Evaluation of a Supervised Adapted Physical Activity Program Associated or Not with Oral Supplementation with Arginine and Leucine in Subjects with Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: In patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS), lifestyle interventions combining diet, in particular, and physical exercise are recommended as the first line treatment. Previous studies have suggested that leucine or arginine supplementation may have beneficial effects on the body composition or insulin sensitivity and endothelial function, respectively. We thus conducted a randomized controlled study to evaluate the effects of a supervised adapted physical activity program associated or not with oral supplementation with leucine and arginine in MetS-complicated patients with obesity. Methods: Seventy-nine patients with obesity and MetS were randomized in four groups: patients receiving arginine and leucine supplementation (ALs group, n = 20), patients on a supervised adapted physical activity program (APA group, n = 20), patients combining ALs and APA (ALs+APA group, n = 20), and a control group (n = 19). After the baseline evaluation (m0), patients received ALs and/or followed the APA program for 6 months (m6). Body composition, MetS parameters, lipid and glucose metabolism markers, inflammatory markers, and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were assessed at m0, m6, and after a 3-month wash-out period (m9). Results: After 6 months of intervention, we did not observe variable changes in body weight, body composition, lipid and glucose metabolism markers, inflammatory parameters, or quality of life scores between the four groups. However, during the CPET, the maximal power (Pmax and Ppeak), power, and O2 consumption at the ventilatory threshold (P(VT) and O2(VT)) were improved in the APA and ALs+APA groups (p < 0.05), as well as the forced vital capacity (FVC). Between m6 and m9, a gain in fat mass was only observed in patients in the APA and ALs+APA groups. Conclusion: In our randomized controlled trial, arginine and leucine supplementation failed to improve MetS in patients with obesity, as did the supervised adapted physical activity program and the combination of both. Only the cardiorespiratory parameters were improved by exercise training.

Accuracy of bioimpedance equations for measuring body composition in a cohort of 2134 patients with obesity.

INTRODUCTION: Measuring body composition is an important issue to phenotype patients with obesity and to follow the nutritional care efficiency. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is a simple and rapid technique. However, validity of BIA in patients with obesity remains controversial. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the validity of several BIA equations to assess body composition in a large cohort of patients with obesity by using dual X ray absorptiometry (DXA) as reference. METHODS: Seven BIA equations have been retrospectively applied on electrical data measured by BIA in patients with obesity with BMI equal or higher than 30 kg/m2 and results were compared to DXA-derived fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM). BIA and DXA were done the same day after an overnight fasting. Results were compared with Bland-Altman method and Pearson correlation. We also calculated the accuracy defined as the percentage of patients with DXA-BIA difference within ± 10% of DXA measures for FFM and FM. RESULTS: Data from 2134 patients with class I and II obesity (ob1/2, n = 1452, 47.4 ± 14.2 y; 35.0 ± 2.7 kg.m-2) and class III obesity (ob3, n = 682, 48.2 ± 13.9 y; 44.1 ± 3.5 kg.m-2) were analyzed. The best results to evaluate FFM both in ob1/2 and ob3 groups were obtained with Roubenoff's equation: Bland Altman bias at -1.96 and -0.82 kg, Pearson correlation r at 0.93 and 0.87, accuracy at 75.7% and 83.3%, respectively. However, limits of agreements at 95% were high: [-9.42; 5.49 kg] and [-8.16; 6.52 kg]. For FM evaluation, Roubenoff's equation also showed best results for ob1/2 group (bias at -1.17 kg; correlation r at 0.89 and accuracy at 79.1%) but not for ob3 group. In this latter group, Deurenberg's equation exhibited the best results (bias at 2.09 kg; correlation r at 0.81 and accuracy at 76.8%). However, limits of agreements remained high. CONCLUSION: In patients with obesity, Roubenoff BIA equation should be recommended to assess fat free mass, even if limits of agreements remain high.