Accumulative Assessment of Upper Extremity.

OBJECTIVE: The Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE) is a measure for assessing upper extremity motor function in patients with stroke. However, the considerable administration time of the assessment decreases its feasibility. This study aimed to develop an accumulative assessment system of upper extremity motor function (AAS-UE) based on the FMA-UE to improve administrative efficiency while retaining sufficient psychometric properties. METHODS: The study used secondary data from 3 previous studies having FMA-UE datasets, including 2 follow-up studies for subacute stroke individuals and 1 test-retest study for individuals with chronic stroke. The AAS-UE adopted deep learning algorithms to use patients' prior information (ie, the FMA-UE scores in previous assessments, time interval of adjacent assessments, and chronicity of stroke) to select a short and personalized item set for the following assessment items and reproduce their FMA-UE scores. RESULTS: Our data included a total of 682 patients after stroke. The AAS-UE administered 10 different items for each patient. The AAS-UE demonstrated good concurrent validity (r = 0.97-0.99 with the FMA-UE), high test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.96), low random measurement error (percentage of minimal detectable change = 15.6%), good group-level responsiveness (standardized response mean = 0.65-1.07), and good individual-level responsiveness (30.5%-53.2% of patients showed significant improvement). These psychometric properties were comparable to those of the FMA-UE. CONCLUSION: The AAS-UE uses an innovative assessment method which makes good use of patients' prior information to achieve administrative efficiency with good psychometric properties. IMPACT: This study demonstrates a new assessment method to improve administrative efficiency while retaining psychometric properties, especially individual-level responsiveness and random measurement error, by making good use of patients' basic information and medical records.

Examining the effects of binaural beat music on sleep quality, heart rate variability, and depression in older people with poor sleep quality in a long-term care institution: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effects of binaural beat music (BBM) on sleep quality, heart rate variability, and depression in older people with poor sleep quality in a long-term care institution. METHODS: A single-blind randomized controlled trial design was employed, and 64 older participants with poor sleep quality were recruited from a long-term care institution in Taiwan. Participants were randomized into the BBM group or control group and received 14 days of intervention. During the intervention period, participants in the experimental group listened to 20 min of Taiwanese Hokkien oldies embedded with BBM once in the morning and afternoon three times a week. Participants in the control group only listened to Taiwanese Hokkien oldies. Questionnaires and heart rate variability analysis were used to assess participants' sleep quality, heart rate variability, and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in sleep quality, along with an increase in heart rate variability means of heart rate and normal sinus beats, and a decrease in low-frequency normalized units and depression severity in the BBM group after the intervention. In the control group, effects on sleep quality were inconsistent, heart rate variability showed significant improvements in some autonomic nervous function regulation, and depression severity was significantly decreased. Furthermore, the BBM group showed a significant improvement in sleep quality and a significant reduction in sympathetic nervous activity compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that 14 days of BBM intervention, a non-invasive intervention, could improve sleep quality and depression in older people with poor sleep quality in long-term care institutions. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 297-304.

Psychometric validation of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument using Rasch analysis in people with dementia.

This study aimed to examine unidimensionality of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) using Rasch analysis and estimate Rasch person reliability in people with dementia. CASI data of people with dementia was collected from medical records of one general hospital in northern Taiwan. A total of 506 people with dementia were recruited from the Department of Neurology. The confirmatory factor analysis was first conducted to verify the fitness of one-factor model of the CASI. Unidimensionality was confirmed through 2 assumptions: the infit and outfit mean square were 0.5 to 1.5, and residual variance of the first principal component in principal component analysis was ≤20%. Rasch person reliability was estimated after undimensionality was supported. The results of one-factor model had shown that the Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Means Square Error of Approximation = 0.015, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual = 0.067, representing a good fit to the model. Both the infit and outfit mean square were ranged 0.87 to 1.37 and 0.86 to 1.42, respectively, and low residual variance of the first principal component (12.3%). Rasch person reliability result of 0.58 was satisfactory. The person-item map indicated the difference between item difficulty and person ability was within the acceptable limits (0.22 logits). Differential Item Function was found between -0.48 to 0.44 logits for gender, indicating the CASI functioned similarly for both genders. The 46 items of the CASI showed a unidimensional construct. The CASI had been demonstrated as a valid and reliable screening tool for assessing overall cognitive function in people with dementia, capturing their cognitive functions effectively.

Examining the Predictors of Turnover Behavior in Newly Employed Certified Nurse Aides: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: The turnover rate of nurse aides in Taiwan is high. However, the predictors of turnover behavior in the newly employed are still unclear. Objective: To examine the predictors of turnover behavior in newly employed licensed nurse aides. Methods: A longitudinal study design was used and subjects were newly employed certified nurse aides from a nurse aid training association in Taiwan. A total of five questionnaire surveys were conducted. The questionnaire was mainly used to collect information on turnover behavior, personal socioeconomic background, workplace psychosocial hazards, worker health hazards, and musculoskeletal disorders. Results: A total of 300 participants were recruited in the study. Cox regression analysis results showed that short working experience (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.21, p < 0.01), work as non-home nurse aides (HR = 0.58, p = 0.01), low monthly salary (HR = 0.68, p < 0.01), high work mental load (HR = 1.01, p = 0.01), low workplace justice (HR = 0.97, p < 0.01), high workplace violence (HR = 1.60, p < 0.01), high burnout (HR = 1.01, p = 0.04), poor mental health (HR = 1.06, p = 0.04), and high total number of musculoskeletal disorder sites (HR = 1.08, p = 0.01) contribute to a higher risk of turnover. Conclusion: The results indicated that employment period, work as a home nurse aide, monthly salary, work mental load, workplace justice, workplace violence, work-related burnout, mental health, and total number of musculoskeletal disorder sites are predictors of turnover behavior in newly employed certified nurse aides.

Investigating the effectiveness of online interactive courses on loneliness and quality of life of older adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study and a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic was a critical time for increasing loneliness, especially for older people. However, there is insufficient existing research on associated interventions and their effectiveness. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an 8-week online interactive course on the loneliness, depression, social support, and quality of life (QOL) of older adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted to collect data from a community in Taiwan. Eighty-nine participants recruited from long-term care institutions were randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 44) and a control group (n = 45). Participants in the experimental group received an 8-week (Monday to Friday) intensive online interactive course, whereas those in the control group watched 8 weeks (Monday to Friday) of unidirectional online video programs. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the UCLA Loneliness Scale and in both the psychological health and social relationship domains of the WHO Quality of Life-BREF Scale. In other words, compared with those in the control group, participants in the experimental group experienced more significant improvements in the state of their loneliness as well as QOL in the psychological health and social relationship domains (without the physical health/environment domains) after taking the online interactive course. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the 8-week online interactive course could effectively improve the loneliness, the psychological health domain, and the social relationship domain of the QOL of the older adults of a particular community during the ongoing pandemic. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 91-97.

Factors influencing loneliness among older people using homecare services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Elderly homecare service users may reduce their level of social participation and interpersonal interactions due to physiological loss, which may lead to loneliness and depression over the years. However, there is a lack of research on loneliness among older people who use homecare services. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing loneliness among older people using homecare services. METHODS: This is a longitudinal study conducted in communities in Central Taiwan, and data were collected using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was first administered as a pre-test to obtain baseline information about the participants, and the same questionnaire was administered as a post-test after 6 months to follow-up. The pre- and post-test questionnaires included five sections, that is, participant demographics, Brief Symptom Rating Scale, Interpersonal Interaction Scale (IIS), Frenchay Activities Index, and UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA). RESULTS: A total of 178 participants were recruited in this study. Results indicated that gender, whether participants eat alone or with others at dinner, social media use, perceived economic status, and IIS score were significantly correlated with the loneliness score on the UCLA. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the loneliness score among male participants in the low loneliness group from baseline to 6 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Gender, presence of others at dinner, social media use, perceived economic status, and interpersonal interaction skills are significant factors that influence loneliness among older people using homecare services. Men tend to experience higher levels of loneliness over time.

Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with stroke.

PURPOSE: To compare the group- and individual-level responsiveness of the Barthel Index (BI) and modified BI (MBI) in patients with early subacute stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The BI and MBI scores of 63, 63, and 55 patients were retrieved at 3 time points with a 3-weeks interval. The group-level responsiveness was examined using paired t-test and standardized response mean (SRM). The individual-level responsiveness was examined by the percentage of patients who achieved significant improvement exceeding the corresponding minimal detectable change. RESULTS: At the group level, the MBI showed significantly larger SRMs than did the BI in the 1st-2nd assessment (1.10 vs. 0.81 [95% CI of mean difference = 0.05-0.38]) and the 2nd-3rd assessment (0.94 vs. 0.72 [95% CI of mean difference = 0.04-0.41]). At the individual level, the MBI detected significantly more patients with significant improvement than the BI for the 1st-2nd assessments only (34.9 vs. 25.4% [95% CI of mean differences = 3.2-17.5]). CONCLUSIONS: The MBI has better responsiveness than the BI at both the group and individual levels in the patients with early subacute stroke. The MBI is recommended for clinical and research use as an outcome measure for patients with stroke.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe MBI is recommended for clinical and research applications because of its superior ability to detect subtle changes in ADL performance in patients with subacute stroke.The MBI and the BI have equal responsiveness for patients whose magnitude of improvement of ADL is substantial.

Development of a Berg Balance Scale Short-Form Using a Machine Learning Approach in Patients With Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is frequently used in routine clinical care and research settings and has good psychometric properties. This study was conducted to develop a short form of the BBS using a machine learning approach (BBS-ML). METHODS: Data of 408 individuals poststroke were extracted from a published database. The initial (ie, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, and 8-item) versions were constructed by selecting top-ranked items based on the feature selection algorithm in the artificial neural network model. The final version of the BBS-ML was chosen by selecting the short form that used a smaller number of items to achieve a higher predictive power R2 , a lower 95% limit of agreement (LoA), and an adequate possible scoring point (PSP). An independent sample of 226 persons with stroke was used for external validation. RESULTS: The R2 values for the initial 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, and 8-item short forms were 0.93, 0.95, 0.97, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively. The 95% LoAs were 14.2, 12.2, 9.7, 9.6, and 8.9, respectively. The PSPs were 25, 35, 34, 35, and 36, respectively. The 6-item version was selected as the final BBS-ML. Preliminary external validation supported its performance in an independent sample of persons with stroke ( R2 = 0.99, LoA = 10.6, PSP = 37). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The BBS-ML seems to be a promising short-form alternative to improve administrative efficiency. Future research is needed to examine the psychometric properties and clinical usage of the 6-item BBS-ML in various settings and samples.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A402 ).

Development of a Short-Form Stroke Impact Scale Using a Machine Learning Algorithm for Patients at the Subacute Stage.

IMPORTANCE: Several short forms of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SIS 3.0) have been proposed in order to decrease its administration time of about 20 min. However, none of the short-form scores are comparable to those of the original measure. OBJECTIVE: To develop a short-form SIS 3.0 using a machine learning algorithm (ML-SIS). DESIGN: We developed the ML-SIS in three stages. First, we calculated the frequencies of items having the highest contribution to predicting the original domain scores across 50 deep neural networks. Second, we iteratively selected the items showing the highest frequency until the coefficient of determination (R2) of each domain was ≥.90. Third, we examined the comparability and concurrent and convergent validity of the ML-SIS. SETTING: Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: We extracted complete data for 1,010 patients from an existing data set. RESULTS: Twenty-eight items were selected for the ML-SIS. High average R2s (.90-.96) and small average residuals (mean absolute errors and root-mean-square errors = 0.49-2.84) indicate good comparability. High correlations (rs = .95-.98) between the eight domain scores of the ML-SIS and the SIS 3.0 indicate sufficient concurrent validity. Similar interdomain correlations between the two measures indicate satisfactory convergent validity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The ML-SIS uses about half of the items in the SIS 3.0, has an estimated administration time of 10 min, and provides valid scores comparable to those of the original measure. Thus, the ML-SIS may be an efficient alternative to the SIS 3.0. What This Article Adds: The ML-SIS, a short form of the SIS 3.0 developed using a machine learning algorithm, shows good potential to be an efficient and informative measure for clinical settings, providing scores that are valid and comparable to those of the original measure.

Development of a Rasch-Calibrated Test for Assessing Implied Meaning in Patients With Schizophrenia.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with schizophrenia tend to have severe deficits in theory of mind, which may limit their interpretation of others' behaviors and thereby hamper social participation. Commonly used measures of theory of mind assess the ability to understand various social situations (e.g., implied meaning or hinting, faux pas), but these measures do not yield valid, reliable, and gender unbiased results to inform interventions for managing theory-of-mind deficits. We used understanding of implied meaning, which appears to be a unidimensional construct highly correlated with social competence, as a promising starting point to develop a theory-of-mind assessment. OBJECTIVE: To develop a Rasch-calibrated computerized test of implied meaning. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Psychiatric hospitals and community. PARTICIPANTS: 344 participants (240 patients with schizophrenia and 104 healthy adults). RESULTS: We initially developed 27 items for the Computerized Implied Meaning Test. After inappropriate items (12 misfit items and 1 gender-biased item) were removed, the remaining 14 items showed acceptable model fit to the Rasch model (infit = 0.84-1.16; outfit = 0.65-1.34) and the one-factor model (comparative fit index = .91, standardized root mean square residual = .05, root-mean-square error of approximation = .08). Most patients (81.7%) achieved individual Rasch reliability of ≥.90. Healthy participants performed significantly better on the test than patients with schizophrenia (Cohen's d = 2.5, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our preliminary findings suggest that the Computerized Implied Meaning Test may provide reliable, valid, and gender-unbiased results for patients with schizophrenia. What This Article Adds: We developed a new measure for assessing theory-of-mind ability in patients with schizophrenia that consists of items targeting the understanding of implied meaning. Preliminary findings suggest that the Computerized Implied Meaning Test is reliable, valid, and gender unbiased and may be used in evaluating patients' theory-of-mind deficits and relevant factors.

Does Smartphone Addiction, Social Media Addiction, and/or Internet Game Addiction Affect Adolescents' Interpersonal Interactions?

The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlations that levels of addiction to smartphones, social media, and online games have with levels of real-life and online interpersonal interactions among adolescents. In this cross-sectional study of adolescents in a college in Taiwan, structured questionnaire surveys were used to collect information. The questionnaire included the following: demographic background, Real Interpersonal Interaction Scale (RIIS), Internet Interpersonal Interaction Scale (IIIS), Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS), Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), and Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS9-SF). Multiple regression analyses were carried out to investigate the correlations between SABAS, BSMAS, IGDS9-SF, and RIIS/IIIS. We recruited 998 students (413 boys). The average age was 17.18 ± 1.46. The study results show that adolescents with higher levels of addiction to smartphones and social media may have greater interpersonal interaction with friends in real life, but adolescents with high levels of addiction to online games may have less interpersonal interactions with friends in real life. Adolescents with high levels of addiction to smartphones, social media, and online games may have greater interpersonal interactions with friends online.

Practice effect and test-retest reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 in people with dementia.

BACKGROUND: The Mini-Mental State Examination-Second Edition (MMSE-2) consists of three visions: a brief version (MMSE-2:BV), a standard version (MMSE-2:SV), and an expanded version (MMSE-2: EV). Each version was equipped with alternate forms (blue and red). There was a lack of evidence on the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the three versions of the MMSE-2, limiting its utility in both clinical and research settings. The purpose of this study was to examine the practice effect and test-retest reliability of the MMSE-2 in people with dementia. METHODS: One hundred and twenty participants were enrolled, of which 60 were administered with the blue form twice (i.e., the same-form group, [SF group]) and 60 were administered with the blue form first and then the red form (alternate-form group, [AF group]). The practice effect was evaluated using a paired t-test and Cohen's d. The test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For the practice effects, in the SF group, no statistically significant differences were found for the MMSE-2:BV and MMSE-2: EV total scores and eight subtests (p = 0.061-1.000), except for the MMSE-2:SV total score (p = 0.029). In the AF group, no statistically significant differences were found for all three versions of the total scores and subtests (p = 0.106-1.000), except for the visual-constructional ability subtest (p = 0.010). Cohen's d of all three versions' total scores and subtests were 0.00-0.20 and 0.00-0.26 for SF group and AF group, respectively. For the test-retest reliability, ICC values for all three versions and eight subtests in SF and AF groups were 0.60-0.93 and 0.56-0.93, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that the practice effect could be minimized when alternate forms of the MMSE-2 were used. The MMSE-2 had good to excellent test-retest reliability, except for three subtests (i.e., visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall). Caution should be taken when interpreting the results of visual-constructional ability, registration, and recall subtests of the MMSE-2.

Improving the utility of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: a computerized adaptive test for patients with stroke.

PURPOSE: Health literacy among patients is crucial for effective stroke management. The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire is a theory-based measure that comprehensively captures 12 domains of health literacy. We aimed to develop a computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire to efficiently assess health literacy among patients with stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire data of 311 patients and item parameters were retrieved from a Rasch validation study. Real data simulations were performed to develop a computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire and explore its efficiency and reliability. RESULTS: The computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire displayed suitable reliability in all 12 domains (0.72-0.84) with a mean test length of 17 items (36.2% of the 47-item European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire, which assesses 12 domains of health literacy among patients with stroke in a timely and precise fashion, is efficient and reliable.Implications for rehabilitationThe computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire assesses the subjective fit of personal health literacy competencies to environmental demands, providing insight into patient strengths and weaknesses when dealing with health tasks and interacting with health systems.The computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire assesses the 12 domains of health literacy among patients with stroke in a timely and precise manner.Our study has demonstrated the utility of the computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in reducing the assessment burden of patients in clinical practice.Developing of the computerized adaptive test of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire provided findings that may benefit researchers and clinicians interested in developing efficient outcome measures.

A comparison of test-retest reliability of four cognitive screening tools in people with dementia.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the Saint Louis University Status Examination (SLUMS) in a single sample of people with dementia. METHODS: Sixty people with dementia were assessed twice two weeks apart, and the test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for four screening tools. The MDC95 value was calculated based on the standard error of measurement to estimate the random measurement error. RESULTS: The ICC values for screening tools were 0.86-0.90. The MDC95 values (MDC95%) were 5.0 (17.2%), 2.74 (27%), 4.71(20%), and 6.26 (24%) for the MMSE, SPMSQ, MoCA, and SLUMS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the four screening tools were similar in test-retest reliability which imply that the MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS were reliable in monitoring cognitive function in people with dementia. The results of the direct comparisons of test-retest reliability of the four screening tools provide useful information for both clinicians and researchers to select an appropriate cognitive screening tool.Implications for RehabilitationThe MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS are equally reliable and thus they could be used to monitor the cognitive function in people with dementia.The MDC values are useful in determining whether a real change has occurred between repeated assessments for people with dementia.

Association between work content and musculoskeletal disorders among home caregivers: a cross-section study.

In Taiwan, over 80% of home caregivers have experienced musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in the past year. Although MSDs in health care workers have been discussed in existing literature (e.g., in nursing staff), there is limited understanding of the association between MSD and the work content of home caregivers. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the work content and MSD of home caregivers. This cross-sectional study was conducted in long-term care units in central Taiwan. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data, including basic information, work content survey, and information from the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between work content and MSD. A total of 149 home caregivers with a mean age of approximately 50.97 ± 9.80 years were recruited for the study. The frequency of transfer of toilet and wheelchair was significantly associated with shoulder discomfort, upper back discomfort, and wrists/hands discomfort. In addition, the frequency of passive range of motion exercise was significantly associated with elbows discomfort. The results of this study indicated that the highest risk factor for MSD was transfer of toilet and wheelchair followed by passive range of motion exercise.

Reliability of the performance-based measure of executive functions in people with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The Performance-based measure of Executive Functions (PEF) with four domains is designed to assess executive functions in people with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the PEF administered by the same rater (intra-rater agreement) and by different raters (inter-rater agreement) in people with schizophrenia and to estimate the values of minimal detectable change (MDC) and MDC%. METHODS: Two convenience samples (each sample, n = 60) with schizophrenia were conducted two assessments (two weeks apart). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was analyzed to examine intra-rater and inter-rater agreements of the test-retest reliability of the PEF. The MDC was calculated through standard error of measurement. RESULTS: For the intra-rater agreement study, the ICC values of the four domains were 0.88-0.92. The MDC (MDC%) of the four domains (volition, planning, purposive action, and perfromance effective) were 13.0 (13.0%), 12.2 (16.4%), 16.2 (16.2%), and 16.3 (18.8%), respectively. For the inter-rater agreement study, the ICC values of the four domains were 0.82-0.89. The MDC (MDC%) were 15.8 (15.8%), 17.4 (20.0%), 20.9 (20.9%), and 18.6 (18.6%) for the volition, planning, purposive action, and performance effective domains, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PEF has good test-retest reliability, including intra-rater and inter-rater agreements, for people with schizophrenia. Clinicians and researchers can use the MDC values to verify whether an individual with schizophrenia shows any real change (improvement or deterioration) between repeated PEF assessments by the same or different raters.

Measurement Equivalence between the Original and Estimated Mini-Mental State Examination in People with Dementia.

BACKGROUND: The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) is increasingly used to assess general cognitive function in people with dementia. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score can be converted from the CASI (i.e., the estimated MMSE). Recognizing that measurement equivalence is critical to meaningfully representing one with the other, we aimed to determine whether the estimated MMSE score obtained from the CASI was equivalent to the original MMSE in people with dementia. METHODS: We obtained 110 data points for the MMSE and CASI scores in people with dementia. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson's r, percent of standard error of measurement (SEM%), paired t-test, and effect size (Cohen's d) were used to investigate the equivalence. RESULTS: To examine the equivalence between the original and estimated MMSE score, the ICC and Pearson's r of the total score and six domains were 0.62-0.95 and 0.62-0.96, respectively. The SEM% of the total score and six domains were 0.6-8.9%. The paired t-test results showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the total score and the three domains. The Cohen's d of the total score and six domains were 0.06-0.27. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated MMSE score was found to have moderate to excellent equivalence to the original MMSE score. The three domains (i.e., registration, attention and calculation, and visual-constructional ability) with moderate equivalence should be used cautiously to interchange with the original MMSE in people with dementia.

Nutritional status as a predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function and quality of life in patients with stroke.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional status could affect functional capacity and reduce quality of life in patients with stroke. Although the associations between nutritional status, basic activities of daily living (BADL)/Instrumental ADL, and quality of life (QOL) in older people have been identified, the relationships have not yet been examined in patients with stroke, using the full Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) or MNA-short form (MNA-SF). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the relationship between nutritional status (using full MNA and MNA-SF), comprehensive ADL function, and QOL in patients with stroke. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with ischemic stroke participated in this cross-sectional design study. Each participant was assessed with the full MNA, MNA-SF, comprehensive ADL function (including Barthel Index and Frenchay Activities Index), and WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) once. RESULTS: The MNA-SF was only significantly correlated with the comprehensive ADL function (rho = 0.27, p = 0.013), whereas, the full MNA was found to be significantly correlated with the comprehensive ADL function and WHOQOL-BREF (rho = 0.24, p = 0.029 and rho = 0.30, p = 0.005, respectively). The MNA-SF was a significant predictor of comprehensive ADL function, accounting for 44% of the variance. The full MNA was the only significant predictor of the WHOQOL-BREF, explaining 17% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed a relationship between nutritional status, comprehensive ADL function, and QOL among patients with stroke. Patients with stroke with better nutritional status had higher ADL function as well as better QOL. The MNA-SF was useful in predicting comprehensive ADL, whereas, the full MNA could be used to predict QOL. Knowledge and evidence of the association and predictive power of the MNA-SF and full MNA could guide clinicians to choose tools for assessing the nutritional status of patients with stroke more effectively.

Factors associated with anxiety and quality of life of the Wuhan populace during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In December 2019, COVID-19 broke out in Wuhan, China, affecting the mental health and quality of life (QoL) of its inhabitants. This study aimed at investigating the factors associated with anxiety and QoL in the Wuhan populace during the COVID-19 pandemic. An online questionnaire survey was carried out during July 6-10, 2020. The questionnaire collected information on demography, anxiety, QoL, and social-environmental support. The main statistical methods included descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and multivariate regression analysis. In total, 226 participants were recruited. The findings showed that females, elderly, middle-income, poor health status, shortage of medical supplies, and insufficient basic commodities were associated with anxiety significantly. Multiple regression analysis indicated that social-environmental support was significantly related to anxiety. Higher social-environmental support was significantly associated with a higher QoL. Our findings showed that the social-environmental support may reduce anxiety and improve the QoL for those living in an area heavily affected by the pandemic.

Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the test of nonverbal intelligence-fourth edition in patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Fluid intelligence deficits affect executive functioning and social behaviors in patients with schizophrenia. To help clinicians manage fluid intelligence deficits, a psychometrically sound measure is needed. The purposes of this study were to examine the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition (TONI-4) assessing fluid intelligence in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with stable condition were assessed with the TONI-4 twice with a 4-week interval to examine the test-retest reliability. We further used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Tablet-Based Symbol Digit Modalities Test (T-SDMT) to examine the convergent validity of the TONI-4. RESULTS: The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.73 for the TONI-4. The percentages of standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change for the TONI-4 were 5.1 and 14.2%, respectively. The practice effect of the TONI-4 was small (Cohen's d = - 0.03). Convergent validity showed small to moderate significant correlations between the TONI-4 and the MoCA as well as the T-SDMT (r = 0.35, p = .011 with the T-SDMT and r = 0.61, p < .001 with the MoCA). The results demonstrated that the TONI-4 had good test-retest reliability, limited random measurement error, and a trivial practice effect. The convergent validity of the TONI-4 was good. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the TONI-4 has potential to be a reliable and valid assessment of fluid intelligence in patients with schizophrenia.