RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Well-established clinical practice to assess progress in labor involves routine abdominal palpation and vaginal examination (VE). However, VE is subjective, poorly reproducible and painful for women. In this study, our aim is to evaluate the feasibility of systematically integrating transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal position, psAOP, HPD and SCD to monitor labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor (IOL). We also aim at determining if ultrasound can reduce women's pain during examinations. METHODS: Women were recruited as they presented for IOL in three maternity units. Ultrasound assessments were performed in 100 women between 37+0 and 41+6 weeks' gestation. A baseline combined transabdominal and transperineal scan was performed, including the assessment of fetal biometry, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery Dopplers, amniotic fluid index (AFI), fetal spine and occiput positions, psAOP, HPD, SCD, and cervical length. Intrapartum scans were performed instead of VEs according to protocol. Participants were asked to indicate their level of pain by verbally giving a pain score from 0 - 10 (with 0 representing no pain) during assessment. The repeated measures data were analyzed by mixed effect models to identify the significant factors that affected the relationship between psAOP, HPD, SCD and mode of delivery. RESULTS: 223 intrapartum ultrasound scans with a median of 2 scans per participant (interquartile range (IQR) = 1 - 3), and 151 VEs were performed with a median of 1 per participant (IQR = 0 - 2). There were no adverse fetal or maternal outcomes. After excluding those with epidural anesthesia during examination, median pain score for intrapartum scan was 0 (IQR = 0 - 1) and 3 for VE (IQR = 0 - 6). Cesarean delivery and epidural anesthesia were significantly associated with slower rate of change in psAOP, HPD and SCD. Maternal height, parity and neonatal birth weight did not affect ultrasound measurements of labor progress. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment can be successfully used to assess progress in labor and can reduce the level of pain experienced during examination. Ultrasound assessment may be able to replace some transabdominal and VE examinations during labor. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether maternal serum glycosylated fibronectin (GlyFn) level in the first trimester increases the sensitivity of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) triple test, which incorporates mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and placental growth factor, when screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) in an Asian population. METHODS: This was a nested case-control study of Chinese women with a singleton pregnancy who were screened for PE at 11-13 weeks' gestation as part of a non-intervention study between December 2016 and June 2018. GlyFn levels were measured retrospectively in archived serum from 1685 pregnancies, including 101 with PE, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and from 448 pregnancies, including 101 with PE, using a point-of-care (POC) device. Concordance between ELISA and POC tests was assessed using Lin's correlation coefficient and Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analyses. GlyFn was transformed into multiples of the median (MoM) to adjust for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. GlyFn MoM was compared between PE and non-PE pregnancies, and the association between GlyFn MoM and gestational age at delivery with PE was assessed. Risk for developing PE was estimated using the FMF competing-risks model. Screening performance for preterm and any-onset PE using different biomarker combinations was quantified by area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and detection rate (DR) at a 10% fixed false-positive rate (FPR). Differences in AUC between biomarker combinations were compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: The concordance correlation coefficient between ELISA and POC measurements was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.88). Passing-Bablok analysis indicated proportional bias (slope, 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.14)), with POC GlyFn being significantly higher compared with ELISA GlyFn. ELISA GlyFn in non-PE pregnancies was independent of gestational age at screening (P = 0.11), but significantly dependent on maternal age (P < 0.003), weight (P < 0.0002), height (P = 0.001), parity (P < 0.02) and smoking status (P = 0.002). Compared with non-PE pregnancies, median GlyFn MoM using ELISA and POC testing was elevated significantly in those with preterm PE (1.23 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001 and 1.18 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001, respectively) and those with term PE (1.26 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001 and 1.22 vs 1.00; P < 0.0001, respectively). GlyFn MoM was not correlated with gestational age at delivery with PE (P = 0.989). Adding GlyFn to the FMF triple test for preterm PE increased significantly the AUC from 0.859 to 0.896 (P = 0.012) and increased the DR at 10% FPR from 64.9% (95% CI, 48.7-81.1%) to 82.9% (95% CI, 66.4-93.4%). The corresponding DRs at 10% FPR for any-onset PE were 52.5% (95% CI, 42.3-62.5%) and 65.4% (95% CI, 55.2-74.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adding GlyFn to the FMF triple test increased the screening sensitivity for both preterm and any-onset PE in an Asian population. Prospective non-intervention studies are needed to confirm these initial findings. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.