Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 89
Filtrar
1.
Implement Sci ; 19(1): 65, 2024 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39285305

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in primary care are common and contribute to antimicrobial resistance in the population. Audit and feedback (A&F) on antibiotic prescribing to primary care can improve the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing, but the optimal approach is uncertain. We performed two pragmatic randomized controlled trials of different approaches to audit and feedback. The trial results showed that A&F was associated with significantly reducing antibiotic prescribing. Still, the effect size was small, and the modifications to the A&F interventions tested in the trials were not associated with any change. Herein, we report a theory-informed qualitative process evaluation to explore potential mechanisms underlying the observed effects. METHODS: Ontario family physicians in the intervention arms of both trials who were sent A&F letters were invited for one-on-one interviews. Purposive sampling was used to seek variation across interested participants in personal and practice characteristics. Qualitative analysis utilized inductive and deductive techniques informed by the Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. RESULTS: Modifications to the intervention design tested in the trial did not alter prescribing patterns beyond the changes made in response to the A&F overall for various reasons. Change in antibiotic prescribing in response to A&F depended on whether it led to the formation of specific intentions and whether those intentions translated to particular behaviours. Those without intentions to change tended to feel that their unique clinical context was not represented in the A&F. Those with intentions but without specific actions taken tended to express a lack of self-efficacy for avoiding a prescription in contexts with time constraints and/or without an ongoing patient relationship. Many participants noted that compared to overall prescribing, A&F on antibiotic prescription duration was perceived as new information and easily actionable. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that contextual factors, including the types of patients and the setting where they are seen, affect how clinicians react to audit and feedback. These results suggest a need to test tailored feedback reports that reflect the context of how, where, and why physicians prescribe antibiotics so that they might be perceived as more personal and more actionable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial registration IDs: NCT04594200, NCT05044052.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Ontário , Médicos de Família , Retroalimentação , Feminino , Masculino , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Auditoria Médica
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; : 1-5, 2024 Aug 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39192746

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic overuse for asymptomatic bacteriuria is common in older adults and can lead to harmful outcomes including antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a simple scoring tool on urine culturing and antibiotic prescribing for adults with presumed urinary tract infections (UTI). DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study using interrupted time series with segmented regression to evaluate urine culturing and urinary antibiotic use and length of stay (LOS), acute care transfers, and mortality 18 months before and 16 months after the intervention. SETTING: 134-bed complex continuing care and rehabilitation hospital in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians, and other healthcare professionals. INTERVENTION: A multifaceted intervention focusing on a 6-item mnemonic scoring tool called the BLADDER score was developed based on existing minimum criteria for prescribing antibiotics in patients with presumed UTI. The BLADDER score was combined with ward- and prescriber-level feedback and education. RESULTS: Before the intervention, the mean rate of urine culturing was 12.47 cultures per 1,000 patient days; after the intervention, the rate was 7.92 cultures per 1,000 patient days (IRR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67-1.12). Urinary antibiotic use declined after the intervention from a mean of 40.55 DDD per 1,000 patient days before and 25.96 DDD per 1,000 patient days after the intervention (IRR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59-0.79). There was no change in mean patient LOS, acute care transfers, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The BLADDER score may be a safe and effective tool to support improved diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship to reduce unnecessary treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria.

3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(8): 2053-2061, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958258

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The risk factors and outcomes associated with persistent bacteraemia in Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) are not well described. We conducted a follow-on analysis of a retrospective population-wide cohort to characterize persistent bacteraemia in patients with GN-BSI. METHODS: We included all hospitalized patients >18 years old with GN-BSI between April 2017 and December 2021 in Ontario who received follow-up blood culture (FUBC) 2-5 days after the index positive blood culture. Persistent bacteraemia was defined as having a positive FUBC with the same Gram-negative organism as the index blood culture. We identified variables independently associated with persistent bacteraemia in a multivariable logistic regression model. We evaluated whether persistent bacteraemia was associated with increased odds of 30- and 90-day all-cause mortality using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In this study, 8807 patients were included; 600 (6.8%) had persistent bacteraemia. Having a permanent catheter, antimicrobial resistance, nosocomial infection, ICU admission, respiratory or skin and soft tissue source of infection, and infection by a non-fermenter or non-Enterobacterales/anaerobic organism were associated with increased odds of having persistent bacteraemia. The 30-day mortality was 17.2% versus 9.6% in those with and without persistent bacteraemia (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.29-2.11), while 90-day mortality was 25.5% versus 16.9%, respectively (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89). Prevalence and odds of developing persistent bacteraemia varied widely depending on causative organism. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent bacteraemia is uncommon in GN-BSI but is associated with poorer outcomes. A validated risk stratification tool may be useful to identify patients with persistent bacteraemia.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Humanos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Ontário/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Hemocultura , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Relevância Clínica
4.
BMJ ; 385: e079329, 2024 06 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839101

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether providing family physicians with feedback on their antibiotic prescribing compared with that of their peers reduces antibiotic prescriptions. To also identify effects on antibiotic prescribing from case-mix adjusted feedback reports and messages emphasising antibiotic associated harms. DESIGN: Pragmatic, factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care physicians in Ontario, Canada PARTICIPANTS: All primary care physicians were randomly assigned a group if they were eligible and actively prescribing antibiotics to patients 65 years or older. Physicians were excluded if had already volunteered to receive antibiotic prescribing feedback from another agency, or had opted out of the trial. INTERVENTION: A letter was mailed in January 2022 to physicians with peer comparison antibiotic prescribing feedback compared with the control group who did not receive a letter (4:1 allocation). The intervention group was further randomised in a 2x2 factorial trial to evaluate case-mix adjusted versus unadjusted comparators, and emphasis, or not, on harms of antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antibiotic prescribing rate per 1000 patient visits for patients 65 years or older six months after intervention. Analysis was in the modified intention-to-treat population using Poisson regression. RESULTS: 5046 physicians were included and analysed: 1005 in control group and 4041 in intervention group (1016 case-mix adjusted data and harms messaging, 1006 with case-mix adjusted data and no harms messaging, 1006 unadjusted data and harms messaging, and 1013 unadjusted data and no harms messaging). At six months, mean antibiotic prescribing rate was 59.4 (standard deviation 42.0) in the control group and 56.0 (39.2) in the intervention group (relative rate 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.94 to 0.96). Unnecessary antibiotic prescribing (0.89 (0.86 to 0.92)), prolonged duration prescriptions defined as more than seven days (0.85 (0.83 to 0.87)), and broad spectrum prescribing (0.94 (0.92 to 0.95)) were also significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group. Results were consistent at 12 months post intervention. No significant effect was seen for including emphasis on harms messaging. A small increase in antibiotic prescribing with case-mix adjusted reports was noted (1.01 (1.00 to 1.03)). CONCLUSIONS: Peer comparison audit and feedback letters significantly reduced overall antibiotic prescribing with no benefit of case-mix adjustment or harms messaging. Antibiotic prescribing audit and feedback is a scalable and effective intervention and should be a routine quality improvement initiative in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04594200.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Retroalimentação , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Padrões de Prática Médica , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Ontário , Serviços Postais , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 79(4): 855-863, 2024 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758977

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Data supporting routine infectious diseases (ID) consultation in gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) are limited. We evaluated the association between ID consultation and mortality in patients with GN-BSI in a retrospective population-wide cohort study in Ontario using linked health administrative databases. METHODS: Hospitalized adult patients with GN-BSI between April 2017 and December 2021 were included. The primary outcome was time to all-cause mortality censored at 30 days, analyzed using a mixed effects Cox proportional hazards model with hospital as a random effect. ID consultation 1-10 days after the first positive blood culture was treated as a time-varying exposure. RESULTS: Of 30 159 patients with GN-BSI across 53 hospitals, 11 013 (36.5%) received ID consultation. Median prevalence of ID consultation for patients with GN-BSI across hospitals was 35.0% with wide variability (range 2.7%-76.1%, interquartile range 19.6%-41.1%). In total, 1041 (9.5%) patients who received ID consultation died within 30 days, compared to 1797 (9.4%) patients without ID consultation. In the fully adjusted multivariable model, ID consultation was associated with mortality benefit (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] .77-.88, P < .0001; translating to absolute risk reduction of -3.8% or number needed to treat [NNT] of 27). Exploratory subgroup analyses of the primary outcome showed that ID consultation could have greater benefit in patients with high-risk features (nosocomial infection, polymicrobial or non-Enterobacterales infection, antimicrobial resistance, or non-urinary tract source). CONCLUSIONS: Early ID consultation was associated with reduced mortality in patients with GN-BSI. If resources permit, routine ID consultation for this patient population should be considered to improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Ontário/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Doenças Transmissíveis/mortalidade
6.
IJID Reg ; 11: 100370, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812702

RESUMO

Objectives: Evidence-based prescribing is essential to optimize patient outcomes in cystitis. This requires knowledge of local antibiotic resistance rates. Diagnostic and Antimicrobial Stewardship (DASH) to Protect Antibiotics (https://dashuti.com/) is a multicentric mentorship program guiding centers in preparing, analyzing and disseminating local antibiograms to promote antimicrobial stewardship in community urinary tract infection. Here, we mapped the susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli from 22 Indian centers. Methods: These centers spanned 10 Indian states and three union territories. Antibiograms for urinary E. coli from the outpatient departments were collated. Standardization was achieved by regional online training; anomalies were resolved via consultation with study experts. Data were collated and analyzed. Results: Nationally, fosfomycin, with 94% susceptibility (inter-center range 83-97%), and nitrofurantoin, with 85% susceptibility (61-97%), retained the widest activity. The susceptibility rates were lower for co-trimoxazole (49%), fluoroquinolones (31%), and oral cephalosporins (26%). The rates for third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins were 46% and 52%, respectively, with 54% (33-58%) extended-spectrum ß-lactamase prevalence. Piperacillin-tazobactam (81%), amikacin (88%), and meropenem (88%) retained better activity; however, one center in Delhi recorded only 42% meropenem susceptibility. Susceptibility rates were mostly higher in South, West, and Northeast India; centers in the heavily populated Gangetic plains, across north and northwest India, had greater resistance. These findings highlight the importance of local antibiograms in guiding appropriate antimicrobial choices. Conclusions: Fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin are the preferred oral empirical choices for uncomplicated E. coli cystitis in India, although elevated resistance in some areas is concerning. Empiric use of fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins is discouraged, whereas piperacillin/tazobactam and aminoglycosides remain carbapenem-sparing parenteral agents.

7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751942

RESUMO

The escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) necessitates impactful, reproducible, and scalable antimicrobial stewardship strategies. This review addresses the critical need to enhance the quality of antimicrobial stewardship intervention research. We propose five considerations for authors planning and evaluating antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Antimicrobial stewards should consider the following mnemonic ABCDE: (A) plan Ahead using implementation science; (B) Be clear and thoroughly describe the intervention by using the TidIER checklist; (C) Use a Checklist to comprehensively report study components; (D) Select a study Design carefully; and (E) Assess Effectiveness and implementation by selecting meaningful outcomes. Incorporating these recommendations will help strengthen the evidence base of antimicrobial stewardship literature and support optimal implementation of strategies to mitigate AMR.

8.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 30(7): 890-898, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38552794

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI) is controversial. Observational studies have suggested significant mortality benefit but may be limited by single-centre designs, immortal time bias, and residual confounding. We examined the impact of FUBCs on mortality in patients with GN-BSI in a retrospective population-wide cohort study in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Adult patients with GN-BSI hospitalized between April 2017 and December 2021 were included. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days. FUBC was treated as a time-varying exposure. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality, length of stay, and number of days alive and out of hospital at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: Thirty-four thousand one hundred patients were included; 8807 (25.8%) patients received FUBC, of which 966 (11.0%) were positive. Median proportion of patients receiving FUBC was 18.8% (interquartile range, 10.0-29.7%; range, 0-66.1%) across 101 hospitals; this correlated with positivity and contamination rate. Eight hundred ninety (10.1%) patients in the FUBC group and 2263 (8.9%) patients in the no FUBC group died within 30 days. In the fully adjusted model, there was no association between FUBC and mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04). Patients with FUBC had significantly longer length of stay (median, 11 vs. 7 days; adjusted risk ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.16-1.21) and fewer number of days alive and out of hospital at 30 and 90 days. DISCUSSION: FUBC collection in patients with GN-BSI varies widely across hospitals and may be associated with prolonged hospitalization without clear survival benefit. Residual confounding may be present given the observational design. Clear benefit should be demonstrated in a randomized trial before widespread adoption of routine FUBC.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Hemocultura , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Hemocultura/métodos , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Ontário/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Adulto
9.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(3): ofae053, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38434616

RESUMO

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), the field of infectious diseases (ID) faces both innovation and disruption. AI and its subfields including machine learning, deep learning, and large language models can support ID clinicians' decision making and streamline their workflow. AI models may help ensure earlier detection of disease, more personalized empiric treatment recommendations, and allocation of human resources to support higher-yield antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention strategies. AI is unlikely to replace the role of ID experts, but could instead augment it. However, its limitations will need to be carefully addressed and mitigated to ensure safe and effective implementation. ID experts can be engaged in AI implementation by participating in training and education, identifying use cases for AI to help improve patient care, designing, validating and evaluating algorithms, and continuing to advocate for their vital role in patient care.

10.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(5): 1460-1467, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Overuse of antimicrobials in residents of long-term care homes is common and can result in harm. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are needed in the long-term care (LTC) homes setting to improve the appropriate use of antimicrobials. Previous literature has highlighted the importance of documenting antimicrobial indication as a strategy that contributes to improve antimicrobial use; however, there is a lack of evidence in LTC homes. This study examines the prevalence, clarity, and facility-level variability of antibiotic indication documentation in this setting. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective study of oral antibiotic prescriptions dispensed to 218 homes between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Indication was obtained from reviewing antibiotic prescription data. Clarity was determined by comparing documented indication to the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS). Descriptive analysis was performed to examine the prevalence and clarity of indication documentation. Funnel plots were generated to examine variability in prevalence of indication documentation and clarity at the home level. RESULTS: Overall, 22.9% (7998/34,867) of prescriptions had an indication documented. The proportion of indications that were clear was 37% (2984/7998). The most common indications were for urinary (45%), skin and soft tissue (19.9%) and respiratory infections (15.0%). At the home level, the median prevalence of indication was 19.6% (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.8%-31.4%) and median prevalence of clear indications was 35.1% (IQR: 23.8%-42.9%). Funnel plots revealed substantial variability in indication prevalence with 46.3% of homes falling outside of 99% limits but minimal variability in indication clarity between homes with only 8.7% of homes outside of 99% control limits. CONCLUSIONS: There is an opportunity to increase both the prevalence and clarity of antibiotic prescriptions in LTC homes. Future work should focus on determining how best to support prescription indication documentation in this setting with consideration being given to prescription workflow and most common antibiotic prescription indications.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Documentação , Assistência de Longa Duração , Casas de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle
11.
Infect Med (Beijing) ; 2(1): 31-35, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38076404

RESUMO

Background: Studies have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with extended infusion (EI) piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) compared to standard infusion (SI). However, there is less evidence on its benefits in noncritically-ill patients. Hospital-wide EI TZP was implemented at our site on February 21, 2012. Our objectives were to compare clinical, safety and economic outcomes between EI and SI TZP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who received EI TZP (3.375 g IV q8h infused over 4 hours and SI TZP for ≥ 48 hours during 3 years pre-and postimplementation was conducted. The primary study outcome was 14-day mortality while secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS), nursing plus pharmacy cost, occurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection, readmission within 30 days and change in Pseudomonas aeruginosa minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution for TZP. The primary outcome and binary secondary outcomes were analyzed using a logistic regression model. LOS was examined using time to event analysis. Cost was examined using linear regression modelling. Results: Overall, 2034 patients received EI TZP and 1364 patients received SI TZP. EI TZP was associated with lower odds of mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.91), lower odds of C. difficile infection (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.84) and 8% lower cost (estimate 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98) compared to SI TZP. Conclusions: Hospital-wide implementation of EI TZP was associated with lower odds of 14-day mortality and incidence of C. difficile infection with cost savings at our institution.

13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38028902

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate inter-physician variability and predictors of changes in antibiotic prescribing before (2019) and during (2020/2021) the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of physicians in Ontario, Canada prescribing oral antibiotics in the outpatient setting between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021 using the IQVIA Xponent data set. The primary outcome was the change in the number of antibiotic prescriptions between the prepandemic and pandemic period. Secondary outcomes were changes in the selection of broad-spectrum agents and long-duration (>7 d) antibiotic use. We used multivariable linear regression models to evaluate predictors of change. Results: There were 17,288 physicians included in the study with substantial inter-physician variability in changes in antibiotic prescribing (median change of -43.5 antibiotics per physician, interquartile range -136.5 to -5.0). In the multivariable model, later career stage (adjusted mean difference [aMD] -45.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] -52.9 to -37.8, p < .001), family medicine (aMD -46.0, 95% CI -62.5 to -29.4, p < .001), male patient sex (aMD -52.4, 95% CI -71.1 to -33.7, p < .001), low patient comorbidity (aMD -42.5, 95% CI -50.3 to -34.8, p < .001), and high prescribing to new patients (aMD -216.5, 95% CI -223.5 to -209.5, p < .001) were associated with decreases in antibiotic initiation. Family medicine and high prescribing to new patients were associated with a decrease in selection of broad-spectrum agents and prolonged antibiotic use. Conclusions: Antibiotic prescribing changed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic with overall decreases in antibiotic initiation, broad-spectrum agents, and prolonged antibiotic courses with inter-physician variability. These findings present opportunities for community antibiotic stewardship interventions.

14.
Microbiol Spectr ; 11(6): e0263023, 2023 Dec 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37975711

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Bacterial infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, previous studies have demonstrated pandemic-related shifts in the epidemiology of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs) in the general population and in specific hospital systems. Our study uses a large, comprehensive data set stratified by setting [community, long-term care (LTC), and hospital] to uniquely demonstrate how the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on BSIs and testing practices varies by healthcare setting. We showed that, while the number of false-positive blood culture results generally increased during the pandemic, this effect did not apply to hospitalized patients. We also found that many infections were likely under-recognized in patients in the community and in LTC, demonstrating the importance of maintaining healthcare for these groups during crises. Last, we found a decrease in infections caused by certain pathogens in the community, suggesting some secondary benefits of pandemic-related public health measures.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Bacterianas , COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Sepse , Humanos , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Pandemias , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Hemocultura , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Sepse/epidemiologia , Bactérias , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia
15.
EClinicalMedicine ; 65: 102257, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37842549

RESUMO

Background: COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are two intersecting public health crises. Antimicrobial overuse in patients with COVID-19 threatens to worsen AMR. Guidelines are fundamental in encouraging antimicrobial stewardship. We sought to assess the quality of antibiotic prescribing guidelines and recommendations in the context of COVID-19, and whether they incorporate principles of antimicrobial stewardship. Methods: We performed a systematic survey which included a search using the concepts "antibiotic/antimicrobial" up to November 15, 2022 of the eCOVID-19 living map of recommendations (RecMap) which aggregates guidelines across a range of international sources and all languages. Guidelines providing explicit recommendations regarding antibacterial use in COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. Guideline and recommendation quality were assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instruments, respectively. We extracted guideline characteristics including panel representation and the presence or absence of explicit statements related to antimicrobial stewardship (i.e., judicious antibiotic use, antimicrobial resistance or adverse effects as a consequence of antibiotic use). We used logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between guideline characteristics including quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. Protocol registration (OSF): https://osf.io/4pgtc. Findings: Twenty-eight guidelines with 63 antibiotic prescribing recommendations were included. Recommendations focused on antibiotic initiation (n = 52, 83%) and less commonly antibiotic selection (n = 13, 21%), and duration of therapy (n = 15, 24%). Guideline and recommendation quality varied widely. Twenty (71%) guidelines incorporated at least one concept relating to antimicrobial stewardship. Including infectious diseases expertise on the guideline panel (OR 9.44, 97.5% CI: 1.09-81.59) and AGREE-REX score (OR 3.26, 97.5% CI: 1.14-9.31 per 10% increase in overall score) were associated with a higher odds of guidelines addressing antimicrobial stewardship. Interpretation: There is an opportunity to improve antibiotic prescribing guidelines in terms of both quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. These findings can help guideline developers better address antibiotic stewardship in future recommendations beyond COVID-19. Funding: This project was funded by Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE centres.

17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37592966

RESUMO

Background: We sought to evaluate the impact of antibiotic selection and duration of therapy on treatment failure in older adults with catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI). Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study comparing antibiotic treatment options and duration of therapy for non-hospitalized adults aged 66 and older with presumed CA-UTI (defined as an antibiotic prescription and an organism identified in urine culture in a patient with urinary catheterization documented within the prior 90 d). The primary outcome was treatment failure, a composite of repeat urinary antibiotic prescribing, positive blood culture with the same organism, all-cause hospitalization or mortality, within 60 days. We determined the risk of treatment failure accounting for age, sex, comorbidities, and healthcare exposure using log-binomial regression. Results: Of 4,436 CA-UTI patients, 2,709 (61.1%) experienced treatment failure. Compared to a reference of TMP-SMX (61.9% failure), of those treated with fluoroquinolones, 56.3% experienced failure (RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.98) and 60.9% of patients treated with nitrofurantoin experienced failure (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94-1.10). Compared to 5-7 days of therapy (treatment failure: 59.4%), 1-4 days was associated with 69.5% failure (RR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.27), and 8-14 days was associated with a 62.0% failure (RR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.99-1.11). Conclusions: Although most treatment options for CA-UTI have a similar risk of treatment failure, fluoroquinolones, and treatment durations ≥ 5 days in duration appear to be associated with modestly improved clinical outcomes. From a duration of therapy perspective, this study provides reassurance that relatively short courses of 5-7 days may be reasonable for CA-UTI.

19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37325681

RESUMO

Background: Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) is an established practice in critical care settings but not in surgical populations. We pilot-tested a structured face-to-face PAF program for our acute-care surgery (ACS) service. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study. For the quantitative analysis, the structured PAF period was from August 1, 2017, to April 30, 2019. The ad hoc PAF period was from May 1, 2019, to January 31, 2021. Interrupted time-series segmented negative binomial regression analysis was used to evaluate change in antimicrobial usage measured in days of therapy per 1,000 patient days for all systemic and targeted antimicrobials. Secondary outcomes included C. difficile infections, length of stay and readmission within 30 days. Each secondary outcome was analyzed using a logistic regression or negative binomial regression model. For the qualitative analyses, all ACS surgeons and trainees from November 23, 2015, to April 30, 2019, were invited to participate in an email-based anonymous survey developed using implementation science principles. Responses were measured using counts. Results: In total, 776 ACS patients were included in the structured PAF period and 783 patients were included in the in ad hoc PAF period. No significant changes in level or trend for antimicrobial usage were detected for all and targeted antimicrobials. Similarly, no significant differences were detected for secondary outcomes. The survey response rate was 25% (n = 10). Moreover, 50% agreed that PAF provided them with skills to use antimicrobials more judiciously, and 80% agreed that PAF improved the quality of antimicrobial treatment for their patients. Conclusion: Structured PAF showed clinical outcomes similar to ad hoc PAF. Structured PAF was well received and was perceived as beneficial by surgical staff.

20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37327874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical features and predictors of Clostridioides difficile infection overlap with many conditions. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic utility of clinical features (clinical examination, risk factors, laboratory tests, and radiographic findings) associated with C. difficile. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic features for C. difficile. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched up to September 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies that reported clinical features of C. difficile, a valid reference standard test for confirming diagnosis of C. difficile, and a comparison among patients with a positive and negative test result. PARTICIPANTS: Adult and paediatric patients across diverse clinical settings. OUTCOMES: Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios. REFERENCE STANDARD: Stool nucleic acid amplification tests, enzyme immunoassays, cell cytotoxicity assay, and stool toxigenic culture. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Rational Clinical Examination Series and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Univariate and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: We screened 11 231 articles of which 40 were included, enabling the evaluation of 66 features for their diagnostic utility for C. difficile (10 clinical examination findings, 4 laboratory tests, 10 radiographic findings, prior exposure to 13 antibiotic types, and 29 clinical risk factors). Of the ten features identified on clinical examination, none were significantly clinically associated with increased likelihood of C. difficile infection. Some features that increased likelihood of C. difficile infection were stool leukocytes (LR+ 5.31, 95% CI 3.29-8.56) and hospital admission in the prior 3 months (LR+ 2.14, 95% CI 1.48-3.11). Several radiographic findings also strongly increased the likelihood of C. difficile infection like ascites (LR+ 2.91, 95% CI 1.89-4.49). DISCUSSION: There is limited utility of bedside clinical examination alone in detecting C. difficile infection. Accurate diagnosis of C. difficile infection requires thoughtful clinical assessment for interpretation of microbiologic testing in all suspected cases.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA