Stability analysis of pumped storage hydropower plant in abandoned open-pit mine affected by dynamic surface subsidence of combined mining.

The construction of a pumped storage hydropower plant (PSHP) in an abandoned open-pit mine is a potential alternative to green mining and energy storage, which can increase the utilization rate of renewable energy and develop residual resources of abandoned mines. Dynamic surface subsidence affected by combined underground and open-pit mining (CUOPM) seriously affects the construction and operation of the PSHP and is one of the critical scientific issues that needs to be solved immediately. The stability of the PSHP was analyzed and treatment scheme of the goafs was proposed based on on-site measurement, theoretical analysis, and numerical simulation. First, the distribution of goafs in the Haizhou open-pit mining area was investigated and surface subsidence value was obtained using InSAR technology and ground monitoring. Secondly, the surface subsidence mechanism affected by CUOPM is analyzed and indicates the subsidence maximum values and scope of influence are greater than those of single underground mining. A dynamic surface subsidence prediction model for combined mining is established based on the Knothe time function model. Thirdly, based on the CVISC model, the numerical calculation models were established by using FLAC3D, and the characteristics and laws of surface subsidence in different periods of CUOPM were studied. The comparative analysis of the observation results shows that the proposed model and numerical simulation calculation method have excellent applicability and accuracy. Finally, a stability evaluation method of PSHP was established, and the results of the evaluation show that the affected areas are the semi-ground powerhouse (SGPH) and the west side of the lower reservoir. The method of grouting filling was used to treat the goafs, and the results showed that it effectively alleviates the dynamic surface subsidence affected by CUOPM, and provides a safety guarantee for PSHP.

Theoretical research on reasonable shield support capacity in close-multiple coal seams with the coordinated mining: A case study of Qianjiaying coal mine.

In order to assess the rationality of the rated shield support capacity (RSSC) experienced selection and guide the reasonable RSSC selection for the subsequent working faces of each coal seam, the coupling relationship between shield and roof strata was revealed during each coal seams mining. According to whether the fractured rock blocks generated by the main roof are articulated and whether the upper coal seam has been mined and influenced on the lower coal seam, two roof structure mechanical models of the rock blocks generated by the thick main roof and two calculation methods of a given load on the rock blocks are proposed. In addition, a selection method of roof structure model for maximum shield support capacity (MSSC) of close-multiple coal seams with the coordinated mining is put forward. Three roof structures to calculate the MSSC are established. Based on a case study of close-multiple coal seams with the coordinated mining in the Qianjiaying coal mine, the MSSC is calculated and analyzed in each coal seam combined with roof structure characteristics description, theoretical analysis, and field measurement. No.7, No.12-1, and No.5 coal seams mining are applicable to a voussoir beam balanced structure. No.8 coal seam mining is applicable to a balanced structure with a given load of loose body. No.9 coal seam mining is applicable to a voussoir beam balanced structure with a given load of loose body. Through the calculation, the MSSC of No.7, No.8, No.12-1, No.9, and No.5 coal seam is 3948.55kN, 4018.32kN, 4101.63kN, 3560.03kN, and 4015.30kN, respectively. And the RSSC suggested selection of each coal seam is 4500kN, 4300kN, 4300kN, 4000kN, and 4300kN, respectively. By field measurement, the RSSC experienced selection of each coal seam in the Qianjiaying coal mine is unreasonable with low support load utilization. However, after adopting the RSSC suggested selection in each coal seam, the support load utilization increased by 29.07%, 9.6%, 8.57%, 15.33%, and 11.39%.