Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 5(4): 763-769, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34377948

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of clinical pharmacists in daily audits, under the direction of an antimicrobial stewardship program, of antibiotic treatment durations for the common inpatient disease states of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and urinary tract infection (UTI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study that evaluated the difference in the duration of antibiotic therapy for CAP or non-catheter-associated UTI of hospitalized patients who received a daily audit by clinical pharmacists compared with patients who did not receive a daily audit. Retrospective chart review included randomly selected hospitalized patients diagnosed with CAP or UTI during preaudit and postaudit periods. RESULTS: The preaudit group had 64 patients; and the postaudit group, 51 patients. The therapy duration was 7 days in the preaudit group and 6 days in the postaudit group (P=.55). Fluoroquinolone use was reduced in the postaudit group and was significantly less than in the preaudit group (24 [37.5%] vs 7 [13.7%]; P=.007). CONCLUSION: The daily audits of clinical pharmacists may be an effective method to reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy and are effective in the reduction of fluoroquinolone use. Additional studies must be done to further investigate the effects of clinical pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

2.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 96(5): 1250-1261, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33958056

RESUMO

The administration of spike monoclonal antibody treatment to patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 is very challenging. This article summarizes essential components and processes in establishing an effective spike monoclonal antibody infusion program. Rapid identification of a dedicated physical infrastructure was essential to circumvent the logistical challenges of caring for infectious patients while maintaining compliance with regulations and ensuring the safety of our personnel and other patients. Our partnerships and collaborations among multiple different specialties and disciplines enabled contributions from personnel with specific expertise in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, infection prevention and control, electronic health record (EHR) informatics, compliance, legal, medical ethics, engineering, administration, and other critical areas. Clear communication and a culture in which all roles are welcomed at the planning and operational tables are critical to the rapid development and refinement needed to adapt and thrive in providing this time-sensitive beneficial therapy. Our partnerships with leaders and providers outside our institutions, including those who care for underserved populations, have promoted equity in the access of monoclonal antibodies in our regions. Strong support from institutional leadership facilitated expedited action when needed, from a physical, personnel, and system infrastructure standpoint. Our ongoing real-time assessment and monitoring of our clinical program allowed us to improve and optimize our processes to ensure that the needs of our patients with COVID-19 in the outpatient setting are met.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , COVID-19 , Procedimentos Clínicos , Terapia por Infusões no Domicílio , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Procedimentos Clínicos/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos/tendências , Eficiência Organizacional , Terapia por Infusões no Domicílio/métodos , Terapia por Infusões no Domicílio/normas , Humanos , Colaboração Intersetorial , Cultura Organizacional , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/antagonistas & inibidores , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Am J Ther ; 27(2): e177-e182, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30418221

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy with a macrolide and ß-lactam or a fluoroquinolone for the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in an inpatient non-intensive care setting is recommended per guidelines. Studies show that these treatments have similar outcomes, including death, adverse effects, and bacterial eradication. However, a comparison of 30-day readmission rates between these treatments is limited. STUDY QUESTION: To determine whether 30-day readmissions for patients treated for CAP in a regional hospital differed between a fluoroquinolone monotherapy and a ß-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥18 years with a CAP diagnosis who were admitted to the same regional hospital from December 1, 2011, through December 1, 2016. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Patients receiving a third-generation cephalosporin plus macrolide were compared with those receiving a respiratory fluoroquinolone. Exclusion criteria were concurrent or recent use of the study antibiotics; death, transfer, or transition to hospice; and diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia or health care-associated pneumonia. The collected data were 30-day readmission rates, antibiotic regimens, demographic characteristics, and pneumonia severity index and comorbidity scores. Association between treatment group and readmissions was assessed with logistic regression. Association between readmissions and individual data points between the 2 treatment groups was calculated with multivariate regression and odds ratio (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: Of 432 patients, 171 met inclusion criteria (fluoroquinolone group, n = 101; ß-lactam plus macrolide group, n = 70). Thirty-day readmissions were not significantly different between the fluoroquinolone group and ß-lactam plus macrolide group (P = 0.58). Increased 30-day readmissions were independently associated with male sex and hospital length of stay (P < 0.05). Length of stay was approximately 3 days and did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was seen in 30-day readmissions between CAP patients who received fluoroquinolone monotherapy and those who received ß-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/mortalidade , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Bacteriana/mortalidade , Caracteres Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA