Can we identify patients carrying targeted deleterious DPYD variants with plasma uracil and dihydrouracil? A GPCO-RNPGx retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is the main cause of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicities. The best strategy for identifying DPD-deficient patients is still not defined. The EMA recommends targeted DPYD genotyping or uracilemia (U) testing. We analyzed the concordance between both approaches. METHODS: This study included 19,376 consecutive French patients with pre-treatment plasma U, UH2 and targeted DPYD genotyping (*2A, *13, D949V, *7) analyzed at Eurofins Biomnis (2015-2022). RESULTS: Mean U was 9.9 ± 10.1 ng/mL (median 8.7, range 1.6-856). According to French recommendations, 7.3 % of patients were partially deficient (U 16-150 ng/mL) and 0.02 % completely deficient (U≥150 ng/mL). DPYD variant frequencies were *2A: 0.83 %, *13: 0.17 %, D949V: 1.16 %, *7: 0.05 % (2 homozygous patients with U at 22 and 856 ng/mL). Variant carriers exhibited higher U (median 13.8 vs. 8.6 ng/mL), and lower UH2/U (median 7.2 vs. 11.8) and UH2/U2 (median 0.54 vs. 1.37) relative to wild-type patients (p<0.00001). Sixty-six% of variant carriers exhibited uracilemia <16 ng/mL, challenging correct identification of DPD deficiency based on U. The sensitivity (% patients with a deficient phenotype among variant carriers) of U threshold at 16 ng/mL was 34 %. The best discriminant marker for identifying variant carriers was UH2/U2. UH2/U2<0.942 (29.7 % of patients) showed enhanced sensitivity (81 %) in identifying deleterious genotypes across different variants compared to 16 ng/mL U. CONCLUSIONS: These results reaffirm the poor concordance between DPD phenotyping and genotyping, suggesting that both approaches may be complementary and that targeted DPYD genotyping is not sufficiently reliable to identify all patients with complete deficiency.

Dosing Regimen for Cefotaxime Should Be Adapted to the Stage of Renal Dysfunction in Critically Ill Adult Patients-A Retrospective Study.

Cefotaxime administration is recommended in doses of 3-12 g/day in adults with a Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) > 5 mL/min. This study aimed to assess the impact of renal function and obesity on cefotaxime concentrations in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive ICU patients receiving continuous cefotaxime infusion between 2020 and 2022 [IRBN992021/CHUSTE]. Doses were not constant; consequently, a concentration-to-dose ratio (C/D) was considered. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationship between cefotaxime concentrations, renal function, and obesity. A total of 70 patients, median age 61 years, were included, with no significant difference in cefotaxime concentrations between obese and non-obese patients. However, concentrations varied significantly by GFR, with underdosing prevalent in patients with normal to increased renal function and overdosing in those with severely impaired renal function. Adjustment of cefotaxime dosing according to GFR was associated with improved target attainment. Cefotaxime dosing in critically ill patients should consider renal function, with higher initial doses required in patients with normal to increased GFR and lower doses in those with severely impaired renal function. Therapeutic drug monitoring may aid in optimising dosing regimens. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and inform clinical practice.

Prospective assessment of the frequency of and risk factors for bleeding events in patients treated with cefazolin.

PURPOSE: Major bleedings have been described with cefazolin. The objective was to determine the frequency of bleeding events in cefazolin-treated patients and to identify risk factors for these complications. METHODS: Monocenter prospective observational study of all consecutive cefazolin-treated patients. Patients benefited from a daily clinical assessment of bleedings and a twice-a-week blood sampling including hemostasis. Bleedings were classified according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis classification: major, clinically relevant non-major bleedings (CRNMB) and minor bleedings. RESULTS: From September 2019 to July 2020, 120 patients were included, with a mean age of 59.4 (± 20.7) years; 70% of them (84/120) were men. At least 1 CRNMB or major bleeding were observed in 10% of the patients (12/120). Compared to patients with no or minor bleeding, patients with CRNMB or major bleeding were, upon start of cefazolin, more frequently hospitalized in an intensive care unit (7/12, 58.3%, vs. 12/108, 11.1%, P < 0.001, respectively) and receiving vitamin K antagonists (4/12, 33.3%, vs. 8/108, 7.4%, P = 0.019, respectively). After multivariate analysis, patients receiving vitamin K antagonists the day prior bleeding and/or treated for endocarditis were factors associated with an increased risk of CRNMB or major bleeding (odd ratio 1.36, confidence interval 95%, 1.06-1.76, P = 0.020 and 1.30, 1.06-1.61, P = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding events associated with cefazolin treatment are frequent. Close clinical monitoring should be performed for patients treated for endocarditis and/or receiving vitamin K antagonists. Hemostasis work-up could be restricted to these patients.

Towards optimization of ceftazidime dosing in obese ICU patients: the end of the 'one-size-fits-all' approach?

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime is commonly used as a key antibiotic against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in critically ill patients. ICU patients have severely altered and variable antibiotic pharmacokinetics, resulting in lower antimicrobial concentrations and potentially poor outcome. Several factors, including obesity and renal function, may influence pharmacokinetics. Thus, the objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of obesity and renal function on ceftazidime plasma concentrations and dosing regimen in ICU patients. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients from six ICUs, treated with continuous ceftazidime infusion and under therapeutic drug monitoring evaluation, were included. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m². Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula. The ceftazidime recommended target for plasma concentrations was between 35 and 80 mg/L. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients (45 obese), with an average weight of 90 (±25) kg, were included. Mean GFR was 84.1 (±40.4) mL/min/1.73 m2. Recommended ceftazidime plasma concentrations were achieved for only 48.0% of patients, with median dosing regimen of 6 g/day. Obese patients had lower ceftazidime plasma concentrations compared with non-obese patients (37.8 versus 56.3 mg/L; P = 0.0042) despite similar dosing regimens (5.83 g/day versus 5.52 g/day, P = 0.2529). Almost all augmented renal clearance patients were underdosed despite ceftazidime dosing of 6.6 (±0.8) g/day. Weight-based ceftazidime dosing seemed to attenuate such obesity-related discrepancies, regardless of GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Obese ICU patients required significantly greater ceftazidime doses to achieve the target range. A tailored dosing regimen may be considered based on weight and GFR. Future prospective studies should be performed to confirm this individualized dosing approach.

Failure of Risk Assessment After Paracetamol Overdose-A Short Communication.

BACKGROUND: The accepted treatment for patients with acetaminophen/paracetamol overdose includes risk assessment based on the Rumack-Matthew (R-M) nomogram. An inaccurate use of the nomogram may result in improper treatment. Clinicians were surveyed to determine their understanding and proper use of this risk assessment tool in practice. METHODS: Differences between visual risk assessment using the same depiction of the R-M nomogram and calculated risk assessment were determined using an online calculator developed based on the Rumack equation. An online survey was administered in French between August 25, 2021, and November 25, 2021, as a Google Form with 14 questions (the paracetamol concentration and time postingestion were stated). A total of 147 respondents with an average age of 32 years (range 23-61 years) performed risk assessment (low/possible/probable/not assessable). The mean assessment accuracy was 66.2 ± 26.7% (12.3-99.3). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 93%, 55%, 71%, and 89%, respectively. A subcohort of n = 31 senior clinicians showed the same trends (91%, 52%, 69%, and 84%). RESULTS: Approximately 7% of patients who are at risk of hepatotoxicity based on the R-M nomogram would not be treated. By contrast, N-acetylcysteine was not recommended by the R-M nomogram but would be administered to approximately 50% of patients. A concern for the latter group is that anaphylactoid reactions occur in up to 25% of patients with low paracetamol concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients may be undertreated, resulting in possible hepatotoxicity, and many patients may be overtreated, resulting in a high percentage of anaphylaxis. Rather than relying on visual risk assessment, physicians should use an online calculator ( www.hopitox.com/?lang=en ) or consult with a toxicologist or poison center to substantially improve patient care after acetaminophen/paracetamol overdose.

Quantitative impact of pre-analytical process on plasma uracil when testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

AIMS: Determining dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity by measuring patient's uracil (U) plasma concentration is mandatory before fluoropyrimidine (FP) administration in France. In this study, we aimed to refine the pre-analytical recommendations for determining U and dihydrouracil (UH2 ) concentrations, as they are essential in reliable DPD-deficiency testing. METHODS: U and UH2 concentrations were collected from 14 hospital laboratories. Stability in whole blood and plasma after centrifugation, the type of anticoagulant and long-term plasma storage were evaluated. The variation induced by time and temperature was calculated and compared to an acceptability range of ±20%. Inter-occasion variability (IOV) of U and UH2 was assessed in 573 patients double sampled for DPD-deficiency testing. RESULTS: Storage of blood samples before centrifugation at room temperature (RT) should not exceed 1 h, whereas cold (+4°C) storage maintains the stability of uracil after 5 hours. For patients correctly double sampled, IOV of U reached 22.4% for U (SD = 17.9%, range = 0-99%). Notably, 17% of them were assigned with a different phenotype (normal or DPD-deficient) based on the analysis of their two samples. For those having at least one non-compliant sample, this percentage increased up to 33.8%. The moment of blood collection did not affect the DPD phenotyping result. CONCLUSION: Caution should be taken when interpreting U concentrations if the time before centrifugation exceeds 1 hour at RT, since it rises significantly afterwards. Not respecting the pre-analytical conditions for DPD phenotyping increases the risk of DPD status misclassification.

Relationship Between Plasmatic Metformin Concentration and Renal Replacement Therapy: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Metformin is the first-line treatment used for type 2 diabetes mellitus for more than 60 years. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis is the most serious adverse effect of metformin and is most widely defined as metabolic acidosis with elevated lactate levels in the presence of metformin. However, there is no consensus regarding the role of metformin in metformin-associated lactic acidosis onset. This study aimed to determine the metformin toxicity threshold (the metformin plasma concentration that predicts the occurrence of lactic acidosis) and the metformin dialysis threshold (the metformin plasma concentration strongly correlated with dialysis introduction). METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. All consecutive adult patients with at least one metformin-detectable blood concentration measurement were included. RESULTS: In total, 169 patients (92 men; mean age, 70 ± 11 years) were included in this study. A receiver operating characteristic analysis using Youden index showed that a metformin plasma concentration threshold of 17.9 mg/L was associated with lactic acidosis (sensitivity: 43.8%; specificity: 90.5%). Another receiver operating characteristic analysis using Youden index showed that a metformin plasma concentration threshold of 17.5 mg/L was associated with dialysis (sensitivity, 53.0%; specificity: 94.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective study design, lack of clinical data, and selection bias (patients in whom metformin was prescribed owing to pathological conditions) were major limitations, resulting in only preliminary findings. However, this study could serve as a basis for future prospective clinical studies to evaluate the use of these clinical threshold values as therapeutic guides.

Ceftazidime dosing in obese patients: is it time for more?

INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime is used for the treatment of many bacterial infections, including severe P. aeruginosa infections. Like other beta-lactams, inter-individual variability in ceftazidime pharmacokinetics has been described. Due to its related pathophysiological modifications, obesity might influence ceftazidime pharmacokinetics. AREAS COVERED: The objective of this review is to assess the current state of knowledge about the impact of obesity on ceftazidime treatment. A literature search was conducted on PubMed-MEDLINE (2016-2021) to retrieve pharmacokinetic studies published in English, matching the terms 'ceftazidime' AND 'pharmacokinetics.' EXPERT OPINION: The impact of obesity on pharmacokinetics is generally poorly known, mainly because obese patients are often excluded from clinical studies. However, the published literature clearly shows that obese patients have significantly lower ceftazidime concentrations. This could be explained by increased volume of distribution and clearance. This low exposure represents a major factor of therapeutic failure, potentially fatal for critically ill patients. While further studies would be useful to better assess the magnitude and understanding of this variability, the use of higher doses of ceftazidime is needed in obese patients. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring for dose adaptation is of major interest for these patients, as the efficacy of ceftazidime seems to be directly related to its plasma concentration.

Antifungal Drugs TDM: Trends and Update.

PURPOSE: The increasing burden of invasive fungal infections results in growing challenges to antifungal (AF) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in AF TDM. METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search for articles during 2016-2020 using "TDM" or "pharmacokinetics" or "drug-drug-interaction" with "antifungal," consolidated for each AF. Selection was limited to English language articles with human data on drug exposure. RESULTS: More than 1000 articles matched the search terms. We selected 566 publications. The latest findings tend to confirm previous observations in real-life clinical settings. The pharmacokinetic variability related to special populations is not specific but must be considered. AF benefit-to-risk ratio, drug-drug interaction (DDI) profiles, and minimal inhibitory concentrations for pathogens must be known to manage at-risk situations and patients. Itraconazole has replaced ketoconazole in healthy volunteers DDI studies. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling is widely used to assess metabolic azole DDI. AF prophylactic use was studied more for Aspergillus spp. and Mucorales in oncohematology and solid organ transplantation than for Candida (already studied). Emergence of central nervous system infection and severe infections in immunocompetent individuals both merit special attention. TDM is more challenging for azoles than amphotericin B and echinocandins. Fewer TDM requirements exist for fluconazole and isavuconazole (ISZ); however, ISZ is frequently used in clinical situations in which TDM is recommended. Voriconazole remains the most challenging of the AF, with toxicity limiting high-dose treatments. Moreover, alternative treatments (posaconazole tablets, ISZ) are now available. CONCLUSIONS: TDM seems to be crucial for curative and/or long-term maintenance treatment in highly variable patients. TDM poses fewer cost issues than the drugs themselves or subsequent treatment issues. The integration of clinical pharmacology into multidisciplinary management is now increasingly seen as a part of patient care.

Severe Inflammation, Acute Kidney Injury, and Drug-Drug Interaction: Triple Penalty for Prolonged Elimination of Apixaban in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Grand Round.

ABSTRACT: In this article, we present a case of apixaban elimination prolonged by 450% in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 because of multiple conditions, including drug-drug interaction, severe inflammation, and acute kidney injury. Therapeutic drug monitoring was used to explain unusual routine coagulation assays. This grand round highlights the importance of dialog between the clinician and a therapeutic drug monitoring consultant for optimal patient care.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Current Evidences, Gaps in Knowledge and Future Directions.

Antibiotic therapy is one of the main treatments for cystic fibrosis (CF). It aims to eradicate bacteria during early infection, calms down the inflammatory process, and leads to symptom resolution of pulmonary exacerbations. CF can modify both the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of antibiotics, therefore specific PK/PD endpoints should be determined in the context of CF. Currently available data suggest that optimal PK/PD targets cannot be attained in sputum with intravenous aminoglycosides. Continuous infusion appears preferable for ß-lactam antibiotics, but optimal concentrations in sputum are unlikely to be reached, with some possible exceptions such as meropenem and ceftolozane. Usual doses are likely suboptimal for fluoroquinolones and linezolid, whereas daily doses of 45-60 mg/kg and 200 mg could be convenient for vancomycin and doxycycline, respectively. Weekly azithromycin doses of 22-30 mg/kg could also be appropriate for its anti-inflammatory effect. The difficulty with achieving optimal concentrations supports the use of combined treatments and the inhaled administration route, as very high local concentrations, concomitantly with low systemic exposure, can be obtained with the inhaled route for aminoglycosides, colistin, and fluoroquinolones, thus minimizing the risk of toxicity.

Pharmacobezoar After Venlafaxine and Oxazepam Overdose: How Pharmacokinetics Could Help?-A Grand Round.

ABSTRACT: The authors present here a case of a pharmacobezoar after drug overdose, diagnosed using multiple blood samples for TDM. This grand round highlights the importance of a dialog between a clinician and a TDM consultant for the optimal care of a patient.

Accidental apixaban intoxication in a 23-month-old child: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban, are increasingly used in everyday practice in order to treat or prevent thromboembolic diseases. To date, there is no available data about apixaban pharmacokinetics in children, and no intoxication has previously been described. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-month-old boy, with no medical history, was admitted to the emergency department 2 h after accidentally ingesting 40 mg apixaban and 0.75 mg digoxin. No adverse event was observed. Digoxin trough level was within therapeutic values. Apixaban blood concentration increased up to 1712 µg/L at H + 6 (1000-2750 µg/L using 2-5 mg/kg of apixaban in adults). The terminal half-life was 8.2 h (6-15 h in adults). The rapid elimination may explain the absence of bleeding despite high concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an important intake of apixaban and a real disturbance in routine coagulation assays, no clinical sign of bleeding was observed, perhaps due to wide therapeutic range of apixaban. It may also be explained by its rapid elimination. Considering the high Cmax and a possible enteroenteric recycling, the use of activated charcoal should be considered in such situations in order to prevent eventual bleeding.

Influence of Renal Function and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Levofloxacin in Patients with Bone and Joint Infections.

Despite its efficacy and toxicity being exposure-related, levofloxacin pharmacokinetics in patients with bone and joint infections has been poorly described to date, so the possible need for a dose adjustment is unknown in this population. A prospective population pharmacokinetic study was conducted in 59 patients to answer this question. The final model consisted of a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Mean parameter estimates (% interindividual variability) were 0.895 h-1 for the absorption rate constant (Ka), 6.10 L/h (40%) for the apparent clearance (CL/F), 90.6 L (25%) for the apparent distribution volume (V/F). Age and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), estimated by the modification of diet in renal disease formula, were related to CL/F by power models, and CL/F was found to increase for increasing GFR and decreasing age. For a similar GFR, the simulated area under the curve (AUC) was 55% higher in 70 years-old patients compared to 30 year-old patients. Based on this model, a 750 mg dose should provide an optimal exposure (AUC/ minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥100), with the possible exception of patients older than 60 years and with GFR <70 mL/min/m² who may necessitate a dose reduction, and patients with infections caused by bacteria with MIC close to 1 mg/L who may need an increase in the dose.

Towards Optimization of Hydroxychloroquine Dosing in Intensive Care Unit COVID-19 Patients.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) appears to be a promising treatment for COVID-19. However, all ongoing clinical trials with HCQ use different dosing regimens, resulting in various concentrations. Pharmacokinetic studies are therefore needed to define the optimal dosing regimen.