Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; (436): 229-36, 2005 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15995446

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The Losee repair controls rotational subluxation of the lateral femoral condyle, or pivot shift, but does not reliably eliminate Lachman laxity. Despite this surgical limitation, many patients who were operated on continued to do high-demand activities at the last followup. We hypothesized that Lachman findings alone did not predict poor surgical outcome or progression to osteoarthritis. We report on 87 patients evaluated at an average of 9 years (range, 5-21 years) postoperatively. Prospectively collected examinations and radiographic, subjective, and objective outcome measures were recorded and statistically evaluated. The presence of a postoperative pivot shift or residual varus laxity correlated with poor patient subjective evaluations and poor scoring outcomes. Lachman laxity with an absent pivot shift had no correlation with the outcome measures or onset of radiographic progression to osteoarthritis. Meniscectomy, additional knee surgery, increased valgus or varus laxity, and time from injury until the final radiograph positively correlated with the onset of osteoarthritis. Elimination of the pivot shift was necessary to achieve successful relief of symptoms and functional outcome. In the absence of a pivot shift, Lachman laxity was not solely predictive of poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Instabilidade Articular/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 85(8): 1488-96, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12925628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pain in the retrocalcaneal space can be incapacitating. Patients who do not respond to nonoperative treatment may seek a surgical solution. The first purpose of this paper was to describe and evaluate the efficacy of a minimally invasive procedure to address retrocalcaneal pain caused by retrocalcaneal bursitis, a Haglund spur, and impingement. The second purpose was to compare the endoscopic technique with a standard open technique. METHODS: Our prospective study included thirty-three heels in thirty consecutive patients with chronic pain in the retrocalcaneal space for which nonoperative treatment had failed and endoscopic decompression was performed. The mean age was forty-nine years (range, nineteen to seventy-nine years). This group was compared with a group of seventeen heels in fourteen patients with the same diagnostic criteria who were treated with an open technique. Both groups of patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, and the patients treated with the endoscopic procedure were also evaluated postoperatively with the University of Maryland 100-point Painful Foot Center Scoring System. RESULTS: In the endoscopic group, the AOFAS scores averaged 61.8 points preoperatively and 87.5 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). The endoscopic procedures yielded nineteen excellent, five good, three fair, and three poor results at an average of twenty-two months postoperatively. (Three patients were excluded from the study.) In the open-treatment group, the AOFAS scores averaged 58.1 points preoperatively and 79.3 points at an average of forty-two months postoperatively (p = 0.006). The scores after the endoscopic procedures were numerically, but not significantly (p = 0.115), better than those after the open procedures. The time to recovery was the same in the two groups. The endoscopic procedures were performed more quickly than the open procedures (forty-four compared with fifty-six minutes) and were associated with fewer complications (a 3% compared with a 12% rate of infection, a 10% compared with an 18% rate of altered sensation, and a 7% compared with an 18% rate of scar tenderness). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic decompression is a feasible and efficient procedure for the treatment of retrocalcaneal disorders. It produces final results equal to or better than those of an open technique, with a similar recovery time, fewer complications, and a better cosmetic appearance.


Assuntos
Artroscopia , Bursite/cirurgia , Calcâneo/cirurgia , Descompressão Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Esporão do Calcâneo/cirurgia , Tendinopatia/cirurgia , Tendão do Calcâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , Tendão do Calcâneo/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Bursite/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Constrição Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Esporão do Calcâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Tendinopatia/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA