RESUMO
Neurocardiogenic syncope, also called vasovagal syncope, represents one of the clinical manifestations of neurally mediated syncopal syndrome. Generally, the prognosis of the cardioinhibitory form of neurocardiogenic syncope is good, but quality of life is seriously compromised in patients who experience severe forms. Drug therapy has not achieved good clinical results and very heterogeneous data come from studies regarding permanent cardiac pacing. In this scenario, the ganglionated plexi ablation has been proposed as an effective and safe method in patients with cardioinhibitory neurocardiogenic syncope, especially in young patients in order to avoid or prolong, as much as possible, the timing of definitive cardiac pacing. Certainly, making this procedure less extensive and limiting the ablation in the right atrium (avoiding the potential complications of a left atrial approach) and at level of anatomical regions of the most important ganglionated plexy, considered 'gateway' of the sino-atrial and atrio-ventricular node function (through the recognition of specific endocardial potentials), could be very advantageous in this clinical scenario. Finally, randomized, multicentre, clinical trials on a large population are needed to better understand which is the best ablation treatment (right-only or bi-atrial) and provide evidence for syncope guidelines.
RESUMO
Background. Nowadays, it is still not possible to clinically distinguish whether an increase in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) values is due to myocardial injury or an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Moreover, predictive data regarding hs-cTnT in an emergency room (ER) setting are scarce. This monocentric retrospective study aimed to improve the knowledge and interpretation of this cardiac biomarker in daily clinical practice. Methods. Consecutive adult patients presenting at the ER and hospitalized with a first abnormal hs-cTnT value (≥14 ng/L) were enrolled for 6 months. The baseline hs-cTnT value and the ensuing changes and variations were correlated with the clinical presentation and the type of diagnosis. Subsequently, multivariable models were built to assess which clinical/laboratory variables most influenced hospital admissions in the investigated population analyzed according to the final reason for hospitalization: (1) cardiovascular vs. non-cardiovascular diagnosis, and (2) ACS vs. non-ACS one. Results. A total of 4660 patients were considered, and, after a first screening, 4149 patients were enrolled. Out of 4129 patients, 1555 (37.5%) had a first hs-cTnT ≥14 ng/L, and 1007 (65%) were hospitalized with the following types of diagnosis: ACS (182; 18%), non-ACS cardiovascular disease (337; 34%) and non-cardiovascular disease (487; 48%). Higher hs-cTnT values and significant hs-cTnT variations were found in the ACS group (p < 0.01). The mean percentage of variation was higher in patients with ACS, intermediate in those with non-ACS cardiovascular disease, and low in those with non-cardiovascular disease (407.5%, 270.6% and 12.4%, respectively). Only syncope and CRP (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02−0.39, p < 0.01 and OR: 0.9988, 95% CI: 0.9979−0.9998, p = 0.02, respectively) or CRP (OR: 0.9948, 95% CI: 0.9908−0.9989, p = 0.01) and NT-proBNP (OR: 1.0002, 95% CI: 1.0000−1.0004, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of a cardiovascular disease diagnosis. On the other hand, only chest pain (OR: 22.91, 95% CI: 3.97−132.32, p < 0.01) and eGFR (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.004−1.083, p = 0.03) were associated with the ACS diagnosis. Conclusions. Differently from the investigated biomarkers, in this study, only clinical variables predicted hospitalizations in different patients' subgroups.