Team debriefing in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of a hospital-wide clinical event debriefing program and a novel qualitative model to analyze debriefing content.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers faced unique challenges during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic which necessitated rapid adaptation. Clinical event debriefings (CEDs) are one tool that teams can use to reflect after events and identify opportunities for improving their performance and their processes. There are few reports of how teams have used CEDs in the COVID-19 pandemic. Our aim is to explore the issues discussed during COVID-19 CEDs and propose a framework model for qualitatively analyzing CEDs. METHODS: This was a descriptive, qualitative study of a hospital-wide CED program at a quaternary children's hospital between March and July 2020. CEDs were in-person, team-led, voluntary, scripted sessions using the Debriefing in Suspected COVID-19 to Encourage Reflection and Team Learning (DISCOVER-TooL). Debriefing content was qualitatively analyzed using constant comparative coding with an integrated deductive and inductive approach. A novel conceptual framework was proposed for understanding how debriefing content can be employed at various levels in a health system for learning and improvement. RESULTS: Thirty-one debriefings were performed and analyzed. Debriefings had a median of 7 debriefing participants, lasted a median of 10 min, and were associated with multiple systems-based process improvements. Fourteen themes and 25 subthemes were identified and categorized into a novel Input-Mediator-Output-Input Debriefing (IMOID) model. The most common themes included communication, coordination, situational awareness, team member roles, and clinical standards. CONCLUSIONS: Teams identified diverse issues in their debriefing discussions related to areas of high performance and opportunities for improvement in their care of COVID-19 patients. This model may help healthcare systems to understand how CED tools can be used to accelerate organizational learning to promote safety and improve outcomes in changing clinical environments.

Prevention of Latent Safety Threats: A Quality Improvement Project to Mobilize a Portable CT.

INTRODUCTION: Transporting critically ill patients to diagnostic imaging for needed studies can be challenging and even prohibitive. A portable computerized tomography (CT) scanner allows the patient to remain in the intensive care unit, but presents new positioning and team challenges. Before activation of a portable CT scanner in our pediatric intensive care unit and through the use of iterative simulation-based Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles in the clinical environment, a multidisciplinary team of bedside caregivers determined optimal patient positioning, equipment needs, and specific staffing and choreography to develop detailed portable CT guidelines. METHOD: Our team engaged stakeholders from radiology, critical care, respiratory therapy, environmental services, facilities operations, and the CT vendor to develop scenarios. Simulations included infant and pediatric patients who required critical invasive monitoring and treatment devices, such as ventilators, and high-risk intracardiac and intravascular lines. Scenario objectives centered on the safe positioning, transfer, and scanning of the patient. Trained simulation specialists from the hospital's simulation center facilitated simulation sessions. RESULTS: Simulation-based PDSA testing identified 31 latent safety threats, including the need for a custom bed adapter due to pediatric patients' variable size. We paused portable CT activation pending the custom adapter's availability and remediation of other latent safety threats. Additional simulation-based PDSA cycles further refined the process once the custom adapter was available. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation identified unanticipated latent safety threats before the implementation of a portable CT scanner.

Therapeutic antibiotic serum concentrations by two blood collection methods within the pediatric patient: A comparative effectiveness trial.

Repeated venipunctures and fingersticks to confirm serum drug concentrations cause pain and dissatisfaction for pediatric patients and their families. In many organizations, the standard of care to obtain therapeutic serum drug concentrations by peripheral venipuncture or capillary fingerstick, even when the patient has an existing peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) or central venous catheter (CVC). The primary objective of this study was to assess agreement between serum tobramycin/vancomycin concentrations collected from a CVC or PIV, versus venipuncture or fingerstick. Among hospitalized pediatric patients (age 3 months to 22 years), 36 paired blood samples were collected. Serum trough vancomycin and random tobramycin concentrations were compared between peripheral intravenous or CVC samples, and venipuncture or fingerstick samples within the same patient. A strict sampling protocol for obtaining the samples was followed, that included collection of the CVC/PIV sample before the venipuncture or fingerstick, less than 2 min between collections of samples from the different sites, and a strict volume-based flush and waste protocol. Concordant correlation coefficients demonstrated substantial agreement between CVC/PIV and venipuncture/fingerstick concentrations for vancomycin (n = 17) and tobramycin (n = 19) (Rc = 0.982 for both). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated good overall between-method agreement within subjects and minimal bias. Consequently, using a lumen volume-based flush and waste protocol, children with indwelling catheters may not require additional venipunctures and/or fingersticks for confirmation of drug concentrations while hospitalized, improving the quality of care and patient satisfaction.