Assessment of Urinary Dysfunction After Midurethral Sling Placement: A Comparison of Two Voiding Trial Methods.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Temporary urinary retention after midurethral sling (MUS) surgery requiring indwelling catheter or self-catheterization usage is common. Different methods for assessment of immediate postoperative urinary retention have been described. This study aimed to compare postoperative voiding trial (VT) success after active vs passive VT in women undergoing MUS surgery. DESIGN: Comparative retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Patients with stress urinary incontinence who underwent surgical treatment during the study period were eligible for inclusion. Excluded were patients younger than the age of 18 years, combined cases with other surgical services, planned laparotomy, and a history of urinary retention and patients for whom their VT was performed on postoperative day 1. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: (1) patients who underwent an active retrofill of their bladder using a Foley catheter and (2) patients who were allowed to have a spontaneous void. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 285 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Of these subjects, 94 underwent an active VT and 191 underwent a passive VT. There were no statistically significant differences in immediate postoperative urinary retention (30.8% vs 29.3%; p = .79) or time from surgery end to VT (233.0 ± 167.6 minutes vs 203.1 ± 147.8 minutes; p = .13) between groups. Urinary retention, as defined by a failed VT, increased from 10% to 29.3% when MUS placement was accompanied by concomitant prolapse repair procedure. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that undergoing a combined anterior and posterior colporrhaphy (odds ratio [OR], 5.13; p <.001) and undergoing an apical prolapse procedure (OR, 2.75; p = .004) were independently associated with immediate postoperative urinary retention whereas increased body mass index (OR, 0.89; p <.001) lowered likelihood of retention. CONCLUSION: The method used to assess immediate postoperative urinary retention did not affect VT success. Concomitant combined anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and apical suspension were correlated with greater likelihood of VT failure whereas increased body mass index decreased odds of retention.

Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse is a debilitating condition impacting lives of millions of women worldwide. Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is considered an effective and durable surgical technique for treatment of apical prolapse. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes including postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters between patients who underwent SCP with a mini-laparotomy approach compared to patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic SCP. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients treated for apical prolapse at a university affiliated urogynecology practice. Patients over the age of 18 who underwent abdominal SCP between 2019 and 2023 were included. The cohort was formed into two groups: (1) Patients who underwent SCP through a mini-laparotomy incision (Mini-lap group); (2) Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic SCP (Lap/Robot group). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included in the final analysis. Ninety patients underwent either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted SCP, whereas 26 patients underwent SCP with a mini-laparotomy approach. Study participants exhibited a mean age of 63.1 ± 10.3 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.8 ± 4.9 Kg/m2, and 77.6% of them identified as Caucasian. Upon comparison of demographic and past medical history between groups there were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, menopausal status, race, parity or comorbid conditions. Patients in the Mini-lap group were less likely to have undergone previous abdominal surgery (11.5% vs. 50.6%, p < 0.001) and had more severe apical prolapse (stage 4 prolapse, 40% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001) than their counterparts in the Lap/robot group. Regarding intraoperative parameters, length of surgery was significantly shorter in the Mini-lap group compared to the Lap/robot group (97.3 ± 35.0 min vs. 242.0 ± 52.6 min, p < 0.001). When focusing on the primary outcome, postoperative complications within the first 30 days after surgery, there were no differences noted between groups. Additionally, the number of unanticipated healthcare encounters, such as phone calls, clinic visits, emergency department visits, urgent care visits, readmissions and reoperations were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-laparotomy approach for SCP is safe with comparable intra- and postoperative complications, and unanticipated healthcare encounters compared to conventional minimally invasive methods.

Prolapsing vaginal fibroepithelial polyp.

Although uncommon, vaginal fibroepithelial polyps can present as prolapsing vaginal tissue, causing discomfort and anxiety. Surgical excision of the polyps can provide a minimally invasive solution. In this case, we describe a nulliparous female in late adolescence who presented for evaluation of tissue protruding through the vagina. On exam, a 5×4 cm fibroepithelial polyp was extending from the distal posterior vagina on a broad stalk. Successful transperineal surgical excision was performed. Fibroepithelial polyps, although uncommon, can be a cause for prolapsing vaginal tissue and should be part of the differential diagnosis, especially in patients who have no risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse. They can be excised vaginally, alleviating symptoms and distress. Because they sometimes recur, continued surveillance with gynaecological exams is recommended.