Effects of Target and Masker Fundamental Frequency Contour Depth on School-Age Children's Speech Recognition in a Two-Talker Masker.

PURPOSE: Maturation of the ability to recognize target speech in the presence of a two-talker speech masker extends into early adolescence. This study evaluated whether children benefit from differences in fundamental frequency (f o) contour depth between the target and masker speech, a cue that has been shown to improve recognition in adults. METHOD: Speech stimuli were recorded from talkers using three speaking styles, with f o contour depths that were Flat, Normal, or Exaggerated. Targets were open-set, declarative sentences produced by a female talker, and maskers were two streams of concatenated sentences produced by a second female talker. Listeners were children (ages 5-17 years) and adults (ages 18-24 years) with normal hearing. Each listener was tested in one of the three masker styles paired with all three target styles. Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) corresponding to 50% correct were estimated by fitting psychometric functions to adaptive track data. RESULTS: For adults, performance did not differ significantly across conditions with matched speaking styles. A mismatch benefit was observed when combining Flat targets with the Exaggerated masker and Exaggerated targets with the Flat masker, and for both Flat and Exaggerated targets paired with the Normal masker. For children, there was a significant effect of age in all conditions. Flat targets in the Flat masker were associated with lower SRTs than the other two matched conditions, and a mismatch benefit was observed for young children only when the target f o contour was less variable than the masker f o contour. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas child-directed speech often has exaggerated pitch contours, young children were better able to recognize speech with less variable f o. Age effects were observed in the benefit of mismatched speaking styles for some conditions, which could be related to differences in baseline SRTs rather than differences in segregation abilities.

Extended high-frequency hearing and head orientation cues benefit children during speech-in-speech recognition.

While the audible frequency range for humans spans approximately 20 Hz to 20 kHz, children display enhanced sensitivity relative to adults when detecting extended high frequencies (frequencies above 8 kHz; EHFs), as indicated by better pure tone thresholds. The impact that this increased hearing sensitivity to EHFs may have on children's speech recognition has not been established. One context in which EHF hearing may be particularly important for children is when recognizing speech in the presence of competing talkers. In the present study, we examined the extent to which school-age children (ages 5-17 years) with normal hearing were able to benefit from EHF cues when recognizing sentences in a two-talker speech masker. Two filtering conditions were tested: all stimuli were either full band or were low-pass filtered at 8 kHz to remove EHFs. Given that EHF energy emission in speech is highly dependent on head orientation of the talker (i.e., radiation becomes more directional with increasing frequency), two masker head angle conditions were tested: both co-located maskers were facing 45°, or both were facing 60° relative to the listener. The results demonstrated that regardless of age, children performed better when EHFs were present. In addition, a small change in masker head orientation also impacted performance, with better recognition at 60° compared to 45°. These findings suggest that EHF energy in the speech signal above 8 kHz is beneficial for children in complex listening situations. The magnitude of benefit from EHF cues and talker head orientation cues did not differ between children and adults. Therefore, while EHFs were beneficial for children as young as 5 years of age, children's generally better EHF hearing relative to adults did not provide any additional benefit.