Phase III study of weekly high-dose infusional fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40986.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that adding irinotecan to a standard weekly schedule of high-dose, infusional fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]) can prolong progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty patients with measurable or assessable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either FA 500 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion and FU 2.6 g/m(2) by intravenous 24-hour infusion, both administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie [AIO] arm, n = 216), or a similar schedule but with FU 2.3 or 2.0 g/m(2) preceded by irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) administered over 30 minutes (experimental group, n = 214). RESULTS: The median PFS time in the experimental group was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.9 months) compared with 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2 months) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). The median overall survival time was increased from 16.9 to 20.1 months (P = .2779). The objective response rate was 62.2% (95% CI, 55.0% to 69.5%) in the experimental group and 34.4% (95% CI, 27.5% to 41.3%) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The addition of irinotecan to the standard AIO FU/FA regimen was associated with a highly significant improvement in PFS and response rate and was well tolerated. The results of this study confirm that irinotecan in combination with high-dose infusional FU/FA is a reference first-line treatment.

Randomized phase III study of high-dose fluorouracil given as a weekly 24-hour infusion with or without leucovorin versus bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: European organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40952.

PURPOSE: This trial was conducted to determine whether high-dose fluorouracil (FU) given as a weekly 24-hour infusion is more active than bolus FU + leucovorin (LV), and whether high-dose infusional FU can be modulated by LV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 497 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive bolus FU 425 mg/m2 intravenously + LV 20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 and repeated on day 28 (FU + LV), or FU 2600 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion alone (FU24h) or in combination with 500 mg/m2 LV (FU24h + LV)-all given weekly x6 followed by a 2-week rest period. Survival was the major study end point. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of more than 3 years, survival did not differ among the treatment groups (median FU + LV, 11.1 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 15.0 months]; FU24h, 13.0 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 15.4 months]; FU24h + LV, 13.7 months [95% CI, 12.0 to 16.4 months]; P =.724). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for FU24h + LV (median FU + LV, 4.0 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 4.9]; FU24h, 4.1 months [95% CI, 3.4 to 5.0]; FU24h + LV 5.6 months [95% CI, 4.4 to 6.7]; P =.029). The response rates in the subgroup of patients with measurable disease were 12%, 10%, and 17% for FU + LV, FU24h, and FU24h + LV, respectively (not significant). Occurrence of grade 3 and 4 diarrhea was higher in the FU24h + LV arm (22%) compared with the FU24h (6%) or FU + LV (9%) arms; however, stomatitis (11% in FU + LV v 3% in FU24h v 5% in FU24h + LV arms) and hematologic toxicity were higher in the bolus FU + LV arm. Global quality of life did not differ within the three arms. CONCLUSION: Neither FU24h + LV nor FU24h prolong survival, relative to bolus FU + LV. Leucovorin increases PFS if added to FU24h, but increases toxicity.

[Iodo-doxorubicin, a new anthracycline derivative. Current state of progress]. / Jodo-Doxorubicin, ein neues Anthrazyklin-Derivat. Aktueller Stand der Entwicklung.

Iodo-doxorubicin belongs to the group of doxorubicin analogs with modifications at the 4'-position of the daunosamine sugar moiety. Epirubicin is the archetype of the analogs created by configurational changes at the sugar. In case of EPI, the hydroxy group at the 4'-position is equatorial instead axial. In case of I-DOX, the hydroxy group has been replaced by an iodine-atom. This exchange has a great influence on the basicity of the amino group at the 3'-position. The physico-chemical properties of I-DOX are markedly different from those of DOX and EPI. I-DOX is unprotonated at physiological pH and much more lipophilic than DOX. The preclinical screening showed greater potency of I-DOX in different tumor cell systems. Cardiotoxicity and tissue toxicity after extravasation were significantly reduced in case of I-DOX. The substance was evaluated within three phase-I-studies in Europe during 1988 to 1990. The most prominent toxicity observed was myelotoxicity. This type of toxicity was dose-dependent and reversible. Alopecia, stomatitis/mucositis were not seen at all. There was only minor nausea without vomiting. The measured thyroid parameters were not affected by administration of an iodine-containing drug, but long-term effects cannot be ruled out. No acute cardiotoxicity was observed. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of I-DOX differ from those of DOX and EPI. The terminal half-life of I-DOX is shorter, the plasma clearance higher than of DOX. One major difference is the formation of iodo-doxorubicinol, which is much larger in case of I-DOX compared to DOX and EPI. This cytostatic metabolite has a long terminal half-life.

Toxicity, pharmacokinetics and metabolism of iododoxorubicin in cancer patients.

25 patients, mostly pretreated, received 55 courses of iododoxorubicin as a single intravenous bolus every 2 weeks. The starting dose was 2 mg/m2 with seven steps to reach the dose-limiting toxicity level. 3 patients treated with 90 mg/m2 had WHO grade 4 myelotoxicity; 2 of these patients had not had cytostatic chemotherapy. 3 of 7 patients treated with 75 mg/m2 had grade 3-4 myelotoxicity; 4 had grade 1-2. Non-haematological toxicities were minor. Acute cardiotoxicity and objective tumour responses were not observed. Plasma and urine levels of iododoxorubicin and five metabolites were assayed in 16 patients. Metabolism to iododoxorubicinol was rapid and plasma clearance was dose-dependent and rapid. Plasma levels and the area under the curve for iododoxorubicin increased with dose. The mean residence time was 3.9 h in patients without liver metastasis and 10.4 h in patients with liver metastasis. Renal excretion was minor. The maximally tolerated dose was 90 mg/m2.

A phase II study of intensive-dose epirubicin/verapamil as induction therapy followed by intensive-dose ifosfamide for advanced breast cancer.

Preliminary data of an ongoing phase II-study in metastatic breast cancer patients are presented. Patients with metastatic breast cancer entered the study after hormone therapy had failed; prior treatment with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) was also allowed. The patients were treated with three cycles of 40 mg/m2 epirubicin i.v. on days 1-3 and 4 x 120 mg oral verapamil on days 0-3, given every 3-4 weeks. After three chemotherapy courses, ifosfamide was given as a short infusion of 3 g/m2 on days 1-3. Mesna (20% of the total ifosfamide dose) was given 0, 4 and 8 h after ifosfamide administration. Response was evaluated after three cycles of epirubicin/verapamil and after the last (third) cycle of ifosfamide. The side effects of this treatment were tolerable. The epirubicin/verapamil combination was no more toxic than epirubicin alone. Despite the high dose of verapamil, systolic blood pressure remained above 80 mm Hg, and patients never had a period of strict bed rest. Alopecia was almost complete after induction therapy with epirubicin/verapamil, and nausea and vomiting were absent or mild during epirubicin/verapamil chemotherapy and were easily controlled by antiemetics during ifosfamide treatment. Stomatitis and mucositis, the main toxic effects, could be ameliorated by intensive mouth-washing procedures. The haematological toxicity was greater after epirubicin/verapamil treatment than after ifosfamide therapy, but neither bleeding nor infections due to thrombocytopenia or leucopenia were observed.