Polypyridyl ruthenium complexes with benzothiazole moiety as membrane disruptors and anti-resistance agents for Staphylococcus aureus.

Developing new antimicrobials to combat drug-resistant bacterial infections is necessary due to the increasing problem of bacterial resistance. In this study, four metallic ruthenium complexes modified with benzothiazoles were designed, synthesized and subjected to bio-evaluated. Among them, Ru-2 displayed remarkable inhibitory activity against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1.56 µg/mL. Additionally, it showcased low hemolytic toxicity (HC50 > 200 µg/mL) and the ability to effectively eradicate S. aureus without fostering drug resistance. Further investigation into the antibacterial mechanism suggested that Ru-2 may target the phospholipid component of S. aureus, leading to the disruption of the bacterial cell membrane and subsequent leakage of cell contents (nucleic acid, protein, and ONPG), ultimately resulting in the death of the bacterial cell. In vivo studies, both the G. mellonella larvae and the mouse skin infection models were conducted, indicated that Ru-2 could potentially serve as a viable candidate for the treatment of S. aureus infection. It exhibited no toxic or side effects on normal tissues. The results suggest that benzothiazole-modified ruthenium complexes may have potential as membrane-active antimicrobials against drug-resistant bacterial infections.

Coumarin-modified ruthenium complexes by disrupting bacterial membrane to combat Gram-positive bacterial infection.

Antibiotic abuse has caused the generation of drug-resistant bacteria and a series of infections induced by multidrug-resistant bacteria have become a threat to human health. Facing the failure of traditional antibiotics, antibacterial drugs with new molecular and action modes urgently need to be developed. In this study, ruthenium complexes containing coumarin were designed and synthesized. By altering the structure of the ancillary ligand, we explored the biological activities of four ruthenium complexes against Staphylococcus aureus. Among them, Ru(II)-1 with the best antibacterial activity (minimum inhibitory concentration: 1.56 µg mL-1) was used for further investigations. Surprisingly, Ru(II)-1 could significantly inhibit the formation of biofilm and hinder the development of drug-resistant bacteria. Besides, Ru(II)-1 also exhibited excellent biocompatibility. Antibacterial mechanism studies suggested that Ru(II)-1 could target the bacterial cell membrane and combine with the phospholipid component of the membrane (phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylethanolamine) and generate reactive oxygen species to induce an oxidative stress response, which resulted in the damage of membrane integrity, finally leading bacteria death. Moreover, antibacterial tests in G. mellonella larvae and mice in vivo model indicated that Ru(II)-1 had the potential to combat S. aureus infection. Therefore, all the above results showed that ruthenium complexes modified with coumarin could be a promising antibacterial agent to tackle bacterial infection problems.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of ruthenium complexes bearing the 1,2,4-triazole group as potential membrane-targeting antibacterial agents towards Staphylococcus aureus.

Bacterial infection is one of the most serious public health problems, being harmful to human health and expensive. Nowadays, the misuse and overuse of antibiotics have led to the emergence of drug resistance. Therefore, it is an urgent need to develop new antimicrobial agents to address the current situation. In this study, four 1,2,4-triazole ruthenium polypyridine complexes [Ru(bpy)2(TPIP)](PF6)2 (Ru1), [Ru(dmb)2(TPIP)](PF6)2 (Ru2), [Ru(dtb)2(TPIP)](PF6)2 (Ru3) and [Ru(dmob)2(TPIP)](PF6)2 (Ru4) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, dmb = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine, dtb = 4,4'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-bipyridine, dmob = 4,4'-dimethoxy-2,2'-bipyridine and TPIP = 2-(4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)phenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) were synthesized and evaluated for antibacterial activity. Results showed that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of Ru3 against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was only 0.78 µg mL-1, showing the best antimicrobial activity in vitro. Besides, Ru3 showed low hemolytic activity and good biocompatibility. Due to its ability to damage the cell membrane of Staphylococcus bacteria, Ru3 was able to kill bacteria in a short time. Importantly, by inhibiting bacterial toxins and the formation of biofilm, Ru3 was not susceptible to the development of drug resistance. Moreover, Ru3 revealed excellent therapeutic effects in vivo and showed no irritation to the skin of mice. In conclusion, the four obtained 1,2,4-triazole ruthenium polypyridine complexes show strong antibacterial activity and satisfactory biocompatibility with excellent potential for antibacterial treatment, and provide a new solution for the current antibacterial crisis.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of ruthenium complexes containing phenylseleny against Gram-positive bacterial infection by damage membrane integrity and avoid drug-resistance.

Compounds modified with selenium atom as potential antibacterial agents have been exploited to combat the nondrug-resistant bacterial infection. In this study, we designed and synthesized four ruthenium complexes retouching of selenium-ether. Fortunately, those four ruthenium complexes shown excellent antibacterial bioactive (MIC: 1.56-6.25 µg/mL) against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and the most active complex Ru(II)-4 could kill S. aureus by targeting the membrane integrity and avoid the bacteria to evolve drug resistance. Moreover, Ru(II)-4 was found to significantly inhibit the formation of biofilms and biofilm eradicate capacity. In toxicity experiments, Ru(II)-4 exhibited poor hemolysis and low mammalian toxicity. To illustrate the antibacterial mechanism: we conducted scanning electron microscope (SEM), fluorescent staining, membrane rupture and DNA leakage assays. Those results demonstrated that Ru(II)-4 could destroy the integrity of bacterial cell membrane. Furthermore, both G. mellonella wax worms infection model and mouse skin infection model were established to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Ru(II)-4 in vivo, the results indicated that Ru(II)-4 was a potential candidate for combating S. aureus infections, and almost non-toxic to mouse tissue. Thus, all the results indicated that introducing selenium-atom into ruthenium compounds were a promising strategy for developing interesting antibacterial agents.

Effects of a new shape-memory alloy interspinous process device on pressure distribution of the intervertebral disc and zygapophyseal joints in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the pressure distribution of lumbar intervertebral discs and zygapophyseal joints with different degrees of distraction of the interspinous processes by using a new shape-memory interspinous process stabilization device, and to research the relationship between changing disc and zygapophyseal joint loads and the degree of distraction of interspinous processes, and thus optimize usage of the implant. METHODS: Six cadaver lumbar specimens (L(2)-L(5)) were loaded. The loads in disc and zygapophyseal joints were recorded at each L(3-4) disc level. Implants with different spacer heights were then placed by turn and the pressure measurements repeated. RESULTS: An implant with 10 mm spacer height does not significantly share the load. A 12 mm implant reduces the posterior annulus load, and meanwhile decreases the zygapophyseal joints pressure, but only in extension. A 14 mm implant shares the loads of posterior annulus, nucleus, and zygapophyseal joints in extension and the neutral position, but slightly increases the anterior annulus' load. Though 16-20 mm implants do decrease the loads in the posterior annulus and zygapophyseal joints, the anterior annulus' load was apparently increased. CONCLUSION: Different degrees of distraction of the interspinous processes lead to different load distribution on the intervertebral disc. The implant tested is not appropriate in cases of serious spinal stenosis because of the contradiction that, while over-distraction of the interspinous processes decreases the posterior annulus and the zygapophyseal joints load and distracts the intervertebral foramina, it leads to a marked increase in the load of the anterior annulus, which is recognized to accelerate disc degeneration.