The Efficacy of Electroacupuncture in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) and analgesics in treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and provide evidence-based medical support for EA for the treatment of KOA. Randomized controlled trials from January 2012 to December 2021 are included in electronic databases. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials is used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies, while the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation is used to assess the quality of evidence. Statistical analyses are performed using Review Manager V5.4. There are 1616 patients from 20 clinical studies, including 849 patients in the treatment group and 767 patients in the control group. The effective rate in the treatment group is significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.00001). In the treatment group, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) stiffness scores are significantly improved as compared to the control group (p < 0.0001). However, EA is similar to analgesics in improving visual analog scale scores and WOMAC subitems such as pain and joint function. EA is effective in treating KOA because it can significantly improve clinical symptoms and quality of life in KOA patients.

Research on electroacupuncture parameters for knee osteoarthritis based on data mining.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis, a common degenerative joint disease, has been widely treated by electroacupuncture in recent years. However, there are too many parameters of the treatment currently, resulting in various applications in clinical practice. This study aims to summarize the optimal stimulation parameters of electroacupuncture for knee osteoarthritis in clinical studies by applying data mining techniques. METHODS: Four databases including Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for clinical studies on electroacupuncture treating knee osteoarthritis from 2012 to 2021. A database was established by Microsoft Excel 2020 and analyzed by R Version 4.1.1. RESULTS: Forty-six articles were included according to the established criteria. The most used electroacupuncture stimulation parameters were 0.30 mm × 40 mm needle, continuous wave, low frequency of current (mainly 2 Hz), stimulation duration for 30 min per treatment, and frequency of treatment for once a day. Eighteen acupoints were mentioned and the most used ones include Dubi (ST35), Liangqiu (ST34), Neixiyan (EX-LE4), Xuehai (SP10), Yanglingquan (GB34), and Yinlingquan (SP9), and those most generally used acupoints are closely arranged on the Stomach Channel of Foot Yangming. Cluster analysis showed two groups, one for obligatory acupoints and one for adjunctive ones. The association analysis showed the most supported acupoint pair was Liangqiu (ST34) and Xuehai (SP10). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous wave, low frequency of current (2 Hz), 30-min stimulation, and local acupoint selection are frequently used for electroacupuncture treating knee osteoarthritis. Due to the limitations of this study, further research and more standardized, multi-centered, and large-sample clinical trials should be conducted to provide more convincing evidence.

External Treatment With Chinese Herbal Medicine for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse reaction of chemotherapy. Many studies have confirmed that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has unique advantages for treating CIPN. However, there is no standard TCM prescription in clinical practice or objective outcome index, and similar efficacy varies. Therefore, in this study, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of external treatment with Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for CIPN. This analysis provides evidence-based medical support for the use of CHM for external treatment of CIPN. Methods: Relevant RCTs assessing CHM external treatment of CIPN were searched in nine electronic databases, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Biology Medicine Disc, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database, PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and OVID, from inception to July 2021. A meta-analysis was performed on these studies using RevMan5.3 software. Results: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 33 clinical studies were included, while 1,354 studies were screened out. There were 2,356 patients in total, including 1,208 in the treatment group and 1,148 in the control group. In the treatment group, peripheral neurotoxicity rate, total effect rate, KPS score, TCM syndrome score and efficacy, pain NRS score, and pain relief rate were significantly improved compared with those of the control group (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the peroneal and median nerve conduction velocities were also improved compared with those in the control group (p < 0.05). By creating a funnel plot for the incidence of peripheral neurotoxicity and the total effect rate, we showed that the left and right sides were symmetrical, and that the publication bias was low. Conclusion: CHM external treatment was found to be an effective method for treating CIPN as it significantly improved clinical symptoms and quality of life in patients with CIPN. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier ChiCTR1900024617.