Temporal Changes of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score after Sphincter Preservation: A Prospective Cohort Study on Repetitive Assessment of Rectal Cancer Patients.

Background: There is a relative shortage of studies directly addressing the postoperative rectal cancer patients' evacuatory dysfunction, as estimated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score at repeated assessment time-points. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence of LARS at predefined time intervals during the first 3 years after sphincter preserving rectal cancer surgery and to enlighten the effect of identified risk factors.Materials and methods: Seventy-eight patients, who remained alive and recurrence-free 2 years after (ultra-) low anterior resection were prospectively assessed at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months postoperatively, using the LARS score as bowel dysfunction outcome measure. All patients have completed the 2-year follow-up functional assessment, while 56 and 37 of them have been evaluated up to the 30th and the 36th postoperative month, respectively.Results: The proportion of patients with "major and minor" LARS significantly decreased during the first 3 evaluations (up to 18 months) (74% vs 62% vs 35%, p = 0.0001). The tumor distance from the anal verge and the neoadjuvant radiotherapy were identified as risk factors for high LARS score at 6 months (p < 0.03). The tumor distance remained as risk factor throughout the entire follow-up. All patients with high tumors were alleviated from symptoms reflecting "major" or "minor" LARS at 18 months. Most patients (90%) after radiotherapy showed a high LARS score in the first semester, but improved afterwards.Conclusion: Overall, the LARS score improves in the majority of patients after 18 months, with low tumor height and radiation adversely affecting them. Our results may be useful in more accurately define the postoperative "functional course" of rectal cancer patients and in aiding their consultation on expected functional outcome.

Validation and comparative assessment of low anterior resection syndrome questionnaires in Greek rectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Our study validated the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score questionnaire, the colorectal functional outcome (COREFO) questionnaire, and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center bowel function instrument (MSKCC-BFI) in Greek rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Internal consistency, repeatability, construct and discriminant validity were evaluated for LARS, COREFO, and MSKCC-BFI questionnaires. The convergent validity was assessed by correlations with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 domains. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the questionnaire's subscales was satisfactory (Cronbach's a>0.6). The repeatability test showed extremely high reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9). High positive correlation was detected between the 3 questionnaires' total scores and each of their questions (rho>0.5), indicating their valid construction. All questionnaires demonstrated a good convergent validity through correlations with comparable domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29. Statistically significant associations were detected between LARS, COREFO, MSKCC-BFI scores and tumor distance and temporary stoma (P<0.001 and P=0.009, P<0.001 and P=0.005, P<0.001 and P=0.002 respectively). In addition, COREFO and MSKCC-BFI scores were significantly associated with radiation therapy. LARS score was significantly correlated to all COREFO and MSKCC-BFI subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The Greek versions of the LARS score, COREFO and MSKCC-BFI questionnaires were proven to have good psychometric properties and can be used as specific and valid instruments for measuring LARS. Since the COREFO and MSKCC-BFI questionnaires, which are more extensive and possibly less applicable in routine clinical practice, showed no advantages in relation to the LARS score, the latter may be established as the simplest, fastest to complete and most targeted tool for assessing LARS.

Use of a biological mesh for the treatment of perineal fistula following radical colorectal resection.

Patients with postradiation therapy for malignancies and/or extensive colorectal surgery are prone to the development of enteroperineal fistulas. Application of biological meshes may prove beneficial in treating complicated enteroperineal fistulas as they provide a stable ground for closing pelvic defects even in contaminated fields.

Bowel perforation by lumbar-peritoneal (LP) shunt: A rare complication of neurosurgery.

INTRODUCTION: Lumbar-peritoneal (LP) and ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt placement is the treatment of choice for diversion of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the subarachnoid space into the peritoneal cavity. This invasive procedure has been associated with several complications, most commonly infection and obstruction. Perforation of the bowel is an extremely rare complication. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 72 old female patient with LP shunt for raised intracranial pressure, who presented with LP shunt catheter protruding from anus. This was due to bowel perforation in the recto-sigmoid junction by the distal tip of lumbar-peritoneal shunt. She was surgically treated with removal of the distal part of the shunt, external drainage of the proximal part and primary closure of the perforation. DISCUSSION: The mortality after perforation is relatively high, approaching 15-18%, and it is further increased when infection is present up to 22% with central nervous system (CNS) infection such as meningitis, encephalitis, or brain abscesses (Vinchon, 2006) and 33% with intra-abdominal infection. CONCLUSION: Clinical suspicion of abdominal complications by the LP should be raised when patient with hydrocephalus develops acute abdominal symptoms or infection with unusual positive CSF cultures.