Feasibility, safety and diagnostic yield of interventional cardiac magnetic resonance for routine right heart catheterization in adults.

BACKGROUND: Real-time cardiac magnetic resonance generates spatially and temporally resolved images of cardiac anatomy and function, without the need for contrast agent or X-ray exposure. Cardiac magnetic resonance-guided right heart catheterization (CMR-RHC) combines the benefits of cardiac magnetic resonance and invasive cardiac catheterization. The clinical adoption of CMR-RHC represents the first step towards the development of cardiac magnetic resonance-guided therapeutic procedures. AIM: To describe the feasibility, safety and diagnostic yield of CMR-RHC in consecutive all-comer patients with clinical indications for right heart catheterization. METHODS: From December 2018 to May 2021, 35 consecutive patients with prespecified indications for right heart catheterization were scheduled for CMR-RHC via the femoral route under local anaesthesia in a 1.5T cardiac magnetic resonance suite equipped for interventional cardiac magnetic resonance. The duration of various procedural components and safety data were recorded. Success rate (defined by the ability to record all prespecified haemodynamic measurements and imaging metrics), adverse events and patient/physician perprocedural comfort were assessed. RESULTS: One patient withdrew his consent before the study, and scanner troubleshooting occurred in one case. Among the 33 remaining patients, prespecified cardiac magnetic resonance imaging metrics were obtained in all patients, whereas full CMR-RHC measurements were obtained in 30 patients (91%). A dedicated cardiac magnetic resonance-compatible wire was used in 25/33 procedures. CMR-RHC was completed in 29±16minutes, and the total duration of the procedure, including conventional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, was 62±20minutes. There were no adverse events and no femoral haematomas. Procedural comfort was deemed good by the patients and operators for all procedures. CMR-RHC significantly impacted diagnosis or patient management in 28/33 patients (85%). CONCLUSIONS: CMR-RHC seems to be a feasible and safe procedure that can be used in routine daily practice in consecutive adults with an impactful clinical yield.

Vasoplegic Syndrome after Cardiac Surgery for Infective Endocarditis.

Purpose: Post-operative vasoplegic syndrome is a dreaded complication in infective endocarditis (IE). Methods and Results: This retrospective study included 166 consecutive patients referred to cardiac surgery for non-shocked IE. Post-operative vasoplegic syndrome was defined as a persistent hypotension (mean blood pressure < 65 mmHg) refractory to fluid loading and cardiac output restoration. Cardiac surgery was performed 7 (5−12) days after the beginning of antibiotic treatment, 4 (1−9) days after negative blood culture and in 72.3% patients with adapted anti-biotherapy. Timing of cardiac surgery was based on ESC guidelines and operating room availability. Most patients required valve replacement (80%) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration was 106 (95−184) min. Multivalvular surgery was performed in 43 patients, 32 had tricuspid valve surgery. Post-operative vasoplegic syndrome was reported in 53/166 patients (31.9%, 95% confidence interval of 24.8−39.0%) of the whole population; only 15.1% (n = 8) of vasoplegic patients had a post-operative documented infection (6 positive blood cultures) and no difference was reported between vasoplegic and non-vasoplegic patients for valve culture and the timing of cardiac surgery. Of the 23 (13.8%) in hospital-deaths, 87.0% (n = 20) occurred in the vasoplegic group and the main causes of death were multiorgan failure (n = 17) and neurological complications (n = 3). Variables independently associated with vasoplegic syndrome were CPB duration (1.82 (1.16−2.88) per tertile) and NTproBNP level (2.11 (1.35−3.30) per tertile). Conclusions: Post-operative vasoplegic syndrome is frequent and is the main cause of death after IE cardiac surgery. Our data suggested that the mechanism of vasoplegic syndrome was more related to inflammatory cardiovascular injury rather than the consequence of ongoing bacteremia.

Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incremental prognostic value of vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: Recurrent MI is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among MI survivors. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2019, consecutive patients with prior MI referred for stress CMR were followed up for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined by cardiovascular mortality or recurrent nonfatal MI. Uni- and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia and the extent of myocardial scar. RESULTS: Among 1,594 patients with prior MI and myocardial scar on CMR, 1,401 (92%) (68.2 ± 11.0 years; 61.4% men) completed the follow-up (median: 6.2 years), and 205 had MACE (14.6%). Patients without inducible ischemia experienced a lower annual rate of MACE (3.1%) than those with 1-2 (4.9%), 3-5 (21.5%), or ≥6 segments of ischemia (45.7%) (all p < 0.01). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of inducible ischemia and the extent of scar were associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR]:3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67 to 4.65 and HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.53 to 2.18, respectively; both p < 0.001). In multivariable stepwise Cox regression, the presence of ischemia and the extent of scar were independent predictors of MACE (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 2.14 to 3.78 and HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.44 to 1.72, respectively; both p < 0.001). These findings were significant in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The addition of CMR parameters to the model including traditional risk factors resulted in a better discrimination for MACE (C-statistic: 0.76 vs. 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prior MI, vasodilator stress CMR has independent and incremental prognostic value over traditional risk factors.

Feasibility and Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Because most studies have excluded arrhythmic patients, the prognostic value of stress perfusion CMR in patients with AF is unknown. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with suspected or stable chronic coronary artery disease and AF referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were included and followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event(s) (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. The diagnosis of AF was defined by 12-lead electrocardiography before and after CMR. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR. RESULTS: Of 639 patients (mean age 72 ± 9 years, 77% men), 602 (94%) completed the CMR protocol, and 538 (89%) completed follow-up (median 5.1 years); 80 had MACE. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of ischemia (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.86 to 11.80) or LGE (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.55 to 3.74) was associated with the occurrence of MACE (p < 0.001 for both). In a multivariate Cox regression including clinical and CMR indexes, the presence of ischemia (HR: 5.98; 95% CI: 3.68 to 9.73) or LGE (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.89 to 3.60) was an independent predictor of MACE (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, stress perfusion CMR is feasible and has good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE.

Prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft.

AIMS: The accuracy and prognostic value of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are established in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Because myocardial contrast kinetics may be altered after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), most studies excluded CABG patients. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in CABG patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive CABG patients referred for stress CMR were retrospectively included and followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiovascular (CV) death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic association of inducible ischaemia and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR. Of 866 consecutive CABG patients, 852 underwent the stress CMR protocol and 771 (89%) completed the follow-up [median (interquartile range) 4.2 (3.3-6.2) years]. There were 85 MACE (63 CV deaths and 22 non-fatal MI). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of inducible ischaemia identified the occurrence of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 3.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27-5.48; P < 0.001] and CV death (HR 2.55, 95% CI: 1.52-4.25; P < 0.001). In a multivariable stepwise Cox regression including clinical characteristics and CMR indexes, the presence of inducible ischaemia was an independent predictor of a higher incidence of MACE (HR 3.22, 95% CI: 2.06-5.02; P < 0.001) and CV death (HR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.28-3.62; P = 0.003), and the same was observed for LGE (both P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Stress CMR has a good discriminative prognostic value in patients after CABG, with a higher incidence of MACE and CV death in patients with inducible ischaemia and/or LGE.

Safety and Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) referred for stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may have a less optimal hemodynamic response to intravenous vasodilator. The aim was to assess the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with HFrEF defined by left ventricular ejection fraction <40% prospectively referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined by cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement by CMR. RESULTS: Of 1053 patients with HFrEF (65±11 years, median [interquartile range] left ventricular ejection fraction 38.7% [37.2-39.0]), 1018 (97%) completed the CMR protocol and 950 (93%) completed the follow-up (median [interquartile range], 5.6 [3.6-7.3] years); 117 experienced a MACE (12.3%). Stress CMR was well tolerated without any adverse events. Patients without ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement experienced a lower annual event rate of MACE (1.8%) than those with both ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement (12.0%; P<0.001). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement were significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (hazard ratio, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.69-3.60]; and hazard ratio, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.77-4.83], respectively, both P<0.001). In multivariable Cox regression, inducible ischemia was an independent predictor of a higher incidence of MACE (hazard ratio, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.52-3.35]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Stress CMR is safe and has a good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE in patients with HFrEF.