Breast Conserving Therapy for Patients With Prior Cosmetic Implant-Based Breast Augmentation: Outcomes and Comparison Against a Matched Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists regarding potential increased toxic effects in patients with cosmetic implant-based augmentation (CIBA) who receive radiation therapy. We evaluated acute and chronic toxic effects associated with radiation therapy in women with prior CIBA treated with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) as part of breast conserving therapy (BCT) and compared these results against a cohort of patients without prior breast augmentation who received similar therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with a prior history of CIBA who subsequently underwent BCT with WBI. The control group consisted of consecutively treated patients without prior CIBA who also underwent BCT with WBI. Analyses included a comparison of baseline and treatment-associated factors between the augmentation and control groups, evaluation of toxic effects between both groups, and multivariable analysis of factors associated with the receipt of additional surgery following radiation. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with prior CIBA and 135 consecutively treated patients without CIBA were identified. Patients with prior CIBA were treated from 2006 through 2019, and patients without CIBA were treated from 2016 through 2019, though treatment characteristics and median follow-up time were similar between the two groups. Patients with prior CIBA were significantly less likely to experience acute moist desquamation (0% vs. 18%; P = .005). There were otherwise no statistically significant differences in acute (≤ 6 months) or chronic (> 6 months) toxic effects between the two groups. Rates of excellent/good chronic cosmetic outcome were 89% for the CIBA group and 97% in the control group (P = .094). On multivariable analysis, patients without prior CIBA (OR = 0.04; CI = 0.01-0.13; P < .001) and patients treated with moderately hypofractionated irradiation (OR = 0.08; CI = 0.02-0.23; P < .001) were significantly less likely to undergo additional surgery following receipt of WBI. Two patients experienced implant loss following radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: WBI as part of BCT in patients with prior implant-based breast augmentation appears safe and is associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes. There was an increased need for additional surgery in patients with prior CIBA, but rates of acute and chronic toxic effects appeared similar to those in nonaugmented patients.

Trends, survival outcomes, and predictors of nonadherence to mastectomy guidelines for nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend modified radical mastectomy (MRM) as the surgical treatment of choice for nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Limited studies have looked into the outcomes of breast conserving surgery (BCS) vs. MRM for IBC. METHODS: National Cancer Database (NCDB) data from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall survival (OS) trends were compared for BCS and MRM cases of nonmetastatic IBC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 413 (3.89%) BCS and 10,197 (96.11%) MRM cases were identified. Median follow-up was 58.45 months. Compared to MRM, BCS patients were more likely to be older, be African American, have Medicare/Medicaid or be uninsured, live in lower education ZIP codes, and live in a metropolitan area (all p < 0.05). BCS rates significantly decreased from 5.84% in 2004 to 3.19% in 2014 (p < 0.001). BCS patients also were more likely to have less than 50% of the breast involved (51.57% vs. 43.88%; p = 0.0081) and were less likely to receive trimodal therapy (50.85% vs. 74.62%; p = <0.0001). The OS was significantly higher in the mastectomy group over 9 years at 62.02% vs. 54.47% in the BCS group. Additionally, in the adjusted multivariate model, BCS cases were associated with 23% higher hazards of overall mortality (p = 0.0091). CONCLUSION: BCS was performed in a limited number of cases, which decreased over the study period. The analysis identified both demographic predictors of receiving BCS and significantly lower OS for IBC patients undergoing a BCS.

Outcome of African-American compared to White-American patients with early-stage breast cancer, stratified by phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer mortality rates are 39% higher in the African-American (AA) women compared to White-American (WA) women despite the advances in overall breast cancer screening and treatments. Several studies have undertaken to identify the factors leading to this disparity in United States with possible effects of lower socioeconomic status and underlying aggressive biology. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done using a prospectively maintained database of a metropolitan health system. Patients were selected based on diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer between 10/1998 and 02/2017, and included women over age of 18 with clinically node-negative disease. Patients were then stratified by phenotype confirmed by pathology and patient-identified race. RESULTS: A total of 2,298 women were identified in the cohort with 39% AA and 61% WA women. The overall mean age at the time of diagnosis for AA women was slightly younger at 60 years compared to 62 years for WA women (p = 0.003). Follow-up time was longer for the WA women at 95 months vs. 86 months in AA women. The overall 5-year survival was analyzed for the entire cohort, with the lowest survival occurring in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Phenotype distribution revealed a higher incidence of TNBC in AA women compared to WA women (AA 16% vs. WA 10%; p < 0.0001). AA women also had higher incidence of HER2 positive cancers (AA 16.8% vs. WA 15.3%; p < 0.0001). WA women had a significantly higher distribution of Non-TNBC/HER2-negative phenotype (AA 55% vs. WA 65%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was done for a sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative cohort that showed higher rates of grade 3 tumors in AA (AA 35% vs. WA 23%; p < 0.0001); and higher rates of grade 1 and grade 2 tumors in WA (30% vs. 21% and 44% vs. 40%). Despite higher grade tumors in AA women, five-year overall survival outcomes in SLN-negative cohort did not differ between AA and WA women when stratifying based on tumor subtype. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer survival disparities in AA and WA women with SLN-negative breast cancer are diminished when evaluated at early-stage cancers defined by SLN-negative tumors. Our evaluation suggests that when diagnosed early, phenotype does not contribute to racial survival outcomes. The lower survival rate in AA women with breast cancer may be attributed to later stage biology between the two races, or underlying socioeconomic disparities.

A rare presentation of bilateral, synchronous male breast cancer.

Rarity of male breast cancer limits available clinical research and data for management guidance and screening guidelines for patients at high risk. Here, we report on a patient with bilateral, synchronous male breast cancer with discussion of risk factors and need for possible screening.

Isolated unilateral adrenal gland hemorrhage following motor vehicle collision: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal gland trauma is a rare condition that typically stems from blunt force trauma, and is associated with multiple organ injuries. Alternatively, isolated adrenal gland trauma is extremely rare, accounting for only 1.5 to 4% of all adrenal trauma cases. While isolated adrenal trauma is a mostly self-limiting condition, it is potentially life-threatening, representing a significant cause of bleeding, and/or hypotension due to adrenal insufficiency and adrenal crisis. Due to its rare occurrence, there are no reported guidelines for monitoring and observing isolated adrenal trauma. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report on an isolated adrenal hemorrhage from a blunt trauma without associated injuries. A 53-year-old white man presented with abdominal pain after a high-speed motor vehicle accident. An initial evaluation revealed minimal abdominal pain and negative focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination; computed tomography imaging revealed a significant fluid collection consistent with adrenal hemorrhage. He was observed in our intensive care unit for 24 hours, and had stable hemoglobin and vital signs, after which he was discharged. At 1-month follow-up, he reported persistent intermittent abdominal pain, which was completely resolved by the 4-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This case report demonstrates isolated adrenal gland injury resulting from significant blunt trauma to the abdomen. There are no current guidelines for monitoring isolated adrenal hemorrhage. Recognizing possible adrenal injury in blunt trauma cases is important due to potentially severe adrenal hemorrhage; therefore, we recommend follow-up with serial abdominal computed tomography until the resolution of hemorrhage and symptoms.