Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(10): 1670-1672, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971237

RESUMO

The environment surrounding 30 of 31 carriers of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) was contaminated by CRAB. The environmental CRAB loads were similar whether carriers were identified only by surveillance cultures (nonclinical carriers) or also had positive clinical cultures. Screening to detect and isolate nonclinical CRAB carriers may be important to prevent CRAB transmission.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Humanos , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Controle de Infecções , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(2): 166-171, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31722777

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated environmental contamination by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), the effectiveness of cleaning practices, the performance of aerosolized hydrogen-peroxide (aHP) technology, and the correlation between measures of cleaning and environmental contamination. DESIGN: Serial testing of environmental contamination during a 7-month period. SETTING: Single-patient rooms in intensive care units (ICUs) and multipatient step-up and regular rooms in internal medicine wards in a tertiary-care hospital with endemic CRAB. METHODS: CRAB environmental contamination was determined semiquantitatively using sponge sampling. RESULTS: In step-up rooms, 91% of patient units (56% of objects) were contaminated, and half of them were heavily contaminated. In regular rooms, only 21% of patient units (3% of objects) were contaminated. In ICUs, 76% of single-patient rooms (24% of objects) were contaminated. Cleaning did not reduce the number of contaminated objects or patient units in step-up rooms. After refresher training, cleaning reduced the proportion of contaminated objects by 2-fold (P = .001), but almost all patient units remained contaminated. Using aerosolized hydrogen peroxide (aHP) disinfection after discharge of a known CRAB-carrier decreased room contamination by 78%, similar to the reduction achieved by manual hypochloride cleaning. Measuring cleaning efficacy using fluorescent gel did not correlate with recovery of CRAB by sponge cultures. CONCLUSIONS: In step-up rooms, the high number of objects contaminated combined with poor efficacy of cleaning resulted in failure to eliminate CRAB in patient units. Fluorescent gel is a poor detector of CRAB contamination. The role of aHP is still unclear. However, its use in multipatient rooms is limited because it can only be used in unoccupied rooms.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Desinfecção/métodos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Microbiologia Ambiental , Quartos de Pacientes , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA