Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 430, 2022 Apr 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35443635

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are used in treating cardiovascular diseases. Previous studies indicated that ACEIs/ARBs may benefit cancer patients by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and proliferation. The effect of ACEIs/ARBs on cancer survival in esophageal and gastric cancer is still unclear. This study is to investigate the association between ACEIs/ARBs usage and esophageal and gastric cancer prognosis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified esophageal and gastric cancer patients during 2008-2016 from the Taiwan Cancer Registry, and obtained medication usage and follow-up information from the National Health Insurance Research Database and Death Registry. Analysis groups were defined as ACEIs/ARBs user or non-user based on the usage of ACEIs/ARBs within the 6 months after cancer diagnosis. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was applied to balance covariates between study groups. We also used Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression to compare survival outcome and estimate hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: We identified 14,463 and 21,483 newly-diagnosed esophageal and gastric cancer patients during 2008-2016. ACEIs/ARBs users were associated with lower risk of cancer-specific mortality, although only significantly in gastric cancer (gastric: adjusted HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78-0.97; esophageal: adjusted HR =0.88, 95% CI = 0.76-1.02). A better survival outcome was observed among patients who received higher cumulative defined daily dose of ACEIs/ARBs. CONCLUSIONS: We found that using ACEIs/ARBs after cancer diagnosis were associated with lower risk of mortality. Our results add to the knowledge of the benefit of ACEIs/ARBs against mortality in individuals with esophageal/gastric cancer patients with hypertension.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Hipertensão , Neoplasias Gástricas , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicações , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 29(9): 1312-1321, 2022 07 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34179961

RESUMO

AIMS: New-generation breakpoint cluster region-Abelson tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have a higher incidence of cardiovascular events than imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). However, this knowledge is insufficiently proven. Hence, this study aimed to explore the association between cardiovascular events and TKIs in patients with CML. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective population-based cohort study enrolled first-time users of imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2016. Arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) were the primary outcome, while other cardiovascular-related events were the secondary outcomes. The event rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox regression. Additionally, the competing risk was adjusted using the Fine and Gray competing risk model. We included 1207 patients. Nilotinib had a significantly higher ATE risk (subdistribution HR = 4.92, 95% CI = 1.68-14.36) than imatinib. Conversely, no difference was found for other cardiovascular-related events. Risks of ATE and other cardiovascular-related events were similar between dasatinib and imatinib and between nilotinib and dasatinib. The risk of ATE hospitalization consistently increased throughout the main analyses and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Nilotinib-treated patients had a significantly higher risk of developing ATE than imatinib-treated patients. However, the risks of ATE and other cardiovascular-related events were not significantly different between dasatinib and imatinib.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dasatinibe/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/efeitos adversos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/epidemiologia , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA