[Proposal for the delineation of postoperative primary clinical target volumes in maxillary sinus and nasal cavity cancers]. / Proposition de délinéation des volumes cibles anatomocliniques postopératoires de la tumeur primitive des cancers du sinus maxillaire et des cavités nasales.

In this article, we propose a consensus delineation of postoperative clinical target volumes for the primary tumour in maxillary sinus and nasal cavity cancers. These guidelines are developed based on radioanatomy and the natural history of those cancers. They require the fusion of the planning CT with preoperative imaging for accurate positioning of the initial GTV and the combined use of the geometric and anatomical concepts for the delineation of clinical target volume for the primary tumour. This article does not discuss the indications of external radiotherapy (nor concurrent systemic treatment) but focuses on target volumes when there is an indication for radiotherapy.

[Impact of HPV status on nutritional status during radio chemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer]. / Impact du statut HPV sur l'évolution nutritionnelle au cours de la chimioradiothérapie des patients atteints d'un cancer de l'oropharynx.

PURPOSE: Patients with oropharyngeal cancer are at high nutritional risk before and during treatment. Little is known about the influence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection on nutritional status and its evolution during treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted between August 2017 and December 2020 including 48 patients (14 HPV-induced: HPV+ and 34 non-HPV-induced: HPV-) with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated by radiotherapy±chemotherapy (RT/CT). Nutritional risk at the time of tumor assessment (TA) was assessed by weight loss, swallowing ability, and the presence of digestive disorders in 4 stages of increasing severity. Nutritional status was assessed by weight and nutrition risk index (NRI) at the time of TA, before the start and at 3 months from the end of RT±CT. During RT±CT, the NRI and the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI=neutrophils * monocytes/lymphocytes) were assessed weekly. RESULTS: HPV+patients were at lower nutritional risk at TA (50% grade ≥2 vs 85%, P=0.02), lost more weight (6% of their body weight vs 3%, P=0.05), and increased their SIRI by 7.5 points more than HPV- patients (P=0.04) during RT/CT. CONCLUSION: HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer patients are at high nutritional risk even in the absence of undernutrition at the outset of management.

Radiotherapy for hypopharynx cancers.

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy for hypopharynx. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is the gold standard treatment for hypopharynx cancers. Early T1 and T2 tumors could be treated by exclusive radiotherapy or surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy in case of high recurrence risk. For locally advanced tumours requiring total pharyngolaryngectomy (T2 or T3) or with significant lymph nodes involvement, induction chemotherapy followed by exclusive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy were possible. For T4 tumour, surgery must be proposed. The treatment of lymph nodes is based on initial primary tumour treatment. In non-surgical procedure, for 35 fractions, curative dose is 70Gy (2Gy per fraction) and prophylactic dose are 50 to 56Gy (2Gy per fraction in case of sequential radiotherapy or 1.6Gy in case of integrated simultaneous boost) radiotherapy; for 33 fractions, curative dose is 69.96Gy (2.12Gy per fraction) and prophylactic dose is 52.8Gy (1.6Gy per fraction in integrated simultaneous boost radiotherapy or 54Gy in 1.64Gy per fraction); for 30 fractions, curative dose is 66Gy (2.2Gy per fraction) and prophylactic dose is 54Gy (1.8Gy per fraction in integrated simultaneous boost radiotherapy). Doses over 2Gy per fraction could be done when chemotherapy is not used regarding potential larynx toxicity. Postoperatively, radiotherapy is used in locally advanced cancer with dose levels based on pathologic criteria, 60 to 66Gy for R1 resection and 54 to 60Gy for complete resection in bed tumour; 50 to 66Gy in lymph nodes areas regarding extracapsular spread. Volume delineation were based on guidelines cited in this article.

Radiotherapy for laryngeal cancers.

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy of laryngeal cancers. Intensity modulated radiotherapy is the standard of care radiotherapy for the management of laryngeal cancers. Early stage T1 or T2 tumours can be treated either by radiotherapy or conservative surgery. For tumours requiring total laryngectomy (T2 or T3), an organ preservation strategy by either induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin is recommended. For T4 tumours, a total laryngectomy followed by radiotherapy is recommended when feasible. Dose regimens for definitive and postoperative radiotherapy are detailed in this article, as well as the selection and delineation of tumour and lymph node target volumes.

Radiotherapy for oral cavity cancers.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy and brachytherapy are standard techniques of irradiation for the treatment of oral cavity cancers. These techniques are detailed in terms of indication, planning, delineation and selection of the volumes of interest, dosimetry and patients positioning control. This is an update of the guidelines of the French Society of Radiotherapy Correspondence.

[Dosimetric and toxicity comparison of IMRT and 3D-CRT of non-small cell lung cancer]. / Comparaison dosimétrique et de la toxicité de la radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité et de la radiothérapie conformationnelle tridimensionnelle des carcinomes bronchiques non à petites cellules.

PURPOSE: Although three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) remains the gold standard as a curative treatment for NSCLC when surgery is not possible, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is increasingly used routinely. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical (immediate toxicities) and dosimetric impact of IMRT compared to 3D-CRT in the treatment of locally advanced (stages IIIA to IIIC) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy, while IMRT in lung cancer was implemented in the radiotherapy department of the Jean-Perrin Center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2015 and October 2019, 64 patients treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy were retrospectively included. Thirty-two received 3D-CRT and 32 IMRT. The radiotherapy prescription was 66Gy in 33 fractions of 2Gy. RESULTS: IMRT has improved coverage of target volumes (V95 increased by 14.81% in IMRT; P<0.001) without increasing doses to OARs and reducing dysphagia (RR=0.67; P=0.027). Low doses to the lung were not significantly increased in IMRT (pulmonary V5 increased by 7.46% in IMRT). CONCLUSION: Intensity modulated radiotherapy, compared with the standard RC3D technique, improve the coverage of target volumes without increasing the dose to the OARs. It also improves the immediate tolerance of the treatment by reducing the number of dysphagia.

Toxicity and time lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is the standard treatment for brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, mostly in combination with immunotherapy. The objective was to retrospectively evaluate the influence of the time-lapse between immunotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy on toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2019, 59 patients treated with SRT for 103 brain metastases of NSCLC (60%) and melanoma (40%) in combination with concomitant immunotherapy (≤30 days) were included. The prescribed dose was 20Gy/1f or 33Gy/3f at the isocentre and 14Gy or 23.1Gy (70%) respectively at the PTV envelope (PTV=GTV+2mm). The mean tumour diameter was 14mm (4-52mm). The immunotherapies used were anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. The 103 metastases were classified into 3 groups according to the time-lapse between instatement of immunotherapy and instatement of SRT for the patient concerned: 7 (7%) in group A (≤7 days), 38 (37%) in group B (7 to 14 days) and 58 (56%) in group C (14 to 30 days). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 10.1 months. The median overall survival was 11.5 months for NSCLC and 12.5 months for melanoma. The percentage of local control (LC) at one year was 65.1% (93.6% for NSCLC and 26.5% for melanoma). The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of LC (P=0.86), while the histology was (P<0.001). The proportion of grade≥3 toxicities was 5.1%, and that of radionecrosis was 9.7% (among these patients, 80% were non-symptomatic): 0%, 13.1% and 8.6% for groups A, B and C respectively. The time-lapse between immunotherapy and SRT was not a significant predictor of toxicity. Only tumour volume was a significant predictive factor (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: The time lapse between immunotherapy and SRT does not influence brain toxicity. The tumour volume remains the main factor.

[Predictive factors for mandibular osteoradionecrosis after irradiation of head and neck cancers]. / Facteurs prédictifs de l'ostéoradionécrose mandibulaire après irradiation des cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures.

The identification of the different risk factors for mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) must be done before and after the management of patients with head and neck cancer. Various clinical criteria for this severe radiation-induced complication are related to the patient (intrinsic radiosensitivity, malnutrition associated with thin weight loss, active smoking intoxication, microcapillary involvement, precarious oral status, hyposalivation) and/or related to the disease (oral cavity, large tumor size, tumor mandibular invasion). Therapeutic risk factors are also associated with a higher risk of ORN (primary tumor surgery, concomitant radio-chemotherapy, post-irradiation dental avulsion, preventive non-observance with the absence of stomatological follow-up and daily installation of gutters fluoride and, non-observance curative healing treatments). Finally, various dosimetric studies have specified the parameters in order to target the dose values distributed in the mandible, which increases the risk of ORN. An mean mandibular dose greater than 48-54Gy and high percentages of mandibular volume receiving 40 to 60Gy appear to be discriminating in the risk of developing an ORN.

Impact of the method chosen for the analysis of recurrences after radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: volume-based, point-based and combined methods.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck is a complex technique. Inappropriate delineation and/or dose distribution can lead to recurrences. Analysis of these recurrences should lead to improve clinical practice. For several years, different methods of analysis have been described. The purpose of this review is to describe these different methods and to discuss their advantages and limitations. The first published methods used a volume-based approach studying the entire volume of recurrence according to initial target volumes, or dose distribution. The main limitation of these methods was that the volume of recurrence studied was dependent on the delay in diagnosis of that recurrence. Subsequently, other methods used point-based approaches, conceptualizing recurrence either as a spherical expansion from a core of radioresistant cells (center of mass of recurrence volume) or using a more clinical approach, taking into account tumor expansion pathways. More recently, more precise combined methods have been described, combining the different approaches. The choice of method is decisive for conclusions on the origin of recurrence.

[Proposal for the delineation of postoperative primary clinical target volumes in ethmoid cancers]. / Proposition de délinéation des volumes cibles anatomocliniques postopératoires de la tumeur primitive des cancers de l'ethmoïde.

It is proposed to delineate the anatomo-clinical target volumes of primary tumor (CTV-P) in ethmoid cancers treated with post-operative radiotherapy. This concept is based on the use of radioanatomy and the natural history of cancer. It is supported by the repositioning of the planning scanner with preoperative imaging for the replacement of the initial GTV and the creation of margins around it extended to the microscopic risk zones according to the anatomical concept. This article does not discuss the indications of external radiotherapy but specifies the volumes to be delineated if radiotherapy is considered.

[Intra and extra hepatic cholangiocarcinomas radiation therapy]. / Place de la radiothérapie des cholangiocarcinomes intra- et extrahépatiques.

Cholangiocarcinomas are digestive tumors whose incidence remains low and have poor prognosis. The benefits of adjuvant radiochemotherapy and radiotherapy have never been demonstrated in any phase III randomized controlled trial. Chemotherapy with capecitabine 6 months is the standard of care in adjuvant setting. Radiochemotherapy is validated in R1 patients. It is not recommended in neoadjuvant situations given the lack of evidence. Chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy are validated in adjuvant or locally advanced diseases. Stereotactic radiation therapy offers an interesting perspective, at the cost of significant digestive toxicities, requiring evaluation in randomized trials.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for large brain metastases: Optimizing the dosimetric parameters.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of brain metastases (BM). We aimed to compare the dosimetric results of four plans for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for large brain metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients treated with upfront NovalisTx® non-coplanar multiple dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) HFSRT for≥25mm diameter single BM were included. Three other volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were evaluated: with coplanar arcs (Eclipse®, Varian, VMATcEclipse®), with coplanar and non-coplanar arcs (VMATncEclipse®), and with non-coplanar arcs (Elements Cranial SRS®, Brainlab, VMATncElements®). The marginal dose prescribed for the PTV was 23.1Gy (isodose 70%) in three fractions. The mean GTV was 27mm3. RESULTS: Better conformity indices were found with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (1.05 vs 1.28, P<0.05). Better gradient indices were found with VMATncElements® and DCA (2.43 vs 3.02, P<0.001). High-dose delivery in healthy brain was lower with all VMAT techniques compared to DCA (5.6 to 6.3 cc vs 9.4 cc, P<0.001). Low-dose delivery (V5Gy) was lower with VMATncEclipse® or VMATncElements® than with DCA (81 or 94 cc vs 110 cc, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NovalisTx® VMAT HFSRT for≥25mm diameter brain metastases provides the best dosimetric compromise in terms of target coverage, sparing of healthy brain tissue and low-dose delivery compared to DCA.

[Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head neck cancers. Should organs at risk dose constraints be revisited ?] / Chimioradiothérapie concomitante des cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures. Faut-il revoir les contraintes de dose dans les organes à risque ?

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves the outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancers and the current reference chemotherapy is cisplatin. These results are obtained at the cost of increased toxicities. To limit the risk of toxicity, organ at riskdose constraints have been established starting with 2D radiotherapy, then 3D radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Regarding grade ≥3 acute toxicities, the scientific literature attests that concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly increases risks of mucositis and dysphagia. Constraints applied to the oral mucosa volume excluding the planning target volume, the pharyngeal constrictor muscles and the larynx limit this adverse impact. Regarding late toxicity, concurrent chemoradiotherapy increases significantly the risk of postoperative neck fibrosis and hearing loss. However, for some organs at risk, concurrent chemotherapy appears to increase late radiation induced effect, even though the results are less marked (brachial plexus, mandible, pharyngeal constrictor muscles, parotid gland). This additional adverse impact of concomitant chemotherapy may be notable only when organs at risk receive less than their usual dose thresholds and this would be vanished when those thresholds are exceeded as seems to be the situation for the parotid glands. Until the availability of more robust data, it seems appropriate to apply the principle of delivering dose to organs at risk as low as reasonably achievable.

[Preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy of rectal cancers: Relevance and modalities]. / Radiothérapie avec modulation d'intensité préopératoire des cancers rectaux : intérêt et application.

Preoperative radiotherapy boosted by chemotherapy is a recommended treatment in locally advanced rectal cancers. This treatment is delivered by three dimensional conformal irradiation, which is usually well tolerated but can induce potential toxicity such as rectitis, cystitis and hematologic adverse effects. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, widely available nowadays, allows optimization of volume covering and sparing of organs at risk such as bladder and bone marrow. This review presents relevant clinical situations and requirements for a beneficial and safe preoperative irradiation of rectal cancers by intensity-modulated technique. This technique is compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Long-Term Outcomes After Linac Radiosurgery for Benign Meningiomas.

AIMS: Although several studies on outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign meningiomas have been reported, Linac-based SRS outcomes have not been as widely evaluated. The aim of this retrospective institutional single-centre study was to determine long-term outcomes of Linac-based SRS for benign intracranial meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1996 to May 2011, 60 patients with 69 benign meningiomas were included. All patients were treated with single-fraction Linac-based SRS with four to five non-coplanar arcs, dynamic or not. The marginal dose prescribed for the periphery was 16 Gy. Prognostic factors associated with local control, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were tested. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 128 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. The values observed at 1, 5 and 10 years were, respectively, 100%, 98.4% and 92.6% for local control, 94.9%, 93.2% and 78% for PFS and 100%, 94.7% and 92.7% for overall survival. In univariate analysis, local control after SRS was significantly higher for skull base and parasagittal meningiomas compared with convexity meningiomas (P = 0.031). Multivariate analyses showed significantly longer PFS when the minimum dose delivered to the tumour was greater than 10 Gy (P = 0.0082). No grade 5 toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION: Our long-term results from a large sample size of benign meningiomas treated with Linac-based SRS confirmed excellent local control (>90%) and good safety, which is in line with published studies on Gamma Knife surgery. Above all, we showed significantly poorer PFS if the minimum dose to the tumour was under 10 Gy.

[Functional stereotactic radiosurgery: Indications and perspectives]. / Radiochirurgie fonctionnelle : indications et perspectives.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive technique that enables to create brain focal lesions with a high precision and localization. Thus, functional brain disorders can be treated by SRS in case of pharmacoresistance or inoperability. To date, treatment of trigeminal neuralgia is the most described and known indication. Other indications will be developed in the future like movement disorders, refractory epilepsy, obsessive compulsive disorder and severe depression. We present here a review of actual and future indications of functional brain SRS with their level of evidence. All these SRS treatments have to be strictly conducted by trained teams with an excellent collaboration between radiation physicists, medical physicists, neurosurgeons, neurologists, psychiatrists and probably neuroradiologists.

[Reirradiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Indications and results]. / Réirradiations des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures : indications et résultats.

Despite progress in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a significant proportion of patients previously irradiated for head-and-neck cancer will develop locoregional recurrence or a second primary. Because of the heterogeneity of this population with respect to disease-related factors (localization, volume, recurrence or second primary, time interval from previous irradiation…) and patient-related factors (comorbidities, sequelae of previous irradiation…), the optimal reirradiation treatment remains to be defined. Salvage therapy using reirradiation, despite some encouraging results, has historically been avoided because of concerns regarding toxicity. The results of more recent studies using contemporary treatment techniques and conformal delivery methods such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) have been somewhat more promising. The aim of this review is to discuss the reirradiation of HNSCC in terms of patient selection and modern radiotherapy techniques.

[Proposal for the selection and delineation of clinical target volumes for the radiotherapy of submandibular gland tumours]. / Proposition de sélection et délinéation des volumes cibles anatomocliniques tumoraux et ganglionnaire pour la radiothérapie des cancers de la glande sous-mandibulaire.

This article provides a proposal for the selection and delineation of clinical target volumes for the treatment with radiation of submandibular glands tumours. This article does not deal with external radiotherapy indications but specifies the volumes to be treated if radiotherapy is chosen. High-risk and low-risk peritumoral clinical target volumes are described based on the probability of local tumoral spread. High-risk and low-risk clinical target volumes are illustrated on CT-scan slices. A proposal for the selection of nodal clinical target volumeis also proposed.

[Post-treatment follow-up of head and neck cancer patients]. / Surveillance après traitement d'un cancer cervicofacial.

Post-therapeutic follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer involves numerous professionals. The radiation oncologist should play an active role in this process. His oncological knowledge and technical expertise position him as a cornerstone for the detection of recurrences from the treated tumor, the research of second primary cancers and the screening of potential side-effects induced by the different treatments administered. To improve the benefits/costs ratio and allow good patient-compliance, follow-up programs should be built through close collaboration between the different contributors and planned according to a feasible schedule. Paraclinical exams must be arranged to respond to accurate objectives. Patient-education is essential to ensure the patient's full understanding and active participation. Finally, the transfer of the long-term follow-up of cancer survivors from specialists to primary care physicians is relevant but would require a prospective evaluation of its efficiency for this specific population.