Association of obstructive sleep apnea and diurnal variation of cystatin C.

PURPOSE: Obstructive sleep apnea is a known risk factor for the progression of chronic kidney disease. To find early signs of the progression in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea., we assessed the diurnal variation of kidney biomarkers. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, South Korea. All participants underwent in-laboratory polysomnography and phlebotomy in the evening before the polysomnography and in the morning after the polysomnography. Kidney biomarkers, including serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and serum cystatin C, were measured. Delta kidney biomarkers were calculated by subtracting the evening level of the biomarkers from the morning level. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 50 participants had severe obstructive sleep apnea. Delta cystatin C was significantly correlated with apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and total arousal index with coefficients of -0.314, -0.323, and -0.289, respectively. In participants without severe obstructive sleep apnea, the morning cystatin C level (0.84 ± 0.11 mg/L) was significantly higher than the evening cystatin C level (0.81 ± 0.11 mg/L) (P = 0.005). With severe obstructive sleep apnea, the cystatin C levels were not different between the morning (0.85 ± 0.11 mg/L) and the evening (0.85 ± 0.10 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C level was increased in the morning in participants without severe obstructive sleep apnea, but not in participants with severe obstructive sleep apnea.

Removal of Uremic Solutes from Dialysate by Activated Carbon.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Adsorption of uremic solutes to activated carbon provides a potential means to limit dialysate volumes required for new dialysis systems. The ability of activated carbon to take up uremic solutes has, however, not been adequately assessed. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Graded volumes of waste dialysate collected from clinical hemodialysis treatments were passed through activated carbon blocks. Metabolomic analysis assessed the adsorption by activated carbon of a wide range of uremic solutes. Additional experiments tested the ability of the activated carbon to increase the clearance of selected solutes at low dialysate flow rates. RESULTS: Activated carbon initially adsorbed the majority, but not all, of 264 uremic solutes examined. Solute adsorption fell, however, as increasing volumes of dialysate were processed. Moreover, activated carbon added some uremic solutes to the dialysate, including methylguanidine. Activated carbon was particularly effective in adsorbing uremic solutes that bind to plasma proteins. In vitro dialysis experiments showed that introduction of activated carbon into the dialysate stream increased the clearance of the protein-bound solutes indoxyl sulfate and p-cresol sulfate by 77%±12% (mean±SD) and 73%±12%, respectively, at a dialysate flow rate of 200 ml/min, but had a much lesser effect on the clearance of the unbound solute phenylacetylglutamine. CONCLUSIONS: Activated carbon adsorbs many but not all uremic solutes. Introduction of activated carbon into the dialysate stream increased the clearance of those solutes that it does adsorb.

Improving Solute Clearances by Hemodialysis.

The adequacy of hemodialysis is now assessed by measuring the removal of the single-solute urea. The urea clearance provided by contemporary dialysis is a large fraction of the blood flow through the dialyzer and therefore cannot be increased much further. Other solutes however likely contribute more than urea to the residual uremic illness suffered by hemodialysis patients. We here review methods which could be employed to increase the clearance of nonurea solutes. We will separately consider the clearances of free low-molecular-mass solutes, free larger solutes, and protein-bound solutes. New clinical studies will be required to test the extent to which increasing the clearance on nonurea solutes with these various characteristics can improve patients' health.

Impaired Tubular Secretion of Organic Solutes in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The clearance of solutes removed by tubular secretion may be altered out of proportion to the GFR in CKD. Recent studies have described considerable variability in the secretory clearance of waste solutes relative to the GFR in patients with CKD. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that secretory clearance relative to GFR is reduced in patients approaching dialysis, we used metabolomic analysis to identify solutes in simultaneous urine and plasma samples from 16 patients with CKD and an eGFR of 7±2 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and 16 control participants. Fractional clearances were calculated as the ratios of urine to plasma levels of each solute relative to those of creatinine and urea in patients with CKD and to those of creatinine in controls. RESULTS: Metabolomic analysis identified 39 secreted solutes with fractional clearance >3.0 in control participants. Fractional clearance values in patients with CKD were reduced on average to 65%±27% of those in controls. These values were significantly lower for 18 of 39 individual solutes and significantly higher for only one. Assays of the secreted anions phenylacetyl glutamine, p-cresol sulfate, indoxyl sulfate, and hippurate confirmed variable impairment of secretory clearances in advanced CKD. Fractional clearances were markedly reduced for phenylacetylglutamine (4.2±0.6 for controls versus 2.3±0.6 for patients with CKD; P<0.001), p-cresol sulfate (8.6±2.6 for controls versus 4.1±1.5 for patients with CKD; P<0.001), and indoxyl sulfate (23.0±7.3 versus 7.5±2.8; P<0.001) but not for hippurate (10.2±3.8 versus 8.4±2.6; P=0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Secretory clearances for many solutes are reduced more than the GFR in advanced CKD. Impaired secretion of these solutes might contribute to uremic symptoms as patients approach dialysis.

Improving Clearance for Renal Replacement Therapy.

The adequacy of hemodialysis is now assessed by measuring the removal of a single solute, urea. The urea clearance provided by current dialysis methods is a large fraction of the blood flow through the dialyzer, and, therefore, cannot be increased much further. However, other solutes, which are less effectively cleared than urea, may contribute more to the residual uremic illness suffered by patients on hemodialysis. Here, we review a variety of methods that could be used to increase the clearance of such nonurea solutes. New clinical studies will be required to test the extent to which increasing solute clearances improves patients' health.