techniques (electron diffraction, HREM, XEDS) have been used to determine the nature of their structure. According to TEM and XEDS data (for more than 15 crystals studied) both phases are monolayer type, i.e. (SbSe)1+delta (NbSe2). Electron microscopy reveals a composite modulated structure that consists of the periodical intergrowth of a pseudotetragonal SbSe layer, denominated as Q, and a pseudohexagonal layer NbSe2, denominated as H. Both layers fit along b, stack along c and do not fit along a (misfit) giving rise to an incommensurate modulation along this direction. The two phases differ in the symmetry of the Q layers being in one case orthorhombic (for delta = 0.17) and monoclinic in the other (for delta = 0.19). After the characterization of the sample by electron microscopy the unit cells of the basic layers could be refined for both phases by powder X-ray diffraction: aQ = 5.824(2) A, bQ = 5.962(5) A, cQ = 23.927(6) A, alpha = 90 degrees, beta = 90 degrees and gamma = 90 degrees and aH = 3.415(5) A, bH = 5.962(6) A,, cH = 11.962(1) A, alpha = 90 degrees, beta = 90 degrees and gamma = 90 degrees for the orthorhombic phase; aQ = 5.844(2) A, bQ = 5.981(1) A, cQ = 23.919(5) A, alpha = 90 degrees, beta = 90 degrees and gamma = 96.00(3)degrees and aH = 3.439(1) A, bH = 5.994(2) A, cH = 11.956(3) A, alpha = 90 degrees, beta = 90 degrees and gamma = 90 degrees for the monoclinic phase. The phase with the monoclinic Q-sublattice often appears as twinned crystals. The more abundant crystals are disordered intergrowths of both monolayer phases.

Elucidation of the crystal structure of oxyapatite by high-resolution electron microscopy.

High-resolution electron-microscopy (HREM) images from different hydroxyapatite (OHAp) samples showed p3 projection symmetry along [001] instead of the p6 projection symmetry compatible with the space group P6_3/m of OHAp. Image processing was used to establish without ambiguity that threefold symmetry dominates the images along [001]. OHAp crystals decompose in the transmission electron microscope and it is concluded that the threefold symmetry observed corresponds to an early step in the decomposition process, the dehydration of OHAp to oxyapatite (OAp). A structural model for OAp where every second O atom along the 6(3) axis in OHAp is removed has the maximal space-group symmetry P{\bar 6}. This is compatible with the p3 projection symmetry observed. Atomic shifts in this OAp model compared to the OHAp structure were estimated using the HREM images and geometric optimizations of the atomic structure. No refinements of the atomic coordinates against diffraction data were possible but the simulated HREM images of this crude model fit well with the experimental images.