Family Language Preference, Not Provider-Family Language Concordance, Predicts Integrated Psychology Treatment Engagement in a Spanish-English Bilingual Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Monolingual Spanish speakers-many of whom identify as Hispanic/Latine-often experience barriers to accessing psychology services, including language access. Integrated primary care (IPC) clinics, where individuals receive psychological services within primary care, aim to improve service accessibility. However, minoritized populations are less likely to engage with these services than non-Hispanic/Latine White individuals. Few studies examine psychology treatment engagement within pediatric integrated clinics for Spanish-speaking families. This study investigated differences in psychology treatment engagement for Spanish-speaking families and the role of patient-provider language concordance within pediatric IPC. METHODS: A retrospective chart review examined data from a multiethnic sample of 887 patients (M age = 8.97 yrs, 55.69% male, 64.83% Hispanic/Latine, 6.99% non-Hispanic/Latine White, 41.71% Spanish-preferring) from an urban pediatric IPC clinic serving a high proportion of Hispanic/Latine, Spanish-speaking families. We examined the association between language preference and patient-provider language concordance on service engagement using hierarchical linear regression. RESULTS: Spanish-preferring families were more likely than English-preferring families to engage in psychology services. Working with a Spanish-speaking provider during an initial psychology visit was unrelated to psychology treatment engagement for Spanish-preferring families. CONCLUSION: Higher engagement for Spanish-preferring families seems to reflect the clinic's reputation as a center for linguistically accessible services. While linguistic accessibility remains important, our study did not detect an effect of language concordance during the initial psychology visit and subsequent treatment engagement. The findings highlight the importance of providing culturally responsive and linguistically accessible mental health services for Spanish-speaking families.

Distance from the endocrinology clinic and diabetes control in a rural pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the impact of geographic distance from the clinic on adherence to recommended clinic visits and diabetes control among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) seen in a pediatric endocrinology clinic serving a rural region in eastern North Carolina. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with T1D age ≤20 years seen in our clinic during 2017. Outcomes were tracked until June 2018. Distance from the clinic was determined according to the zone improvement plan (ZIP) code of patient address. Visit adherence was defined based on the number of attended visits during the study period, aiming for 1 every 3 months. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured at the first and last visits during the review period. RESULTS: The analysis included 368 patients, of whom 218 (59%) completed at least 1 visit every 3 months. The median HbA1c was 9.1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0, 10.3) at the initial visit, and 9.3 (IQR: 8.0, 11.1) at the final visit. Median distance from the clinic was 56 km (IQR: 35, 86). On multivariable logistic regression, greater distance from the clinic was associated with lower odds of visit adherence (odds ratio per 10 km: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.87, 0.99; p=0.030). Neither distance to the clinic nor clinic visit adherence were associated with HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Patients living further away from the clinic were less likely to adhere to the recommended visit schedule, but distance was not correlated with HbA1c levels. Further work is needed to assist families living far from the clinic with adhering to recommended visits.