Acceptability in the Older Population: The Importance of an Appropriate Tablet Size.

Presenting many advantages, solid oral dosage forms (SODFs) are widely manufactured and frequently prescribed in older populations regardless of the specific characteristics of patients. Commonly, patients with dysphagia (swallowing disorders) experience difficulties taking SODFs, which may lead to non-adherence or misuse. SODF characteristics (e.g., size, shape, thickness) are likely to influence swallowability. Herein, we used the acceptability reference framework (the ClinSearch acceptability score test (CAST))-a 3D-map juxtaposing two acceptability profiles-to investigate the impact of tablet size on acceptability. We collected 938 observer reports on the tablet intake by patients ≥65 years in hospitals or care homes. As we might expect, tablets could be classified as accepted in older patients without dysphagia (n = 790), while not in those with swallowing disorders (n = 146). However, reducing the tablet size had a significant impact on acceptability in this subpopulation: tablets <6.5 mm appeared to be accepted by patients with swallowing disorders. Among the 309 distinct tablets assessed in this study, ranging in size from 4.7 to 21.5 mm, 83% are ≥6.5 mm and consequently may be poorly accepted by institutionalized older people and older inpatients suffering from dysphagia. This underlines the need to develop and prescribe medicines with the best adapted characteristics to reach an optimal acceptability in targeted users.

Acceptability of oral liquid pharmaceutical products in older adults: palatability and swallowability issues.

BACKGROUND: In institutional care, oral liquid pharmaceutical products are widely prescribed for older patients, especially for those with swallowing disorders. As medicines acceptability is a key factor for compliance in the older population, this study investigated the acceptability of oral liquid pharmaceutical products in this targeted population. METHODS: An observational, multicenter, prospective study was conducted in eight geriatric hospitals and eight nursing homes in France. Observers reported several behaviours/events describing the many aspects of acceptability for various pharmaceutical products' uses in patients aged 65 and older. Acceptability scores of oral liquid pharmaceutical products were obtained using an acceptability reference framework (CAST - ClinSearch Acceptability Score Test®): a 3D-map summarizing the different users' behaviors, with two clusters defining the positively and negatively accepted profiles materialized by the green and red zones, respectively. RESULTS: Among 1288 patients included in the core study and supporting the acceptability reference framework, 340 assessments were related to the administration of an oral liquid pharmaceutical product. The mean age of these patients was 87 (Range [66-104y]; SD = 6.7), 68% were women and 16% had swallowing disorders. Globally, the oral liquid pharmaceutical products were classified as "positively accepted," the barycenter of the 340 assessments, along with the entire confidence ellipses surrounding it, were positioned on the green zone of the map. Sub-populations presenting a different acceptability profile have also been identified. For patients with swallowing disorders, the oral liquid pharmaceutical products were classified as "negatively accepted," the barycenter of the 53 assessments along with 87% of its confidence ellipses were associated with this profile. A gender difference was observed for unflavored oral liquids. In women, they were classified "negatively accepted," the barycenter of the 68 assessments with 75% of its confidence ellipses were located in the red zone, while they were classified "positively accepted" in men. CONCLUSION: This study showed that oral liquid pharmaceutical products are a suboptimal alternative to solid oral dosage forms in patients with swallowing disorders. To ensure an optimal acceptability, prescribers should also consider the presence of a taste-masker in these oral liquids. As highlighted herein, palatability remains crucial in older populations, especially for women.

Dosage form suitability in vulnerable populations: A focus on paracetamol acceptability from infants to centenarians.

INTRODUCTION: Medicine acceptability is a multi-faceted concept driven by both product and user characteristics. Although a key factor for treatment effectiveness, especially in vulnerable populations, knowledge of those medicine features that best promote individual user acceptability remains fragmented. Focusing on paracetamol, this study has explored the appropriateness of pharmaceutical products in different dosage forms to achieve adequate patient acceptability from infants to centenarians. METHODS: This observational, multicentre, prospective study was carried out in 10 hospitals, 8 nursing homes and over 150 community dispensaries. Observers reported several behaviours/events evaluating acceptability for 1016 different pharmaceutical product uses in paediatrics (<18y.) and 1288 in the elderly (≥65y.). Using mapping and clustering, a multivariate approach offered an intelligible reference framework for each population, providing comprehensive scores: positively or negatively accepted. RESULTS: Among all the evaluations supporting the acceptability reference frameworks, there were 502 reports on paracetamol products intake. Herein we focused on the 5 products with ≥30 evaluations. Although oral suspension and powder for oral solution were positively-accepted in the paediatric group, the powder had a higher rate of negative patient reaction (p<0.001). Of those that received this formulation, 72% were ≤8y., and therefore suitable to receive the better accepted oral suspension. In the elderly, patients with swallowing disorders were preferentially treated with such powders (p<0.001), which were less often fully taken than orally disintegrating tablets (p<0.001). Even in those patients ≥90y., capsule formulations appeared to be the best accepted product in patients without swallowing alterations, and thus could be a suitable alternative to the powder in this population. CONCLUSIONS: By better integrating patient characteristics when choosing dosage forms, clinicians and caregivers may improve treatment acceptability and adherence. Moreover, hospitals and healthcare institutions could optimise purchasing to best suit their local population, disseminating information to help staff align specific dosage forms to targeted patients.

A Decision Support Tool Facilitating Medicine Design for Optimal Acceptability in The Older Population.

PURPOSE: Medicine acceptability, which is of the utmost importance for vulnerable patients' adherence, is driven by both user and product characteristics. Herein, a novel multivariate approach integrating the many aspects of acceptability is used to discriminate positively and negatively accepted medicines in the older population. METHODS: An observational study was carried out in eight hospitals and eight nursing homes to collect a large set of real-life data on medicines uses in older patients (≥65 years). Mapping and clustering explored these multiple observational measures and summarised the main information into an intelligible reference framework. Resampling statistics were used to validate the model's reliability. RESULTS: A three-dimensional map and two clusters defining acceptability profiles, as positive or negative, emerged from the 1079 evaluations. Factors of interest (medicines, user features…) were positioned on the map at the barycentre of their evaluations and assigned to an acceptability profile. Focusing on patients' ability to swallow, we have highlighted the tool's efficacy in demonstrating the impact of user features on medicine acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: This multivariate approach provides a relevant judgement criterion for this multi-dimensional concept. Facilitating the choice of the most appropriate dosage form to achieve optimal acceptability in a targeted population, this tool is of real potential to improve clinical decisions.

Monitoring of Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions in Older Inpatients: A French Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) or potentially inappropriate associations (PIAs) prescribed knowingly are associated with patient monitoring. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Geriatric units (n = 56) in 28 hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients aged 75 and older (N = 1,327). MEASUREMENTS: Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) were defined as a PIM or a PIA selected by an expert board from lists of explicit criteria (Beers, Priscus, Laroche, French Health Agency) using a Delphi process. They were considered to be prescribed knowingly if they were maintained after reassessment by the geriatrician and the clinical pharmacist. Primary outcome was the rate of PIPs maintained (prescribed knowingly) and for which a geriatrician declared that specific monitoring was performed. Secondary outcomes were the parameters monitored and the rate of participants receiving knowingly a PIP. RESULTS: One thousand sixty-three PIPs were detected in 607 participants (46%). After reassessment, 826 (78%) PIPs were maintained in 490 participants (37%), the main reasons being participant's regular treatment and lack of alternative. Psychotropic (36%), cardiovascular (including antithrombotics) (29%), and laxative or antiemetic drugs (16%) were the most-frequent classes prescribed knowingly. The geriatricians declared to perform clinical or biological monitoring for 69% (n = 570) of PIMs or PIAs prescribed knowingly. Three types of specific monitoring were identified: clinical, biological, and follow-up with a specialist. CONCLUSION: Approximately three-quarters of PIMs or PIAs were prescribed knowingly, of which 69% were monitored, with wide variations in occurrence and in quality according to drug classes. This underlines the need for accurate guidelines on PIP monitoring.