Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(8): 1556-60, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27292601

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although surgical intervention is the favorable treatment modality for perforated peptic ulcer, nonsurgical treatment is another option. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of conservative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2014, 403 patients were admitted to our hospital for perforated peptic ulcer, and 383 patients underwent surgery, whereas 20 were allocated to conservative treatment. The results of nonsurgical intervention in these patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate of conservative treatment was 40%. Eleven patients remained hospitalized less than 2 weeks; among them, patients with a high (≥IV) American Society of Anesthesiologists class at admission had higher mortality than those with a low (

Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Úlcera Duodenal/complicações , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Úlcera Duodenal/diagnóstico , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/etiologia , Radiografia Abdominal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA