RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence-based management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE and Cochrane database searches were performed using the medical subject headings of treatment, nausea, vomiting, pregnancy, and hyperemesis gravidarum. The quality of evidence reported in these guidelines has been described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria outlined in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care. BENEFITS: Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy has a profound effect on women's health and quality of life during pregnancy as well as a financial impact on the health care system, and its early recognition and management is recommended. COST: Costs, including hospitalizations, additional office visits, and time lost from work, may be reduced if nausea and vomiting in pregnancy is treated early.
Assuntos
Hiperêmese Gravídica/terapia , Náusea/terapia , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , GravidezRESUMO
Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy is a multifactorial condition with significant adverse effects on quality of life and health of mother and fetus that warrants recognition, investigation, and treatment. Safe therapies are available and should be offered readily to all women suffering from this condition.
Assuntos
Êmese Gravídica/terapia , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Êmese Gravídica/diagnóstico , Êmese Gravídica/fisiopatologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for operative vaginal birth in the management of the second stage of labour. OPTIONS: Non-operative techniques, episiotomy, and Caesarean section are compared to operative vaginal birth. outcome: Reduced fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched using the key words 'vacuum' and 'birth' as well as 'forceps' and 'birth' for literature published in English from January 1970 to June 2004. The level of evidence and quality of recommendations made are described using the Evaluation of Evidence from the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Non-operative interventions such as one-to-one support, partogram use, oxytocin use, and delayed pushing in women using epidurals will decrease need for operative birth. (I-A) 2. Manual rotation may be used alone or in conjunction with instrumental birth with little or no increased risk to the pregnant woman or to the fetus. (III-B) 3. Routine episiotomy is not necessary for an assisted vaginal birth. (II-1E) 4. When operative intervention in the second stage of labour is required, the options, risks, and benefits of vacuum, forceps, and Caesarean section must be considered. The choice of intervention needs to be individualized, as one is not clearly safer or more effective than the other. (II-B) 5. Failure of the chosen method, vacuum and/or forceps, to achieve delivery of the fetus in a reasonable time should be considered an indication for abandonment of the method. (III-C) 6. Adequate clinical experience and appropriate training of the operator are essential to the safe performance of operative deliveries. Hospital credentialing boards should grant privileges for performing these techniques only to an appropriately trained individual who demonstrates adequate skills. (III-C). VALIDATION: The Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee and Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved these guidelines.
Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/normas , Obstetrícia/normas , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , GravidezAssuntos
Avaliação de Medicamentos/normas , Tratamento Farmacológico/normas , Experimentação Humana/ética , Saúde da Mulher , Avaliação de Medicamentos/ética , Tratamento Farmacológico/ética , Ética em Pesquisa , Feminino , Humanos , Farmacocinética , Gravidez , Caracteres Sexuais , Saúde da Mulher/éticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence-based management of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) and hyperemesis gravidarum. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE and Cochrane database searches were performed using the medical subject headings (MeSH) of treatment, nausea, vomiting, pregnancy, and hyperemesis gravidarum. The quality of evidence reported in these guidelines has been described using the Evaluation of Evidence criteria outlined in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Exam. BENEFITS: NVP has a profound effect on women's health and quality of life during pregnancy, as well as a financial impact on the health care system, and its early recognition and management are recommended. (III-B) COST: Costs, including hospitalizations, additional office visits, and time lost from work, may be reduced if NVP is treated early.
Assuntos
Hiperêmese Gravídica/terapia , Náusea/terapia , Obstetrícia/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Vômito/terapia , Algoritmos , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Terapias Complementares/métodos , Terapias Complementares/normas , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Árvores de Decisões , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperêmese Gravídica/economia , Hiperêmese Gravídica/psicologia , Estilo de Vida , Náusea/economia , Náusea/psicologia , Obstetrícia/normas , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas , Piridoxina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Esteroides , Vômito/economia , Vômito/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical aspects of hemorrhagic shock and provide recommendations for therapy. OPTIONS: Early recognition of hemorrhagic shock and prompt systematic intervention will help avoid poor outcomes. OUTCOMES: Establish guidelines to assist in early recognition of hemorrhagic shock and to conduct resuscitation in an organized and evidence-based manner. EVIDENCE: Medline references were sought using the MeSH term "hemorrhagic shock." All articles published in the disciplines of obstetrics and gynaecology, surgery, trauma, critical care, anesthesia, pharmacology, and hematology between 1 January 1990 and 31 August 2000 were reviewed, as well as core textbooks from these fields. Selected references from these articles and book chapters were also obtained and reviewed. The level of evidence has been determined using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Clinicians should be familiar with the clinical signs of hemorrhagic shock. (III-B) 2. Clinicians should be familiar with the stages of hemorrhagic shock. (III-B) 3. Clinicians should assess each woman's risk for hemorrhagic shock and prepare for the procedure accordingly. (III-B) 4. Resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock should include adequate oxygenation. (II-3A) 5. Resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock should include restoration of circulating volume by placement of two large-bore IVs, and rapid infusion of a balanced crystalloid solution. (I-A) 6. Isotonic crystalloid or colloid solutions can be used for volume replacement in hemorrhagic shock (I-B). There is no place for hypotonic dextrose solutions in the management of hemorrhagic shock (I-E). 7. Blood component transfusion is indicated when deficiencies have been documented by clinical assessment or hematological investigations (II-2B). They should be warmed and infused through filtered lines with normal saline, free of additives and drugs (II-3B). 8. Vasoactive agents are rarely indicated in the management of hemorrhagic shock and should be considered only when volume replacement is complete, hemorrhage is arrested, and hypotension continues. They should be administered in a critical care setting with the assistance of a multidisciplinary team. (III-B) 9. Appropriate resuscitation requires ongoing evaluation of response to therapy, including clinical evaluation, and hematological, biochemical, and metabolic assessments. (III-B) 10. In hemorrhagic shock, prompt recognition and arrest of the source of hemorrhage, while implementing resuscitative measures, is recommended. (III-B)VALIDATION: These guidelines have been reviewed by the Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee and approved by Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SPONSORS: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.