Informal caregiver well-being during and after patients' treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: a prospective, exploratory study.

INTRODUCTION: Caring for a significant other during cancer treatment can be demanding. Little is known about the well-being of informal caregivers of patients with colon cancer. This study aims to examine informal caregiver well-being during adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This exploratory longitudinal, prospective study measured the course of informal caregiver burden (Self-Perceived Pressure of Informal Care), distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), health-related quality of life (RAND-36), marital satisfaction (Maudsley Marital Questionnaire), social support (Social Support List - Discrepancies), fatigue (Abbreviated Fatigue Questionnaire), and self-esteem (Caregiver Reaction Assessment) before (T0), during (T1), and after (T2) patients' treatment. RESULTS: Baseline data of 60 out of 76 eligible dyads (79%) were analyzed. Mean levels of informal caregiver burden and distress improved significantly over time, as did their health-related quality of life and perceived social support. At baseline, 30% and 26.7% of informal caregivers reported moderate-to-high levels of burden and clinically relevant levels of distress, respectively, which changed to 20% and 18.8% at T2. Informal caregiver burden and distress at baseline were the strongest predictors of informal caregiver burden and distress during and following patients' treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: When informal caregivers and patients experience problems before start of adjuvant chemotherapy, problems seem to improve over time. Approximately 20% of informal caregivers remain burdened and distressed after patients' end of treatment. Paying attention to baseline distress and burden seems indicated, as these were strong predictors of informal caregivers' well-being during and after treatment.

Caregivers of patients receiving long-term treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): a cross-sectional assessment of their distress and burden.

BACKGROUND: TKIs are a long-term treatment for GIST, and may have an impact on caregivers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, patients and caregivers were both included when patients had been treated with TKIs for at least six months. Caregivers completed questionnaires including demographics, distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), burden (Self-Perceived Pressure from Informal Care) general health (RAND-36), comorbidity (Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire), social support (Social Support List - Discrepancies) and marital satisfaction (Maudsley Marital Questionnaire). Patients completed similar questionnaires, without 'burden'. We conducted analyses to explore differences between caregivers with low/moderate versus high levels of burden and low versus high levels of distress. RESULTS: Sixty-one out of seventy-one eligible couples (84%) were included in the analysis. The median age of the caregivers was 60 years; 66% were female and 78% were the patients' spouse. The median age of the patients was 66 years; 43% were female. Caregivers experienced high levels of burden and distress in 10% and 23%, respectively. Caregivers with high levels of burden perceived significantly lower mental health, less vitality, lower general health and high levels of distress. Significantly higher levels of burden were found in non-spouses, caregivers of patients with more treatment-related side-effects, caregivers who spent more hours caring, and those caring for more than one person. For distress, caregivers with high levels of distress perceived significantly more burden, lower social functioning, more role physical and emotional problems, lower mental health, less vitality and lower general health. Furthermore, high levels of distress were found in caregivers of more dependent patients and those caring for more than one person. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers of the patients with GIST treated with TKI are managing well. There is a small, vulnerable group of caregivers with high levels of burden and/or distress, show more health-related problems, both physical and mental, and require adequate support.

Gebruik van comedicatie tijdens palliatieve sedatie.

- Palliative sedation is a treatment option for patients in the terminal stage of their disease who have one or more refractory symptoms.- In giving palliative sedation it is important to take into account the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of medications that contribute to good palliation: this covers both medication used in palliative sedation and continued chronic medication.- This article provides tools for clinical practice to deal with the difficulties concerning stopping or continuing chronic medication and on interaction between medications in palliative sedation.

Proof-of-concept study on the suitability of 13C-urea as a marker substance for assessment of in vivo behaviour of oral colon-targeted dosage forms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: (13)C-urea may be a suitable marker to assess the in vivo fate of colon-targeted dosage forms given by mouth. We postulated that release in the colon (urease-rich segment) of (13)C-urea from colon-targeted capsules would lead to fermentation of (13)C-urea by bacterial ureases into (13)CO(2). Subsequent absorption into the blood and circulation would lead to detectable (13)C (as (13)CO(2)) in breath. If, however, release of (13)C-urea occurred in the small intestine (urease-poor segment), we expected detectable (13)C (as (13)C-urea) in blood but no breath (13)C (as (13)CO(2)). The differential kinetics of (13)C-urea could thus potentially describe both release kinetics and indicate the gastrointestinal segment of release. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The in vivo study consisted of three experiments, during which the same group of four volunteers participated. KEY RESULTS: The kinetic model was internally valid. The appearance of (13)C-in breath CO(2) (F(fermented)) and the appearance of (13)C in blood as (13)C-urea (F(not fermented)) show a high inverse correlation (Pearson's r=-0.981, P= 0.06). The total recovery of (13)C (F(fermented)+F(not fermented)) averaged 99%, indicating complete recovery of the administered (13)C via breath and blood. (13)CO(2) exhalation was observed in all subjects. This indicates that (13)C-urea was available in urease-rich segments, such as the caecum or colon. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In this proof-of-concept study, (13)C-urea was able to provide information on both the release kinetics of a colon-targeted oral dosage form and the gastrointestinal segment where it was released.