No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. BURDEN OF SUFFERING: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. EVIDENCE: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. VALUES: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; G) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.

No 164 - Directive clinique de consensus pour la prise en charge de la douleur pelvienne chronique.

OBJECTIF: Améliorer La compréhension de la douleur pelvienne chronique (DPC) et fournir des directives cliniques factuelles qui bénéficieront aux fournisseurs de soins de santé primaires, aux obstétriciens-gynécologues et aux spécialistes de la douleur chronique. FARDEAU DE LA SOUFFRANCE: La DPC est une pathologie débilitante courante qui affecte les femmes. Elle est à l'origine d'importantes souffrances personnelles et de dépenses de santé considérables associées aux interventions, dont de multiples consultations et un grand nombre de traitements médicaux et chirurgicaux. Puisque la pathophysiologie sous-jacente de cet état pathologique complexe est mal comprise, ces traitements n'ont obtenu que des taux de réussite variables. ISSUES: Efficacité des options diagnostiques et thérapeutiques (y compris l'évaluation du dysfonctionnement myofascial); soins multidisciplinaires; un modèle de réadaptation mettant l'accent sur l'obtention d'un fonctionnement supérieur malgré la présence d'une certaine douleur (plutôt que de chercher à obtenir une guérison totale); et utilisation appropriée des opiacés pour le soulagement de la douleur chronique. PREUVES: Des recherches ont été menées dans Medline et la base de données Cochrane en vue d'en tirer les articles de langue anglaise, publiés entre 1982 et 2004, portant sur des sujets liés à la DPC, dont la gestion des soins actifs, le dysfonctionnement myofascial et les options thérapeutiques médicales et chirurgicales. Les membres du comité ont analysé la littérature pertinente, ainsi que les données disponibles tirées d'une évaluation des besoins des personnes présentant une DPC; ils ont fait appel à une approche de consensus pour l'élaboration des recommandations. VALEURS: La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur l'examen médical périodique. Les recommandations visant la pratique ont été classées conformément à la méthode décrite dans ce rapport (Tableau 1). RECOMMANDATIONS: Les recommandations visent ce qui suit : (a) compréhension des besoins des femmes présentant une DPC ; (b) évaluation clinique générale ; (c) évaluation pratique des niveaux de douleur ; (d) douleur myofasciale ; (e) médicaments et interventions chirurgicales ; (f) principes de la gestion des opiacés; (g) utilisation accrue de l'imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) ; (h) documentation de l'étendue de La maladie constatée au moyen de la chirurgie ; (i) thérapies non conventionnelles; (j) accès à des modèles de soins multidisciplinaires faisant appel à des composantes de physiothérapie (comme l'exercice et la posture) et de psychologie (comme La thérapie cognitivo- comportementale), conjointement avec d'autres disciplines médicales, telles que La gynécologie et l'anesthésie ; (k) attention accrue portée à La DPC dans La formation des professionnels de La sante ; et (l) attention accrue portée à la DPC dans le domaine des recherches officielles et de haut calibre. Le comité recommande que les ministères provinciaux de La Sante prennent des mesures en faveur de la création d'équipes multidisciplinaires pouvant assurer La prise en charge de cette pathologie. Chapitre 2 : Portee et definition de La douleur pelvienne chronique Chapitre 3 : Anamnese, examen physique et évaluation psychologique Chapitre 4 : Explorations Chapitre 5 : Sources de douleur pelvienne chronique Chapitre 6 : Causes urologiques et gastro-intestinales de La douleur pelvienne chronique Chapitre 7 : Dysfonctionnement myofasclal Chapitre 8 : Therapie medicale - résultats en matiere d'efficacite Chapitre 9 : Chirurgie - résultats en matiere d'efficacite Chapitre 11 : Prise en charge multidisciplinaire de La douleur chronique Chapitre 14 : Orientations futures.

Consensus guidelines for the management of chronic pelvic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. BURDEN OF SUFFERING: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. EVIDENCE: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. VALUES: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; (j) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.

Consensus guidelines for the management of chronic pelvic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. BURDEN OF SUFFERING: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. EVIDENCE: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. VALUES: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (f) principles of opiate management; (g) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (h) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (i) alternative therapies; (j) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical isciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; (k) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (l) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition. CHAPTER 7: MYOFASCIAL DYSFUNCTION: 1. Health care providers should become more aware of myofascial dysfunction as a cause of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and the available treatment options (IB). 2. Patients should participate in the management of CPP due to myofascial dysfunction by actively using a home stretching and exercise program (ll-2B). CHAPTER 8: MEDICAL THERAPY--EVIDENCE ON EFFECTIVENESS: 1. Opioid therapy can be considered for pain control under adequate supervision (II-3B). 2. Hormonal treatment of chronic pelvic pain of gynaecologic origin, including oral contraceptives, progestins, danazol, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, has been studied extensively and should be considered as the first line for many women, especially those with endometriosis (I and II-1A). 3. Adjuvant medications, such as antidepressants and antibiotics, can be of supporting help in specific situations (II-3B). CHAPTER 9: SURGERY-EVIDENCE ON EFFECTIVENESS: 1. The lack of robust clinical trials of the surgical management of chronic pelvic pain should be addressed. The use of alternative epidemiologic models, including case-controlled and cohort-controlled trials, should be considered (III-A). 2. Further delineation of the role of appendectomy and of presacral neurectomy appears warranted in the management of endometriosis-related pain (III-A). CHAPTER 11: MULTIDISCIPLINARY CHRONIC PAIN MANAGEMENT: 1. Multidisciplinary chronic pain management should be available for women with chronic pelvic pain within the publicly funded health care system in each province and territory of Canada (III-B). CHAPTER 14: FUTURE DIRECTIONS: 1. The curriculum for professional development should be expanded to include theory and techniques in the management of myofascial dysfunction (A). 2. Research into CPP should be encouraged, particularly in the areas of the impact of CPP on the use of health services, the pathophysiology of myofascial dysfunction, and gene therapy. Because randomized trials for qualitative outcomes are exceedingly difficult, alternative robust models, such as case-controlled or cohort-controlled trials, should be pursued (A). 3. Methods of improving interaction with patients should be explored. They might include formal contractual approaches to managing pain with opiates and efforts to better appreciate the patient's perceived needs (A).

Breast cancer, pregnancy, and breastfeeding.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this guideline is to provide Canadian physicians up-to-date, accurate information and recommendations regarding: i) impact of pregnancy and lactation on risk of breast cancer; ii) prognosis of breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy and lactation; iii) risk of recurrence of breast cancer with the occurrence of subsequent pregnancies; iv) feasibility of breastfeeding and its impact on the prognosis of women with breast cancer. OPTIONS: This guideline reviews evidence on whether pregnancy and breastfeeding change the lifetime risk for breast cancer in women, and whether breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or during lactation has a different prognosis. It offers the clinician advice on the diagnostic options to help identify breast cancer in pregnancy and/or during lactation, and offers evidence-based recommendations in managing an ongoing pregnancy and/or lactation when treatment for breast cancer is being planned. It also offers recommendations to clinicians in counselling their patients regarding future pregnancy and future breastfeeding for women who have been treated for breast cancer. OUTCOMES: These guidelines should help physicians counsel patients using evidence-based recommendations. These recommendations may also improve the prognosis of patients diagnosed with breast cancer during pregnancy and lactation, or of those patients who had breast cancer and are contemplating future pregnancies. EVIDENCE: A Medline search was carried out for all publications from 1990 through 2000, in the English language, related to breast cancer and pregnancy in terms of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, as well as for breast cancer and breastfeeding, with particular focus on impact of treatment of breast cancer on lactation and prognosis of breast cancer after lactation. The authors submitted the manuscript for review to members of the Breast Disease Committee, who also validated the levels of evidence. The final manuscript was submitted to the SOGC Council for approval and dissemination. The levels of evidence for recommendations have been determined using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Canadian physicians will be able to counsel their patients on the impact of pregnancy and lactation on a woman's lifetime risk for breast cancer. Physicians and patients will be empowered to decide how to manage pregnancy and lactation when breast cancer is diagnosed in pregnancy, and to appreciate the ramifications of reproduction and breastfeeding after breast cancer. This guideline identifies areas where good evidence is lacking and advocates research in those areas. RECOMMENDATIONS: Women should be counselled regarding their risk for breast cancer and be informed that: 1. There is good evidence that there is a transient increase in risk of breast cancer in the first three to four years after delivery of a singleton baby (II-2B). Subsequently, their lifetime risk seems lower than that of women who remain nulliparous (II-2B). 2. There is good evidence that the risk for premenopausal breast cancer is reduced with lactation (II-2A). This protective effect seems to be best for women who had extended periods of breastfeeding during their lifetime (ll-2B). Women with familial risks could potentially benefit most from breastfeeding (II-2C). Since breast milk is the ideal nutrient for the newborn, and since breastfeeding is a modifiable risk factor, all women should be encouraged to breastfeed their children (II-2A). 3. All women should be encouraged to practice breast self-examination in pregnancy and during lactation (II-2B). Clinicians should screen all pregnant patients for breast cancer with thorough breast examination early in pregnancy (III-B). The clinician is advised to examine the breast in the postpartum period if the woman is not breastfeeding. The obstetrician is advised to examine the breast at any time in the postpartum period if the woman presents with breast symptoms (III-B). 4. Physicians should be encouraged to use ultrasltrasonography, mammography, needle aspiration, or breast biopsies to assess suspicious breast masses in pregnancy and during lactation, in the same timely fashion as for non-pregnant or non-lactating women (II-2A). Interruption of lactation during investigation is not necessary, nor is it recommended unless nuclear studies are entertained (III-B). 5. Once breast cancer is diagnosed, a multidisciplinary approach should be taken. This includes the obstetrician, surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists, and breast cancer counsellors (II-2A). 6. In early pregnancy, the patient should be counselled regarding the effect of proposed therapy on the fetus and on overall maternal prognosis. Termination of pregnancy should be discussed, but the patient should be counselled that prognosis is not altered by termination of pregnancy. Women should be advised that premature menopause may result from breast cancer treatments, especially if chemotherapy is given to patients who are past the age of 30. (II-2C) 7. Up until now, modified radical mastectomy was the cornerstone of surgical treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be entertained and, if required, administered without delay. The patient should be counselled regarding the effect of chemotherapy on the fetus and/or the future reproductive potential of the patient (II-2B). In the third trimester, the risks and benefits of early delivery versus continuation of pregnancy, and the effect of chemotherapy on the fetus, should be addressed (II-2B). Women undergoing chemotherapy or tamoxifen treatment should not breastfeed (III-B). 8. Women treated for breast cancer and who wish to become pregnant should be counselled that pregnancy is possible and does not seem to be associated with a worse prognosis for their breast cancer (II-3C). However, they should be made aware that the evidence to support such advice is relatively poor. 9. Since most breast cancer recurrences appear within two to three years after initial diagnosis, patients should be advised to postpone pregnancy for three years (III-C). If a patient has axillary node involvement, the recommendation to defer pregnancy should be extended to five years, but this recommendation is based on opinion only (III-C). Prior to attempting pregnancy, a breast cancer survivor should be referred for a full oncologic evaluation. 10. There is no evidence that breastfeeding increases the risk of breast cancer recurring or of a second breast cancer developing, nor that it carries any health risk to the child. Women previously treated for breast cancer, who do not show any evidence of residual tumour, should be encouraged to breastfeed their children (III-B). VALIDATION: Level of evidence, quality of research in the recruited publications, and ensuing recommendations were reviewed and discussed by members of the SOGC Breast Disease Committee as well as by a member of the Gynaecological Oncology Committee. External reviewers with expertise in the area were also solicited for comments and criticism.