Imaging presentation of extraskeletal osteosarcomas on CT and MRI and correlation with patients outcome: A two-center retrospective study of 54 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the imaging features of extraskeletal osteosarcomas (ESOS) on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to investigate their associations with overall survival (OS) using uni- and multivariable survival analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This two-center retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients between 2008 and 2021 with histopathologically-proven ESOS who underwent pre-treatment CT and/or MRI. Clinical and histological characteristics, ESOS presentation on CT and MRI, treatment and outcomes were reported. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regressions. Associations between imaging features and OS were searched using uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included (30/54 [56%] men, median age: 67.5 years). Twenty-four died of ESOS (median OS: 18 months). ESOS were mostly deep-seated (46/54, 85%) in the lower limb (27/54, 50%) with a median size of 95 mm (interquartile range: 64, 142; range: 21-289 mm). Mineralization was seen on 26/42 (62%) patients, mainly gross-amorphous (18/26; 69%). ESOS were generally highly heterogeneous on T2-weighted images (38/48; 79%) and contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted images (29/40; 72%), with necrosis (39/40; 97%), well-defined or focally infiltrative margins (39/47; 83%), with moderate peritumoral edema (39/47; 83%) and rim-like peripheral enhancement (17/40; 42%). Size, location, mineralization on CT, signal intensity heterogeneity on T1-, T2- and CE-T1-weighted images and hemorragic signal on MRI were associated with poorer OS (range of log-rank P = 0.0069-0.0485). At multivariable analysis, hemorragic signal and signal intensity heterogeneity on T2-weighted images remained predictive for poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.68, P = 0.0299; HR = 9.85, P = 0.0262, respectively) CONCLUSION: ESOS typically presents as mineralized heterogeneous and necrotic soft tissue tumor with a possible rim-like enhancement and limited peritumoral abnormalities. MRI may help estimate outcome of patients with ESOS.

Adaptation and Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire in Italian Language.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The population of patients with advanced stages of cancer, including metastatic spinal disease, is growing because of better treatment options allowing for longer control of disease. The main goal of treatment for these patients is to improve or maintain their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A spine oncology-specific outcome measure has been developed by the Spine Oncology Study Group and validated through international studies. We proposed to translate and validate the questionnaire in Italian language. METHODS: The cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire has been performed according to guidelines previously proposed. After this process, an observational prospective study has been conducted to validate the efficacy of SOSGOQ in Italian language. SOSGOQ has been compared to SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey-36), a generic validated questionnaire to assess HRQOL. Starting from January 2020, SOSGOQ and SF-36 questionnaires were auto-administered to 150 patients affected by spinal metastases who provided written informed consent for study participation. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis on the 4 domains examined showed a good model fit (comparative fit index, .95; RMSEA .07 (90% CI, .05-.09) and SRMR, .05), endorsing construct validity. The analysis of concurrent validity demonstrated strong correlation for physical function, pain and mental health domains with the corresponding domain scores of SF-36. The reliability across item was high with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .91. CONCLUSIONS: The statistical analysis of the results will allow to accept the Italian version of SOSGOQ as a specific and efficient tool to measure HRQOL in Italian-speaking patients affected by spinal metastases.

Denosumab in patients with aneurysmal bone cysts: A case series with preliminary results.

PURPOSE:: Aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a rare skeletal tumor usually treated with surgery/embolization. We hypothesized that owing to similarities with giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), denosumab was active also in ABC. METHODS:: In this observational study, a retrospective analysis of ABC patients treated with denosumab was performed. Patients underwent radiologic disease assessment every 3 months. Symptoms and adverse events were noted. RESULTS:: Nine patients were identified (6 male, 3 female), with a median age of 17 years (range 14-42 years). Primary sites were 6 spine-pelvis, 1 ulna, 1 tibia, and 1 humerus. Patients were followed for a median time of 23 months (range 3-55 months). Patients received a median of 8 denosumab administrations (range 3-61). All symptomatic patients had pain relief and 1 had paresthesia improvement. Signs of denosumab activity were observed after 3 to 6 months of administration: bone formation by computed tomography scan was demonstrated in all patients and magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium contrast media decrease was observed in 7/9 patients. Adverse events were negligible. At last follow-up, all patients were progression-free: 5 still on denosumab treatment, 2 off denosumab were disease-free 11 and 17 months after surgery, and the last 2 patients reported no progression 12 and 24 months after denosumab interruption and no surgery. CONCLUSIONS:: Denosumab has substantial activity in ABCs, with favorable toxicity profile. We strongly support the use of surgery and/or embolization for the treatment of ABC, but denosumab could have a role as a therapeutic option in patients with uncontrollable, locally destructive, or recurrent disease.

How a Clinical Trial Unit can improve independent clinical research in rare tumors: the Italian Sarcoma Group experience.

BACKGROUND: The Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG) is a nonprofit group of professionals established in 1997 aimed to improve the quality of care and promote the independent research in sarcomas. The increased regulatory requirements, the chance to increase the number of trials with other cooperative groups and an interest from pharmaceutical companies in supporting independent research, generated the need of an internal service for research management. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 2010, ISG implemented in its organization a Clinical Trial Unit (CTU). The CTU was appointed to fully manage Clinical Trial Operations, to guarantee regulation compliance and provide a central support to the investigators, fostering a collaboration both at national and international level. In 2016 ISG promoted 25 studies in about 120 centers, with a fivefold increase in the last 5 years: 68% were interventional and 32% observational. Nine of the 17 interventional studies (52%) were supported by pharmaceutical companies, while 4 (24%) were funded by European Commission within specific projects on sarcomas and 4 (24%) were supported by the ISG itself. CONCLUSION: The contribution of ISG researchers to the international community was striking from the earliest years of the ISG creation. The challenges of the regulatory clinical research scenario, which imposes solid and hard-fast methodology with deep knowledge and expertise, highlighted the need to identify qualified and dedicated experts able to run and follow the multifaceted aspects of trials. Our analysis demonstrated how this model has led to a growth in competitiveness of the group. The collaboration between clinicians and CTU made possible to support the research with high scientific and ethical standards and to increase the number of trials, sites and overall enrolled patients. The reduced time for approvals, the continuous support to sites, the increased speed in data collection and analysis make the ISG research attractive for pharmaceutical industries, despite the problems that have characterized the independent research in the last years. The ability to fully manage and oversight Clinical Operations and the high quality of delivered services, have led the ISG to be recognized as a reliable partner and coordinator within the international sarcoma networks.