RPS15 Coordinates with CtIP to Facilitate Homologous Recombination and Confer Therapeutic Resistance in Breast Cancer.

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through homologous recombination (HR) is vital for maintaining the stability and integrity of the genome. RNA binding proteins (RBPs) intricately regulate the DNA damage repair process, yet the precise molecular mechanisms underlying their function remain incompletely understood. In this study, we highlight the pivotal role of RPS15, a representative RBP, in homologous recombination repair. Specifically, we demonstrate that RPS15 promotes DNA end resection, a crucial step in homologous recombination. Notably, we identify an interaction between RPS15 and CtIP, a key factor in homologous recombination repair. This interaction is essential for CtIP recruitment to DSB sites, subsequent RPA coating, and RAD51 replacement, all critical steps in efficient homologous recombination repair and conferring resistance to genotoxic treatments. Functionally, suppressing RPS15 expression sensitizes cancer cells to X-ray radiation and enhances the therapeutic synergistic effect of PARP1 inhibitors in breast cancer cells. In summary, our findings reveal that RPS15 promotes DNA end resection to ensure effective homologous recombination repair, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target in cancer treatment.

A recent perspective on designing tumor vaccines for tumor immunology.

With the rapid development of immunotherapy, therapeutic tumor vaccines, which aim to enhance the immunogenicity of tumor cells and activate the patient's immune system to kill tumor cells, as well as eliminate or inhibit tumor growth, have drawn increasing attention in the field of tumor therapy. However, due to the lack of immune cell infiltration, low immunogenicity, immune escape and other problems, the efficacy of tumor vaccine is often limited. Researchers have developed a variety of strategies to enhance tumor immune recognition, such as improving the immunogenicity of tumor antigens, selecting a suitable vaccine platform, or combining tumor vaccines with other anticancer treatments. In this review, we will deliberate on how to overcome the problem of therapeutic tumor vaccines, and discuss the up-to-date progress and achievements in the tumor vaccine development, as well as their future in cancer treatment.

Engineered Carrier-Free Nanosystem-Induced In Situ Therapeutic Vaccines for Potent Cancer Immunotherapy.

In situ vaccines that can stimulate tumor immune response have emerged as a breakthrough in antitumor therapy. However, the immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment and insufficient infiltration of immune cells lead to ineffective antitumor immunity. Hence, a biomimetic carrier-free nanosystem (BCC) to induce synergistic phototherapy/chemotherapy-driven in situ vaccines was designed. A carrier-free nanosystem was developed using phototherapeutic reagents CyI and celastrol as raw materials. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that under NIR light irradiation, BCC-mediated photo/chemotherapy not only accelerates the release of drugs to deeper parts of tumors, achieving timing and light-controlled drug delivery to result in cell apoptosis, but also effectively stimulates the antitumor response to induce in situ vaccine, which could invoke long-lasting antitumor immunity to inhibit tumor metastasis and eliminate distant tumor. This therapeutic strategy holds promise for priming robust innate and adaptive immune responses, arresting cancer progression, and inducing tumor dormancy.

Long term survival outcomes of surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for perforated low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) are very rare, accounting for approximately 0.2%-0.5% of gastrointestinal tumors. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to explore the impact of different surgical procedures combined with HIPEC on the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 91 LAMN perforation patients from 9 teaching hospitals over a 10-year period, and divided them into HIPEC group and non-HIPEC group based on whether or not underwent HIPEC. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients with LAMN, 52 were in the HIPEC group and 39 in the non-HIPEC group. The Kaplan-Meier method predicted that 52 patients in the HIPEC group had 5- and 10-year overall survival rates of 82.7% and 76.9%, respectively, compared with predicted survival rates of 51.3% and 46.2% for the 39 patients in the non-HIPEC group, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2 = 10.622, p = 0.001; χ2 = 10.995, p = 0.001). Compared to the 5-year and 10-year relapse-free survival rates of 75.0% and 65.4% in the HIPEC group, respectively, the 5-year and 10-year relapse-free survival rates of 48.7% and 46.2% in the non-HIPEC group were significant different between the two outcomes (χ2 = 8.063, p = 0.005; χ2 = 6.775, p = 0.009). The incidence of postoperative electrolyte disturbances and hypoalbuminemia was significantly higher in the HIPEC group than in the non-HIPEC group (p = 0.023; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that surgery combined with HIPEC can significantly improve 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates and relapse-free survival rates of LAMN perforation patients, without affecting their short-term clinical outcomes.

Effect of preoperative immunonutrition on postoperative short-term clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer cachexia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines(ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery and other guidelines) recommend preoperative immunonutrition for cachectic gastric cancer patients, the strength of the recommendation is weak, and the level of evidence is low. The benefits of preoperative immunonutrition still remain controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 112 patients with gastric cancer cachexia were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either preoperative enteral immunonutrition support (IN, n = 56) or standard enteral nutrition support (SEN, n = 56). The primary endpoint was the incidence of infectious complications, and the secondary endpoints included the nutritional indicators, inflammatory markers, immune parameters, postoperative recovery and complications and gastrointestinal intolerance reactions. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative infectious complications(P = 0.040) and overall complications (P = 0.049)was significantly lower in the IN group compared to the SEN group. In terms of laboratory inflammatory indexes, patients in the IN group demonstrated significantly lower levels of white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as higher levels of lymphocytes (LYMPH) and immunoglobulin A (IgA), compared to patients in the SEN group, with statistically significant differences. In terms of clinical outcomes, the IN group had a shorter duration of antibiotic use (P = 0.048), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.018), and lower total hospital costs (P = 0.034) compared to the SEN group. The IN group also experienced significantly less weight loss after surgery (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Preoperative administration of immunonutrition formula has a positive impact on the incidence of infectious complications in patients with gastric cancer cachexia after surgery. It improves patients' inflammatory and immune status, shortens hospital stays, and reduces healthcare costs. Preoperative use of immunonutrition may contribute to the improvement of prognosis in this high-risk population.

Deciphering the tumor immune microenvironment of imatinib-resistance in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors at single-cell resolution.

The heterogeneous nature of tumors presents a considerable obstacle in addressing imatinib resistance in advanced cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). To address this issue, we conducted single-cell RNA-sequencing in primary tumors as well as peritoneal and liver metastases from patients diagnosed with locally advanced or advanced GIST. Single-cell transcriptomic signatures of tumor microenvironment (TME) were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence staining were used to further validate it. This analysis revealed unique tumor evolutionary patterns, transcriptome features, dynamic cell-state changes, and different metabolic reprogramming. The findings indicate that in imatinib-resistant TME, tumor cells with activated immune and cytokine-mediated immune responses interacted with a higher proportion of Treg cells via the TIGIT-NECTIN2 axis. Future immunotherapeutic strategies targeting Treg may provide new directions for the treatment of imatinib-resistant patients. In addition, IDO1+ dendritic cells (DC) were highly enriched in imatinib-resistant TME, interacting with various myeloid cells via the BTLA-TNFRSF14 axis, while the interaction was not significant in imatinib-sensitive TME. Our study highlights the transcriptional heterogeneity and distinct immunosuppressive microenvironment of advanced GIST, which provides novel therapeutic strategies and innovative immunotherapeutic agents for imatinib resistance.

The association and clinicopathological significance of Integrin alphavbeta6 and Rac1 expression in gastric carcinoma.

Background: The present study investigate the expression and correlation of ITGB6 and Rac1 proteins in gastric cancer tissues. By exploring the clinical significance and functions of these proteins, we aimed to gain further insights into the mechanisms underlying gastric cancer development. Patients and methods: In this study, a total of 198 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and who underwent gastrectomy between July 2010 to October 2012 were included. The median follow-up time was 52.00 months. To evaluate the factors influencing overall survival, Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and Cox regression analysis were conducted. Furthermore, an independent prognostic factor-based nomogram was constructed and validated to predict survival outcomes in gastric cancer patients. In addition, in vitro experiments including CCK8 and Transwell assays were conducted to explore the roles of ITGB6 and Rac1 in gastric cancer. Results: The expression levels of ITGB6 and Rac1 in gastric cancerous and paraneoplastic tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry. The correlation and clinical significance of the two proteins were also investigated. ITGB6 expression showed significant associations with tumor size (P=0.030), pathological grading (P=0.013), location (P=0.031), N stage (P=0.002), and clinical stage (P=0.002). Additionally, we found that tumor size (P=0.013), tumor's anatomical location (P=0.031), N stage (P=0.002), clinical stage (P=0.035), and survival status (P<0.001) were significantly associated with the expression of Rac1. ITGB6 was moderately correlated with Rac1 (r=0.285, P<0.001). Both the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model analysis demonstrated that the presence of positive expression of ITGB6 and Rac1 proteins served as independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer. These findings highlight the potential of ITGB6 and Rac1 as valuable markers for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer patients (HR=2.212 P<0.001 and HR=2.073 P=0.001), with a significant poorer trend for 5-year survival (P<0.0001, respectively, the log-rank test). Additionally, subsequent in vitro experiments preliminarily demonstrated that ITGB6 and Rac1 promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells, and ITGB6 may functions via targeting Rac1. Conclusion: ITGB6 and Rac1 are indicators of poor prognosis and tumor progression in gastric cancer patients. The potential signaling pathways associated with both may provide useful targets for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer.

Short- and long-term comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with BMI≥30 kg/m2: A propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastric patients has gained popularity in recent decades, reports on the comparison of short and long clinical outcomes between robotic gastrectomy (RG) and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer patients with BMI≥30 kg/m2 are still limited. METHODS: A total of 226 obese gastric cancer patients who underwent either RG (n = 81) or LG (n = 145) were enrolled in this study between October 2014 and September 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed to reduce confounding bias. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between the RG and LG groups. RESULTS: The clinicopathological characteristics of 156 patients in the RG group (n = 79) and LG group (n = 79) were well balanced after PSM. Compared with the LG group, the RG group had a significantly shorter operation time, less estimated blood loss, more harvested lymph nodes, a faster postoperative recovery course, reduced surgical morbidity, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. The long-term outcomes were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: RG is a safe and feasible approach for gastric cancer with a BMI≥30 kg/m2 and has better short-term clinical outcomes than LG. However, RG is similar to LG in terms of long-term prognosis.

Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram Based on Enhanced CT to Predict the Response of Metastatic Lymph Nodes to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to construct and validate a deep learning (DL) radiomics nomogram using baseline and restage enhanced computed tomography (CT) images and clinical characteristics to predict the response of metastatic lymph nodes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 112 patients with LAGC who received NACT from January 2021 to August 2022. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 98 patients were randomized 7:3 to the training cohort (n = 68) and validation cohort (n = 30). We established and compared three radiomics signatures based on three phases of CT images before and after NACT, namely radiomics-baseline, radiomics-delta, and radiomics-restage. Then, we developed a clinical model, DL model, and a nomogram to predict the response of LAGC after NACT. We evaluated the predictive accuracy and clinical validity of each model using the receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis, respectively. RESULTS: The radiomics-delta signature was the best predictor among the three radiomics signatures. So, we developed and validated a DL delta radiomics nomogram (DLDRN). In the validation cohort, the DLDRN produced an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.96) and demonstrated adequate differentiation of good response to NACT. Furthermore, the DLDRN significantly outperformed the clinical model and DL model (p < 0.001). The clinical utility of the DLDRN was confirmed through decision curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LAGC, the DLDRN effectively predicted a therapeutic response in metastatic lymph nodes, which could provide valuable information for individualized treatment.