A prospective multicenter feasibility study of a miniaturized implantable continuous flow ventricular assist device in smaller children with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: There is no FDA-approved left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for smaller children permitting routine hospital discharge. Smaller children supported with LVADs typically remain hospitalized for months awaiting heart transplant-a major burden for families and a challenge for hospitals. We describe the initial outcomes of the Jarvik 2015, a miniaturized implantable continuous flow LVAD, in the NHLBI-funded Pumps for Kids, Infants, and Neonates (PumpKIN) study, for bridge-to-heart transplant. METHODS: Children weighing 8 to 30 kg with severe systolic heart failure and failing optimal medical therapy were recruited at 7 centers in the United States. Patients with severe right heart failure and single-ventricle congenital heart disease were excluded. The primary feasibility endpoint was survival to 30 days without severe stroke or non-operational device failure. RESULTS: Of 7 children implanted, the median age was 2.2 (range 0.7, 7.1) years, median weight 10 (8.2 to 20.7) kilograms; 86% had dilated cardiomyopathy; 29% were INTERMACS profile 1. The median duration of Jarvik 2015 support was 149 (range 5 to 188) days where all 7 children survived including 5 to heart transplant, 1 to recovery, and 1 to conversion to a paracorporeal device. One patient experienced an ischemic stroke on day 53 of device support in the setting of myocardial recovery. One patient required ECMO support for intractable ventricular arrhythmias and was eventually transplanted from paracorporeal biventricular VAD support. The median pump speed was 1600 RPM with power ranging from 1-4 Watts. The median plasma free hemoglobin was 19, 30, 19 and 30 mg/dL at 7, 30, 90 and 180 days or time of explant, respectively. All patients reached the primary feasibility endpoint. Patient-reported outcomes with the device were favorable with respect to participation in a full range of activities. Due to financial issues with the manufacturer, the study was suspended after consent of the eighth patient. CONCLUSION: The Jarvik 2015 LVAD appears to hold important promise as an implantable continuous flow device for smaller children that may support hospital discharge. The FDA has approved the device to proceed to a 22-subject pivotal trial. Whether this device will survive to commercialization remains unclear because of the financial challenges faced by industry seeking to develop pediatric medical devices. (Supported by NIH/NHLBI HHS Contract N268201200001I, clinicaltrials.gov 02954497).

Expanding use of the HeartMate 3 ventricular assist device in pediatric and adult patients within the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION).

BACKGROUND: We report current outcomes in patients supported with the HeartMate 3 (HM3) ventricular assist device in a multicenter learning network. METHODS: The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network database was queried for HM3 implants between 12/2017 and 5/2022. Clinical characteristics, postimplant course, and adverse events were collected. Patients were stratified according to body surface area (BSA) (<1.4 m2, 1.4-1.8 m2, and >1.8 m2) at device implantation. RESULTS: During the study period, 170 patients were implanted with the HM3 at participating network centers, with median age 15.3years; 27.1% were female. Median BSA was 1.68 m2; the smallest patient was 0.73 m2 (17.7 kg). Most (71.8%) had a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. With a median support time of 102.5days, 61.2% underwent transplantation, 22.9% remained supported on device, 7.6% died, and 2.4% underwent device explantation for recovery; the remainder had transferred to another institution or transitioned to a different device type. The most common adverse events included major bleeding (20.8%) and driveline infection (12.9%); ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke were encountered in 6.5% and 1.2% of patients, respectively. Patients with BSA <1.4 m2 had a higher incidence of infection, renal dysfunction, and ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In this updated cohort of predominantly pediatric patients supported with the HM3 ventricular assist device, outcomes are excellent with <8% mortality on device. Device-related adverse events including stroke, infection, and renal dysfunction were more commonly seen in smaller patients, highlighting opportunities for improvements in care.

Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation for Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Recipients Across North America.

Despite increasing utilization of continuous-flow pediatric ventricular assist devices (VAD) in children, data on exercise testing and cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are unknown. We described variation in CR practices and identified barriers to exercise testing and CR. A survey was performed through the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) representing pediatric VAD centers across North America. Descriptive statistics were performed. A multidisciplinary cohort of 52 respondents from 28 pediatric VAD centers responded. Although 38% reported performing exercise testing, most (65%) used 6 minute walk tests rather than formal cycle or treadmill exercise testing. While all respondents refer to physical therapy during the initial inpatient stay for VAD placement, only 52% refer to a CR program. When performed, CR was performed at an ACTION center (84%), a local specialized center (21%), or a home-based CR program (26%). Commonly cited barriers to either CR or exercise testing were inadequate resources, inadequate implementation logistics knowledge, concerns about safety, inability of patients to travel to a CR facility, and concern about utility of exercise testing or CR. Over 90% of centers were interested in implementing a standardized pediatric VAD CR program. Utilization of exercise testing and CR after VAD placement is variable. Despite perceived barriers, most pediatric VAD centers are interested in implementing a standardized CR program for recipients. In response to this interest, we plan to implement a standardized CR protocol to all ACTION pediatric VAD centers in an effort to improve pretransplant waitlist rehabilitation and post-transplant outcomes.

Pediatric VAD Discharge and Outpatient Care.

The advancement of pediatric ventricular assist devices (VADs) has enabled pediatric centers to discharge VAD patients home and integrate them back into their communities. Creating standard work flow processes to ensure the educational needs of the patient, family, and community are met will enable programs to successfully manage VAD patients at home. Utilizing multidisciplinary teams to support these patients while hospitalized will greatly contribute to the patients and families readiness for discharge. Defining mutual goals and expectations for patients, families, and the VAD team will promote a superior discharge and outpatient experience.

Post-transplant outcomes in pediatric ventricular assist device patients: A PediMACS-Pediatric Heart Transplant Study linkage analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) support as bridge to transplant has improved waitlist survival, but the effects of pre-implant status and VAD-related events on post-transplant outcomes have not been assessed. This study is a linkage analysis between the PediMACS and Pediatric Heart Transplant Study databases to determine the effects of VAD course on post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: Database linkage between October 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015 identified 147 transplanted VAD patients, the primary study group. The comparison cohort was composed of 630 PHTS patients without pre-transplant VAD support. The primary outcome was post-transplant survival, with secondary outcomes of post-transplant length of stay, freedom from infection and freedom from rejection. RESULTS: At implant, the VAD cohort was INTERMACS Profile 1 in 33 (23%), Profile 2 in 89 (63%) and Profile 3 in 14 (10%) patients. The VAD cohort was older, larger, and less likely to have congenital heart disease (p < 0.0001). However, they had greater requirements for inotrope and ventilator support and increased liver and renal dysfunction (p < 0.0001), both of which normalized at transplant after device support. Importantly, there were no differences in 1-year post-transplant survival (96% vs 93%, p = 0.3), freedom from infection (81% vs 79%, p = 0.9) or freedom from rejection (71% vs 74%, p = 0.87) between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric VAD patients have post-transplant outcomes equal to that of medically supported patients, despite greater pre-implant illness severity. Post-transplant survival, hospital length of stay, infection and rejection were not affected by patient acuity at VAD implantation or VAD-related complications. Therefore, VAD as bridge to transplant mitigates severity of illness in children.