Finite nucleos(t)ide-analogue therapy for functional cure in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: recent development in the paradigm shift.

Long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may lead to hepatitis B virus (HBV) suppression, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, improvement of histological lesions, and prevention of liver disease progression, but rarely achieve HBsAg loss, the hallmark of functional cure. HBeAg-negative CHB patients have often been recommended to continue Nuc therapy until HBsAg loss, which usually means indefinitely. However, long-term/life-long Nuc therapy is associated with increasing costs and concerns of adverse outcomes subsequent to poor adherence and/or self-cessation/loss-to-follow-up. Hence, 2012 Asian-Pacific guidelines recommended that HBeAg-negative CHB patients can stop Nuc therapy after ≥12 months of HBV DNA undetectability. Subsequent Asian and few European studies have found the strategy of finite Nuc therapy to be feasible and reasonably safe. In 2016-2017, stopping Nuc was also included as a conditional strategy for HBeAg-negative CHB patients in the American and European guidelines. Furthermore, progressively increasing HBsAg loss rates with prolongation of off-Nuc follow-up were documented, being higher in Caucasians and more apparent beyond years 4-5 in Asian patients. Recently, a large study in patients with HBV cirrhosis showed not only higher 10-year HBsAg loss rate (15.3 vs. 1.6%) but also ~50% lower 10-year hepatocellular carcinoma incidence (16.5 vs. 29.5%) and 60% lower liver-related mortality/transplantation rate (6.1 vs. 15.1%) after Nuc cessation, as compared with well-matched patients continuing Nuc therapy. Since novel drug development aiming for functional cure has not been satisfactory, the strategy of finite Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative CHB seems to be the best realistic option for functional cure today.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gastric Metastasis Mimicking a 4 cm Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After a 3-year Disease-free Interval.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive tumor that usually occurs in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Surgical resection is an optimal treatment for HCC, but the 5-year recurrence rates are significantly high. The majority of recurrent HCCs occur through intrahepatic metastasis with local tumor progression, and less than 20% of recurrences are extrahepatic metastases. HCC with gastric metastasis is extremely rare, and it is easily misdiagnosed as primary gastric cancer with liver metastasis. An 80-year-old male chronic hepatitis B virus carrier had received lamivudine and entecavir for years and was regularly followed up in the clinic. He had a 3.5 cm solitary HCC with microvascular invasion and received curative surgical resection in 2009. In 2013, he developed a 1.3 cm solitary HCC again and was treated with combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation and pure ethanol injection. Afterwards, he was followed every 3-6 months and was HCC-free. Three years later, in 2016, endoscopy for intermittent epigastralgia showed a solitary 4 cm intraluminal gastric subepithelial tumor without mucosal ulcers or erosions over the gastric fundus. All imaging studies, including computed tomography, favored the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but the pathology of the tumor proved to be HCC. The patient did not receive any systemic anticancer therapy but only wedge resection of the stomach and remained tumor- and HCC-free until his latest clinic visit in 2023. The current case is unique and indicates the possibility of HCC with late solitary gastric metastasis mimicking GIST. Complete gastric tumor resection ensured an extremely good outcome for the patient, which is different from the devastating prognosis of most cases of HCC with gastric metastasis.

Higher end-of-treatment HBsAg levels is associated with later onset but not severe relapse in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients stopping antivirals.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at end-of-treatment (EOT) predict clinical relapse (CR) after nucleos(t)ide analogues (Nuc) in chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients. It is unclear if higher EOT qHBsAg leads to earlier onset or more severe off-Nuc CR. AIM: This large cohort study investigates the association between EOT qHBsAg and CR onset/severity. METHODS: This study enrolled HBeAg-negative CHB patients who had achieved undetectable HBV DNA for over 1 year after receiving Nuc therapy before discontinuation. The EOT qHBsAg level was categorised into three groups: <100, 100-999, ≥1000 IU/mL. The study assessed the predictability of qHBsAg levels for CR, and analysed and compared the incidence, time to onset and severity of CR among these three groups. RESULTS: Patients with higher EOT qHBsAg showed a higher incidence of CR (≥1000, 100-999, <100 IU/mL: 73%, 65%, and 38%, p < 0.01) but a later onset of CR (median time to CR: 35, 33 and 27 weeks, p < 0.01). The predictabilities of EOT qHBsAg for CR were greater in patients aged <50-year-old or with genotype C than in those aged ≥50-year-old or with genotype B. There's no correlation between EOT qHBsAg level and ALT folds at CR (Pearson correlation coefficient: r = -0.03, p = 0.35). EOT qHBsAg was neither a predictor for severe hepatitis flare nor a predictor for hepatic decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Predictability using EOT qHBsAg levels for CR differed in subgroups of age and genotypes. Higher EOT qHBsAg levels correlate with higher incidence but later onset of CR. No correlation between EOT qHBsAg and relapse severity was observed.

Hepatocellular carcinoma reduced, HBsAg loss increased, and survival improved after finite therapy in hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (Nuc) treatment can reduce HCC in patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis (HBV-LC). Earlier small cohort studies showed a comparable 5-year incidence of HCC in HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped and those continued Nuc therapy. This study aimed to validate these findings using a large cohort with 10-year follow-up. APPROACH AND RESULTS: From 2 centers, 494 HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped (finite group) and 593 who continued (continuous group) Nuc therapy were recruited. HCC, HBsAg loss, liver-related mortality/transplantation, and overall survival rates were compared between 2 groups with 1:1 propensity score matching of sex, treatment history, types of Nuc, age, transaminases, platelet count, and HBsAg levels at end of therapy in finite group or 3-year on-therapy in continuous groups. During a median follow-up of 6.2 (3.4-8.9) years, the annual and 10-year HCC incidence were lower in finite group (1.6 vs. 3.3%/y and 10-y 15.7% vs. 26.8%, respectively; log-rank test, p <0.0001). The finite group showed greater HBsAg decline/year (-0.116 vs. -0.095 log 10 IU/mL, p =0.0026) and 7.6 times higher 10-year incidence of HBsAg loss (22.7% vs. 3%, p <0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression showed finite therapy an independent factor for HBsAg loss (adjusted HR: 11.79) but protective against HCC (adjusted HR: 0.593), liver-related mortality/transplantation (adjusted HR: 0.312), and overall mortality (adjusted HR: 0.382). CONCLUSIONS: Finite Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative HBV-LC may reduce HCC incidence, increase HBsAg loss, and improve survival. Greater HBsAg decline/loss may reflect enhanced immunity and contribute to the reduction of hepatic carcinogenesis.

Case report: Unusual viral evolutions following antiviral therapies in a patient with concurrent hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection.

Concurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not uncommon as the two viruses shared the similar transmission routes. HCV is usually the dominant virus to suppress HBV, and HBV reactivation may occur during or after the course of anti-HCV treatment. By contrast, HCV reactivation after anti-HBV therapy in the concurrent HBV- and HCV-infected patients was rarely noted. Here, we reported the unusual viral evolutions of a patient with concurrent HBV and HCV infection, in whom HCV reactivation occurred during the entecavir therapy to rescue the severe HBV flare, while the following anti-HCV combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin elicited the second HBV flare despite sustained virological response to HCV infection, and further entecavir therapy healed the flare.

Emerging Therapies for Chronic Hepatitis B and the Potential for a Functional Cure.

Worldwide, an estimated 296 million people are living with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Current therapy with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and indefinite or finite therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (Nucs) are effective in HBV suppression, hepatitis resolution, and prevention of disease progression. However, few achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss (functional cure), and relapse often occurs after the end of therapy (EOT) because these agents have no direct effect on durable template: covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and integrated HBV DNA. Hepatitis B surface antigen loss rate increases slightly by adding or switching to Peg-IFN in Nuc-treated patients and this loss rate greatly increases up to 39% in 5 years with finite Nuc therapy with currently available Nuc(s). For this, great effort has been made to develop novel direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and immunomodulators. Among the DAAs, entry inhibitors and capsid assembly modulators have little effect on reducing HBsAg levels; small interfering RNA, antisense oligonucleotides, and nucleic acid polymers in combination with Peg-IFN and Nuc may reduce HBsAg levels significantly, even a rate of HBsAg loss sustained for > 24 weeks after EOT up to 40%. Novel immunomodulators, including T-cell receptor agonists, check-point inhibitors, therapeutic vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies may restore HBV-specific T-cell response but not sustained HBsAg loss. The safety issues and the durability of HBsAg loss warrant further investigation. Combining agents of different classes has the potential to enhance HBsAg loss. Compounds directly targeting cccDNA would be more effective but are still in the early stage of development. More effort is required to achieve this goal.