[Diagnosis and treatment of subglottic mass（report of 5 cases）].

Subglottic masses is very rare. The clinical data of five cases of subglottic mass in our hospital from 2017 to 2022 were summarized, and their clinical manifestations, auxiliary examination findings, treatment plan and pathological features were analyzed. Among the 5 patients, 1 case was subglottic pleomorphic adenoma, 1 case was subglottic granuloma, 1 case was subglottic breast cancer metastasis, 1 case was subglottic primary adenoid cystic carcinoma, and 1 case was immunoglobulin G4-related disease. No recurrence was observed in the patients so far. Subglottic mass is easy to be missed. Therefore, when the lesion is suspected in this area, the examination of ear, nose and throat should be carried out systematically to detect the lesion early and improve the prognosis.

The Time-Point Distribution Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Elderly Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the characteristics of the time-point distribution of the occurrence of hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) in elderly and younger patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Analysis of data from patients with LPR-related symptoms and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-hour HEMII-pH) monitoring from February 2017 to September 2022 at Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital. METHODS: Patients were divided into 2 age groups: the elderly group (>60 years) and the younger group (≤60 years). The time series of HREs and meals within 24 hours were analyzed based on HEMII-pH. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients were included (126 elderly patients). In younger patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs, the incidence of the remaining types of HREs tended to increase within 2 hours after meals, especially after dinner. The incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal was not significantly different in the elderly group (χ2 = 0.080, P = .777). The incidence of nighttime HREs in elderly patients was statistically higher than in younger patients (6.23% vs 3.96%, P = .030), particularly acid-/nonacid-liquid HREs. CONCLUSION: HREs tend to increase within 2 hours after meals in younger LPR patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs. In elderly LPR patients, the incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal were not significantly different, and nighttime fluid HREs was more prone to occur than in younger patients.

A Study of the Diagnostic Value of the Sign and Symptom Questionnaires for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic value of symptom questionnaires, sign questionnaires, and the combination of 2 questionnaires for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-centered. SETTING: Seventy-seven patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery from October 2022 to April 2023 were included. METHODS: Included patients completed the RSS, RSI, RSA, and RFS questionnaires and underwent 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH). The RSS, RSI, RSA, RFS, RSS+RSA, RSS+RFS, RSI+RSA, RSI+RFS, and RSI+RFS diagnostic value were compared using Cohen's k test and receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Based on the 24 hours HEMII-pH results, 52 patients had LPRD, and 25 patients did not have LPRD. The Kappa values of RSS, RSI, RSA, RFS, RSS+RSA,2 RSS+RFS, RSI+RSA, and RSI+RFS with the 24 hours HEMII-pH monitoring results were 0.565, 0.442, 0.318, 0.431, 0.517, 0.631, 0.451, and 0.461, respectively. The RSS+RFS questionnaire had the highest AUC of 0.836 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.762-0.909) and the RSA questionnaire had the lowest AUC (AUC = 0.665, 95% CI 0.560-0.790). The sensitivity of RSS was the highest (98%), the specificities of RSS+RFS and RSI+RFS were the highest (96%), and the specificity of RSS was the lowest (52%). RSS+RFS had a sensitivity of 75%, second only to RSS and RFS (76%). CONCLUSION: Among the 8 methods, the RSS combined with the RFS had the highest concordance with 24 hours HEMII-pH monitoring results and AUC values when screening for LPRD.

History of Previous Surgical Resection Promotes the Sclerosis of the Arytenoid Cartilage in Patients With Laryngeal Contact Granuloma.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between arytenoid cartilage sclerosis and a history of previous surgical resection in patients with laryngeal contact granuloma. METHODS: 167 patients with laryngeal contact granuloma treated from March 2016 to December 2018 were studied. The high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) data of the sclerosis of arytenoid cartilage is divided into asymmetric sclerosis, bilateral sclerosis, and no sclerosis according to the range of sclerosis. The proportions of various ranges of sclerosis in two subgroups of patients were compared to patients with and without a history of previous surgical resection. RESULTS: The arytenoid cartilage sclerosis rate of 167 patients was 69.46%. The exact probability method showed that P < 0.001, suggesting that the distribution of arytenoid cartilage sclerosis was different in patients with and without a history of previous surgical resection, and there was a moderate correlation between the extent of arytenoid sclerosis and history of previous surgical resection (Cramer's V = 0.436, P < 0.001). There were 18 cases of bilateral sclerosis in patients with a history of previous surgical resection, of which 50% had contralateral recurrence after combined therapy (proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and glucocorticoid injection into granuloma via the thyrohyoid membrane approach), accounting for 75% of recurrence after combined therapy. CONCLUSION: Surgery promotes the expansion of arytenoid sclerosis, Patients with bilateral arytenoid sclerosis are prone to recurrence of contralateral laryngeal contact granuloma.

Relationship Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adult Males.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with OSA who were hospitalized in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery from November 2021 to April 2022 were selected, and male patients with non-OSA during the same period were selected as the control group. Patients who participated in the study completed the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), the Reflux Finding Sign (RFS), and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring. RSI, RFS, and outcomes of 24 hour-MII-pH monitoring were compared between the OSA group and the control group. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were enrolled, of whom 49 were OSA patients and 37 were non-OSA patients. The positive rate of LPR (97.96% vs 75.68%) and the median number of LPR episodes (9 vs 5) were significantly higher in OSA patients than in non-OSA patients (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, respectively). A logistic regression model including body mass index, alcohol consumption, and the presence of OSA showed that having OSA was a risk factor for the occurrence of LPR (P < 0.05, OR [odds ratio] = 9.995, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.084-92.181). There were correlations between Apnea-Hypopnea Index and the number of non-acid LPR episodes and the number of alkaline LPR episodes (r = 0.243, P < 0.05, r = 0.274, P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Having OSA is a risk factor for LPR, and LPR episodes occur more frequently in patients with OSA compared to those without OSA. When OSA is comorbid with LPR, the occurrence of alkaline LPR, such as bile reflux, should be a concurrent concern.

Can pepsin immunohistochemical staining of laryngeal lesions accurately diagnose non-acid laryngeal reflux?

BACKGROUND: Non-acid reflux is the most common form of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, the damage caused by non-acid reflux to the laryngeal mucosa is weaker than that caused by acid reflux. AIMS: To evaluate whether pepsin immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of laryngeal lesions can accurately diagnose acidic and non-acidic LPR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring was performed, and the patients were divided into acid reflux and non-acid reflux groups. Pathological sections of laryngeal lesions were examined using pepsin IHC staining, which was positive when pepsin was detected in the cytoplasm. RESULTS: The study included 136 patients, with 58 in the acid reflux group, 43 in the non-acid reflux group, and 35 in the without reflux group. There were no significant differences in the positive rate of pepsin IHC staining between the non-acid and acid reflux groups (p = .421). The sensitivity of pepsin IHC staining for the diagnosis of acid and non-acid reflux was 94.8% and 90.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of pepsin IHC staining for laryngeal lesions in the diagnosis of non-acidic LPR is satisfactory. SIGNIFICANCE: Pepsin IHC staining is suitable for LPR screening of patients with laryngeal lesions as it is economical, non-invasive, and highly sensitive.

Tumoral Calcinosis in the Larynx.

Tumoral calcinosis is a rare benign disease defined as calcium salt deposits in the periarticular soft tissue region. Tumoral calcinosis is rare in the neck and larynx. In this case, we described a 58-year-old man who had numerous calcified nodules in the larynx.

Comparison of the Effects of Botulinum Toxin A Injection and Local Glucocorticoid Injection for Treating Laryngeal Contact Granuloma.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of botulinum toxin A injection and local glucocorticoid injection for treating laryngeal contact granuloma and to discuss the indications for both regimens. METHODS: The case data of 50 patients with laryngeal contact granuloma in the outpatient clinic of the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were reviewed, and the patients were divided into the following two groups according to the different treatments received: botulinum toxin A injection or local glucocorticoid injection. Quantitative assessment of the lesion size was performed using Image J software to compare the efficacy in the two groups. RESULTS: On comparing the cure rate between the two groups at 3 months after treatment, 72% of patients in the botulinum toxin A group were cured compared to 40% of patients in the glucocorticoid group (P = 0.023). On comparing the cure rate between the two groups at 6 months after treatment, 88% of patients in the botulinum toxin A group were cured compared to 64% of patients in the glucocorticoid group (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin A injection is superior to local glucocorticoid injection, and local glucocorticoid injection is more appropriate for patients who cannot tolerate the adverse effects of botulinum toxin A.

Investigation of the potential relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in symptomatology - a prospective study based on a multidisciplinary outpatient.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scale were administered to patients attending the gastroenterology outpatient clinic at the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from 7 April 2021 to 10 June 2021. Patients with GERD-Q score >7 were indicated GERD, and patients with RSI >13 were indicated LPRD. The analysis of patients with pure GERD (independent GERD, iG), patients with LPRD and GERD (LPRD & GERD, L&G), patients with simple LPRD (independent LPRD, iL) and the percentage of normal group (GERDQ-negative and RSI-negative, N). RESULTS: 3060 GERD-Q and RSI questionnaires were distributed, and 2974 complete questionnaires were returned. Among them, 274 (9.20%) iL, 334 (11.23%) iG and 151 (5.10%) L&G patients and 2215 (74.48%) N patients. The positive rate of GERD in this sample was 16.31%, of which 31.13% had coexisting LPRD, and the positive rate of LPRD was 14.29%, of which 35.53% had coexisting GERD. Among patients with LPRD, the positive rate of concomitant GERD (χ2 = 4.157, p = 0.041) and RSI score (Z = -6.823, p = 0.000) was significantly higher in patients with the presence of respiratory symptoms than in those without respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSION: LPRD can exist alone or in conjunction with GERD. Patients with both LPRD and GERD had the most severe reflux symptoms. The need to focus on the risk of those initially screened only with GERD developing LPRD. Respiratory symptoms play an important role in reflux disease.

Comparison of Reflux Symptom Score versus Reflux Symptom Index in screening laryngopharyngeal reflux.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the screening value of the Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) and the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: All included patients attending the Department of Otolaryngology at the Sixth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from February 2022 to August 2022, completed the RSS and the RSI and underwent 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24 h HEMII-pH) monitoring. The results of 24 h HEMII-pH were used as a diagnostic criterion for LPR, consistency between two questionnaires (RSS, RSI) and 24 h HEMII-pH was compared by the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic and the screening value of RSS and RSI for LPR was compared by receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients, 58 males, and 19 females, were included. The Kappa values of between RSS, RSI, and 24 h HEMII-pH were 0.663 (p < 0.001) and 0.213 (p < 0.05), respectively. The sensitivity of RSS and RSI were 92.8% and 48.2%, respectively, the specificity was 71.4% and 80.9%. The negative predictive value and positive predictive value of RSI were 36.9%, 87.1%, and that of RSS were 78.9%, 89.6%. The area under curve of the RSS (0.783; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.75) is significantly higher than RSI (0.633; 95% CI = 0.72, 0.90). CONCLUSION: The RSS has a higher consistency and better screening value for LPR compared to RSI. In addition, the RSS includes more reflux symptoms, which may reduce the number of missed diagnoses in patients with LPR to some extent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2104-2109, 2023.

Optimal Timing of the Salivary Pepsin Test for the Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal time point for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) through combining 24-h hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-h HEMII-pH) monitoring and the multi-time point salivary pepsin test (MTPSPT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective uncontrolled trial. METHOD: Patients with and without LPR symptoms were included as the test group and the control group, respectively. The patients in the test group underwent 24-h HEMII-pH and MTPSPT. The results of 24-h HEMII-pH were used as a diagnostic criterion for LPR, and the diagnostic value of salivary pepsin tests performed at different time points was compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included. Based on 24-h HEMII-pH, the positive rate of LPR in the test group of patients was 84.00%. In the control group, only one person (3.57%) had a positive salivary pepsin test result. The area under the curve (AUC) of the MTPSPT was 0.827. In addition, we separately calculated the AUC of the combined salivary pepsin test at different time points, and found good diagnostic value (AUC = 0.799) when the test was combined with the waking, 1 and 2 h after breakfast and lunch, and 1 h after dinner tests. However, when the number of tests were further increased, the diagnostic value did not improve significantly. CONCLUSION: Salivary pepsin testing combined with waking, 1 h and 2 h after breakfast and lunch, and 1 h after dinner has almost the same diagnostic value as MTPSPT, and testing at these time points can be an effective method for diagnosing LPR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1706-1711, 2023.

Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients of Different Genders and Ages.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differences in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) characteristics between gender and age groups based on the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS) scale and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (HEMII-pH) monitoring. METHODS: The enrolled were patients with LPR symptoms completed the 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring and divided into two gender groups (male and female) and elderly group (>60 years), middle-aged group (41-60 years) and young group (18-40 years). The total RSI and RFS scores of individuals were counted. Various potential differences as well as incidence of each type of LPR events between gender and age groups were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients were included, with 333 (79.3%) diagnosed with LPR confirmed by 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. Females (n=49) had a statistically higher LPR positivity (91.0% vs. 76.6%, P < 0.01) than males (n=342). Female patients with LPR had significantly higher RSI scores (14.08 ± 6.72 vs. 11.08 ± 4.82, P < 0.001) than male patients. The positive rate of LPR were 82.6%, 80.7% and 63.3% in the elderly, middle-aged and young groups. The Elderly group had significantly lower RSI scores (10.20 ± 4.06 vs. 12.80 ± 6.58, 12.24 ± 5.57, P < 0.001) but higher RFS scores (9.37 ± 3.25 vs. 8.16 ± 3.34, 8.57 ± 2.58, P < 0.05) than the other two groups. The number of acid hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) and distal esophageal acid reflux were significantly higher in elderly than in young patients. Except for non-acid gas HREs, the positive rates of other types of HREs were increasing from young to middle-aged to the elderly group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Female patients with suspected LPR symptoms had a higher positive rate of LPR and RSI score than males. The prevalence of LPR and the number of acid reflux were progressively increasing with age, but the perception of reflux symptoms may diminish.

Prognosis of patients with laryngeal contact granuloma: Development and validation of RCGSG score.

Objective: This study aimed to develop an objective and simple score for predicting the prognosis of patients with laryngeal contact granuloma (LCG) treated with local glucocorticoid injection combined with oral proton pump inhibitor (GI + PPI). Methods: Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the effect of baseline variables on the prognosis of 507 patients with LCG treated with GI + PPI. An easy-to-apply RCGSG (Reflus, Cough, Gender, and Surgery in GI + PPI therapy) score was developed based on the independent risk factors selected by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The score was internally validated by receiver-operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. Results: After univariate and multivariate analyses, male gender (hazard ratio [HR] 0.546, p < .001), laryngopharyngeal reflux (HR 0.702, p = .001), chronic cough (HR 0.709, p = .001), and history of surgical resection (HR 0.433, p < .001) were found to be the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of LCG. According to the score, the median cure time was 3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.81-3.19) in the low-risk group, 4 months (95% CI 3.74-4.26) in the moderate-risk group, and 5 months (95% CI 4.76-5.24) in the high-risk group. The bootstrap method was used to plot calibration curves for internal validation. Conclusion: The RCGSG score, developed based on laryngopharyngeal reflux, chronic cough, gender, and surgical resection history, has been internally verified to be a good predictor of the prognosis of patients with LCG receiving GI + PPI treatment. Level of evidence: Level 4.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Can Mutually Influence.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mutually relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). METHODS: All included patients completed simultaneous 24-hour hypopharyngeal intraluminal multichannel impedance pH monitoring (24h-MII-pH), Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). The LPRD diagnosis was based on the occurrence of ≥1 acid or non-acid hypopharyngeal proximal reflux episode(HRE), GERD was defined as a length of time >4.0% of the 24-hour recording spent below pH 4.0 or a DeMeester score >14.72. Patients with both positive LPRD and GERD were classified as LPRD & GERD group, patients with positive LPRD and negative GERD were classified as ILPRD group, patients with negative LPRD and positive GERD were classified as IGERD group, and patients with both negative LPRD and GERD were classified as N group. The differences in clinical characteristics of reflux between the groups were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 437 patients were included, including 248 (56.75%) in the ILPRD group, 98 (22.43%) in the LPRD & GERD group, 23 (5.26%) in the IGERD group, and 68 (15.56%) in the N group. There was no significant difference between the types of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with GERD. The number of weak acid/acid/gas/liquid HREs was significantly more in LPRD & GERD patients than in ILPRD patients (P < 0.01), and the number of distal acid reflux events and Longest distal acid clearance time were significantly higher in LPRD & GERD patients than in IGERD patients (P > 0.01). CONCLUSION: GERD and LPRD are not the same disease but can mutually influence. Combined GERD increased all types of laryngopharyngeal reflux events in patients with LPRD, whereas combined LPRD only increased acidic distal reflux events and acid clearance time in patients with GERD.

The Profiles of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients With Different Vocal Fold Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the profiles of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the relationship between hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) and the positive rate of salivary pepsin testing in patients with vocal fold lesions (VFLs). METHODS: The enrolled patients were divided into vocal fold cancer group (VFCG), vocal fold leukoplakia group (VFLG), benign vocal fold lesion group (BVFLG) and control group (CG). Patients benefited from multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) and multi-time point salivary pepsin testing (MTPSPT). The LPR profiles of patients with VFLs were studied by analyzing the MII-pH findings. The relationship between HREs and positive rate of MTPSPT was investigated through the nonparametric test. RESULTS: 177 patients were included. According to 24 h MII-pH, the occurrence of HREs tended to increase after meals. 55.75%, 63.98%, 66.82% and 55.77% of the HREs in the VFCG, VFLG, BVFLG and CG occurred within 3 h after meals, respectively. The overall positive rate of MTPSPT was higher in the VFCG than the remaining groups. In the VFCG, there was a significant correlation between overall positive results of MTPSPT and HREs occurring within 3 h after meals. CONCLUSION: In the Chinese population, the occurrence of HREs tend to more frequently after meals in patients with VFLs, and most HREs occur within 3 h after meals. By analyzing the 24h MII-pH findings, we can develop a more individualized anti-reflux therapeutic strategy for LPR patients.

Investigation of Reflux Characteristics in Outpatients of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery by Age and Gender in the Chinese Population.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of patients with reflux diseases in the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics through the Reflux Symptom Scale-12 (RSS-12) and the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q). METHODS: All included patients completed the RSS-12 and GERD-Q scales and were considered to have LPR with an RSS-12 score >11 and GERD with a GERD-Q score >7. Data were analyzed according to genders (male and female) and age (18-40, 41-60, and >60 years). RESULTS: A total of 977 patients were included. the mean RSS-12 and GERD-Q score were 11.32±21.34 and 6.31±1.21, and the positive rate of LPR and GERD were 28.76% and 8.90%, respectively. Males had a higher positive rate of LPR and GERD than females, and there were more males with LPR who also had GERD. Among those with both LPR and GERD, males had significantly higher ear-nose-throat (ENT) symptom scores such as hoarseness and excess throat mucus than females. However, females had significantly higher scores of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, mainly indigestion and abdominal pain, and elder patients (>60 years) had higher scores of ENT, GI, respiratory symptoms, as well as the impact of symptoms on quality of life than the young patients (18-40, and 41-60 years). CONCLUSION: Patients in the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics have different reflux characteristics by gender and age in the Chinese population. Males had more severe ENT-related symptoms of distress, while females had more complaints of GI symptoms. Older patients had higher scores for ENT, GI and respiratory symptoms.

Coblation-assisted transoral supraglottic laryngectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transoral supraglottic laryngectomy (TSL) has been widely applied in the treatment of supraglottic cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate a simplified technique for excising properly selected supraglottic tumors with a transoral coblation-assisted system. METHODS: Eight patients with T1-3N2M0 supraglottic cancer were treated with TSL with the coblation-assisted system. RESULTS: Tumors in all patients were en bloc resected with negative surgical margins and the selective neck dissection was also performed. The mean operation time for TSL was 39 minutes (25-65 minutes). The average time for the removal of the nasogastric tube was 8.6 days (1-28 days). All patients were extubated and shifted to the ward after operation. None of the patients required tracheotomy. CONCLUSION: Coblation-assisted TSL is a relatively simple, easy approach with low risk. It could be a feasible and safe procedure for patients with properly selected supraglottic cancer.

Does hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux have to be 24 h?

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic value of combined multi-timepoint salivary pepsin testing (MTPSPT) and hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH) for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and whether an appropriate reduction in the duration of HEMII-pH would affect the accuracy of diagnosis of LPR. METHODS: Recruited patients were studied with both MTPSPT and HEMII-pH. The diagnosis of LPR was based on the occurrence of > 1 reflux event and/or positive results on any of the MTPSPT. The diagnostic value of combined diagnosis was studied through combining a breakdown of the 24-h HEMII-pH finding and the results of the MTPSPT. The diagnostic value was expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Based on 24-h HEMII-pH and MTPSPT, the positive rate of LPR was 83.33% and 74.69%, respectively. According to the combined diagnosis, the positive rate of LPR was 90.74%. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined diagnosis both were 89.51% and 100%, when the HEMII-pH intervals were 7 a.m.-6 p.m. and 7 a.m.-7 p.m., respectively. However, when the monitoring time was extended to 8 p.m. and bedtime, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the combined diagnosis both were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MTPSPT and HEMII-pH increased the sensitivity and accuracy of diagnosis of LPR. For patients with positive MTPSPT results, the duration of HEMII-pH can be appropriately shortened to reduce patient sufferings.