Peak Oxygen Uptake is Slope Dependent: Insights from Ground Reaction Forces and Muscle Oxygenation in Trained Male Runners.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to explore the effect of treadmill slope on ground reaction forces and local muscle oxygenation as putative limiting factors of peak oxygen uptake in graded maximal incremental running tests. Thirteen trained male runners completed five maximal incremental running tests on treadmill at - 15%, - 7.5%, 0%, 7.5% and 15% slopes while cardiorespiratory and local muscle oxygenation responses as well as ground reaction forces were continuously recorded. Blood lactate concentration and isometric knee extensor torque were measured before and after each test. RESULTS: Peak oxygen uptake was lower at - 15% slope compared to all other conditions (from - 10 to - 17% lower, p < 0.001), with no difference between - 7.5 and + 15% slope. Maximal heart rate and ventilation values were reached in all conditions. The negative external mechanical work increased from steep uphill to steep downhill slopes (from 6 to 92% of total external work) but was not correlated with the peak oxygen uptake reduction. Local muscle oxygenation remained higher in - 15% slope compared to level running (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Similar peak oxygen uptake can be reached in downhill running up to - 7.5% slope. At more severe downhill slopes (i.e., - 15%), greater negative muscle work and limited local muscle deoxygenation occurred, even in subjects familiarized to downhill running, presumably preventing the achievement of similar to other condition's peak oxygen uptake. KEY POINTS: Trained male runners can reach like level running V̇O2peak at moderate but not at severe negative slope. Negative external mechanical work increases with increasing negative slope. At maximal intensity Vastus Lateralis muscle oxygenation is higher in steep negative slope. Knee extensor isometric muscle torque is preserved after maximal level and uphill running, but reduced after downhill running, despite lower blood lactate. Progressive reduction of V̇O2 at maximal effort with increasing negative slope might be related to the metabolic consequences of increased lower limb negative external work (i.e., eccentric muscle actions).

Relationship between biomechanics and energy cost in graded treadmill running.

The objective of this study was to determine whether the relationships between energy cost of running (Cr) and running mechanics during downhill (DR), level (LR) and uphill (UR) running could be related to fitness level. Nineteen athletes performed four experimental tests on an instrumented treadmill: one maximal incremental test in LR, and three randomized running bouts at constant speed (10 km h-1) in LR, UR and DR (± 10% slope). Gas exchange, heart rate and ground reaction forces were collected during steady-state. Subjects were split into two groups using the median Cr for all participants. Contact time, duty factor, and positive external work correlated with Cr during UR (all, p < 0.05), while none of the mechanical variables correlated with Cr during LR and DR. Mechanical differences between the two groups were observed in UR only: contact time and step length were higher in the economical than in the non-economical group (both p < 0.031). This study shows that longer stance duration during UR contributes to lower energy expenditure and Cr (i.e., running economy improvement), which opens the way to optimize specific running training programs.

Correspondence Between Values of Vertical Loading Rate and Oxygen Consumption During Inclined Running.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to provide a theoretical model to predict the vertical loading rate (VLR) at different slopes and speeds during incline running. METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy subjects running at least once a week performed in a randomized order 4-min running trials on an instrumented treadmill at various speeds (8, 10, 12, and 14 km h-1) and slopes (- 20%, - 10%, - 5%, 0%, + 5%, + 10%, + 15%, + 20%). Heart rate, gas exchanges and ground reaction forces were recorded. The VLR was then calculated as the slope of the vertical force between 20 and 80% of the duration from initial foot contact to the impact peak. RESULTS: There was no difference in VLR between the four different uphill conditions at given running speeds, but it was reduced by 27% at 5% slope and by 54% at 10% slope for the same metabolic demand (similar [Formula: see text]), when compared to level running. The average VLR measured at maximal aerobic intensity during level running would be decreased by 52.7% at + 5%, by 63.0% at + 10%, and by 73.3% at + 15% slope. Moreover, VLR was dependent on the slope in downhill conditions. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the possibility to use uphill running to minimize rate of mechanical load (i.e., osteoarticular load) from foot impact on the ground and as a time-efficient exercise routine (i.e., same energy expenditure than in level running in less time).

Energy Cost of Running in Well-Trained Athletes: Toward Slope-Dependent Factors.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the contribution of metabolic, cardiopulmonary, neuromuscular, and biomechanical factors to the energy cost (ECR) of graded running in well-trained runners. METHODS: Eight men who were well-trained trail runners (age: 29 [10] y, mean [SD]; maximum oxygen consumption: 68.0 [6.4] mL·min-1·kg-1) completed maximal isometric evaluations of lower limb extensor muscles and 3 randomized trials on a treadmill to determine their metabolic and cardiovascular responses and running gait kinematics during downhill (DR: -15% slope), level (0%), and uphill running (UR: 15%) performed at similar O2 uptake (approximately 60% maximum oxygen consumption). RESULTS: Despite similar O2 demand, ECR was lower in DR versus level running versus UR (2.5 [0.2] vs 3.6 [0.2] vs 7.9 [0.5] J·kg-1·m-1, respectively; all P < .001). Energy cost of running was correlated between DR and level running conditions only (r2 = .63; P = .018). Importantly, while ECR was correlated with heart rate, cardiac output, and arteriovenous O2 difference in UR (all r2 > .50; P < .05), ECR was correlated with lower limb vertical stiffness, ground contact time, stride length, and step frequency in DR (all r2 > .58; P < .05). Lower limb isometric extension torques were not related to ECR whatever the slope. CONCLUSION: The determining physiological factors of ECR might be slope specific, mainly metabolic and cardiovascular in UR versus mainly neuromuscular and mechanical in DR. This possible slope specificity of ECR during incline running opens the way for the implementation of differentiated physiological evaluations and training strategies to optimize performance in well-trained trail runners.

Short-term cold-water immersion does not alter neuromuscular fatigue development during high-intensity intermittent exercise.

AIMS: Pre-exercise cold-water immersion affects physical performance under ambient environment, however the mechanisms leading to this decrease remains to be elucidated. The purpose was to determine whether short-term lower-body immersion in cold water could induce acute changes in the development of neuromuscular fatigue after high-intensity exercise. METHODS: Ten participants performed on two separate visits a fatigue task (60 intermittent isometric maximal voluntary contractions maintained over 3 s and spaced by 2 s of recovery) once after lower-body cold-water immersion (Pre-Cooling, 6 min at 8.9°C ± 1.6°C) and another time without prior immersion (Control). Before and after the fatigue task, neuromuscular function was assessed during voluntary or evoked contractions (electrical stimulation performed on the femoral nerve) on contracted and relaxed on knee extensor muscles. RESULTS: No differences in neuromuscular fatigue were measured between Pre-Cooling and Control conditions, despite maximal voluntary contraction reductions (-49 and -48%, respectively, both p < 0.05), peripheral contractile capacities (both -28%, p < 0.05). Additionally, rate of perceived exhaustion increases over time for both conditions (both p < 0.05) with differences in the time course. DISCUSSION: Lower body immersion in extreme cold water for a short period of time was not a sufficient stimulus to induce a significant disruption of human body homeostasis: neuromuscular function was not significantly altered during a maximum intensity fatigue task.

Level, Uphill, and Downhill Running Economy Values Are Correlated Except on Steep Slopes.

The aim of this study was first to determine if level, uphill, and downhill energy cost of running (ECR) values were correlated at different slopes and for different running speeds, and second, to determine the influence of lower limb strength on ECR. Twenty-nine healthy subjects completed a randomized series of 4-min running bouts on an instrumented treadmill to determine their cardiorespiratory and mechanical (i.e., ground reaction forces) responses at different constant speeds (8, 10, 12, and 14 km·h-1) and different slopes (-20, -10, -5, 0, +5, +10, +15, and +20%). The subjects also performed a knee extensor (KE) strength assessment. Oxygen and energy costs of running values were correlated between all slopes by pooling all running speeds (all r 2 ≥ 0.27; p ≤ 0.021), except between the steepest uphill vs. level and the steepest downhill slope (i.e., +20% vs. 0% and -20% slopes; both p ≥ 0.214). When pooled across all running speeds, the ECR was inversely correlated with KE isometric maximal torque for the level and downhill running conditions (all r 2 ≥ 0.24; p ≤ 0.049) except for the steepest downhill slope (-20%), but not for any uphill slopes. The optimal downhill grade (i.e., lowest oxygen cost) varied between running speeds and ranged from -14% and -20% (all p < 0.001). The present results suggest that compared to level and shallow slopes, on steep slopes ~±20%, running energetics are determined by different factors (i.e., reduced bouncing mechanism, greater muscle strength for negative slopes, and cardiopulmonary fitness for positive slopes). On shallow negative slopes and during level running, ECR is related to KE strength.

Is Altitude Training Bad for the Running Mechanics of Middle-Distance Runners?

AIMS: It has been hypothesized that altitude training may alter running mechanics due to several factors such as the slower training velocity with associated alteration in muscle activation and coordination. This would lead to an altered running mechanics attested by an increase in mechanical work for a given intensity and to the need to "re-establish" the neuromuscular coordination and running biomechanics postaltitude. Therefore, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that "live high-train high" would induce alteration in the running biomechanics (ie, longer contact time, higher vertical oscillations, decreased stiffness, higher external work). METHODS: Before and 2 to 3 days after 3 weeks of altitude training (1850-2200 m), 9 national-level middle-distance (800-5000 m) male runners performed 2 successive 5-minute bouts of running at moderate intensity on an instrumented treadmill with measured ground reaction forces and gas exchanges. Immediately after the running trials, peak knee extensor torque was assessed during isometric maximal voluntary contraction. RESULTS: Except for a slight (-3.0%; P = .04) decrease in vertical stiffness, no mechanical parameters (stride frequency and length, contact and flight times, ground reaction forces, and kinetic and potential work) were modified from prealtitude to postaltitude camp. Running oxygen cost was also unchanged. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first one to report that "live high-train high" did not change the main running mechanical parameters, even when measured immediately after the altitude camp. This result has an important practical implication: there is no need for a corrective period at sea level for "normalizing" the running mechanics after an altitude camp.

Physiological factors determining downhill vs uphill running endurance performance.

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies investigated the determinants of trail running performance (i.e., combining uphill (UR) and downhill running sections (DR)), while the possible specific physiological factors specifically determining UR vs DR performances (i.e., isolating UR and DR) remain presently unknown. This study aims to determine the cardiorespiratory responses to outdoor DR vs UR time-trial and explore the determinants of DR and UR performance in highly trained runners. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Ten male highly-trained endurance athletes completed 5-km DR and UR time-trials (average grade: ±8%) and were tested for maximal oxygen uptake, lower limb extensor maximal strength, local muscle endurance, leg musculotendinous stiffness, vertical jump ability, explosivity/agility and sprint velocity. Predictors of DR and UR performance were investigated using correlation and commonality regression analyses. RESULTS: Running velocity was higher in DR vs UR time-trial (20.4±1.0 vs 12.0±0.5km·h-1, p<0.05) with similar average heart rate (95±2% vs 94±2% maximal heart rate; p>0.05) despite lower average V̇O2 (85±8% vs 89±7% V̇O2max; p<0.05). Velocity at V̇O2max (vV̇O2max) body mass index (BMI) and maximal extensor strength were significant predictors of UR performance (r2=0.94) whereas vV̇O2max, leg musculotendinous stiffness and maximal extensor strength were significant predictors of DR performance (r2=0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Five-km UR and DR running performances are both well explained by three independent predictors. If two predictors are shared between UR and DR performances (vV̇O2max and maximal strength), their relative contribution is different and, importantly, the third predictor appears very specific to the exercise modality (BMI for UR vs leg musculotendinous stiffness for DR).

High-intensity downhill running exacerbates heart rate and muscular fatigue in trail runners.

This study explores the cardiorespiratory and muscular fatigue responses to downhill (DR) vs uphill running (UR) at similar running speed or similar oxygen uptake (⩒O2). Eight well-trained, male, trail runners completed a maximal level incremental test and three 15-min treadmill running trials at ±15% slope: i) DR at ~6 km·h-1 and ~19% ⩒O2max (LDR); ii) UR at ~6 km·h-1 and ~70% ⩒O2max (HUR); iii) DR at ~19 km·h-1 and ~70% ⩒O2max (HDR). Cardiorespiratory responses and spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured continuously. Maximal isometric torque was assessed before and after each trial for hip and knee extensors and plantar flexor muscles. At similar speed (~6 km·h-1), cardiorespiratory responses were attenuated in LDR vs HUR with altered running kinematics (all p < 0.05). At similar ⩒O2 (~3 l·min-1), heart rate, pulmonary ventilation and breathing frequency were exacerbated in HDR vs HUR (p < 0.01), with reduced torque in knee (-15%) and hip (-11%) extensors and altered spatiotemporal gait parameters (all p < 0.01). Despite submaximal metabolic intensity (70% ⩒O2max), heart rate and respiratory frequency reached maximal values in HDR. These results further our understanding of the particular cardiorespiratory and muscular fatigue responses to DR and provide the bases for future DR training programs for trail runners.

Trail Runners Cannot Reach V˙O2max during a Maximal Incremental Downhill Test.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: (i) determine if well-trained athletes can achieve similar peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak) in downhill running (DR) versus level running (LR) or uphill running (UR) and (ii) investigate if lower limb extensor muscle strength is related to the velocity at V˙O2peak (vV˙O2peak) in DR, LR, and UR. METHODS: Eight athletes (V˙O2max = 68 ± 2 mL·min·kg) completed maximal incremental tests in LR, DR (-15% slope), and UR (+15% slope) on a treadmill (+1, +1.5, and +0.5 km·h every 2 min, respectively) while cardiorespiratory responses and spatiotemporal running parameters were continuously measured. They were also tested for maximal voluntary isometric strength of hip and knee extensors and plantar flexors. RESULTS: Oxygen uptake at maximal effort was approximately 16% to 18% lower in DR versus LR and UR (~57 ± 2 mL·min·kg, 68 ± 2 mL·min·kg, and 70 ± 3 mL·min·kg, respectively) despite much greater vV˙O2peak (22.7 ± 0.6 km·h vs 18.7 ± 0.5 km·h and 9.3 ± 0.3 km·h, respectively). At vV˙O2peak, longer stride length and shorter contact time occurred in DR versus LR and UR (+12%, +119%, -38%, and -61%, respectively). Contrary to knee extensor and plantar flexor, hip extensor isometric strength correlated to vV˙O2peak in DR, LR, and UR (r = -0.86 to -0.96, P < 0.05). At similar V˙O2, higher heart rate and ventilation emerged in DR versus LR and UR, associated with a more superficial ventilation pattern. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that well-trained endurance athletes, accustomed to DR, achieved lower V˙O2peak despite higher vV˙O2peak during DR versus LR or UR maximal incremental tests. The specific heart rate and ventilation responses in DR might originate from altered running gait and increased lower-limb musculotendinous mechanical loading, furthering our understanding of the particular physiology of DR, ultimately contributing to optimize trail race running performance.

Cardiorespiratory Responses to Downhill Versus Uphill Running in Endurance Athletes.

PURPOSE: Mountain running races are becoming increasingly popular, although our understanding of the particular physiology associated with downhill running (DR) in trained athletes remains scarce. This study explored the cardiorespiratory responses to high-slope constant velocity uphill running (UR) and DR. METHOD: Eight endurance athletes performed a maximal incremental test and 2 15-min running bouts (UR, +15%, or DR, -15%) at the same running velocity (8.5 ± 0.4 km·h-1). Oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2), heart rate (HR), and ventilation rates ([Formula: see text]E) were continuously recorded, and blood lactate (bLa) was measured before and after each trial. RESULTS: Downhill running induced a more superficial [Formula: see text]E pattern featuring reduced tidal volume (p < .05, ES = 6.05) but similar respiratory frequency (p > .05, ES = 0.68) despite lower [Formula: see text]E (p < .05, ES = 5.46), [Formula: see text]O2 (p < .05, ES = 12.68), HR (p < .05, ES = 6.42), and bLa (p < .05, ES = 1.70). A negative slow component was observed during DR for [Formula: see text]O2 (p < .05, ES = 1.72) and HR (p < .05, ES = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the cardiorespiratory responses to DR and highlight the need for cautious interpretation of [Formula: see text]O2, HR, and [Formula: see text]E patterns as markers of exercise intensity for training load prescription and management.