Effect of the Implementation of a Local Care Pathway on the Transient Ischemic Attack Management in Emergency Departments.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that urgent care decreases the risk of subsequent stroke after transient ischemic attack (TIA). In response to heterogeneous TIA management observed in our area, we developed a structured pathway, in accordance with current guidelines and adapted to local resources. We aim to assess the effect of local implementation of this care pathway on TIA management in emergency departments (EDs) in the Rhône area (France). PATIENTS AND METHODS: EDs of 5 centers that had a minimum of 30 TIA/year in Lyon and Bourgoin-Jallieu participated. The first 30 consecutive patients who had a TIA as main diagnosis admitted to one of these EDs from January 1 to December 31, 2013 and from January 1 to December 31, 2016, that is, before-and-after care pathway implementation, respectively, were retrospectively included in the study. The primary outcome was the adequate management of TIA defined as having had appropriate workup and antithrombotic treatment within 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included in 2013 and 150 in 2016. There was a significant increase of complete (intracrania and extracranial) vessel imaging from 2013 to 2016 (n=42, 29.8% in 2013 vs. n=118, 78.7% in 2016; P<0.001). Computed tomography angiography was more often performed to assess intracranial and/or extracranial vessel imaging in 2016 compared with 2013 (n=54, 34.8% in 2013 vs. n=116, 77.3% in 2016; P<0.001). Overall, the rate of patients receiving adequate management significantly increased from 2013 to 2016 (n=36, 25.5% in 2013 vs. n=101, 67.3% in 2016; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a local care pathway, in accordance with current guidelines and adapted to local resources, improved TIA management in EDs, mostly by increasing the rate of vessel imaging by computed tomography angiography.

Experience feedback committees: A way of implementing a root cause analysis practice in hospital medical departments.

BACKGROUND: The experience feedback committee (EFC) is a tool designed to involve medical teams in patient safety management, through root cause analysis (RCA) within the team. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the functioning of EFCs in the departments of a large university-affiliated hospital in France and to consider its potential contribution to the management of patient safety. METHODS: Cross-sectional, observational study, based on an analysis of the documents produced by the EFCs for 1 year. Data were collected independently by two investigators in meeting minutes, adverse event reports and event analysis reports. RESULTS: The study included all 20 EFCs operating in the hospital's medical departments. During the study year, committees held 164 meetings, reviewed 1707 adverse events, conducted 91 event analyses and decided on 206 corrective actions. The median number of corrective actions adopted by each EFC was five actions (range, 0-62). A root cause analysis (RCA) was present in 76% of the analysis reports, and these analyses were complete in only 23% of the reports. There was also a lack of planning corrective actions: an implementation deadline was only defined in 26% of the actions. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals adhered to the system-based approach to patient safety, but we observed difficulties in holding regular meetings and deviations from the theoretical framework. These findings confirm the difficulties of practicing RCA in the healthcare setting. Nevertheless, EFCs can be vectors of safety culture and teamwork.

Electronic Medication Regimen Complexity Index at admission and complications during hospitalization in medical wards: a tool to improve quality of care?

OBJECTIVE: Adverse events during hospitalization are a major worry considering their frequency and their burden. Many could be avoided by immediate identification of at-risk patients at admission and adapted prevention. The complexity of a patient's medication regimen immediately available at admission is a good indicator of the complexity of the patient's condition. This study aims to determine whether the electronic Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) at admission is associated with complications during hospitalization. DESIGN: We performed a multilevel logistic regression model, adjusted for age and sex. SETTING: Premier Perspective™ database, a clinical and financial information system from 417 US hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adults hospitalized for more than 3 days in a medical ward and included in Premier's Perspective™ database for 2006. INTERVENTION(S): Multilevel logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Association of the MRCI and complications during hospitalization, defined as in-hospital death, hospital-acquired infection, pressure ulcers; and need for highly technical healthcare, identified as the secondary introduction of catecholamines. RESULTS: In total, 1 592 383 admissions were included. The median MRCI at admission was 13 [interquartile range: 9-19]. The higher the MRCI, the higher the adjusted odds ratio of the following: in-hospital mortality, hospital-acquired infections, pressure ulcers and the secondary introduction of catecholamines. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the MRCI at admission was correlated with patient complexity, independent of age. Considering that patients with complex conditions pose a heavier workload for staff, measuring MRCI at admission could be used to allocate resources in medical wards at an institutional level. The MRCI might be a useful tool to assess the management of care.

Assessment of the contribution of morbidity and mortality conferences to quality and safety improvement: a survey of participants' perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of the morbidity and mortality conferences in improving patient safety is lacking. The aim of this survey was to assess the opinion of participants concerning the benefits and the functioning of morbidity and mortality conferences, according to their organizational characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a survey of professionals involved in a morbidity and mortality conference using a self-administered questionnaire in three French teaching hospitals in 2012. The questionnaire focused on the functioning of morbidity and mortality conferences, the perceived benefits, the motivations of participants, and how morbidity and mortality conferences could be improved. The perception of participants was analysed according to the characteristics of morbidity and mortality conferences. RESULTS: A total of 698 participants in 54 morbidity and mortality conferences completed the questionnaire. Most of them (91 %) were satisfied with how the morbidity and mortality conference they attended was conducted. The improvements in healthcare quality and patient safety were the main benefits perceived by participants. Effectiveness in improving safety was mainly perceived when cases were thoroughly analysed (adjusted odds ratio [a0R] =2.31 [1.14-4.66]). The existence of a written charter (p = 0.05), the use of a standardized case presentation (p = 0.049), and prior dissemination of the meeting agenda (p = 0.02) were also associated with the perception of morbidity and mortality conference effectiveness. The development and achievement of improvement initiatives were associated with morbidity and mortality conferences perceived as being more effective (p < 0.01). Participants suggested improving the attendance of medical and paramedical professionals to enhance the effectiveness of morbidity and mortality conferences. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality conferences were positively perceived. These results suggest that a structured framework and thoroughly analyzing cases improve their effectiveness.

Experience feedback committee in emergency medicine: a tool for security management.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments are high-risk structures. The objective was to analyse the functioning of an experience feedback committee (EFC), a security management tool for the analysis of incidents in a medical department. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study based on the analysis of the written documents produced by the EFC between November 2009 and May 2012. We performed a double analysis of all incident reports, meeting minutes and analysis reports. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 22 meetings attended by 15 professionals. 471 reported incidents were transmitted to the EFC. Most of them (95%) had no consequence for the patients. Only one reported incident led to the patient's death. 12 incidents were analysed thoroughly and the committee decided to set up 14 corrective actions, including eight guideline writing actions, two staff trainings, two resource materials provisions and two organisational changes. CONCLUSIONS: The staff took part actively in the EFC. Following the analysis of incidents, the EFC was able to set up actions at the departmental level. Thus, an EFC seems to be an appropriate security management tool for an emergency department.