The Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery in High and Low/Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In this review article, we explore the implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery after spine surgery (spine ERAS) across different World Bank country-income levels. A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases for articles on the implementation of spine ERAS in both adult and pediatric populations. Study characteristics, ERAS elements, and outcomes were analyzed and meta-analyses were performed for length of stay (LOS) and cost outcomes. The number of spine ERAS studies from low-middle-income countries (LMICs) increased since 2017, when the first spine ERAS implementation study was published. LMICs were more likely than high-income countries (HICs) to conduct studies on patients aged ≥18 years (odds ratio [OR], 6.00; 95% CI, 1.58-42.80), with sample sizes 51 to 100 (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.21-22.90), and randomized controlled trials (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.77-53.50). Preoperative optimization was more frequently implemented in LMICs than in HICs (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.06-4.41), and operation time was more often studied in LMICs (OR 3.78; 95% CI, 1.77-8.35). Implementation of spine ERAS resulted in reductions in LOS in both LMIC (-2.06; 95% CI, -2.47 to -1.64 d) and HIC (-0.99; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.70 d) hospitals. However, spine ERAS implementation did result in a significant reduction in costs. This review highlights the global landscape of ERAS implementation in spine surgery, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing LOS across diverse settings. Further research with standardized reporting of ERAS elements and outcomes is warranted to explore the impact of spine ERAS on cost-effectiveness and other patient-centered outcomes.

An Exploratory Analysis of ChatGPT Compared to Human Performance With the Anesthesiology Oral Board Examination: Initial Insights and Implications.

BACKGROUND: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) has been tested and has passed various high-level examinations. However, it has not been tested on an examination such as the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) Standardized Oral Examination (SOE). The SOE is designed to assess higher-level competencies, such as judgment, organization, adaptability to unexpected clinical changes, and presentation of information. METHODS: Four anesthesiology fellows were examined on 2 sample ABA SOEs. Their answers were compared to those produced by the same questions asked to ChatGPT. All human and ChatGPT responses were transcribed, randomized by module, and then reproduced as complete examinations, using a commercially available software-based human voice replicator. Eight ABA applied examiners listened to and scored the topic and modules from 1 of the 4 versions of each of the 2 sample examinations. The ABA did not provide any support or collaboration with any authors. RESULTS: The anesthesiology fellow's answers were found to have a better median score than ChatGPT, for the module topics scores (P = .03). However, there was no significant difference in the median overall global module scores between the human and ChatGPT responses (P = .17). The examiners were able to identify the ChatGPT-generated answers for 23 of 24 modules (95.83%), with only 1 ChatGPT response perceived as from a human. In contrast, the examiners thought the human (fellow) responses were artificial intelligence (AI)-generated in 10 of 24 modules (41.67%). Examiner comments explained that ChatGPT generated relevant content, but were lengthy answers, which at times did not focus on the specific scenario priorities. There were no comments from the examiners regarding Chat GPT fact "hallucinations." CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT generated SOE answers with comparable module ratings to anesthesiology fellows, as graded by 8 ABA oral board examiners. However, the ChatGPT answers were deemed subjectively inferior due to the length of responses and lack of focus. Future curation and training of an AI database, like ChatGPT, could produce answers more in line with ideal ABA SOE answers. This could lead to higher performance and an anesthesiology-specific trained AI useful for training and examination preparation.

Identifying Variation in Intraoperative Management of Brain-Dead Organ Donors and Opportunities for Improvement: A Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative events and clinical management of deceased organ donors after brain death are poorly characterized and may consequently vary between hospitals and organ procurement organization (OPO) regions. In a multicenter cohort, we sought to estimate the incidence of hypotension and anesthetic and nonanesthetic medication use during organ recovery procedures. METHODS: We used data from electronic anesthetic records generated during organ recovery procedures from brain-dead adults across a Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) cohort of 14 US hospitals and 4 OPO regions (2014-2020). Hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure or MAP <60 mm Hg for at least 10 cumulative minutes was the primary outcome of interest. The associations between hypotension and age, sex, race, anesthesia time, OPOs, and OPO case volume were examined using multivariable mixed-effects Poisson regression analyses with robust standard error estimates. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to describe the variation between-MPOG centers and the OPO regions in the use of medications, time of the operation, and duration of the operation. RESULTS: We examined 1338 brain-dead adult donors, with a mean age of 42± (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 60% (n = 801) were males and 67% (n = 891) non-Hispanic White. During the entire intraoperative monitoring period, 321 donors (24%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-26%) had hypotension for a median of 13.8% [quartile1-quartile 3: 9.4%-21%] of the monitoring period and a minimum of 10 minutes to a maximum of 96 minutes [(median: 17, quartile1-quartile 3: 12-24]). The probability having hypotension in donors 35 to 64 years and 65 years and older were approximately 30% less than in donors 18 to 34 years of age (adjusted relative risk ratios, aRR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.55-0.82, aRR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.94, respectively). Donors received intravenous heparin (96.4%, n = 1291), neuromuscular blockers (89.5%, n = 1198), vasoactive medications (82.7%, n = 1108), crystalloids (76.2%, n = 1020), halogenated anesthetic gases (63.5%, n = 850), diuretics (43.8%, n = 587), steroids (16.7%, n = 224), and opioids (23.2%, n = 310). The largest practice heterogeneity observed between the MPOG center and OPO regions was steroids (between-center ICCs = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62-0.75, between-region ICCs = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.27-0.63) and diuretics (between-center ICCs = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.36-0.6, between-region ICCs = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.22-0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines recommending maintenance of MAP >60 mm Hg in adult brain-dead organ donors, hypotension during recovery procedures was common. Future research is needed to clarify the relationship between intraoperative events with donation and transplantation outcomes and to identify best practices for the anesthetic management of brain-dead donors in the operating room.

Evaluation of the Use of Phenobarbital and Benzodiazepines in the Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in Patients Requiring Neurological/Neurosurgical Critical Care: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Objective There is growing interest in the use of phenobarbital for alcohol withdrawal syndrome in critically ill patients, though experience in neurologically injured patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of phenobarbital-containing alcohol withdrawal regimens versus benzodiazepine monotherapy in the neurocritical care unit. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit from January 2014 through November 2021 who received pharmacologic treatment for alcohol withdrawal. Treatment groups were defined as benzodiazepine monotherapy versus phenobarbital alone or in combination with benzodiazepines. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients requiring intubation after receiving alcohol withdrawal treatment. Secondary outcomes included all-cause, in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, discharge disposition, change in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and the use of adjunctive agents. Results We analyzed data from 156 patients, with 77 (49%) in the benzodiazepine group and 79 (51%) in the phenobarbital combination group. The groups were well-balanced for baseline characteristics, though more males (67, 85%) were in the phenobarbital group. Only three (1.9%) patients received phenobarbital monotherapy, and the rest (153, 98.1%) received combination therapy. The percentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation was significantly higher in the phenobarbital combination group compared to benzodiazepine monotherapy (39% (n=31) versus 13% (n=10); OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.94-9.66; p<0.001). The use of adjunctive propofol and dexmedetomidine was higher in the phenobarbital group (propofol 35% (n= 28) versus 9% (n=7) and dexmedetomidine 30% (n=24) versus 5% (n=4), respectively). Patients in the phenobarbital group also had lower GCS scores and higher Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol (CIWA-Ar) scores during their intensive care unit admission, possibly suggesting more severe alcohol withdrawal. There was no difference in intensive care unit length of stay, all-cause, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, or therapeutic adjuncts. Conclusions Combination therapy of phenobarbital plus benzodiazepines was associated with higher odds of requiring mechanical ventilation. Few patients received phenobarbital monotherapy. Additional studies are needed to better compare the effects of phenobarbital monotherapy versus benzodiazepines in neurocritical patients.

Cerebral Edema Monitoring and Management Strategies: Results from an International Practice Survey.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral edema is a common, potentially life-threatening complication in critically ill patients with acute brain injury. However, uncertainty remains regarding best monitoring and treatment strategies, which may result in wide practice variations. METHODS: A 20-question digital survey on monitoring and management practices was disseminated between July 2022 and May 2023 to clinicians who manage cerebral edema. The survey was promoted through email, social media, medical conferences, and the Neurocritical Care Society Web site. We used the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and logistic regression to report factors associated with practice variation, diagnostic monitoring methods, and therapeutic triggers based on practitioner and institutional characteristics. RESULTS: Of 321 participants from 160 institutions in 30 countries, 65% were from university-affiliated centers, 74% were attending physicians, 38% were woman, 38% had neurology training, and 55% were US-based. Eighty-four percent observed practice variations at their institutions, with "provider preference" being cited most (87%). Factors linked to variation included gender, experience, university affiliation, and practicing outside the United States. University affiliates tended to use more tests (median 3.87 vs. 3.43, p = 0.01) to monitor cerebral edema. Regarding management practices, 20% of respondents' preferred timing for decompressive hemicraniectomy was after 48 h, and 37% stated that radiographic findings only would be sufficient to trigger surgery. Fifty percent of respondents reported initiating osmotic therapy based on radiographic indications or prophylactically. There were no significant associations between management strategies and respondent or center characteristics. Twenty-seven percent of respondents indicated that they acquired neuroimaging at intervals of 24 h or less. Within this group, attending physicians were more likely to follow this practice (65.5% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral edema monitoring and management strategies vary. Features associated with practice variations include both practitioner and institutional characteristics. We provide a foundation for understanding practice patterns that is crucial for informing educational initiatives, standardizing guidelines, and conducting future trials.

Perioperative care of patients with recent stroke undergoing nonemergent, nonneurological, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued. SUMMARY: In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death.

Early Cardiac Evaluation, Abnormal Test Results, and Associations with Outcomes in Patients with Acute Brain Injury Admitted to a Neurocritical Care Unit.

Background: to examine factors associated with cardiac evaluation and associations between cardiac test abnormalities and clinical outcomes in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring neurocritical care. Methods: In a cohort of patients ≥18 years, we examined the utilization of electrocardiography (ECG), beta-natriuretic peptide (BNP), cardiac troponin (cTnI), and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We investigated the association between cTnI, BNP, sex-adjusted prolonged QTc interval, low ejection fraction (EF < 40%), all-cause mortality, death by neurologic criteria (DNC), transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and hospital discharge to home using univariable and multivariable analysis (adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance carrier, pre-admission cardiac disorder, ABI type, admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score, mechanical ventilation, and intracranial pressure [ICP] monitoring). Results: The final sample comprised 11,822 patients: AIS (46.7%), sICH (18.5%), SAH (14.8%), and TBI (20.0%). A total of 63% (n = 7472) received cardiac workup, which increased over nine years (p < 0.001). A cardiac investigation was associated with increased age, male sex (aOR 1.16 [1.07, 1.27]), non-white ethnicity (aOR), non-commercial insurance (aOR 1.21 [1.09, 1.33]), pre-admission cardiac disorder (aOR 1.21 [1.09, 1.34]), mechanical ventilation (aOR1.78 [1.57, 2.02]) and ICP monitoring (aOR1.68 [1.49, 1.89]). Compared to AIS, sICH (aOR 0.25 [0.22, 0.29]), SAH (aOR 0.36 [0.30, 0.43]), and TBI (aOR 0.19 [0.17, 0.24]) patients were less likely to receive cardiac investigation. Patients with troponin 25th-50th quartile (aOR 1.65 [1.10-2.47]), troponin 50th-75th quartile (aOR 1.79 [1.22-2.63]), troponin >75th quartile (aOR 2.18 [1.49-3.17]), BNP 50th-75th quartile (aOR 2.86 [1.28-6.40]), BNP >75th quartile (aOR 4.54 [2.09-9.85]), prolonged QTc (aOR 3.41 [2.28; 5.30]), and EF < 40% (aOR 2.47 [1.07; 5.14]) were more likely to be DNC. Patients with troponin 50th-75th quartile (aOR 1.77 [1.14-2.73]), troponin >75th quartile (aOR 1.81 [1.18-2.78]), and prolonged QTc (aOR 1.71 [1.39; 2.12]) were more likely to be associated with a transition to CMO. Patients with prolonged QTc (aOR 0.66 [0.58; 0.76]) were less likely to be discharged home. Conclusions: This large, single-center study demonstrates low rates of cardiac evaluations in TBI, SAH, and sICH compared to AIS. However, there are strong associations between electrocardiography, biomarkers of cardiac injury and heart failure, and echocardiography findings on clinical outcomes in patients with ABI. Findings need validation in a multicenter cohort.

Utility of Routine Surveillance Head Computed Tomography After Receiving Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism and may require anticoagulation. We evaluated the utility of surveillance computed tomography (CT) in patients with tICH who required therapeutic anticoagulation. METHODS: This single institution, retrospective study included adult patients with tICH who required anticoagulation within 4 weeks and had a surveillance head CT within 24 hours of reaching therapeutic anticoagulation levels. The primary outcome was hematoma expansion (HE) detected by the surveillance CT. Secondary outcomes included 1) changes in management in patients with HE on the surveillance head CT, 2) HE in the absence of clinical changes, and 3) mortality due to HE. We also compared mortality between patients who did and did not have a surveillance CT. RESULTS: Of 175 patients, 5 (2.9%) were found to have HE. Most (n = 4, 80%) had changes in management including anticoagulation discontinuation (n = 4), reversal (n = 1), and operative management (n = 1). Two patients developed symptoms or exam changes prior to the head CT. Of the 3 patients (1.7%) without preceding exam changes, each had only very minor HE and did not require operative management. No patient experienced mortality directly attributed to HE. There was no difference in mortality between patients who did and those who did not have a surveillance scan. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that most patients with tICH who are started on anticoagulation could be followed clinically, and providers may reserve CT imaging for patients with changes in exam/symptoms or those who have a poor clinical examination to follow.

Variability in Intraoperative Opioid and Nonopioid Utilization During Intracranial Surgery: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Key goals during intracranial surgery are to facilitate rapid emergence and extubation for early neurologic evaluation. Longer-acting opioids are often avoided or administered at subtherapeutic doses due to their perceived risk of sedation and delayed emergence. However, inadequate analgesia and increased postoperative pain are common after intracranial surgery. In this multicenter study, we describe variability in opioid and nonopioid administration patterns in patients undergoing intracranial surgery. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database. Opioid and nonopioid practice patterns in 31,217 cases undergoing intracranial surgery across 11 institutions in the United States are described. RESULTS: Across all 11 institutions, total median [interquartile range] oral morphine equivalents, normalized to weight and anesthesia duration was 0.17 (0.08 to 0.3) mg.kg.min-1. There was a 7-fold difference in oral morphine equivalents between the lowest (0.05 [0.02 to 0.13] mg.kg.min-1) and highest (0.36 [0.18 to 0.54] mg.kg.min-1) prescribing institutions. Patients undergoing supratentorial surgery had higher normalized oral morphine equivalents compared with those having infratentorial surgery [0.17 [0.08-0.31] vs. 0.15 [0.07-0.27] mg/kg/min-1; P<0.001); however, this difference is clinically small. Nonopioid analgesics were not administered in 20% to 96.8% of cases across institutions. CONCLUSION: This study found wide variability for both opioid and nonopioid utilization at an institutional level. Future work on practitioner-level opioid and nonopioid use and its impact on outcomes after intracranial surgery should be conducted.

Effect of Increasing Blood Pressure on Brain Tissue Oxygenation in Adults After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To examine if increasing blood pressure improves brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO 2 ) in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Level-I trauma center teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Included patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age and with severe (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9) TBI who had advanced neuromonitoring (intracranial blood pressure [ICP], PbtO 2 , and cerebral autoregulation testing). INTERVENTIONS: The exposure was mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation with a vasopressor, and the primary outcome was a PbtO 2 response. Cerebral hypoxia was defined as PbtO 2 less than 20 mm Hg (low). MAIN RESULTS: MAP challenge test results conducted between ICU admission days 1-3 from 93 patients (median age 31; interquartile range [IQR], 24-44 yr), 69.9% male, White ( n = 69, 74.2%), median head abbreviated injury score 5 (IQR 4-5), and median admission GCS 3 (IQR 3-5) were examined. Across all 93 tests, a MAP increase of 25.7% resulted in a 34.2% cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) increase and 16.3% PbtO 2 increase (no MAP or CPP correlation with PbtO 2 [both R2 = 0.00]). MAP augmentation increased ICP when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (8.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06). MAP augmentation resulted in four PbtO 2 responses (normal and maintained [group 1: 58.5%], normal and deteriorated [group 2: 2.2%; average 45.2% PbtO 2 decrease], low and improved [group 3: 12.8%; average 44% PbtO 2 increase], and low and not improved [group 4: 25.8%]). The average end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) increase of 5.9% was associated with group 2 when cerebral autoregulation was impaired ( p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MAP augmentation after severe TBI resulted in four distinct PbtO 2 response patterns, including PbtO 2 improvement and cerebral hypoxia. Traditionally considered clinical factors were not significant, but cerebral autoregulation status and ICP responses may have moderated MAP and ETCO 2 effects on PbtO 2 response. Further study is needed to examine the role of MAP augmentation as a strategy to improve PbtO 2 in some patients.

Clinical Experience With a Dedicated Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Program in an Academic Medical Center.

Background Managing neurocritical care patients encompasses many complex challenges, necessitating specialized care and continuous quality improvement efforts. In recent years, the focus on enhancing patient outcomes in neurocritical care may have led to the development of dedicated quality improvement programs. These programs are designed to systematically evaluate and refine care practices, aligning them with the latest clinical guidelines and research findings. Objective To describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of a dedicated Neurocritical Care Quality Improvement Program (NCC-QIP) at Harborview Medical Center, United States; a quaternary academic medical center, level I trauma, and a comprehensive stroke center. Materials and methods We describe the development of the NCC-QIP, its structure, function, challenges, and evolution. We examine our performance with several NCC-QI quality measures as proposed by the Joint Commission, the American Association of Neurology, and the Neurocritical Care Society, self-reported quality improvement (QI) concerns and QI initiatives undertaken because of the information obtained during our event/measure reporting process for patients admitted between 1/1/2014 and 06/30/2023. Results The NCC-QI reviewed data from 20,218 patients; mean age 57.9 (standard deviation 18.1) years, 56% (n=11,326) males, with acute ischemic stroke (AIS; 22.3%, n=4506), spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; 14.8%, n=2,996), spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; 8.9%, n=1804), and traumatic brain injury (TBI; 16.6%, n=3352) among other admissions, 37.4% (n=7,559) were mechanically ventilated, and 13.6% (n=2,753) received an intracranial pressure monitor. The median intensive care unit length of stay was two days (Quartile 1-Quartile 3: 2-5 days), and the median hospital length of stay was seven days (Quartile 1-Quartile 3: 3-14 days); 53.9% (n=10,907) were discharged home while 11.4% (2,309) died. The three most commonly reported QI concerns were related to care coordination/communication/handoff (40.4%, n=283), medication-related concerns (14.9%, n=104), and equipment/devices-related concerns (11.7%, n=82). Hospital-acquired infections were in the form of ventilator-associated pneumonia (16.3%, n=419/2562), ventriculostomy catheter-associated infections (4%, n=102/2246), and deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (3.2%, n=647). The quality metrics documentation was as follows: nimodipine after SAH (99.8%, 1802/1810), Hunt and Hess score (36%, n=650/1804), and ICH score (58.4% n=1752/2996). In comparison, 72% (n=3244/4506) of patients with AIS had a documented National Institute of Health Stroke Scale. Admission Glasgow Coma Score was recorded in 99% of patients with SAH, ICH, and TBI. Educational modules were implemented in response to event reporting. Conclusion A dedicated NCC-QIP can be successfully implemented at a quaternary medical medical center. It is possible to monitor and review a large volume of neurocritical care patients, The three most reported NCC-QI concerns may be related to care coordination-communication/handoff, medication-related concerns, and equipment/devices-related complications. The documentation of illness severity scores and stroke measures depends upon the type of measure and ability to reliably and accurately abstract and can be challenging. The quality improvement process can be enhanced by educational modules that reinforce quality and safety.

Delirium and Its Associations with Critical Care Utilizations and Outcomes at the Time of Hospital Discharge in Patients with Acute Brain Injury.

Background and Objectives: We analyzed delirium testing, delirium prevalence, critical care associations outcomes at the time of hospital discharge in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS), non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), non-traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), and traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to an intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: We examined the frequency of assessment for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit. We assessed delirium testing frequency, associated factors, positive test outcomes, and their correlations with clinical care, including nonpharmacological interventions and pain, agitation, and distress management. Results: Amongst 11,322 patients with ABI, delirium was tested in 8220 (726%). Compared to patients 18-44 years of age, patients 65-79 years (aOR 0.79 [0.69, 0.90]), and those 80 years and older (aOR 0.58 [0.50, 0.68]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Compared to English-speaking patients, non-English-speaking patients (aOR 0.73 [0.64, 0.84]) were less likely to undergo delirium testing. Amongst 8220, 2217 (27.2%) tested positive for delirium. For every day in the ICU, the odds of testing positive for delirium increased by 1.11 [0.10, 0.12]. Delirium was highest in those 80 years and older (aOR 3.18 [2.59, 3.90]). Delirium was associated with critical care resource utilization and with significant odds of mortality (aOR 7.26 [6.07, 8.70] at the time of hospital discharge. Conclusions: In conclusion, we find that seven out of ten patients in the neurocritical care unit are tested for delirium, and approximately two out of every five patients test positive for delirium. We demonstrate disparities in delirium testing by age and preferred language, identified high-risk subgroups, and the association between delirium, critical care resource use, complications, discharge GCS, and disposition. Prioritizing equitable testing and diagnosis, especially for elderly and non-English-speaking patients, is crucial for delivering quality care to this vulnerable group.

Perioperative Care and Outcomes of Patients with Brain Tumors Undergoing Elective Craniotomy: Experience from an Ethiopian Tertiary-Care Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To describe patients, perioperative care, and outcomes undergoing supratentorial and infratentorial craniotomy for brain tumor resection in a tertiary-care hospital in Ethiopia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients consecutively admitted between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021, was performed. We characterized patients, perioperative care, and outcomes. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 153 patients; 144 (94%) were 18 years and over, females (n = 48, 55%) with primarily American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class II (n = 97, 63.4%) who underwent supratentorial (n = 114, 75%), or infratentorial (n = 39, 25%) tumor resection. Patients were routinely admitted (95%) to floor/wards before craniotomy; Inhaled anesthetic (isoflurane 88%/halothane 12%) was used for maintenance of general anesthesia. Propofol (n = 93, 61%), mannitol (n = 73, 48%), and cerebrospinal fluid drain (n = 28, 18%), were used to facilitate intraoperative brain relaxation, while the use of hyperventilation was rare (n = 1). The average estimated blood loss was 1040 ± 727 ml; 37 (24%) patients received tranexamic acid, and 57 (37%) received a blood transfusion. Factors associated with extubation were a) infratentorial tumor location: relative risk (RR) 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.69), preoperative hydrocephalus: RR 0.51, (95% CI 0.34-0.79), shorter total anesthesia duration: 277.8 + 8.8 versus 426.77 + 13.1 minutes, P < 0.0001, lower estimated blood loss: 897 + 68 ml versus 1361.7 + 100 ml, P = 0.0002, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage to facilitate brain relaxation: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84). Approximately one in ten patients experienced postoperative obstructive hydrocephalus, surgical site infections, or pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that certain factors may impact patient outcomes following craniotomy for tumor resection. By identifying these factors, health care providers may be better equipped to develop individualized treatment plans and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of postoperative monitoring and management to prevent complications.

Conditioning-based therapeutics for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage - A critical review.

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) carries significant mortality and morbidity, with nearly half of SAH survivors having major cognitive dysfunction that impairs their functional status, emotional health, and quality of life. Apart from the initial hemorrhage severity, secondary brain injury due to early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia plays a leading role in patient outcome after SAH. While many strategies to combat secondary brain injury have been developed in preclinical studies and tested in late phase clinical trials, only one (nimodipine) has proven efficacious for improving long-term functional outcome. The causes of these failures are likely multitude, but include use of therapies targeting only one element of what has proven to be multifactorial brain injury process. Conditioning is a therapeutic strategy that leverages endogenous protective mechanisms to exert powerful and remarkably pleiotropic protective effects against injury to all major cell types of the CNS. The aim of this article is to review the current body of evidence for the use of conditioning agents in SAH, summarize the underlying neuroprotective mechanisms, and identify gaps in the current literature to guide future investigation with the long-term goal of identifying a conditioning-based therapeutic that significantly improves functional and cognitive outcomes for SAH patients.

A Global Review of the Perioperative Care of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Undergoing Microsurgical Repair of Ruptured Intracerebral Aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the perioperative care of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) who undergo microsurgical repair of a ruptured intracerebral aneurysm. METHODS: An English language survey examined 138 areas of the perioperative care of patients with aSAH. Reported practices were categorized as those reported by <20%, 21% to 40%, 41% to 60%, 61% to 80%, and 81% to 100% of participating hospitals. Data were stratified by Worldbank country income level (high-income or low/middle-income). Variation between country-income groups and between countries was presented as an intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Forty-eight hospitals representing 14 countries participated in the survey (response rate 64%); 33 (69%) hospitals admitted ≥60 aSAH patients per year. Clinical practices reported by 81 to 100% of the hospitals included placement of an arterial catheter, preinduction blood type/cross match, use of neuromuscular blockade during induction of general anesthesia, delivering 6 to 8 mL/kg tidal volume, and checking hemoglobin and electrolyte panels. Reported use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring was 25% (41% in high-income and 10% in low/middle-income countries), with variation between Worldbank country-income group (ICC 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-2.76) and between countries (ICC 0.44, 95% CI 0.00-0.68). The use of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection was low (2%). Before aneurysm securement, variable in blood pressure targets was reported; systolic blood pressure 90 to 120 mm Hg (30%), 90 to 140 mm Hg (21%), and 90 to 160 mmHg (5%). Induced hypertension during temporary clipping was reported by 37% of hospitals (37% each in high and low/middle-income countries). CONCLUSIONS: This global survey identifies differences in reported practices during the perioperative management of patients with aSAH.

Intravenous Levothyroxine for Unstable Brain-Dead Heart Donors.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic instability and myocardial dysfunction are major factors preventing the transplantation of hearts from organ donors after brain death. Intravenous levothyroxine is widely used in donor care, on the basis of observational data suggesting that more organs may be transplanted from donors who receive hormonal supplementation. METHODS: In this trial involving 15 organ-procurement organizations in the United States, we randomly assigned hemodynamically unstable potential heart donors within 24 hours after declaration of death according to neurologic criteria to open-label infusion of intravenous levothyroxine (30 µg per hour for a minimum of 12 hours) or saline placebo. The primary outcome was transplantation of the donor heart; graft survival at 30 days after transplantation was a prespecified recipient safety outcome. Secondary outcomes included weaning from vasopressor therapy, donor ejection fraction, and number of organs transplanted per donor. RESULTS: Of the 852 brain-dead donors who underwent randomization, 838 were included in the primary analysis: 419 in the levothyroxine group and 419 in the saline group. Hearts were transplanted from 230 donors (54.9%) in the levothyroxine group and 223 (53.2%) in the saline group (adjusted risk ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.07; P = 0.57). Graft survival at 30 days occurred in 224 hearts (97.4%) transplanted from donors assigned to receive levothyroxine and 213 hearts (95.5%) transplanted from donors assigned to receive saline (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.3 to 6.0; P<0.001 for noninferiority at a margin of 6 percentage points). There were no substantial between-group differences in weaning from vasopressor therapy, ejection fraction on echocardiography, or organs transplanted per donor, but more cases of severe hypertension and tachycardia occurred in the levothyroxine group than in the saline group. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically unstable brain-dead potential heart donors, intravenous levothyroxine infusion did not result in significantly more hearts being transplanted than saline infusion. (Funded by Mid-America Transplant and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04415658.).

Utilizing Artificial Intelligence and Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer to Answer Questions About Clinical Scenarios in Neuroanesthesiology.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the ability of chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence chatbot, to answer questions relevant to scenarios covered in 3 clinical guidelines, published by the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC), which has published management guidelines: endovascular treatment of stroke, perioperative stroke (Stroke), and care of patients undergoing complex spine surgery (Spine). METHODS: Four neuroanesthesiologists independently assessed whether ChatGPT could apply 52 high-quality recommendations (HQRs) included in the 3 SNACC guidelines. HQRs were deemed present in the ChatGPT responses if noted by at least 3 of the 4 reviewers. Reviewers also identified incorrect references, potentially harmful recommendations, and whether ChatGPT cited the SNACC guidelines. RESULTS: The overall reviewer agreement for the presence of HQRs in the ChatGPT answers ranged from 0% to 100%. Only 4 of 52 (8%) HQRs were deemed present by at least 3 of the 4 reviewers after 5 generic questions, and 23 (44%) HQRs were deemed present after at least 1 additional targeted question. Potentially harmful recommendations were identified for each of the 3 clinical scenarios and ChatGPT failed to cite the SNACC guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The ChatGPT answers were open to human interpretation regarding whether the responses included the HQRs. Though targeted questions resulted in the inclusion of more HQRs than generic questions, fewer than 50% of HQRs were noted even after targeted questions. This suggests that ChatGPT should not currently be considered a reliable source of information for clinical decision-making. Future iterations of ChatGPT may refine algorithms to improve its reliability as a source of clinical information.