Dual-Energy CTA Iodine Map Reconstructions Improve Visualization of Residual Cerebral Aneurysms following Endovascular Coiling.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Material-specific reconstructions of dual-energy CTA (DECTA) can highlight iodinated contrast, subtract predefined materials, and reduce metal artifact. We present a technique to improve detection of residual aneurysms after endovascular coiling by which iodine-map DECTA (IM-DECTA) reconstructions subtract platinum coil artifacts in MIP images (MIP IM-DECTA) and assess if IM-DECTA offers improved detection over conventional CTA (CCTA) or monoenergetic DECTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included consecutive patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm coiling with follow-up DECTA and DSA within 24 months. DECTA was performed at 80- and 150-kVp tube voltages on a rapid kV-switching single-source Revolution scanner. CCTA and IM-DECTA series were reconstructed. Reference-standard DSA was compared with CCTA, 50- and 70-keV virtual monochromatic DECTA, IM-DECTA, and MIP IM-DECTA. Blinded to DSA data, cross-section images were reviewed in consensus by 3 neurointerventionalists for residual aneurysms and assigned modified Raymond-Roy classifications (mRRC). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each series is reported relative to DSA, and single-factor ANOVA and pair-wise Spearman correlation coefficients compared the accuracy of each series. Readers provided ROI measurements of HU deviation adjacent to the aneurysm neck for quantitative noise assessment and qualitatively scored each series on a 3-point Likert-style scale ranging from uninterpretable to excellent image quality. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with 25 coiled aneurysms were included. Mean time from DECTA to DSA was 286 ± 212 days. IM-DECTA and MIP IM-DECTA most sensitively (89% and 90%) and specifically (93% and 93%) detected residual aneurysms relative to CCTA (6% and 86%). Relative to DSA, IM-DECTA and MIP IM-DECTA most accurately detected (92% versus 28% for CCTA) and classified residual aneurysms by mRRC (ρC-CTA = -0.08; ρIM = 0.50; ρIM-MIP = 0.55; P < .001). Reader consensus reported the best image quality at the aneurysm neck with IM-DECTA and MIP IM-DECTA, with 56% of CCTAs considered uninterpretable versus 0% of IM-DECTAs, and image noise was significantly lower for IM-DECTA (27.9 ± 3.6 HU) or MIP IM-DECTA (26.8 ± 3.5 HU) than CCTA (103.2 ± 13.3 HU; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: MIP IM-DECTA can subtract coil mass artifact and is more sensitive and specific than CCTA for the detection of residual aneurysms after endovascular coiling.

Clinical and Imaging Features Associated With Fast Infarct Growth During Interhospital Transfers of Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute ischemic stroke patients with a large vessel occlusion (LVO) who present to a primary stroke center (PSC) often require transfer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for thrombectomy. Not much is known about specific characteristics at the PSC that are associated with infarct growth during transfer. Gaining more insight into these features could aid future trials with cytoprotective agents targeted at slowing infarct growth. We aimed to identify baseline clinical and imaging characteristics that are associated with fast infarct growth rate (IGR) during interhospital transfer. METHODS: We included patients from the CT Perfusion to Predict Response to Recanalization in Ischemic Stroke Project, a prospective multicenter study. Patients with an anterior circulation LVO who were transferred from a PSC to a CSC for consideration of thrombectomy were eligible if imaging criteria were fulfilled. A CT perfusion (CTP) needed to be obtained at the PSC followed by an MRI at the CSC, before consideration of thrombectomy. The interhospital IGR was defined as the difference between the infarct volumes on MRI and CTP, divided by the time between the scans. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with fast IGR (≥5 mL/h). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with a median age of 74 years (interquartile range 61-82), of whom 99 (54%) were male and 82 (45%) were fast progressors, were included. At baseline, fast progressors had a higher NIH Stroke Scale score (median 16 vs 13), lower cerebral blood volume index (median 0.80 vs 0.89), more commonly poor collaterals on CT angiography (35% vs 13%), higher hypoperfusion intensity ratios (HIRs) (median 0.51 vs 0.34), and larger core volumes (median 11.80 mL vs 0.00 mL). In multivariable analysis, higher HIR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for every 0.10 increase 1.32 [95% CI 1.10-1.59]) and larger core volume (aOR for every 10 mL increase 1.54 [95% CI 1.20-2.11]) remained independently associated with fast IGR. DISCUSSION: Fast infarct growth during interhospital transfer of acute stroke patients is associated with imaging markers of poor collaterals on baseline imaging. These markers are promising targets for patient selection in cytoprotective trials aimed at reducing interhospital infarct growth.

Disability and Recurrent Stroke Among Participants in Stroke Prevention Trials.

Importance: Stroke secondary prevention trials have disproportionately enrolled participants with mild or no disability. The impact of this bias remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the association between poststroke disability and the rate of recurrent stroke during long-term follow up. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study is a post hoc analysis of the Prevention Regimen For Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) and Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke (IRIS) secondary prevention clinical trial datasets. PRoFESS enrolled patients from 2003 to 2008, and IRIS enrolled patients from 2005 to 2015. Data were analyzed from September 23, 2023, to May 16, 2024. Exposure: The exposure was poststroke functional status at study baseline, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS; range, 0-5; higher score indicates more disability) score of 0 vs 1 to 2 vs 3 or greater. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. The secondary outcome was major cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, new or worsening heart failure, or vascular death. Results: A total of 20 183 PRoFESS participants (mean [SD] age, 66.1 [8.5] years; 12 931 [64.1%] male) and 3265 IRIS participants (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [10.6] years; 2151 [65.9%] male) were included. The median (IQR) follow-up was 2.4 (1.9-3.0) years in PRoFESS and 4.7 (3.2-5.0) years in IRIS. In PRoFESS, the recurrent stroke rate was 7.2%, among patients with an mRS of 0, 8.7% among patients with an mRS of 1 or 2, and 10.6% among patients with an mRS of 3 or greater (χ22 = 27.1; P < .001); in IRIS the recurrent stroke rate was 6.4% among patients with an mRS of 0, 9.0% among patients with an mRS of 1 or 2, and 11.7% among patients with an mRS of 3 or greater (χ22 = 11.1; P < .001). The MACE rate was 10.1% among patients with an mRS of 0, 12.2% among patients with an mRS of 1 or 2, and 17.2% among patients with an mRS of 3 or greater (χ22 = 103.4; P < .001) in PRoFESS and 10.9% among patients with an mRS of 0, 13.3% among patients with an mRS of 1 or 2, and 15.3% among patients with an mRS of 3 or greater (χ22 = 5.8; P = .06) in IRIS. Compared with patients with an mRS of 0, patients with an mRS of 3 or greater had increased hazard for recurrent stroke in PRoFESS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.38-1.92; P < .001) and in IRIS (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.28-2.86; P = .002). There was also increased hazard for MACE in PRoFESS (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.66-2.18; P < .001) and in IRIS (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.03; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that higher baseline poststroke disability was associated with increased rates of recurrent stroke and MACE. Including more patients with greater baseline disability in stroke prevention trials may improve the statistical power and generalizability of these studies.

Advancing diagnostic precision of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: The potential for a vasospasm index score on perfusion imaging to detect vasospasm.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) results in high morbidity and mortality, but the diagnosis remains challenging. This study aimed to identify neuroimaging perfusion parameters indicative of delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with suspected vasospasm. METHODS: This is a case-control study. Cases were adult aSAH patients who underwent magnetic resonance perfusion or computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging ≤ 24 h before digital subtraction angiography performed for vasospasm diagnosis and treatment. Controls were patients without aSAH who underwent CTP. Quantitative perfusion parameters at different thresholds, including Tmax 4-6-8-10 s delay, cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume were measured and compared between cases and controls. The Vasospasm Index Score was calculated as the ratio of brain volume with time-to-max (Tmax) delay > 6 s over volume with Tmax > 4 s. RESULTS: 54 patients with aSAH and 119 controls without aSAH were included. Perfusion parameters with the strongest prediction of vasospasm on cerebral angiography were the combination of the Vasospasm Index Score (Tmax6/Tmax4) + CBV ≤ 48 % (area under the curve value of 0.85 [95 % CI 0.78-0.91]) with a sensitivity of 63 % and specificity of 95 %. CONCLUSION: The Vasospasm Index Score in combination with CBV ≤ 48 % on cerebral perfusion imaging reliably identified vasospasm as the cause of DCI on perfusion imaging.

Overestimation of the Ischemic Core Is Associated With Higher Core Lesion Volume and Degree of Reperfusion After Thrombectomy.

Background CT perfusion (CTP)-derived baseline ischemic core volume (ICV) can overestimate the true extent of infarction, which may result in exclusion of patients with ischemic stroke from endovascular treatment (EVT). Purpose To determine whether ischemic core overestimation is associated with larger ICV and degree of recanalization. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with acute ischemic stroke triaged at multimodal CT who underwent EVT between January 2015 and January 2022. The primary outcome was ischemic core overestimation, which was assumed when baseline CTP-derived ICV was larger than the final infarct volume at follow-up imaging. The secondary outcome was functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 90 days after EVT. Successful vessel recanalization was defined as extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b or higher. Categorical variables were compared between patients with ICV of 50 mL or less versus large ICV greater than 50 mL with use of the χ2 test. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Results In total, 721 patients (median age, 76 years [IQR, 64-83 years]; 371 female) were included, of which 162 (22%) demonstrated ischemic core overestimation. Core overestimation occurred more often in patients with ICV greater than 50 mL versus 50 mL or less (48% vs 16%; P < .001) and those with successful versus unsuccessful vessel recanalization (26% vs 13%; P < .001). In an adjusted model, successful recanalization after EVT (odds ratio [OR], 3.14 [95% CI: 1.65, 5.95]; P < .001) and larger ICV (OR, 1.03 [95% CI: 1.02, 1.04]; P < .001) were independently associated with core overestimation, while the time from symptom onset to imaging showed no association (OR, 0.99; P = .96). Core overestimation was independently associated with functional independence (adjusted OR, 2.83 [95% CI: 1.66, 4.81]; P < .001) after successful recanalization. Conclusion Ischemic core overestimation occurred more frequently in patients presenting with large CTP-derived ICV and successful vessel recanalization compared with those with unsuccessful recanalization. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Arterial Recanalization During Interhospital Transfer for Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute ischemic stroke harboring a large vessel occlusion admitted to nonendovascular-capable centers often require interhospital transfer for thrombectomy. We evaluated the incidence and predictors of arterial recanalization during transfer, as well as the relationship between interhospital recanalization and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 cohorts of patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion transferred for consideration of thrombectomy to a comprehensive center, with arterial imaging at the referring hospital and on comprehensive stroke center arrival. Interhospital recanalization was determined by comparison of the baseline and posttransfer arterial imaging and was defined as revised arterial occlusive lesion (rAOL) score 2b to 3. Pretransfer variables independently associated with interhospital recanalization were studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 520 included patients (Montpellier, France, n=237; Stanford, United States, n=283), 111 (21%) experienced interhospital recanalization (partial [rAOL=2b] in 77% and complete [rAOL=3] in 23%). Pretransfer variables independently associated with recanalization were intravenous thrombolysis (adjusted odds ratio, 6.8 [95% CI, 4.0-11.6]), more distal occlusions (intracranial carotid occlusion as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9-4.5] for proximal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, 5.1 [95% CI, 2.3-11.5] for distal first segment of the middle cerebral artery, and 5.0 [95% CI, 2.1-11.8] for second segment of the middle cerebral artery), and smaller clot burden (clot burden score 0-4 as reference: adjusted odds ratio, 3.4 [95% CI, 1.5-7.6] for 5-7 and 5.6 [95% CI, 2.4-12.7] for 8-9). Recanalization on arrival at the comprehensive center was associated with less interhospital infarct growth (rAOL, 0-2a: 11.6 mL; rAOL, 2b: 2.2 mL; rAOL, 3: 0.6 mL; Ptrend<0.001) and greater interhospital National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score improvement (0 versus -5 versus -6; Ptrend<0.001). Interhospital recanalization was associated with reduced 3-month disability (adjusted common odds ratio, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.68-3.77]) with greater benefit from complete than partial recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Recanalization is frequently observed during interhospital transfer for thrombectomy and is strongly associated with favorable outcomes, even when partial. Broadening thrombolysis indications in primary centers, and developing therapies that increase recanalization during transfer, will likely improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical change during inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy: Incidence, associated factors, and relationship with outcome.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large vessel occlusion (LVO) admitted to non endovascular-capable centers often require inter-hospital transfer for thrombectomy. We aimed to describe the incidence of substantial clinical change during transfer, the factors associated with clinical change, and its relationship with 3-month outcome. METHODS: We analyzed data from two cohorts of acute stroke patients transferred for thrombectomy to a comprehensive center (Stanford, USA, November 2019 to January 2023; Montpellier, France, January 2015 to January 2017), regardless of whether thrombectomy was eventually attempted. Patients were included if they had evidence of an LVO at the referring hospital and had a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score documented before and immediately after transfer. Inter-hospital clinical change was categorized as improvement (⩾4 points and ⩾25% decrease between the NIHSS score in the referring hospital and upon comprehensive center arrival), deterioration (⩾4 points and ⩾25% increase), or stability (neither improvement nor deterioration). The stable group was considered as the reference and was compared to the improvement or deterioration groups separately. RESULTS: A total of 504 patients were included, of whom 22% experienced inter-hospital improvement, 14% deterioration, and 64% were stable. Pre-transfer variables independently associated with clinical improvement were intravenous thrombolysis use, more distal occlusions, and lower serum glucose; variables associated with deterioration included more proximal occlusions and higher serum glucose. On post-transfer imaging, clinical improvement was associated with arterial recanalization and smaller infarct growth and deterioration with larger infarct growth. As compared to stable patients, those with clinical improvement had better 3-month functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) = 2.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.59-3.71; p < 0.001), while those with deterioration had worse outcome (adjusted cOR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.37-0.98; p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Substantial inter-hospital clinical changes are frequently observed in LVO-related ischemic strokes, with significant impact on functional outcome. There is a need to develop treatments that improves the clinical status during transfer. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT: The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.

Association between occlusion location, net water uptake and ischemic lesion growth in large vessel anterior circulation strokes.

Ischemic lesion net water uptake (NWU) represents a quantitative imaging biomarker for cerebral edema in acute ischemic stroke. Data on NWU for distinct occlusion locations remain scarce, but might help to improve the prognostic value of NWU. In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we compared NWU between patients with proximal large vessel occlusion (pLVO; ICA or proximal M1) and distal large vessel occlusion (dLVO; distal M1 or M2). NWU was quantified by densitometric measurements of the early ischemic region. Arterial collateral status was assessed using the Maas scale. Regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between occlusion location, NWU and ischemic lesion growth. A total of 685 patients met inclusion criteria. Early ischemic lesion NWU was higher in patients with pLVO compared with dLVO (7.7% vs 3.9%, P < .001). The relationship between occlusion location and NWU was partially mediated by arterial collateral status. NWU was associated with absolute ischemic lesion growth between admission and follow-up imaging (ß estimate, 5.50, 95% CI, 3.81-7.19, P < .001). This study establishes a framework for the relationship between occlusion location, arterial collateral status, early ischemic lesion NWU and ischemic lesion growth. Future prognostic thresholds for NWU might be optimized by adjusting for the occlusion location.

Random expert sampling for deep learning segmentation of acute ischemic stroke on non-contrast CT.

BACKGROUND: Outlining acutely infarcted tissue on non-contrast CT is a challenging task for which human inter-reader agreement is limited. We explored two different methods for training a supervised deep learning algorithm: one that used a segmentation defined by majority vote among experts and another that trained randomly on separate individual expert segmentations. METHODS: The data set consisted of 260 non-contrast CT studies in 233 patients with acute ischemic stroke recruited from the multicenter DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) trial. Additional external validation was performed using 33 patients with matched stroke onset times from the University Hospital Lausanne. A benchmark U-Net was trained on the reference annotations of three experienced neuroradiologists to segment ischemic brain tissue using majority vote and random expert sampling training schemes. The median of volume, overlap, and distance segmentation metrics were determined for agreement in lesion segmentations between (1) three experts, (2) the majority model and each expert, and (3) the random model and each expert. The two sided Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare performances (1) to 2) and (1) to (3). We further compared volumes with the 24 hour follow-up diffusion weighted imaging (DWI, final infarct core) and correlations with clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days) with the Spearman method. RESULTS: The random model outperformed the inter-expert agreement ((1) to (2)) and the majority model ((1) to (3)) (dice 0.51±0.04 vs 0.36±0.05 (P<0.0001) vs 0.45±0.05 (P<0.0001)). The random model predicted volume correlated with clinical outcome (0.19, P<0.05), whereas the median expert volume and majority model volume did not. There was no significant difference when comparing the volume correlations between random model, median expert volume, and majority model to 24 hour follow-up DWI volume (P>0.05, n=51). CONCLUSION: The random model for ischemic injury delineation on non-contrast CT surpassed the inter-expert agreement ((1) to (2)) and the performance of the majority model ((1) to (3)). We showed that the random model volumetric measures of the model were consistent with 24 hour follow-up DWI.

A Clinical and Imaging Fused Deep Learning Model Matches Expert Clinician Prediction of 90-Day Stroke Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Predicting long-term clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke is beneficial for prognosis, clinical trial design, resource management, and patient expectations. This study used a deep learning-based predictive model (DLPD) to predict 90-day mRS outcomes and compared its predictions with those made by physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A previously developed DLPD that incorporated DWI and clinical data from the acute period was used to predict 90-day mRS outcomes in 80 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke from a single-center registry. We assessed the predictions of the model alongside those of 5 physicians (2 stroke neurologists and 3 neuroradiologists provided with the same imaging and clinical information). The primary analysis was the agreement between the ordinal mRS predictions of the model or physician and the ground truth using the Gwet Agreement Coefficient. We also evaluated the ability to identify unfavorable outcomes (mRS >2) using the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Noninferiority analyses were undertaken using limits of 0.1 for the Gwet Agreement Coefficient and 0.05 for the area under the curve analysis. The accuracy of prediction was also assessed using the mean absolute error for prediction, percentage of predictions ±1 categories away from the ground truth (±1 accuracy [ACC]), and percentage of exact predictions (ACC). RESULTS: To predict the specific mRS score, the DLPD yielded a Gwet Agreement Coefficient score of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.86), surpassing the physicians' score of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.67-0.84), and was noninferior to the readers (P < .001). For identifying unfavorable outcome, the model achieved an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89), again noninferior to the readers' area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69-0.87) (P < .005). The mean absolute error, ±1ACC, and ACC were 0.89, 81%, and 36% for the DLPD. CONCLUSIONS: A deep learning method using acute clinical and imaging data for long-term functional outcome prediction in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the DLPD, was noninferior to that of clinical readers.

Tenecteplase for Stroke at 4.5 to 24 Hours with Perfusion-Imaging Selection.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic agents, including tenecteplase, are generally used within 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke symptoms. Information on whether tenecteplase confers benefit beyond 4.5 hours is limited. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with ischemic stroke to compare tenecteplase (0.25 mg per kilogram of body weight, up to 25 mg) with placebo administered 4.5 to 24 hours after the time that the patient was last known to be well. Patients had to have evidence of occlusion of the middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery and salvageable tissue as determined on perfusion imaging. The primary outcome was the ordinal score on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability and a score of 6 indicating death) at day 90. Safety outcomes included death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 458 patients, 77.3% of whom subsequently underwent thrombectomy; 228 patients were assigned to receive tenecteplase, and 230 to receive placebo. The median time between the time the patient was last known to be well and randomization was approximately 12 hours in the tenecteplase group and approximately 13 hours in the placebo group. The median score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 3 in each group. The adjusted common odds ratio for the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days for tenecteplase as compared with placebo was 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.57; P = 0.45). In the safety population, mortality at 90 days was 19.7% in the tenecteplase group and 18.2% in the placebo group, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 3.2% and 2.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase therapy that was initiated 4.5 to 24 hours after stroke onset in patients with occlusions of the middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery, most of whom had undergone endovascular thrombectomy, did not result in better clinical outcomes than those with placebo. The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was similar in the two groups. (Funded by Genentech; TIMELESS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785678.).

Endovascular Thrombectomy Treatment Effect in Direct vs Transferred Patients With Large Ischemic Strokes: A Prespecified Analysis of the SELECT2 Trial.

Importance: Patients with large ischemic core stroke have poor clinical outcomes and are frequently not considered for interfacility transfer for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Objective: To assess EVT treatment effects in transferred vs directly presenting patients and to evaluate the association between transfer times and neuroimaging changes with EVT clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified secondary analysis of the SELECT2 trial, which evaluated EVT vs medical management (MM) in patients with large ischemic stroke, evaluated adults aged 18 to 85 years with acute ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the internal carotid or middle cerebral artery (M1 segment) as well as an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 3 to 5, core of 50 mL or greater on imaging, or both. Patients were enrolled between October 2019 and September 2022 from 31 EVT-capable centers in the US, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Data were analyzed from August 2023 to January 2024. Interventions: EVT vs MM. Main Outcomes and Measures: Functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days with blinded adjudication. Results: A total of 958 patients were screened and 606 patients were excluded. Of 352 enrolled patients, 145 (41.2%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 66.5 (58-75) years. A total of 211 patients (59.9%) were transfers, while 141 (40.1%) presented directly. The median (IQR) transfer time was 178 (136-230) minutes. The median (IQR) ASPECTS decreased from the referring hospital (5 [4-7]) to an EVT-capable center (4 [3-5]). Thrombectomy treatment effect was observed in both directly presenting patients (adjusted generalized odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.42-2.86) and transferred patients (adjusted generalized OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.11-2.03) without heterogeneity (P for interaction = .14). Treatment effect point estimates favored EVT among 82 transferred patients with a referral hospital ASPECTS of 5 or less (44 received EVT; adjusted generalized OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.89-2.58). ASPECTS loss was associated with numerically worse EVT outcomes (adjusted generalized OR per 1-ASPECTS point loss, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.02). EVT treatment effect estimates were lower in patients with transfer times of 3 hours or more (adjusted generalized OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.73-1.80). Conclusions and Relevance: Both directly presenting and transferred patients with large ischemic stroke in the SELECT2 trial benefited from EVT, including those with low ASPECTS at referring hospitals. However, the association of EVT with better functional outcomes was numerically better in patients presenting directly to EVT-capable centers. Prolonged transfer times and evolution of ischemic change were associated with worse EVT outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for rapid identification of patients suitable for transfer and expedited transport. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03876457.

Endovascular thrombectomy plus medical care versus medical care alone for large ischaemic stroke: 1-year outcomes of the SELECT2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Multiple randomised trials have shown efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large ischaemic stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term (ie, at 1 year) evidence of benefit of thrombectomy for these patients. METHODS: SELECT2 was a phase 3, open-label, international, randomised controlled trial with blinded endpoint assessment, conducted at 31 hospitals in the USA, Canada, Spain, Switzerland, Australia, and New Zealand. Patients aged 18-85 years with ischaemic stroke due to proximal occlusion of the internal carotid artery or of the first segment of the middle cerebral artery, showing large ischaemic core on non-contrast CT (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score of 3-5 [range 0-10, with lower values indicating larger infarctions]) or measuring 50 mL or more on CT perfusion and MRI, were randomly assigned, within 24 h of ischaemic stroke onset, to thrombectomy plus medical care or to medical care alone. The primary outcome for this analysis was the ordinal modified Rankin Scale (range 0-6, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 1-year follow-up in an intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03876457) and is completed. FINDINGS: The trial was terminated early for efficacy at the 90-day follow-up after 352 patients had been randomly assigned (178 to thrombectomy and 174 to medical care only) between Oct 11, 2019, and Sept 9, 2022. Thrombectomy significantly improved the 1-year modified Rankin Scale score distribution versus medical care alone (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney probability of superiority 0·59 [95% CI 0·53-0·64]; p=0·0019; generalised odds ratio 1·43 [95% CI 1·14-1·78]). At the 1-year follow-up, 77 (45%) of 170 patients receiving thrombectomy had died, compared with 83 (52%) of 159 patients receiving medical care only (1-year mortality relative risk 0·89 [95% CI 0·71-1·11]). INTERPRETATION: In patients with ischaemic stroke due to a proximal occlusion and large core, thrombectomy plus medical care provided a significant functional outcome benefit compared with medical care alone at 1-year follow-up. FUNDING: Stryker Neurovascular.

Insole Pressure Sensors to Assess Post-Stroke Gait.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm that the simplified insole does not affect the gait speed and to identify objective sensor-based gait parameters that correlate strongly with existing clinical gait assessment scales. METHODS: Ten participants with gait impairment due to hemiplegic stroke were enrolled in this study. Pairs of insoles with four pressure sensors on each side were manufactured and placed in each shoe. Data were extracted during the 10-Meter Walk Test. Several sensor-derived parameters (for example stance time, heel_on-to-toe_peak time, and toe_peak pressure) were calculated and correlated with gait speed and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer (F-M) score. RESULTS: The insole pressure sensor did not affect gait, as indicated by a strong correlation (ρ=0.988) and high agreement (ICC=0.924) between the gait speeds with and without the insole. The parameters that correlated most strongly with highest ß coefficients against the clinical measures were stance time of the non-hemiplegic leg (ß=-0.87 with F-M and ß=-0.95 with gait speed) and heel_on-to-toe_peak time of the non-hemiplegic leg (ß=-0.86 with F-M and -0.94 with gait speed). CONCLUSION: Stance time of the non-hemiparetic leg correlates most strongly with clinical measures and can be assessed using a non-obtrusive insole pressure sensor that does not affect gait function. These results suggest that an insole pressure sensor, which is applicable in a home environment, may be useful as a clinical endpoint in post-stroke gait therapy trials.

Early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke is linked to unfavorable cerebral venous outflow.

INTRODUCTION: Early neurological deterioration (END) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO). Causes of END after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) include unsuccessful recanalization and reperfusion hemorrhages. However, little is known about END excluding the aforementioned causes. We aimed to investigate factors associated with unexplained END (ENDunexplained) with regard to the cerebral collateral status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of AIS-LVO patients with successful MT (mTICI 2b-3). On admission CT angiography (CTA), pial arterial collaterals and venous outflow (VO) were assessed using the modified Tan-Scale and the Cortical Vein Opacification Score (COVES), respectively. ENDunexplained was defined as an increase in NIHSS score of ⩾ 4 within the first 24 hours after MT without parenchymal hemorrhage on follow-up imaging. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine factors of ENDunexplained and unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6). RESULTS: A total of 620 patients met the inclusion criteria. ENDunexplained occurred in 10% of patients. While there was no significant difference in pial arterial collaterals, patients with ENDunexplained exhibited more often unfavorable VO (81% vs. 53%; P < 0.001). Unfavorable VO (aOR [95% CI]; 2.56 [1.02-6.40]; P = 0.045) was an independent predictor of ENDunexplained. ENDunexplained was independently associated with unfavorable functional outcomes at 90 days (aOR [95% CI]; 6.25 [2.06-18.94]; P = 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Unfavorable VO on admission CTA was associated with ENDunexplained. ENDunexplained was independently linked to unfavorable functional outcomes at 90 days. Identifying AIS-LVO patients at risk of ENDunexplained may help to select patients for intensified monitoring and guide to optimal treatment regimes.

A systematic review on functional electrical stimulation based rehabilitation systems for upper limb post-stroke recovery.

Background: Stroke is one of the most common neurological conditions that often leads to upper limb motor impairments, significantly affecting individuals' quality of life. Rehabilitation strategies are crucial in facilitating post-stroke recovery and improving functional independence. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) systems have emerged as promising upper limb rehabilitation tools, offering innovative neuromuscular reeducation approaches. Objective: The main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive systematic review of the start-of-the-art functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems for upper limb neurorehabilitation in post-stroke therapy. More specifically, this paper aims to review different types of FES systems, their feasibility testing, or randomized control trials (RCT) studies. Methods: The FES systems classification is based on the involvement of patient feedback within the FES control, which mainly includes "Open-Loop FES Systems" (manually controlled) and "Closed-Loop FES Systems" (brain-computer interface-BCI and electromyography-EMG controlled). Thus, valuable insights are presented into the technological advantages and effectiveness of Manual FES, EEG-FES, and EMG-FES systems. Results and discussion: The review analyzed 25 studies and found that the use of FES-based rehabilitation systems resulted in favorable outcomes for the stroke recovery of upper limb functional movements, as measured by the FMA (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) (Manually controlled FES: mean difference = 5.6, 95% CI (3.77, 7.5), P < 0.001; BCI-controlled FES: mean difference = 5.37, 95% CI (4.2, 6.6), P < 0.001; EMG-controlled FES: mean difference = 14.14, 95% CI (11.72, 16.6), P < 0.001) and ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) (EMG-controlled FES: mean difference = 11.9, 95% CI (8.8, 14.9), P < 0.001) scores. Furthermore, the shortcomings, clinical considerations, comparison to non-FES systems, design improvements, and possible future implications are also discussed for improving stroke rehabilitation systems and advancing post-stroke recovery. Thus, summarizing the existing literature, this review paper can help researchers identify areas for further investigation. This can lead to formulating research questions and developing new studies aimed at improving FES systems and their outcomes in upper limb rehabilitation.