Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Geroscience ; 43(5): 2205-2213, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476717

RESUMO

Data suggests that favipiravir (FVP) could be used against SARS-CoV-2. Our aim was to investigate the role of FVP in COVID-19 treatment. A prospective sequential cohort study was performed among adults hospitalized at our center between March and August 2020 with moderate-to-severe, PCR-confirmed COVID-19. For diagnosis and severity, ECDC and WHO definitions were utilized. Patients were screened for inclusion by a priori criteria and included in the FVP cohort if standard-of-care (SOC) + FVP or the non-FVP cohort if SOC ± other antivirals without FVP were administered for > 48 h from diagnosis. Treatment allocation was done per national guidelines, based on severity and drug availability. Primary endpoint was disease progression, a composite of 14-day all-cause death, need for mechanical ventilation, or immunomodulatory therapy. The impact of FVP exposure on disease progression was analyzed by binomial logistic regression. In all, 150 patients were included, 75 in each cohort. Disease progression (17/75, 22.7% vs. 10/75, 13.3%, p = 0.13), 14-day all-cause death (9/75, 12.0% vs. 10/75, 13.3%, p = 0.8), and need for mechanical ventilation (8/75, 10.7% vs. 4/75, 5.3%, p = 0.22) were similar, while immunomodulatory therapies were required more frequently among patients receiving FVP (10/75, 13.3% vs. 1/75, 1.3%, p < 0.01). The use of favipiravir was not retained as a protective factor against disease progression in multivatiate analysis. Time to antiviral therapy from PCR positivity, disease severity, need for oxygen supportation, and ICU admittance rates did not differ statistically between cohorts. In this study, favipiravir did not seem to positively affect disease progression.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Amidas , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Hungria , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirazinas , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 99(2): 115231, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33099134

RESUMO

Our aim was to analyze characteristics of treatment failure with intravenous tigecycline monotherapy among adults with severe Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI). A single-centre observational cohort study was performed between 2014 and 2018. Data were collected by charts review, diagnosis and severity were determined by ESCMID guidelines. Primary outcome was treatment failure, secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, relapse, colectomy, and complication rates. Independent predictors of failure were identified using logistic regression. Altogether 110 patients were included, failure occurred in 37.3%. Patients with failure frequently had chronic heart and pulmonary co-morbidities, peritonitis, higher CRP levels, ICU admittance rates and need for total parenteral nutrition and vasopressors. Mostly, CDI-specific mortality and complications contributed to failure. Relapse rates were similar. Chronic pulmonary disease, ileus, total parenteral nutrition, and duration of tigecycline therapy were predictors of failure. We conclude that severe CDI cases with higher risk for tigecycline monotherapy failure might be identified by contributing factors.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Tigeciclina/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Falha de Tratamento
3.
Orv Hetil ; 160(48): 1887-1893, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31760775

RESUMO

Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) is a hyperacute, life-threatening illness, a complication of invasive streptococcal (mostly group A, rarely groups B, G or C) infection. There is no portal of entry (skin, vagina, pharynx) in nearly half of the STSS cases. The initial signs and symptoms (fever, flu-like complaints, hypotension) are scarce and aspecific, but because of its rapid progression and poor prognosis, early high level of suspicion is necessary. Management has 3 crucial points: initiation of anti-streptococcal regimen (and intravenous immunoglobulin in some cases), aggressive intensive care support of multi-organ failure, and surgical control of the infective source. In this article, we present a case of a patient succumbing to streptococcal toxic shock syndrome which was preceded by primary S. pyogenes bacteremia, and review the key points of this potentially fatal disease for practising clinicians. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(48): 1887-1893.


Assuntos
Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Choque Séptico/complicações , Infecções Estreptocócicas/complicações
4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 584, 2019 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31349818

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired sepsis is a life-threatening systemic reaction, which starts within ≤72 h of hospital admittance in an infected patient without recent exposure to healthcare risks. Our aim was to evaluate the characteristics and the outcomes concerning community-acquired sepsis among patients admitted to a Hungarian high-influx national medical center. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients hospitalized with community-acquired sepsis during a 1-year period was executed. Clinical and microbiological data were collected, patients with pre-defined healthcare associations were excluded. Sepsis definitions and severity were given according to ACCP/SCCM criteria. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admittance, length-of-stay (LOS), source control and bacteraemia rates. Statistical differences were explored with classical comparison tests, predictors of in-hospital all-cause mortality were modelled by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 214 patients (median age 60.0 ± 33.1 years, 57% female, median Charlson score 4.0 ± 5.0) were included, 32.7% of them (70/214) had severe sepsis, and 28.5% (61/214) had septic shock. Prevalent sources of infections were genitourinary (53/214, 24.8%) and abdominal (52/214, 24.3%). The causative organisms were dominantly E. coli (60/214, 28.0%), S. pneumoniae (18/214, 8.4%) and S. aureus (14/214, 6.5%), and bacteraemia was documented in 50.9% of the cases (109/214). In-hospital mortality was high (30/214, 14.0%), and independently associated with shock, absence of fever, male gender and the need for ICU admittance, but source control and de-escalation of empirical antimicrobial therapy were protective. ICU admittance was 27.1% (58/214), source control was achieved in 18.2% (39/214). Median LOS was 10.0 ± 8.0, ICU LOS was 8.0 ± 10.8 days. CONCLUSIONS: Community-acquired sepsis poses a significant burden of disease with characteristic causative agents and sources. Patients at a higher risk for poor outcomes might be identified earlier by the contributing factors shown above.


Assuntos
Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Hungria , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
5.
Infection ; 46(6): 855-860, 2018 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30191513

RESUMO

To describe the characteristics of adult invasive H. influenzae disease, 34 patients diagnosed at a single tertiary center between 2004 and 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective case series study. The annual estimated incidence was 0.1 cases/100.000 inhabitants. Dominant source of infection was pneumonia accompanied by sepsis (62%) and caused by nontypeable strains (74%) with low ampicillin resistance (14%). Survival (94%) and complication rates were high (35%). Main empirical treatments were ceftriaxone or levofloxacine.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Haemophilus/epidemiologia , Haemophilus influenzae/fisiologia , Sepse/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ampicilina/uso terapêutico , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Infecções por Haemophilus/complicações , Infecções por Haemophilus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Haemophilus/microbiologia , Haemophilus influenzae/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Hungria/epidemiologia , Incidência , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/microbiologia
6.
Orv Hetil ; 156(44): 1769-77, 2015 Nov 01.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26498896

RESUMO

Incidence and mortality rates of infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) are high worldwide and in Hungary among paediatric as well as adult populations. Pneumococci account for 35-40% of community acquired adult pneumonias requiring hospitalization, while 25-30% of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonias are accompanied by bacteraemia. 5-7% of all infections are fatal but this rate is exponentially higher in high risk patients and elderly people. Mortality could reach 20% among patients with severe invasive pneumococcal infections. Complications may develop despite administration of adequate antibiotics. The authors summarize the epidemiology of pneumococcal infections, pathogenesis of non-invasive and invasive disease and present basic clinical aspects through demonstration of four cases. Early risk stratification, sampling of hemocultures, administration of antibiotics and wider application of active immunization could reduce the mortality of invasive disease. Anti-pneumococcal vaccination is advisable for adults of ≥50 years and high risk patients of ≥18 years who are susceptible to pneumococcal disease.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Pneumonia Pneumocócica , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Cardiopatias/microbiologia , Humanos , Hungria/epidemiologia , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Pneumocócicas , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/complicações , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/mortalidade , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Insuficiência Respiratória/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA