Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome: Neurocognition Already Reduced in Preschool-Aged Children.

BACKGROUND: Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome (CCHS) is a rare neurocristopathy characterized by severe hypoventilation and autonomic dysregulation, with typical presentation in the neonatal period, and deficient cognitive skills in school-aged patients. We hypothesized that younger (preschool) children with CCHS would also show neurocognitive delay and that CCHS-related physiologic factors would impact neurocognitive test results. METHODS: We studied developmental (Bayley) test results collected during routine clinical care in 31 children (mean age 25.0 ± 8.5 months; range, 6-40 months) with PHOX2B mutation-confirmed CCHS by comparing them with the normative reference mean from the Bayley standardization sample; we also examined associations between Bayley scores and CCHS disease-related factors. RESULTS: Preschool patients with CCHS fell significantly below the normative mean of 100 on Bayley indices of mental (mean, 83.35 ± 24.75) and motor (mean, 73.33 ± 20.48) development (P < .001 for both). Significantly lower Bayley mental and motor scores were associated with severe breath-holding spells, prolonged sinus pauses, and need for 24 h/d artificial ventilation. Lower Bayley motor scores were also associated with seizures. Bayley scores differed among children with the three most common polyalanine repeat expansion mutation genotypes (mental, P = .001; motor, P = .006), being essentially normal in children with the 20/25 genotype but significantly lower in the other genotype groups (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm neurodevelopmental impairment of CCHS preschoolers, with severity related to physiologic compromise and PHOX2B genotype. These findings suggest that adverse effects begin early in the disease process, supporting the need for neurodevelopmental monitoring and intervention from early infancy.

Determining peripheral skin temperature: subjective versus objective measurements.

AIM: Diseases that affect peripheral vasculature or neurological function can manifest with peripheral skin temperature abnormalities. This pilot study investigates the accuracy of current physical examination techniques and determines whether a hand-held infrared device can be used to estimate peripheral skin temperature and detect temperature disparities. METHODS: Comparison between traditional physical examination of hands/feet by 30 healthcare professionals and a hand-held infrared device was made in 12 individuals (ages 4-25 years; 5 with disorders affecting peripheral skin temperature). Thermal camera measurements served as the reference temperature for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 231 extremity examinations by healthcare professionals were analysed. Healthcare professionals correctly identified subjects with colder or warmer than normal peripheral temperature. Hand-held device measurements were significantly different than reference measurements, with the size of the temperature difference diverging significantly between hands (1.20°C) and feet (0.78°C). When analysing temperature disparities, healthcare professionals identified fewer clinically significant disparities (≥3.0°C) than the hand-held device (76% vs. 99%). CONCLUSION: Although different from reference temperatures, the hand-held infrared device provided a more accurate and objective method than traditional physical exam in identifying peripheral skin temperature asymmetries that may be related to chronic paediatric illness.