Effect of ice popsicle treatment on emergence agitation in children undergoing oral surgery with sevoflurane anaesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: Emergence agitation is a common postoperative complication during recovery in children. The purpose of this study is to explore whether the use of ice popsicle could prevent emergence agitation in children undergoing oral surgery with sevoflurane anaesthesia. DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 100 children undergoing oral surgery were randomly assigned to Group 1 which received ice popsicle after emergence (intervention, n = 50) or Group 2 which received verbal encouragement from their parents (control, n = 50). The primary outcome was the 2-hour postoperative incidence of EA. RESULTS: Group 1 had a significant lower incidence of emergence agitation (22% vs 58%, P < 0.001) compared with Group 2. The mean agitation score was significantly lower in Group 1 vs Group 2 at 10  minutes (1.64 vs 2.12, P = 0.024) and 20 min (1.60 vs 2.14, P = 0.004) after emergence. The peak agitation and pain scores were significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that ice popsicle is an effective, cheap, pleasurable, and easily administered method for alleviating emergence agitation in paediatric patients after oral surgery under general anaesthesia. These results are worthy of confirmation in other surgeries. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This approach is highly accepted by both children and their parents, and our findings support the effectiveness of ice popsicle in relieving emergence agitation and pain after oral surgery in children. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015634.

The impact of height on the spread of spinal anesthesia and stress response in parturients undergoing caesarean section: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The spread of spinal anesthesia was influenced by many factors, and the effect of body height on spinal anesthesia is still arguable. This study aimed to explore the impact of height on the spread of spinal anesthesia and the stress response in parturients. METHODS: A total of ninety-seven parturients were allocated into two groups according to their height: the shorter group (body height was shorter than 158 cm) and taller group (body height was taller than 165 cm). Spinal anesthesia was performed with the same amount of 12 mg plain ropivacaine in mothers of different heights. The primary outcome of the study was the success or failure of the spinal anesthesia. The secondary outcomes of the study were stress response, time to T6 sensory level, the incidence of hypotension, the satisfaction of abdominal muscle relaxation and patient VAS scores. RESULTS: The rate of successful spinal anesthesia in the shorter group was significantly higher than that in the taller group (p = 0.02). The increase of maternal cortisol level in the shorter group was lower than that in the taller group at skin closure (p = 0.001). The incidence of hypotension (p = 0.013), time to T6 sensory block (p = 0.005), the quality of abdominal muscle relaxation (p <  0.001), and VAS values in stretching abdominal muscles and uterine exteriorization (p <  0.001) in the shorter group were significantly different from those in the taller group. Multivariate analysis showed that vertebral column length (p <  0.001), abdominal girth (p = 0.022), amniotic fluid index (p = 0.022) were significantly associated with successful spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: It's difficult to use a single factor to predict the spread of spinal anesthesia. Patient's vertebral column length, amniotic fluid index and abdominal girth were the high determinant factors for predicting the spread of spinal anesthesia. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-ROC-17012030 ( Chictr.org.cn ), registered on 18/07/2017.

Effect of caudal ketamine on minimum local anesthetic concentration of ropivacaine in children: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Caudal ketamine has been shown to provide an effective and prolonged post-operative analgesia with few adverse effects. However, the effect of caudal ketamine on the minimum local anesthetic concentration (MLAC) of ropivacaine for intra-operative analgesia is unclear. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-nine children were randomized to five groups: Group C (caudal ropivacaine only), Group K0.25 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.25 mg/kg ketamine), Group K0.5 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.5 mg/kg ketamine), Group K0.75 (caudal ropivacaine plus 0.75 mg/kg ketamine), and Group K1.0 (caudal ropivacaine plus 1.0 mg/kg ketamine). The primary outcome was the MLAC values of ropivacaine with/without ketamine for caudal block. RESULTS: The MLAC values of ropivacaine were 0.128% (0.028%) in the control group, 0.112% (0.021%) in Group K0.25, 0.112% (0.018%) in Group K0.5, 0.110% (0.019%) in Group K0.75, and 0.110% (0.020%) in Group K1.0. There were no significant differences among the five groups for the MLAC values (p = 0.11). During the post-operative period the mean durations of analgesia were 270, 381, 430, 494, and 591 min in the control, K0.25, K0. 5, K0.75, and K1.0 groups respectively, which shown that control group is significantly different from all ketamine groups. Also there were significant differences between K0.25 and K0.75 groups, and between K1.0 groups and the other ketamine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding caudal ketamine to ropivacaine prolong the duration of post-operative analgesia; however, it does not decrease the MLAC of caudal ropivacaine for intra-operative analgesia in children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-TRC-13003492. Registered on 13 August 2013.

The Incidence of and Risk Factors for Postoperative Fever after Cleft Repair Surgery in Children.

PURPOSE: The characteristics of postoperative fever after cleft repair surgery in children are unknown. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for postoperative fever. DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 328 children who underwent cleft surgery at our hospital between March 2016 and April 2017 and were followed up for at least 3 days postoperatively. Fever was defined as a body temperature ≥38.0 °C. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent (n = 233) of patients developed fever within 72 h postoperatively, and most cases of postoperative fever were benign. Patients most frequently developed fever within 24 h postoperatively, and the occurrence of fever significantly decreased between 24 and 72 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). The incidence of fever with temperatures between 38.0 °C and 39.0 °C was higher than that of fever with temperatures ≥39.0 °C (p < 0.001). The mean duration of an episode of fever was 4 h. The type of surgery, method of anesthesia, and duration of anesthesia and surgery were found to be correlated with postoperative fever after cleft surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of postoperative fever after cleft surgery were benign occurrences. Postoperative fever after cleft repair surgery was characterized by a low grade, an early onset and a short duration in children. The method of anesthesia, duration of surgery and duration of anesthesia were risk factors for postoperative fever. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our results could help healthcare providers to gain increased knowledge of the risk factors for fever and when and how to treat postoperative fever.

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) inhibits hepatoma cell growth via downregulation of SEPT2 expression.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis and low therapeutic efficacy. Recent studies have demonstrated the therapeutic prospect of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) cancer angiogenesis. However, the action mechanisms remain elusive. In the present study, by using mass spectrometry, we found that PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone (RGZ) could regulate HCC cell growth by influencing various downstream factors and pathways. Among the altered proteins, septin 2 (SEPT2) was found to exhibit oncogenic function. PPARγ overexpression could inhibit the expression of SEPT2, thus blocking the promoting effects of SEPT2 on HCC cell proliferation, invasion and its inhibitory effect on cell apoptosis. Further studies also indicated that SEPT2 promoted HCC cell growth via upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -9, and simultaneously inhibited the cleavage of caspase-3, -7, and -9. Interestingly, the effects of SEPT2 on the above factors could be suppressed by PPARγ overexpression, suggesting that PPARγ could inhibit HCC cell growth via regulating the expression and blocking the oncogenic function of SEPT2. Taken together, these results provide new evidence for the action mechanisms of PPARγ in carcinogenesis of HCC, and upon further investigation, PPARγ could be developed as a new target for the treatment of liver cancer.

Radiofrequency ablation versus open hepatic resection for elderly patients (> 65 years) with very early or early hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with open hepatic resection (HR) in elderly patients (age > 65 years) with very early or early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Elderly patients (n = 180) with very early or early HCC were studied. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before treatment. As an initial treatment, 89 patients were treated by RFA and 91 patients by HR. The survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survivals were 93.2%, 71.1%, and 55.2% for the RFA group and 88.8%, 62.8%, and 51.9% for the HR group, respectively (P = .305). The corresponding recurrence-free survivals for these 2 groups were 84.1%, 62.7%, and 35.5% and 76.7%, 39.3%, and 33.1%, respectively (P = .035). On subgroup analysis for tumor ≤ 3 cm, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survivals were 94.2%, 82.6%, and 67.5% for the RFA group and 90.1%, 65.0%, and 55.1% for the HR group, respectively (P = .038). The corresponding recurrence-free survivals for the 2 groups were 85.5%, 69.1%, and 40.7%, and 82.2%, 40.1%, and 31.8%, respectively (P = .049). For tumor > 3 cm, there was no significant difference between these 2 groups for overall survivals and recurrence-free survivals (P = .543, P = .356, respectively). A multivariate regression analysis showed that treatment type was the only significant prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between the HR and RFA groups for overall survival, but RFA had better efficacy than HR for elderly patients with HCC ≤ 3 cm.

Radiofrequency ablation does not induce the significant increase of CD4(+) CD25(+) Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells compared with surgical resection in Hepal-6 tumor model.

Surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are all currently recognized as important and effective treatment in solid tumors. This study aimed to investigate change in level of CD4(+) CD25(+) Foxp3(+) regulatory T (Treg) cells in tumor-bearing mice after SR vs. RFA and the relationship of this level with tumor progression. Hepa1-6 tumor cells were inoculated subcutaneously into C57BL/6J mice. The population of Treg cells was measured by flow cytometry at selected post-SR or post-RFA times. Tumor growth was measured by rechallenge in the contralateral flank. The tumor volume was calculated and compared with that of a control group. The correlation between the population of Treg cells and tumor volume was analyzed. A significant increase in Treg cells was observed after SR compared with the preoperative level, while the level after RFA was relatively stable. A significant difference in tumor growth between the SR and RFA groups was observed in the initial postoperative phase but not in the later phase. A correlation was found between tumor volume and level of Treg cells. Our study revealed that RFA stabilizes the level of Treg during postoperative recovery, whereas SR activates the immunosuppressive reaction by upregulating the level of such cells, promoting tumor growth.

Radiofrequency ablation with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 189 patients with HCC less than 7 cm at a single tertiary referral center between October 2006 and June 2009. Patients were randomly asssigned to receive TACE combined with RFA (TACE-RFA; n = 94) or RFA alone (n = 95). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end point was recurrence-free survival, and the tertiary end point was adverse effects. RESULTS: At a follow-up of 7 to 62 months, 34 patients in the TACE-RFA group and 48 patients in the RFA group had died. Thirty-three patients and 52 patients had developed recurrence in the TACE-RFA group and RFA group, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 4-year overall survivals for the TACE-RFA group and the RFA group were 92.6%, 66.6%, and 61.8% and 85.3%, 59%, and 45.0%, respectively. The corresponding recurrence-free survivals were 79.4%, 60.6%, and 54.8% and 66.7%, 44.2%, and 38.9%, respectively. Patients in the TACE-RFA group had better overall survival and recurrence-free survival than patients in the RFA group (hazard ratio, 0.525; 95% CI, 0.335 to 0.822; P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.575; 95% CI, 0.374 to 0.897; P = .009, respectively). There were no treatment-related deaths. On logistic regression analyses, treatment allocation, tumor size, and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas treatment allocation and tumor number were significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION: TACE-RFA was superior to RFA alone in improving survival for patients with HCC less than 7 cm.

Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas 2 cm or smaller: a retrospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare retrospectively the effects of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation with those of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measuring 2 cm or smaller. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent before treatment. From December 2003 to December 2008, 145 patients with a resectable HCC measuring 2 cm or smaller were studied. Sixty-six patients had a central HCC (located at least 3 cm from the liver capsule). As an initial treatment, 71 patients were treated with percutaneous RF ablation and 74 with surgical resection. Of the patients with central HCC, 37 underwent percutaneous RF ablation and 29 underwent surgical resection. Survival curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. The relative prognostic significance of the variables for predicting overall survival rates was assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Complications were observed clinically when patients were admitted and assessed by telephone interview after patients were discharged. RESULTS: One death was considered to be related to treatment after surgical resection. Major complications occurred significantly more often in the surgical resection group (38 of 74 patients) than in the RF ablation group (14 of 71 patients) (P = .009). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.5%, 87.7%, and 71.9%, respectively, with RF ablation and 90.5%, 70.9%, and 62.1% with surgical resection (P = .048). The corresponding recurrence-free survival rates were 76.4%, 65.2%, and 59.8% with RF ablation and 75.6%, 56.1%, and 51.3% with surgical resection (P = .548). At subgroup analysis of patients with central HCC, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 96.6%, 93.0%, and 79.9% with RF ablation and 92.0%, 71.6%, and 61.5% with surgical resection (P = .020). The corresponding recurrence-free survival rates were 86.5%, 74.0%, and 67.0% with RF ablation and 68.0%, 40.0%, and 40.0% with surgical resection (P = .033). For patients with peripheral HCC, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 97.3%, 83.3%, and 65.1% with RF ablation and 87.8%, 68.4%, and 62.9% with surgical resection (P = .464). The corresponding recurrence-free survival rates were 68.7%, 59.2%, and 54.9% with RF ablation and 82.9%, 66.6%, and 52.9% with surgical resection (P = .351). CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of percutaneous RF ablation were better than those of surgical resection in patients with HCC measuring 2 cm or smaller, especially those with central HCC.

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and RF ablation versus RF ablation alone: a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the effects of radiofrequency (RF) ablation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with those of RF ablation alone in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. From January 2002 to December 2006, 139 patients with recurrent HCC measuring 5 cm in diameter or smaller were randomized to receive either sequential TACE and RF ablation (sequential treatment group, n=69) or RF ablation alone (RF ablation group, n=70). The survival curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. Bonferroni correction was applied when multiple comparisons were performed. P<.0083 (.05÷6) was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 94%, 69%, and 46%, respectively, for the sequential treatment group and 82%, 47%, and 36% for the RF ablation group (P=.037). The corresponding recurrence-free survival rates were 80%, 45%, and 40% for the sequential treatment group and 64%, 18%, and 18% for the ablation group (P=.005). At subgroup analyses, the overall survival for the sequential treatment group was better than that for the RF ablation group for patients with tumor recurrence 1 year or less after initial treatment (P=.004) and those with tumors measuring 3.1-5.0 cm (P=.002) but not for those with tumor recurrence more than 1 year after initial treatment (P=.421) and those with tumors 3.0 cm or smaller (P=.478). The recurrence-free survival in the sequential treatment group was better than that in the RF ablation group for patients with tumors measuring 3.1-5.0 cm (P<.001) but not for those with tumors 3.0 cm or smaller (P=.204). For recurrence-free survival, there was no significant difference between the two groups for patients with tumor recurrence 1 year or less or more than 1 year after initial treatment (P=.020 and P=.111, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that treatment allocation and the interval between initial treatment and tumor recurrence were significant prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas the interval between initial treatment and tumor recurrence, treatment allocation, and tumor size were significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of sequential TACE-RF ablation is better than that of RF ablation alone for recurrent HCC.

Conformal radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma with a multi-pin bipolar system.

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a multi-pin bipolar system. METHODS: Between August 2005 and December 2006, 18 patients with 30 HCCs (3.40 ± 1.24 cm, range 1.30-6.0 cm; median number of treated lesions is two per patient, range, 1-3) underwent percutaneous RFA with a multi-pin bipolar system under ultrasound guidance. The primary end-point were treatment efficacy, major and minor complications, and the secondary end-point were overall survival and tumor-free survival. RESULTS: Complete ablation with conformed shape to the index tumor was achieved in 16 of 18 patients, and 28 of the 30 tumors were completely ablated. On follow-up, local and distant intrahepatic tumor progression rates were 12.5% (2 of 16 patients) and 62.5% (10 of 16 patients). There was no patient who developed extrahepatic metastasis. There were no major complications. The 1-, 2-year overall survival rates for all patients were 83.3%, 55.6%, respectively, and the corresponding tumor-free survivals were 50.0%, 22.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RFA with a multi-pin bipolar system was effective and safe for HCC. A large ablation volume could be achieved which conformed to the shape of the index tumor.

Role of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: experience of a cancer center in China.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become an important treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The good candidates for RFA are patients with HCC at an early stage (solitary tumor ≤ 5 cm in diameter or ≤ 3 nodules ≤ 3 cm in diameter). Several clinical trials have shown that RFA is effective in resection for the treatment of small HCC. Until now, RFA has been widely used as a radical treatment for small HCC. RFA also plays an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of HCC and is usually combined with other therapies such as resection, vascular intervention, intratumor ethanol injection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted drug therapy, and biological immune therapy. In this study, we will introduce our experience of RFA in the treatment of HCC in a cancer center in China.

[Risk factors of survival for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and determine the risk factors of survival for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA). METHODS: From January 1999 to December 2008, 82 patients with recurrent HCC, with the diameter less than 7 cm for solitary tumor, or the largest tumor less than 5 cm for multiple tumors(the number of tumors less than 3), were treated by PRFA. The significance of 12 clinical or pathological variables in the risk factors of overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: The overall survival 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 75.8%, 43.9% and 34.5% (from the date of PRFA), and 95.1%, 63.2% and 46.6% (from initial hepatectomy), respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that tumor size before initial hepatectomy, recurrence interval from initial hepatectomy, number of recurrent tumors, diameter of largest recurrent tumor, serum glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and serum albumin (ALB) level were significant prognostic factors (P < 0.05, Kaplan-Meier Log-rank test). Multivariate analysis showed recurrence interval from initial hepatectomy, diameter of largest recurrence tumor, serum GGT and ALB level were significant prognostic (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PRFA is effective for recurrent HCC. Recurrence interval from initial hepatectomy, diameter of largest recurrent tumor, serum GGT and ALB level are significant prognostic factors.

Efficacy of combining temperature- and power-controlled radiofrequency ablation for malignant liver tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Single mode of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) often leads to limited ablation in the zone of necrosis. This study clarifies the efficacy of combining temperature- and power-controlled RFA for malignant liver tumors. METHODS: Between April 2008 and August 2008, 58 patients with malignant liver tumors received RFA at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The patients were divided into 2 groups using a random number table: one group received combined temperature- and power-controlled RFA (the combination group), and the other group received power-controlled RFA alone (the control group). RESULTS: Three patients were lost to follow-up and 55 patients were included for evaluation. Twenty-five patients with 29 tumors were treated by the combination RFA, and 27 tumors (93.1%) achieved either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). One patient had a seriously decreased heart rate. In the control group, 30 patients with 32 tumors received power-controlled RFA, and 29 tumors (90.6%) achieved CR or PR. There were no serious complications. There was no difference between the combination and control groups in treatment time ((13.3 +/- 1.3) min vs. (10.2 +/- 2.3) min, P = 0.459). The number of sessions of RFA for the combination group was less than that of control group (1.3 sessions vs. 2.4 sessions), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.579). CONCLUSION: RFA controlling both temperature and power is effective and safe for patients with malignant liver tumors, and the number of sessions of RFA for the combination group was less than that of the control group.

[Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation combined with other minimally invasive treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) and combined with other minimally invasive treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after hepatectomy. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with RHCC after hepatectomy who were treated with PRFA or combined with other minimally invasive therapies between August 1999 and February 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: There was no treatment related mortality in the study population, and the morbidity was 2.4% (2/84). The complete ablation rate was 94.0% (79/84), and the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 74.9%, 54.9% and 48.2%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with recurrent interval after hepatectomy less than 1 year and over 1 year were 72.1%, 36.2%, 24.2% and 76.8%, 70.6% and 65.1%, respectively (P = 0.040). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with tumor size 3 cm were 83.2%, 67.7%, 67.7% and 59.1%, 24.2%, 12.1%, respectively (P = 0.003). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of patients treated with PRFA alone and combined with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) were 66.7%, 33.3%, 22.2% and 76.5%, 57.3%, 57.3%, respectively (P = 0.017). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of patients treated with PRFA alone and combined with transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) were 55.6%, 24.7%, 24.7% and 81.6%, 66.0%, 57.5%, respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PRFA is an effective and safe treatment for RHCC, and tumor size and recurrent interval after hepatectomy are important prognostic factors. Combination with PEI or TACE may improve the efficacy of PRFA for treatment of RHCC.

[Effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the short-term and long-term effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The clinical data of 114 HCC patients, 104 males and 10 females, aged 55 (30 - 81), treated by RFA combined with TACE and followed up for 20 (1 - 82) months were analyzed. RESULTS: Complete necrosis was achieved in 101 patients (88.6%). 10 patients showed incomplete necrosis and 3 patients showed new neoplasm, and they all underwent repeated RFA or TACE. No therapy-relative death was found. The overall 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were 90.4%, 82.6%, 73.2%, 63.5%, and 49.1%respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year tumor progression-free survival rates were 77.1%, 64.6%, 54.6%, 46.8%, and 36.4% respectively. The overall 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates for the tumors with the size < or = 5 cm and the tumors with the size of 5.1 - 7 cm were 95.5%, 84.6%, 73.1%, 61.5%, and 50.6% and 80.2%, 64.9%, 56.3%, 45.3%, and 39.5% respectively (P = 0.041). The overall 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates for the solitary tumor and multiple tumors (no more than 3 tumors) were 95.8%, 89.1%, 78.1%, 67.1%, and 56.7% and 80.0%, 60.6%, 46.6%, 33.4%, and 21.5% respectively (P = 0.001). The levels of albumin and alpha-fetoprotein, and boundary and number of tumors were proved to be independent risk factors of survival. CONCLUSION: RFA combined with TACE is an effective treatment for HCC with satisfactory short-term and long-term effects, especially for the patients with tumor of the size of 5.1 - 7 cm or multiple lesions.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Whether percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) is as effective as repeat hepatectomy for recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the long-term remains unknown. METHODS: We included 110 patients into this study. Each patient had fewer than three recurrent HCCs, with the largest tumor less than 5 cm in diameter. Sixty-six patients with 88 tumors were treated by PRFA and 44 patients with 55 tumors were treated by repeat hepatectomy. RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates after repeat hepatectomy and PRFA were 78.6%, 56.8%, 44.5%, 30.7%, and 27.6%, and 76.6%, 48.6%, 48.6%, 39.9%, and 39.9%, respectively (P = 0.79). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates after the initial hepatectomy for the two groups were 95.4%, 79.1%, 65.0%, 50.4%, and 42.9%, and 98.5%, 85.0%, 70.8%, 58.7%, and 55.6%, respectively, (P = 0.18). Subgroup analyses showed that there was no significant difference between the overall survivals of the two groups of patients when the interval of tumor recurrence from the initial hepatectomy was 1 year (P = 0.69), and for recurrent tumor 3 cm (P = 0.57). Major complications happened significantly more often after repeat hepatectomy than PRFA (30 of 44 versus 2 of 66, P < 0.05). The interval of recurrence from the initial hepatectomy, the diameter of the recurrent tumor and the serum albumin level were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: PRFA was as effective as repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent small HCC. PRFA had the advantage over repeat hepatectomy in being less invasive.

Risk factors of survival after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIMS: This study aimed to determine the risk factors of survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1999 and May 2005, 281 patients (250 males and 31 females) who were 33-80 years old (mean 65.3 years) received PRFA only or PRFA in combination with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in our center. Patients were treated with PRFA or PEI by a percutaneous approach with ultrasound (US) guidance and were evaluated at regular intervals to determine disease recurrence and survival. The survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The relative significance of the variables in the risk factors of overall survival was assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 189 patients were alive, and 92 were dead. Median survival was 48.7 months. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 89%, 54%, and 43%, respectively. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for small tumor (size < or = 3cm) were 97.8%, 65.7%, 58.6%, respectively, for medium tumor (size 3.1-5cm) 94.1%, 57.1%, 37.1%, respectively, and for large tumor (size >5cm) 62.8%, 40.3%, 0%, respectively. Survival of patients treated with PRFA was dependent on tumor size (p<0.001; risk ratio [RR] 9.6, 95% CI 5.2-17.8), number of tumors (p=0.003; RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.0), combination with PEI (p=0.01; RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9), Child-Pugh class (p=0.002; RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.0) and safety margin (p=0.0026; RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: PRFA is an effective treatment for HCC. This study showed after PRFA, tumor size, number of tumors, combination with PEI, safety margin, and Child-Pugh class were independent risk factors of survival.

Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation with or without ethanol injection: a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate whether use of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) results in better survival compared with use of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was local ethical committee approved; all patients gave written informed consent. One hundred thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to undergo RFA-PEI (n = 66; 57 men, nine women; mean age, 53.3 years; age range, 32-73 years) or RFA alone (n = 67; 58 men, nine women; mean age, 52.2 years; age range, 33-74 years). Patients with viable tumors at computed tomography (CT) 4 weeks after treatment received additional treatment. Overall survival rates were calculated and 3-year survival rates were compared with life-table and Mantel-Haenszel analyses, respectively. Survival curves were constructed and compared by using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests, respectively. The relative prognostic significance of variables in predicting overall survival and the time to tumor recurrence or metastasis were assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: One-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 95.4%, 89.2%, 75.8%, 63.3%, and 49.3%, respectively, with RFA-PEI and 89.6%, 68.7%, 58.4%, 50.3%, and 35.9%, respectively, with RFA alone. The survival curve for the RFA-PEI group was significantly better than that for the RFA-only group (P = .04). The survival curve for the RFA-PEI group was better than that for the RFA-only group with 3.1-5.0-cm tumors (P = .03) but not for those with 3.0 cm or smaller (P = .44) or 5.1-7.0-cm (P = .70) tumors. Overall tumor recurrence was lower with RFA-PEI (23 patients) than with RFA alone (33 patients, nonsignificant difference). Local recurrence was significantly lower with RFA-PEI (four patients) than with RFA alone (14 patients, P = .012). Tumor diameter proved to be the only significant prognostic factor for overall recurrence and intrahepatic recurrence. Treatment type and tumor size were significant prognostic factors for local recurrence. CONCLUSION: RFA-PEI facilitated better local tumor control and long-term survival compared with RFA alone.

[Experience of radiofrequency ablation on liver malignancies: a report of 803 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the 8-year experience of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on liver malignancies and explore the effect and prognostic factors. METHODS: From August 1999 to February 2007, 803 patients with liver malignancies, among which there were 672 with primary liver cancer (PLC) and 131 with liver metastasis, were treated with RFA. There were 781 cases who were performed percutaneously under the guidance of ultrasound, 8 cases under CT, 9 cases with laparoscopy and 5 cases with laparotomy. And there were 117 cases who were treated by RFA combined with percutaneous ethanol injection and 108 cases by RFA combined with trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization. RESULTS: In the treatment of all the 803 patients with liver malignancies, the mortality was 0.25%, the rate of severe complications was 0.37%. The rate of complete ablation was 92.5%, the loco-recurrence rate was 13.8% and the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5-year survivals were 95.1%, 85.6%, 75.7%, 60.7% and 47.5%, respectively. For the 672 patients with PLCs, the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5-year survivals with stage Ia (Chinese staging system) were 97.8%, 91.5%, 84.6%, 77.1% and 61.9%, respectively, with stage Ib were 93.9%, 83.7%, 69.8%, 45.1% and 42.2%, respectively, with stage II were 86.2%, 67.3%, 47.3%, 17.2% and 0, respectively, and the 1, 2-year survivals with stage III were 67.8% and 0, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a safe and effective method for liver malignancy, and the tumor size and stage are important prognostic factors.