The abuse potential of lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act.

RATIONALE: Lemborexant (LEM) is a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) approved in multiple countries including the USA, Japan, Canada, Australia, and several Asian countries for the treatment of insomnia in adults. As a compound with central nervous system activity, it is important to understand the abuse potential of LEM with respect to public health. OBJECTIVES: This review discusses data for LEM relevant to each of the 8 factors of the United States Controlled Substances Act. RESULTS: LEM did not demonstrate abuse potential in nonclinical testing and was associated with a low incidence of abuse-related adverse events in clinical study participants with insomnia disorder. Similar to other DORAs that have been evaluated (eg., almorexant, suvorexant (SUV), and daridorexant), LEM and the positive controls (zolpidem and SUV) also showed drug liking in a phase 1 abuse potential study that enrolled subjects who used sedatives recreationally. However, internet surveillance of SUV and the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System suggests that drugs in the DORA class display very low abuse-related risks in the community. Additionally, as described in FDA-approved labeling, it does not carry physical dependence and withdrawal risks. CONCLUSIONS: LEM, similar to most other prescription insomnia medications, was placed into Schedule IV. However, LEM and other drugs in the DORA class may have a lower potential for abuse as suggested by real-world postmarketing data from federal surveys and internet surveillance, and thus may have lower risks to public health than Schedule IV benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics that potentiate GABA signaling.

Exposure-Response Analyses of Polysomnography and Subjective Sleep Efficacy End Points From the Phase 3 Trials of Lemborexant, a Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Insomnia.

This report describes polysomnography and sleep diary exposure-response analyses from Study E2006-G000-304 (Study 304), a 1-month trial of 5- or 10-mg lemborexant, zolpidem, or placebo; and Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303), a 6-month trial of 5- or 10-mg lemborexant or placebo. Studies 304 and 303 included 1006 (86%) and 956 (68%) (female) participants, respectively; >40% were ≥65 years, with individual lemborexant exposures derived from a previously described pharmacokinetic model. Linear mixed-effects analyses of polysomnography: latency to persistent sleep (LPS), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) quantified the change from baseline given lemborexant exposure, time, and covariates, guided by consensus recommendations regarding clinical significance. A small impact of sex, body weight, and race was predicted for LPS and SE, irrespective of treatment. Effect of age on LPS was small; baseline SE was estimated to be 8% higher for a 50-year-old versus an 80-year-old, decreasing to 6% by 1 month. Baseline WASO was 13 minutes longer for Black versus White subjects, corresponding to a 5-minute lower change from baseline at the end of the study. For subjective end points, the statistically significant covariate effects for age, sex, and race were not deemed therapeutically relevant, likely reflecting physiologic sleep pattern changes across age and study subgroups. Both polysomnography and subjective analyses indicated clinically meaningful differences from baseline for both lemborexant treatments, with effects being greater for 10-mg versus 5-mg lemborexant, while indicating that covariate-specific lemborexant dose adjustments are not warranted.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses of amyloid positron emission tomography and plasma biomarkers for lecanemab in subjects with early Alzheimer's disease.

Lecanemab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to soluble Aß aggregate species, while demonstrating low affinity for Aß monomer. This article describes the population pharmacokinetic (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses for amyloid plaques, as measured using positron emission tomography (PET), and biomarkers of amyloid pathology as evidenced by Aß42/40 ratio and plasma p-tau181 following i.v. administration of lecanemab in subjects with early Alzheimer's disease. Lecanemab PKs were well-characterized with a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Final PK model contained covariate effects of anti-drug antibody positive status, sex, body weight, and albumin on clearance. The time course of amyloid PET standard uptake ratio (SUVr), plasma Aß42/40 ratio, and p-tau181 were described using indirect response models with lecanemab exposure as a maximum effect function stimulating the reduction of SUVr, and as a linear function increasing Aß42/40 ratio and decreasing p-tau181 formation rates. PK/PD simulations show that 10 mg/kg biweekly dosing results in larger and faster decrease in SUVr and p-tau181 and increase in Aß42/40 ratio as compared to 10 mg/kg monthly dose. Furthermore, the PK/PD simulations showed that after treatment discontinuation the brain amyloid re-accumulation to baseline levels is slow with a recovery half-life of ~4 years, whereas plasma Aß42/40 ratio and p-tau181 return to baseline levels faster than amyloid. Given the relationship between changes in amyloid PET SUVr and soluble biomarkers, the developed PK/PD models can be used to inform lecanemab dose regimens in future clinical studies.

ECG Evaluation as Part of the Clinical Pharmacology Strategy in the Development of New Drugs: A Review of Current Practices and Opportunities Based on Five Case Studies.

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 document was revised in 2015 to allow concentration-corrected QT interval (C-QTc) analysis to be applied to data from early clinical pharmacology studies to exclude a small drug-induced effect on QTc. Provided sufficiently high concentrations of the drug are obtained in the first-in-human (FIH) study, this approach can be used to obviate the need for a designated thorough QT (TQT) study. The E14 revision has resulted in a steady reduction in the number of TQT studies and an increased use of FIH studies to evaluate electrocardiogram (ECG) effects of drugs in development. In this review, five examples from different sponsors are shared in which C-QTc analysis was performed on data from FIH studies. Case 1 illustrates a clearly negative C-QTc evaluation, despite observations of QTc prolongation at high concentrations in nonclinical studies. In case 2 C-QTc analysis of FIH data was performed prior to full pharmacokinetic characterization in patients, and the role of nonclinical assays in an integrated risk assessment is discussed. Case 3 illustrates a positive clinical C-QTc relationship, despite negative nonclinical assays. Case 4 demonstrates a strategy for characterizing the C-QTc relationship for a nonracemic therapy and formulation optimization, and case 5 highlights an approach to perform a preliminary C-QTc analysis early in development and postpone the definitive analysis until proof of efficacy is demonstrated. The strategy of collecting and storing ECG data from FIH studies to enable an informed decision on whether and when to apply C-QTc analysis to obviate the need for a TQT study is described.

Acute Cognitive Effects of the Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist Lemborexant Compared With Suvorexant and Zolpidem in Recreational Sedative Users.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: As part of a human abuse potential (HAP) study of lemborexant (LEM), the effects of therapeutic (LEM 10 mg), and supratherapeutic doses of LEM 20 mg and LEM 30 mg on cognition and psychomotor performance were compared with placebo (PBO) and supratherapeutic doses of zolpidem (ZOL) 30 mg and suvorexant (SUV) 40 mg. Subjects (n = 32) were healthy, nondependent, recreational sedative users able to discriminate the effects of both SUV and ZOL from PBO on subjective drug measures. METHODS/PROCEDURES: The human abuse potential study was a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled, 6-way crossover study. Eligible subjects admitted to the treatment phase completed the choice reaction test (CRT) and divided attention test. The CRT included measurements of recognition reaction time (RRT) and motor reaction time. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Recognition reaction time and mean maximum change from baseline (CFB max ) scores were significantly increased (slower performance) versus PBO for all LEM doses (all P < 0.001), ZOL ( P < 0.001), and SUV ( P = 0.004), and LEM (all doses) was not statistically different from ZOL or SUV. Motor reaction time and mean CFB max versus PBO were significantly increased for all LEM doses (all P < 0.001), and ZOL ( P < 0.001) and SUV ( P < 0.001). All LEM doses showed significantly decreased (better performance) mean CFB max versus ZOL (all P < 0.001), but not SUV. Notably, all cognitive effects in the CRT and divided attention test were limited to the main treatment phase (up to 8 hours postdose). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: All active doses of LEM, ZOL, and SUV generally increased reaction time and reduced divided attention capabilities versus PBO. However, at therapeutic/supratherapeutic doses, LEM led to significantly less cognitive impairment than supratherapeutic doses of ZOL in some measures.

Abuse Potential of Lemborexant, a Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist, Compared With Zolpidem and Suvorexant in Recreational Sedative Users.

BACKGROUND: Lemborexant (LEM) is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of insomnia in adults in multiple countries including the the United States, Japan, Canada, Australia and several Asian countries. PROCEDURES: This was a randomized, single-dose, single-center, double-blind, active-control, 6-way crossover study to evaluate LEM abuse potential. The study assessed oral doses of LEM 10 mg (LEM10), 20 mg (LEM20), and 30 mg (LEM30) compared with placebo (PBO), zolpidem (ZOL) immediate release 30 mg, and suvorexant (SUV) 40 mg. Subjects were healthy, nondependent, recreational sedative users able to discriminate/like the effects of both SUV and ZOL from PBO during a qualification phase. RESULTS: Abuse potential endpoints were analyzed in qualified subjects who received and completed all treatments (n = 32). On the "at this moment" drug-liking visual analog scale (VAS), mean maximum (peak) effect (primary endpoint) values were 78.4, 80.5, and 83.6 for LEM10, LEM20, and LEM30, respectively, which were all significantly greater than PBO (57.8; all P > 0.05) but not different from SUV (76.1) or ZOL (78.3). Similarly, for secondary endpoints overall drug-liking VAS and take-drug-again VAS, mean maximum (peak) effect values for all LEM doses were significantly greater than PBO ( P > 0.05) but not different compared with ZOL or SUV. CONCLUSIONS: For all doses, LEM demonstrated abuse potential versus PBO and appeared to have a similar abuse potential profile to ZOL and SUV in this study population. Lemborexant was well tolerated. Lemborexant has been placed in Schedule IV, the same drug schedule as ZOL and SUV.

Phase 1 Single Ascending and Multiple Ascending Dose Studies of Phosphodiesterase-9 Inhibitor E2027: Confirmation of Target Engagement and Selection of Phase 2 Dose in Dementia With Lewy Bodies Trial.

BACKGROUND: E2027 is a novel, highly selective and potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase9 (PDE9) being evaluated as a treatment for dementia with Lewy bodies. METHODS: Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, single ascending dose (SAD, n=96) and multiple ascending dose (MAD, n=68) studies evaluated E2027 doses (5 to 1200 mg) in healthy subjects. The impact of age, race (Japanese/non-Japanese), and food on pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics were evaluated. Serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected to assess the target engagement. RESULTS: E2027 PK profiles were biphasic (elimination half-life: ~30 hours. Approximately 3-fold accumulation was observed following multiple once-daily dosing. E2027 single doses of 50 to 400 mg resulted in mean maximum increases in CSF cyclic guanosine monophosphate ranging from 293% to 461% within 5.37 to 12.9 hours after dose administration to assess target engagement. Dose-response modelling of steady-state predose CSF cyclic guanosine monophosphate concentrations showed ≥200% increase from baseline is maintained with doses of ≥50 mg QD. The most common adverse events with E2027 were post-LP syndrome and back pain. PK profiles were similar between Japanese and non-Japanese. Higher exposure observed in fed versus fasted state was not considered clinically significant. PK exposure was higher in elderly subjects. CONCLUSIONS: S.E2027 was well-tolerated following single and multiple administration. E2027 achieved maximal and sustained target engagement at 50 mg QD, the dose selected for the phase 2 clinical trial.

Effect of alcohol coadministration on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of lemborexant: A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved to treat insomnia in adults in several countries including the USA, Canada, and Japan. AIMS: This study was conducted to investigate effects of lemborexant and alcohol coadministration on postural stability, cognitive performance, and the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of lemborexant. METHODS: This was a Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study in 32 healthy adults. Individuals were randomized into one of four treatment sequences to receive single doses of placebo, lemborexant 10 mg (LEM10), alcohol (males, 0.7 g/kg; females, 0.6 g/kg), and LEM10 plus alcohol, each separated by a 14-day washout. Postural stability (body sway) was measured by ataxiameter and a cognitive performance assessment battery evaluated four domains of attention and memory. RESULTS: Pharmacodynamic outcomes were analyzed for the 18 participants who completed all four treatments. Change from baseline in body sway showed no significant differences between lemborexant plus alcohol versus alcohol alone. Compared with alcohol alone, coadministration of lemborexant with alcohol showed additive negative effects on cognitive performance domains, corresponding approximately with peak plasma lemborexant concentrations (median = 1.5 h). Cognitive performance was also impaired with lemborexant alone at 0.5 and 2 h in this experimental paradigm with morning dosing. Alcohol increased plasma lemborexant exposure by 70% based on area under the curve to 72 h, and increased peak plasma lemborexant concentrations by 35%. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was somnolence. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of lemborexant with alcohol showed additive negative effects on cognitive measures, but not on postural stability, compared with alcohol alone. Lemborexant exposure was increased with alcohol. Lemborexant alone or with alcohol was well tolerated. Patients are advised not to consume alcohol with lemborexant.

E2027 Cardiac Safety Evaluation With Concentration-Response Modeling of ECG Data to Inform Dose Selection in Studies in Patients With Dementia With Lewy Bodies.

BACKGROUND: E2027 is a novel, highly selective and potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 9 in development for dementia with Lewy bodies. Cardiac safety assessments for emerging agents are essential to avoid drug-induced QT interval prolongation, which may predispose individuals to potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. To evaluate the cardiac safety of E2027 and to inform dose selection for the phase 2 study of E2027 in dementia with Lewy bodies, we evaluated concentration-response modeling of pooled electrocardiogram data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A post hoc concentration-QTc analysis evaluated potential QT effects using data from 2 randomized, double-blind studies in healthy subjects: a single ascending dose (SAD) study and a multiple ascending dose (MAD) study. Daily E2027 doses ranged from 5 to 1200 mg. RESULTS: A linear mixed-effects model was used to establish the relationship between plasma concentrations of E2027 and change from the baseline of QTcF (ΔQTcF). A significant but shallow relationship was observed in the estimated slope of the concentration-ΔQTcF: 0.002 ms/ng/mL (90% confidence interval: 0.0007-0.0031) with a small, nonsignificant treatment effect-specific intercept of -0.6 ms. Based on this pooled concentration-QTc analysis, an effect on the QTcF interval >10 ms can be excluded up to E2027 plasma concentrations of ∼3579 ng/mL, corresponding to a dose at least 4-fold larger than the 50 mg phase 2 dose. CONCLUSION: This pooled post hoc analysis evaluating cardiac safety of E2027 demonstrated that clinically concerning QTcF prolongation and related cardiac complications are highly unlikely with proposed E2027 doses planned for phase 2.

Effects of Lemborexant on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptives: Results From a Phase 1 Drug-Drug Interaction Study in Healthy Females.

Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in multiple countries including the United States, Canada, and Japan for the treatment of insomnia in adults. As women of childbearing potential may be prescribed insomnia drugs, a drug-drug interaction study was conducted. This single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study examined potential drug-drug interactions between lemborexant and an oral contraceptive (OC) in healthy females (18-44 years, n = 20). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of lemborexant 10 mg (at steady state) on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of OC (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 1.5 mg norethindrone acetate), assess the effect of a single dose of OC on lemborexant pharmacokinetics, and evaluate safety and tolerability of lemborexant and OC coadministration. Ethinyl estradiol maximum plasma drug concentration was not altered by lemborexant coadministration; area under the curve from zero time to the last quantifiable concentration was slightly increased, by 13%. No clinically relevant effects on norethindrone acetate pharmacokinetics were observed. Coadministration of OC with lemborexant had no clinically relevant effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lemborexant. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile. These results support the conclusion that lemborexant and OC can be coadministered without dose adjustment.

Effect of hepatic impairment on pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of lemborexant.

Lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States, Japan, and Canada for the treatment of insomnia in adults. This phase I, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study assessed the impact of mild or moderate hepatic impairment (HI) on lemborexant pharmacokinetics and metabolism. The pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of lemborexant were evaluated in subjects with mild (Child-Pugh class A) or moderate (Child-Pugh class B) HI and healthy age-, sex-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched control subjects (n = 8 subjects/group). Subjects received a single oral dose of lemborexant 10 mg (LEM10). Blood samples were collected up to 312 hours post dosing for lemborexant pharmacokinetics assessments. Median time to maximum plasma concentration was similar across all groups. Compared with healthy subjects, exposure measures (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity [AUC0-inf ]) increased by ~58% (Cmax ) and ~25% (AUC0-inf ) in subjects with mild HI and ~22% (Cmax ) and ~54% (AUC0-inf ) in subjects with moderate HI. Clearance decreased by 20% and 35% in subjects with mild and moderate HI, respectively, versus healthy subjects. Lemborexant unbound fraction was similar in all groups (range: 0.060-0.065). All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild in severity; no serious TEAEs occurred. In conclusion, following a single LEM10 dose, lemborexant exposure was similar in subjects with mild HI and increased in subjects with moderate HI versus healthy subjects. No dose adjustment is required in subjects with mild HI. Dosing in subjects with moderate HI should be restricted to 5 mg. Lemborexant was well tolerated in all groups.

Effect of severe renal impairment on pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of lemborexant.

The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of severe renal impairment (SRI) on the pharmacokinetics of lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of insomnia. A phase 1 multicenter, single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted in subjects with SRI not requiring dialysis (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-29 ml/min/1.73 m2 ; n = 8) compared with demographically matched healthy subjects with normal renal function (n = 8). Plasma levels of lemborexant and its metabolites were measured over 240 h following a single oral 10-mg dose administered in the morning. Relative to subjects with normal renal function, lemborexant maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) was similar, whereas area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t) ) and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(0-inf) ) were about 1.5-fold higher in subjects with SRI. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) were 104.8 (77.4-142.0), 150.5 (113.2-200.3), and 149.8 (113.1-198.6) for Cmax , AUC(0-t) , and AUC(0-inf) , respectively. In both groups, the median lemborexant time to Cmax (tmax ) was 1 h, and the mean unbound fraction of lemborexant was ~7%. For the M4, M9, and M10 metabolites, Cmax was reduced ~20% and exposure (AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) ) was ~1.4- to 1.5-fold higher in subjects with SRI versus healthy subjects; tmax was delayed ~1.5-2 h for M4 and M10. All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate. Lemborexant pharmacokinetics were not sufficiently altered to warrant a dose adjustment for subjects with renal impairment.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug interactions of lemborexant with CYP3A inhibitors.

Lemborexant, a recently approved dual orexin receptor antagonist for treatment of adults with insomnia, is eliminated primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A metabolism. The recommended dose of lemborexant is 5 mg once per night, with a maximum recommended dose of 10 mg once daily. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for lemborexant was developed and applied to integrate data obtained from in vivo drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments, and to further explore lemborexant interaction with CYP3A inhibitors and inducers. The model predictions were in good agreement with observed pharmacokinetic data and with DDI results from clinical studies with CYP3A inhibitors, itraconazole and fluconazole. The model further predicted that DDI effects of weak CYP3A inhibitors (fluoxetine and ranitidine) are weak, and effects of moderate inhibitors (erythromycin and verapamil) are moderate. Based on the PBPK simulations and clinical efficacy and safety data, the maximum daily recommended lemborexant dose when administered with weak CYP3A inhibitors is 5 mg; co-administration of moderate and strong inhibitors should be avoided except in countries where 2.5 mg has been approved.

Evaluation of the CYP3A and CYP2B6 Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Lemborexant.

Lemborexant is approved for treating insomnia and is under investigation for treating irregular sleep-wake rhythm disorder. Based on in vitro drug-drug interaction (DDI) characteristics, phase 1, open-label DDI studies were conducted to evaluate lemborexant's cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and CYP2B6 interaction potential. Interactions between lemborexant 10 mg and strong and moderate CYP3A inhibitors (itraconazole and fluconazole), a strong CYP3A inducer (rifampin), and CYP3A (midazolam) and CYP2B6 substrates (bupropion) were evaluated. Coadministration of lemborexant with itraconazole or fluconazole resulted in 1.4- to 1.6-fold and 3.7- to 4-fold increases in lemborexant maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve from zero time extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf ), respectively. Coadministration of lemborexant with rifampin resulted in >90% decreases in lemborexant Cmax and AUC0-inf . Midazolam exposure was not affected. Coadministration of lemborexant with bupropion resulted in 49.9% and 45.5% decreases in S-bupropion Cmax and AUC0-inf , respectively.Comparison of estimated exposures for patients in phase 3 trials who were/were not receiving concomitant weak CYP3A inhibitors substantiated the DDI pharmacokinetic findings. Lemborexant was generally well tolerated in the phase 1 studies. In summary, lemborexant does not affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A substrates and has potential to induce CYP2B6. Consistent with in vitro findings, moderate and strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers affected the pharmacokinetics of lemborexant; hence, patients taking lemborexant 5 or 10 mg should avoid coadministration with moderate and strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of the Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist Lemborexant: Findings From Single-Dose and Multiple-Ascending-Dose Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Adults.

Lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is approved for the treatment of insomnia and is under investigation for treating other sleep disorders. Here we summarize pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety data from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies: single ascending doses in healthy adults (Study 001; 1-200 mg; N = 64), multiple ascending doses in healthy and elderly adults (Study 002; 2.5-75 mg; N = 55), and multiple doses in healthy white and Japanese adults (Study 003; 2.5-25 mg; N = 32). Lemborexant exposure increased with increasing dose. The time to maximum concentration ranged from approximately 1 to 3 hours for the 5- and 10-mg doses. The mean effective half-life was 17 hours for lemborexant 5 mg and 19 hours for lemborexant 10 mg. The plasma concentration at 9 hours postdose was 27% of the maximum concentration following multiple dosing with lemborexant 10 mg. There were no clinically relevant effects on next-morning residual sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, Digital Symbol Substitution Test, Psychomotor Vigilance Test) for doses through 10 mg/day, indicating no effect of residual plasma concentrations on next-day residual effects. Lemborexant was well tolerated across the doses tested. There were no clinically relevant effects of age, sex, or race on lemborexant pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, or safety. These results suggest that lemborexant at doses through 25 mg provides an overall pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profile suitable for obtaining the target pharmacologic effect supporting treatment of insomnia while minimizing residual effects during wake time.

Effect of gastric acid-reducing agents on the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of lemborexant.

Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved for treating insomnia. As the solubility of lemborexant is pH-sensitive, the impact of the gastric acid-reducing agent (ARA), famotidine, on lemborexant pharmacokinetics was evaluated in a Phase 1 study. Additionally, post hoc analysis of data from Phase 3 studies examined the potential effect of concomitant ARAs on patient-reported/subjective sleep onset latency (sSOL) in subjects with insomnia. Coadministration of lemborexant 10 mg with famotidine decreased the maximum observed concentration by 27% and delayed time of maximum observed concentration by 0.5 hours. Famotidine did not affect overall lemborexant exposure based on comparison of area under the concentration curves. Concomitant ARA use in the Phase 3 studies did not impact the effect of lemborexant on sSOL; the change from baseline during the last 7 nights of 1 month of treatment with lemborexant 10 mg was -17.1 minutes with vs -17.9 minutes without ARAs. Collectively, these results indicate that lemborexant can be coadministered with ARAs.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for the Most Frequent Adverse Events Following Treatment With Lemborexant, an Orexin Receptor Antagonist, in Subjects With Insomnia Disorder.

Lemborexant is a novel orexin receptor antagonist approved in the United States and Japan for the treatment of insomnia. This article describes the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lemborexant and the relationship of its daily steady-state exposure (Cav,ss ) to the probability of most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The 12 230-observation, 1892-subject PK data set included data from 12 clinical studies with predominantly female subjects (66%) ranging in age from 18 to 88 years and from 37 to 168 kg in body weight. The 1664-subject exposure-response data set included data from 3 late-stage studies. Lemborexant pharmacokinetics were described by a 3-compartment model with combined first- and zero-order absorption with lag time and linear elimination. Oral clearance decreased with increasing body mass index (exponent, -0.428), increasing alkaline phosphatase levels (exponent, -0.118), and was 26% lower in the elderly (≥65 years). Across the adverse event analysis, the frequency of subjects experiencing TEAEs during active treatment ranged from approximately 3% to 8%, in the range estimated for placebo. With and without adjustment for age, lemborexant exposure (Cav,ss ) was not a clinically meaningful linear predictor of the probability of specific TEAEs: somnolence, nasopharyngitis, flu/influenza, urinary tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, or headache. Given the small effect sizes of covariates of the PK model and a low degree of association of lemborexant TEAEs and exposure over the range of phase 3 (therapeutic) 5- and 10-mg doses, lemborexant can be safely administered without the need for dose adjustment.

On-the-road driving performance the morning after bedtime administration of lemborexant in healthy adult and elderly volunteers.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess potential effects of lemborexant on next-morning driving performance in adult and elderly healthy volunteers. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo and active-controlled, four period incomplete crossover study in 48 healthy volunteers (22 females), 23-78 years old. Participants were treated at bedtime for eight consecutive nights with two of three dose levels of lemborexant (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), zopiclone 7.5 mg (on the first and last night with placebo on intervening nights), or placebo. Driving performance was assessed in the morning on days 2 and 9 using a standardized highway driving test in normal traffic, measuring standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). Drug-placebo differences in SDLP >2.4 cm were considered to reflect clinically meaningful driving impairment. RESULTS: Mean drug-placebo differences in SDLP following lemborexant 2.5, 5, and 10 mg on days 2 and 9 were 0.74 cm or less. The upper bound of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lemborexant treatment groups were all below 2.4 cm and the 95% CIs included zero, indicating that the effects were neither clinically meaningful nor statistically significant. Symmetry analysis further supported the lack of clinically meaningful impairment with lemborexant. CONCLUSIONS: When assessed starting ~9 h after lemborexant administration at bedtime the previous night, there was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful effect on driving performance in healthy adults and elderly, as assessed by either mean differences in SDLP relative to placebo or symmetry analysis. In this study, lemborexant at doses up to 10 mg was well-tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02583451. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02583451.

Bioanalysis of dried saliva spot (DSS) samples using detergent-assisted sample extraction with UHPLC-MS/MS detection.

Dried saliva spot (DSS) sampling is a non-invasive sample collection technique for bioanalysis that can be potentially implemented at the patient's home. A UHPLC-MS/MS assay was developed using detergent-assisted sample extraction to quantify BMS-927711, a drug candidate in development for the treatment of migraines, in human DSS. By implementing DSS sampling at the patients' home, the bioanalytical sample collection for pharmacokinetic evaluation can be done at the time of the acute migraine attack without the need for clinical visits. DSS samples were prepared by spotting 15 µL of liquid saliva onto regular Whatman FTA™ DMPK-C cards and verified with a UV lamp (at λ 254 nm or 365 nm) during DSS punching. The 4-mm DSS punches in a 96-well plate were sonicated with 200 µL of [(13)C2, D4]-BMS-927711 internal standard (IS) solution in 20/80 MeOH/water for 10 min, followed by sonication with 50 µL of 100 mM NH4OAc with 1.0% Triton-X-100 (as detergent) prior to liquid-liquid extraction with 600 µL EtOAc/Hexane (90:10). UHPLC-MS/MS was performed with an Aquity(®) UPLC BEH C18 Column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 µm) on a Triple Quad™ 5500 mass spectrometer. The assay was linear with a concentration range from 2.00 to 1000 ng mL(-1) for BMS-927711 in human saliva. The intra- and inter-assay precision was within 8.8% CV, and the accuracy was within ±6.7% Dev of the nominal concentration values. This UHPLC-MS/MS assay has been successfully applied to determine the drug's pharmacokinetics within a clinical study. For the first time, we observed BMS-927711 exposure in human DSS, confirming the suitability of this sampling technique for migraine patients to use at home. Detergent-assisted extraction with Triton-X-100 could be very useful in DSS or other dried matrix spot (DMS) assays to overcome low or inconsistent analyte recovery issues.