Upper-Arm Photoplethysmographic Sensor with One-Time Calibration for Long-Term Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Wearable cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitors have garnered widespread attention in recent years; however, the long-term performance values of these devices are questionable. Most cuffless blood pressure monitors require initial baseline calibration and regular recalibrations with a cuffed blood pressure monitor to ensure accurate blood pressure estimation, and their estimation accuracy may vary over time if left uncalibrated. Therefore, this study assessed the accuracy and long-term performance of an upper-arm, cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitor according to the ISO 81060-2 standard. This device was based on a nonlinear machine-learning model architecture with a fine-tuning optimized method. The blood pressure measurement protocol followed a validation procedure according to the standard, with an additional four weekly blood pressure measurements over a 1-month period, to assess the long-term performance values of the upper-arm, cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitor. The results showed that the photoplethysmographic signals obtained from the upper arm had better qualities when compared with those measured from the wrist. When compared with the cuffed blood pressure monitor, the means ± standard deviations of the difference in BP at week 1 (baseline) were -1.36 ± 7.24 and -2.11 ± 5.71 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, which met the first criterion of ≤5 ± ≤8.0 mmHg and met the second criterion of a systolic blood pressure ≤ 6.89 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure ≤ 6.84 mmHg. The differences in the uncalibrated blood pressure values between the test and reference blood pressure monitors measured from week 2 to week 5 remained stable and met both criteria 1 and 2 of the ISO 81060-2 standard. The upper-arm, cuffless photoplethysmographic blood pressure monitor in this study generated high-quality photoplethysmographic signals with satisfactory accuracy at both initial calibration and 1-month follow-ups. This device could be a convenient and practical tool to continuously measure blood pressure over long periods of time.

A Data-Driven Model with Feedback Calibration Embedded Blood Pressure Estimator Using Reflective Photoplethysmography.

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) is vital for screening cardiovascular activity. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of BP in adults recommends measuring BP outside the office setting using daytime ABPM. The recommendation to use night-day BP measurements to confirm hypertension is consistent with the recommendation of several other guidelines. In recent studies, ABPM was used to measure BP at regular intervals, and it reduces the effect of the environment on BP. Out-of-office measurements are highly recommended by almost all hypertension organizations. However, traditional ABPM devices based on the oscillometric technique usually interrupt sleep. For all-day ABPM purposes, a photoplethysmography (PPG)-based wrist-type device has been developed as a convenient tool. This optical, noninvasive device estimates BP using morphological characteristics from PPG waveforms. As measurement can be affected by multiple variables, calibration is necessary to ensure that the calculated BP values are accurate. However, few studies focused on adaptive calibration. A novel adaptive calibration model, which is data-driven and embedded in a wearable device, was proposed. The features from a 15 s PPG waveform and personal information were input for estimation of BP values and our data-driven calibration model. The model had a feedback calibration process using the exponential Gaussian process regression method to calibrate BP values and avoid inter- and intra-subject variability, ensuring accuracy in long-term ABPM. The estimation error of BP (ΔBP = actual BP-estimated BP) of systolic BP was -0.1776 ± 4.7361 mmHg; ≤15 mmHg, 99.225%, and of diastolic BP was -0.3846 ± 6.3688 mmHg; ≤15 mmHg, 98.191%. The success rate was improved, and the results corresponded to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standard and British Hypertension Society Grading criteria for medical regulation. Using machine learning with a feedback calibration model could be used to assess ABPM for clinical purposes.

Quantification Analysis of Sleep Based on Smartwatch Sensors for Parkinson's Disease.

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). In this study, a smartwatch-based sensor is utilized as a convenient tool to detect the abnormal RBD phenomenon in PD patients. Instead, a questionnaire with sleep quality assessment and sleep physiological indices, such as sleep stage, activity level, and heart rate, were measured in the smartwatch sensors. Therefore, this device can record comprehensive sleep physiological data, offering several advantages such as ubiquity, long-term monitoring, and wearable convenience. In addition, it can provide the clinical doctor with sufficient information on the patient's sleeping patterns with individualized treatment. In this study, a three-stage sleep staging method (i.e., comprising sleep/awake detection, sleep-stage detection, and REM-stage detection) based on an accelerometer and heart-rate data is implemented using machine learning (ML) techniques. The ML-based algorithms used here for sleep/awake detection, sleep-stage detection, and REM-stage detection were a Cole-Kripke algorithm, a stepwise clustering algorithm, and a k-means clustering algorithm with predefined criteria, respectively. The sleep staging method was validated in a clinical trial. The results showed a statistically significant difference in the percentage of abnormal REM between the control group (1.6 ± 1.3; n = 18) and the PD group (3.8 ± 5.0; n = 20) (p = 0.04). The percentage of deep sleep stage in our results presented a significant difference between the control group (38.1 ± 24.3; n = 18) and PD group (22.0 ± 15.0, n = 20) (p = 0.011) as well. Further, our results suggested that the smartwatch-based sensor was able to detect the difference of an abnormal REM percentage in the control group (1.6 ± 1.3; n = 18), PD patient with clonazepam (2.0 ± 1.7; n = 10), and without clonazepam (5.7 ± 7.1; n = 10) (p = 0.007). Our results confirmed the effectiveness of our sensor in investigating the sleep stage in PD patients. The sensor also successfully determined the effect of clonazepam on reducing abnormal REM in PD patients. In conclusion, our smartwatch sensor is a convenient and effective tool for sleep quantification analysis in PD patients.