Phase III randomized intergroup trial of subtotal lymphoid irradiation versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and subtotal lymphoid irradiation for stage IA to IIA Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: The management of early-stage Hodgkin's disease in the United States is controversial. To evaluate whether staging laparotomy could be safely avoided in early-stage Hodgkin's disease and whether chemotherapy should be a part of the treatment of nonlaparotomy staged patients, a phase III intergroup trial was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred forty-eight patients with clinical stage IA to IIA supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease were randomized without staging laparotomy to treatment with either subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI) or combined-modality therapy (CMT) consisting of three cycles of doxorubicin and vinblastine followed by STLI. RESULTS: The study was closed at the second, planned, interim analysis because of a markedly superior failure-free survival (FFS) rate for patients on the CMT arm (94%) compared with the STLI arm (81%). With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 10 patients have experienced relapse or died on the chemoradiotherapy arm, compared with 34 on the radiotherapy arm (P <.001). Few deaths have occurred on either arm (three deaths on CMT and seven deaths on STLI). Treatment was well tolerated, with only one death on each arm attributed to treatment. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that it is possible to obtain a high FFS rate in a large group of stage IA to IIA patients without performing staging laparotomy and that three cycles of chemotherapy plus STLI provide a superior FFS compared with STLI alone. Extended follow-up is necessary to assess freedom from second relapse, overall survival, late toxicities, patterns of treatment failure, and quality of life.

Dose escalation in non-small-cell lung cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: update of a phase I trial.

PURPOSE: High-dose radiation may improve outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). By using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and limiting the target volume, we hypothesized that the dose could be safely escalated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standard phase I design was used. Five bins were created based on the volume of normal lung irradiated, and dose levels within bins were chosen based on the estimated risk of radiation pneumonitis. Starting doses ranged from 63 to 84 Gy given in 2.1-Gy fractions. Target volumes included the primary tumor and any nodes >or= 1 cm on computed tomography. Clinically uninvolved nodal regions were not included purposely. More recently, selected patients received neoadjuvant cisplatin and vinorelbine. RESULTS: At the time of this writing, 104 patients had been enrolled. Twenty-four had stage I, four had stage II, 43 had stage IIIA, 26 had stage IIIB, and seven had locally recurrent disease. Twenty-five received chemotherapy, and 63 were assessable for escalation. All bins were escalated at least twice. Although grade 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in five patients, grade 3 radiation pneumonitis occurred in only two. The maximum-tolerated dose was only established for the largest bin, at 65.1 Gy. Dose levels for the four remaining bins were 102.9, 102.9, 84 and 75.6 Gy. The majority of patients failed distantly, though a significant proportion also failed in the target volume. There were no isolated failures in clinically uninvolved nodal regions. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation in NSCLC has been accomplished safely in most patients using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, limiting target volumes, and segregating patients by the volume of normal lung irradiated.

NCCN Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer.

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. In many situations, the patient and physician have the responsibility to jointly explore and ultimately select the most appropriate option from among the available alternatives. With rare exception, the evaluation, treatment, and follow-up recommendations contained within these guidelines were based largely on the results of past and present clinical trials. However, there is not a single clinical situation in which the treatment of breast cancer has been optimized with respect to either maximizing cure or minimizing toxicity and disfigurement. Therefore, patient and physician participation in prospective clinical trials allows patients not only to receive state-of-the-art cancer treatment but also to contribute to the improvement of treatment of future patients.

Late effects of dose fractionation on the mechanical properties of breast skin following post-lumpectomy radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Late radiation-induced skin effects were studied in a multicenter project using our new sensitive noninvasive viscoelasticity skin analyzer (VESA). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Skin viscoelasticity and anisotropy were examined quantitatively in symmetric areas of both breasts in healthy women and in 110 breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy and radiotherapy. These parameters were evaluated by the VESA measurement of the speed of elastic wave propagation in the skin; higher VESA readings correspond to higher skin stiffness. Effect of radiation was estimated by comparison of the data recorded in the irradiated versus nonirradiated breast of the same patient. RESULTS: Skin viscoelasticity and anisotropy were similar in contralateral areas of the breasts in healthy controls as well as in the nonirradiated breasts of the patients. With age, skin viscoelasticity decreased and anisotropy increased similarly in both breasts. Radiotherapy, by a total radiation dose in the range of 45-50 Gy given with 1.8 Gy/fraction (fx) resulted in a similar minor, but still statistically significant, increase of skin stiffness relative to control. The effect was more pronounced when a dose of 50 Gy was given in a higher dose/fraction of 2.5 Gy. CONCLUSION: We found that the increase in dose of radiation per fraction had much more impact on the development of late skin effects than elevation in the total dose given.

Estimation of tumor control probability model parameters from 3-D dose distributions of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Tumor control probability (TCP) model calculations may be used in a relative manner to evaluate and optimize three-dimensional (3-D) treatment plans. Using a mathematical model which makes a number of simplistic assumptions, TCPs can be estimated from a 3-D dose distribution of the tumor given the dose required for a 50% probability of tumor control (D50) and the normalized slope (gamma) of the sigmoid-shaped dose-response curve at D50. The purpose of this work was to derive D50 and gamma from our clinical experience using 3-D treatment planning to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Our results suggest that for NSCLC patients, the dose to achieve significant probability of tumor control may be large (on the order of 84 Gy) for longer (> 30 months) local progression-free survival.

Optimization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may be performed with many different treatment delivery techniques. This article summarizes the clinical use and optimization of multisegment IMRT plans that have been used to treat more than 350 patients with IMRT over the last 4.5 years. More than 475 separate clinical IMRT plans are reviewed, including treatments of brain, head and neck, thorax, breast and chest wall, abdomen, pelvis, prostate, and other sites. Clinical planning, plan optimization, and treatment delivery are summarized, including efforts to minimize the number of additional intensity-modulated segments needed for particular planning protocols. Interactive and automated optimization of segmental and full IMRT approaches are illustrated, and automation of the segmental IMRT planning process is discussed.

Patterns of failure following high-dose 3-D conformal radiotherapy for high-grade astrocytomas: a quantitative dosimetric study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the failure patterns for patients with high-grade astrocytomas treated with high-dose conformal radiotherapy (CRT) using a quantitative technique to calculate the dose received by the CT- or MR-defined recurrence volume and to assess whether the final target volume margin used in the present dose escalation study requires redefinition before further escalation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 4/89 and 10/95, 71 patients with high-grade supratentorial astrocytomas were entered in a phase I/II dose escalation study using 3-D treatment planning and conformal radiotherapy. All patients were treated to either 70 or 80 Gy in conventional daily fractions of 1.8-2.0 Gy. The clinical and planning target volumes (CTV, PTV) consisted of successively smaller volumes with the final PTV defined as the enhancing lesion plus 0.5 cm margin. As of 10/95, 47 patients have CT or MR evidence of disease recurrence/progression. Of the 47 patients, 36 scans obtained at the time of recurrence were entered into the 3-D radiation therapy treatment planning system. After definition of the recurrent tumor volumes, the recurrence scan dataset was registered with the pretreatment CT dataset so that the actual dose received by the recurrent tumor volumes during treatment could be accurately calculated and then analyzed dosimetrically using dose-volume histograms. Recurrences were divided into several categories: 1) "central," in which 95% or more of the recurrent tumor volume (Vrecur) was within D95, the region treated to high dose (95% of the prescription dose); 2) "in-field," in which 80% or more of Vrecur was within the D95 isodose surface; 3) "marginal," when between 20 and 80% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface; 4) "outside," in which less than 20% of Vrecur was inside the D95 surface. RESULTS: In 29 of 36 patients, a solitary lesion was seen on recurrence scans. Of the 29 solitary recurrences, 26 were central, 3 were marginal, and none were outside. Multiple recurrent lesions were seen in seven patients: three patients had multiple central and/or in-field lesions only, three patients had central and/or in-field lesions with additional small marginal or outside lesions, and one patent had 6 outside and one central lesion. Since total recurrence volume was used in the final analysis, 6 of the 7 patients with multiple recurrent lesions were classified into centra/in-field category. CONCLUSION: Analysis of the 36 evaluable patients has shown that 32 of 36 patients (89%) failed with central or in-field recurrences, 3/36 (8%) had a significant marginal component to the recurrence, whereas only 1/36 (3%) could be clearly labeled as failing mainly outside the high-dose region. Seven patients had multiple recurrences, but only 1 of 7 had large-volume recurrences outside the high-dose region. This study shows that the great majority of patient recurrences that occur after high-dose (70 or 80 Gy) conformal irradiation are centrally located: only 1/36 patients (with 7 recurrent lesions) had more than 50% of the recurrence volume outside the region previously treated to high dose. Further dose escalation to 90 Gy (and beyond) thus seems reasonable, based on the same target volume definition criteria

The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors.

PURPOSE: To analyze treatment delivery errors for three-dimensional (3D) conformal therapy performed at various levels of treatment delivery automation and complexity, ranging from manual field setup to virtually complete computer-controlled treatment delivery using a computer-controlled conformal radiotherapy system (CCRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: All treatment delivery errors which occurred in our department during a 15-month period were analyzed. Approximately 34,000 treatment sessions (114,000 individual treatment segments [ports]) on four treatment machines were studied. All treatment delivery errors logged by treatment therapists or quality assurance reviews (152 in all) were analyzed. Machines "M1" and "M2" were operated in a standard manual setup mode, with no record and verify system (R/V). MLC machines "M3" and "M4" treated patients under the control of the CCRS system, which (1) downloads the treatment delivery plan from the planning system; (2) performs some (or all) of the machine set up and treatment delivery for each field; (3) monitors treatment delivery; (4) records all treatment parameters; and (5) notes exceptions to the electronically-prescribed plan. Complete external computer control is not available on M3; therefore, it uses as many CCRS features as possible, while M4 operates completely under CCRS control and performs semi-automated and automated multi-segment intensity modulated treatments. Analysis of treatment complexity was based on numbers of fields, individual segments, nonaxial and noncoplanar plans, multisegment intensity modulation, and pseudoisocentric treatments studied for a 6-month period (505 patients) concurrent with the period in which the delivery errors were obtained. Treatment delivery time was obtained from the computerized scheduling system (for manual treatments) or from CCRS system logs. Treatment therapists rotate among the machines; therefore, this analysis does not depend on fixed therapist staff on particular machines. RESULTS: The overall reported error rate (all treatments, machines) was 0.13% per segment, or 0.44% per treatment session. The rate (per machine) depended on automation and plan complexity. The error rates per segment for machines M1 through M4 were 0.16%, 0.27%, 0.12%, 0.05%, respectively, while plan complexity increased from M1 up to machine M4. Machine M4 (the most complex plans and automation) had the lowest error rate. The error rate decreased with increasing automation in spite of increasing plan complexity, while for the manual machines, the error rate increased with complexity. Note that the real error rates on the two manual machines are likely to be higher than shown here (due to unnoticed and/or unreported errors), while (particularly on M4) virtually all random treatment delivery errors were noted by the CCRS system and related QA checks (including routine checks of machine and table readouts for each treatment). Treatment delivery times averaged from 14 min to 23 min per plan, and depended on the number of segments/plan, although this analysis is complicated by other factors. CONCLUSION: Use of a sophisticated computer-controlled delivery system for routine patient treatments with complex 3D conformal plans has led to a decrease in treatment delivery errors, while at the same time allowing delivery of increasingly complex and sophisticated conformal plans with little increase in treatment time. With renewed vigilance for the possibility of systematic problems, it is clear that use of complete and integrated computer-controlled delivery systems can provide improvements in treatment delivery, since more complex plans can be delivered with fewer errors, and without increasing treatment time.

Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: an analysis of pooled data of 540 patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the relation between the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and the three-dimensional dose distribution in the lung. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In five institutions, the incidence of radiation pneumonitis was evaluated in 540 patients. The patients were divided into two groups: a Lung group, consisting of 399 patients with lung cancer and 1 esophagus cancer patient and a Lymph./Breast group with 78 patients treated for malignant lymphoma, 59 for breast cancer, and 3 for other tumor types. The dose per fraction varied between 1.0 and 2.7 Gy and the prescribed total dose between 20 and 92 Gy. Three-dimensional dose calculations were performed with tissue density inhomogeneity correction. The physical dose distribution was converted into the biologically equivalent dose distribution given in fractions of 2 Gy, the normalized total dose (NTD) distribution, by using the linear quadratic model with an alpha/beta ratio of 2.5 and 3.0 Gy. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated considering both lungs as one organ and from these DVHs the mean (biological) lung dose, NTDmean, was obtained. Radiation pneumonitis was scored as a complication when the pneumonitis grade was grade 2 (steroids needed for medical treatment) or higher. For statistical analysis the conventional normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model of Lyman (with n=1) was applied along with an institutional-dependent offset parameter to account for systematic differences in scoring patients at different institutions. RESULTS: The mean lung dose, NTDmean, ranged from 0 to 34 Gy and 73 of the 540 patients experienced pneumonitis, grade 2 or higher. In all centers, an increasing pneumonitis rate was observed with increasing NTDmean. The data were fitted to the Lyman model with NTD50=31.8 Gy and m=0.43, assuming that for all patients the same parameter values could be used. However, in the low dose range at an NTDmean between 4 and 16 Gy, the observed pneumonitis incidence in the Lung group (10%) was significantly (p=0.02) higher than in the Lymph./Breast group (1.4%). Moreover, between the Lung groups of different institutions, also significant (p=0.04) differences were present: for centers 2, 3, and 4, the pneumonitis incidence was about 13%, whereas for center 5 only 3%. Explicitly accounting for these differences by adding center-dependent offset values for the Lung group, improved the data fit significantly (p < 10(-5)) with NTD50=30.5+/-1.4 Gy and m=0.30+/-0.02 (+/-1 SE) for all patients, and an offset of 0-11% for the Lung group, depending on the center. CONCLUSIONS: The mean lung dose, NTDmean, is relatively easy to calculate, and is a useful predictor of the risk of radiation pneumonitis. The observed dose-effect relation between the NTDmean and the incidence of radiation pneumonitis, based on a large clinical data set, might be of value in dose-escalating studies for lung cancer. The validity of the obtained dose-effect relation will have to be tested in future studies, regarding the influence of confounding factors and dose distributions different from the ones in this study.

A brain tumor dose escalation protocol based on effective dose equivalence to prior experience.

PURPOSE: The current study describes the design of a dose escalation protocol for conformal irradiation of primary brain tumors that preserves the safe experience of a previous, sequential dose escalation scheme while enabling the delivery of substantially higher effective doses to a central target volume. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Normalized isoeffective composite dose distributions were formed for 20 patients treated on the original protocol (which specified three progressively smaller planning target volumes [PTVs]) using the linear quadratic model (here corrected to equivalent 2 Gy fractions using alpha/beta=10 Gy). These distributions were investigated and a new protocol was designed to preserve a similar level of efficacy and lack of toxicity for the outer volumes, but allowing a higher dose to the inner PTV. Treatment plans were then investigated to determine if the objectives of the new protocol were achievable. In particular, plans that simultaneously achieved all biological treatment planning objectives (all fields treated each day) were investigated. Finally, the success of the protocol design was demonstrated by analysis of the effective dose distributions of 10 patients treated using the new protocol. RESULTS: The composite normalized isoeffective minimum doses to the outer PTVs (PTV3 and PTV2) in the original protocol were close to 60 Gy and 75 Gy, respectively, and these values are specified as the minimum doses to those volumes for the new protocol. Homogeneity requirements to maintain equivalence for the outer target volume domains are: not more than 25% of [PTV3 exclusive of PTV2] >75 Gy; and not more than 50% of [PTV2 exclusive of PTV1] >85 Gy. Treatment plans using multiple noncoplanar arrangements of beams and static intensity modulation treat all volumes at each session. DVHs of the normalized isoeffective dose distributions reveal the equivalence of the new protocol plans to the sequential plans in the previous protocol as well as the ability to achieve a higher dose of 90 Gy to the isocenter of PTV1 (+/-5% homogeneity required). CONCLUSION: The ability to incorporate past experience through use of the linear quadratic model in the design of a new dose escalation protocol is demonstrated.

Spinal cord dose from standard head and neck irradiation: implications for three-dimensional treatment planning.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment with traditional standard field arrangements for patients with head and neck cancer rarely causes myelopathy. Often, initial treatment fields are reduced to avoid the spinal cord after 45 Gy has been delivered and the cord dose that is delivered by 'off-cord' fields is not calculated. To determine a conservative limit to set for the cord dose for conformally-planned field arrangements, the total spinal cord dose delivered with standard opposed lateral fields was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of treatment plans were evaluated for 10 patients enrolled on a parotid-sparing protocol for bilateral head and neck treatment, i.e. (1) standard opposed lateral fields, including large initial fields treating nodal volumes to 45 Gy, off-cord fields for an additional 25 Gy and electron nodal boost fields for an additional 5 Gy and (2) complex 3-D treatment planned field geometries with conformal dose distributions (actual treatment fields). Treatment fields for the protocol conformal plans were arranged so that the maximum cord dose was not to exceed 50 Gy. Dose-volume histograms for both types of planned treatments were analyzed. The maximum and minimum dose to the 1 cm3 cord volume receiving the highest dose were reported. RESULTS: The maximum dose to the cord from the standard composite plans was on average 52 Gy, with a range of 48.9-55.9 Gy. This consisted of an additional 6.3 Gy (average) from the scatter and block transmission dose from the off-cord lateral fields above the prescribed 45 Gy. For the conformal plans, the maximum dose was on average 49.4 Gy (which is protocol criteria). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The maximum spinal cord dose of 50 Gy set as a dose constraint for 3-D treatment planning for conformal plans is a comparable dose to that given in standard opposed lateral head and neck treatments and has been determined to be a conservative spinal cord dose limit, which we have applied in our clinic.

Comprehensive irradiation of head and neck cancer using conformal multisegmental fields: assessment of target coverage and noninvolved tissue sparing.

PURPOSE: Conformal treatment using static multisegmental intensity modulation was developed for patients requiring comprehensive irradiation for head and neck cancer. The major aim is sparing major salivary gland function while adequately treating the targets. To assess the adequacy of the conformal plans regarding target coverage and dose homogeneity, they were compared with standard irradiation plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients with stage III/IV head and neck cancer requiring comprehensive, bilateral neck irradiation participated in this study. CT-based treatment plans included five to six nonopposed fields, each having two to four in-field segments. Fields and segments were devised using beam's eye views of the planning target volumes (PTVs), noninvolved organs, and isodose surfaces, to achieve homogeneous dose distribution that encompassed the targets and spared major salivary gland tissue. For comparison, standard three-field radiation plans were devised retrospectively for each patient, with the same CT-derived targets used for the clinical (conformal) plans. Saliva flow rates from each major salivary gland were measured before and periodically after treatment. RESULTS: On average, the minimal dose to the primary PTVs in the conformal plans [95.2% of the prescribed dose, standard deviation (SD) 4%] was higher than in the standard plans (91%, SD 7%; p = 0.02), and target volumes receiving <95% or <90% of the prescribed dose were smaller in the conformal plans (p = 0.004 and 0.02, respectively). Similar advantages of the conformal plans compared to standard plans were found in ipsilateral jugular nodes PTV coverage. The reason for underdosing in the standard treatment plans was primarily failure of electron beams to fully encompass targets. No significant differences were found in contralateral jugular or posterior neck nodes coverage. The minimal dose to the retropharyngeal nodes was higher in the standard plans. However, all conformal plans achieved the planning goal of delivering 50 Gy to these nodes. In the conformal plans, the magnitude and volumes of high doses in noninvolved tissue were significantly reduced. The main reasons for hot spots in the standard plans (whose dose calculations included missing tissue compensators) were photon/electron match line inhomogeneities, which were avoided in the conformal plans. The mean doses to all the major salivary glands, notably the contralateral parotid (receiving on average 32% of the prescribed dose, SD 7%) were significantly lower in the conformal plans compared with standard radiation plans. The mean dose to the noninvolved oral cavity tended to be lower in the conformal plans (p = 0.07). One to 3 months after radiation, on average 60% (SD 49%) of the preradiation saliva flow rate was retained in the contralateral parotid glands and 10% (SD 16%) was retained in the submandibular/sublingual glands. CONCLUSIONS: Planning and delivery of comprehensive irradiation for head and neck cancer using static, multisegmental intensity modulation are feasible. Target coverage has not been compromised and dose distributions in noninvolved tissue are favorable compared with standard radiation. Substantial major salivary gland function can be retained.

Immunolymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: evaluation using 131I-labeled monoclonal antibody B72.3.

Noninvasive axillary lymph node staging was investigated using [131I]murine monoclonal antibody B72.3 in 16 patients with breast cancer scheduled for axillary dissection. [131I]B72.3 was injected into ipsilateral finger webs or around the breast biopsy. Scintigraphy to 72 h and gamma-counting/immunohistochemistry of nodes were performed. Specific antibody uptake (%ID/g) and the ratio of specific:nonspecific antibody uptake were not significantly different in tumor-positive versus tumor-negative nodes, suggesting that [131I]B72.3 is unsuitable to discriminate axillary node tumor involvement.

Radiation following chemotherapy for mediastinal Hodgkin's disease: the outcome of various doses for bulky tumors.

Twenty-one patients with bulky mediastinal disease responding to chemotherapy received consolidation with low-dose mediastinal radiation (19.8-25.2 Gy). Their 5-year mediastinal failure rate (10%) was equivalent to that of 10 similar patients who received higher doses of 30-44 Gy (20%). Low-dose radiation may be appropriate for these patients. Prospective studies are required to verify these findings.

Conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer using a lung density correction: the University of Michigan experience.

PURPOSE: Although an abundance of reports detail the successful use of definitive radiotherapy of the breast in the treatment in Stage I or II breast cancer, little data have been published concerning the use of lung density correction and its effect upon long-term outcome. As it has been the practice at the University of Michigan to routinely use lung density correction in the dose calculations to the breast, we retrospectively analyzed our results for local control, relapse-free, and overall survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical records were reviewed of 429 women with Stage I or II breast cancer treated with lumpectomy, axillary dissection, and breast irradiation with or without systemic chemo/hormonal therapy. Tangential radiotherapy fields delivering 45 to 50 Gy were used to treat the entire breast. A boost was delivered in 95% of cases for a total tumor bed dose of 60 to 66 Gy. All treatment plans were calculated using a lung density correction. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 4.4 years, the 5-year actuarial rate of local control with local failure as the only site of first failure was 96% (95% CI 94-98%). Univariate analysis for local failure as only first failure found the following factors to statistically predict for increased risk of breast recurrence: young age (< or =35 years old), premenopausal status, tumor size >2 cm, positive family history, and positive microscopic margins. Multivariate analysis revealed young age and margin status to be the only factors remaining significant for local failure. The 5-year actuarial relapse-free survival was 85% (95% CI 81-89%); overall survival at 5 years was 90% (95% CI 87-94%). CONCLUSIONS: Lung density correction results in rates of local control, disease-free, and overall survival at 5 years that compare favorably with series using noncorrected unit density calculations. While we will continue to update our results with increasing follow-up, our 5-year data indicate that the use of lung-density correction for dosimetric accuracy does not compromise local control.

What a surgeon needs to know about radiation.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the physical and biologic principles of radiation oncology, along with improvements in the technical and clinical aspects of this field, have been gained in recent years. Some of these aspects are presented, with an emphasis on their relevance to the oncologic surgeon. RESULTS: Recent innovations have improved our ability to deliver high radiation doses safely and to increase the therapeutic ratio of radiation. They include the concurrent administration of radiation sensitizers and chemotherapy, altered fractionation schemes, and the conformal delivery of radiation using sophisticated imaging and planning tools. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing efficacy of radiation, resulting from innovations described in this review and others, enhances the role of radiotherapy in the struggle against cancer.

The conservative management of Paget's disease of the breast with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of breast-conserving therapy involving limited surgery and definitive radiotherapy as a treatment for Paget's disease, and to determine the disease free and overall survival associated with this approach. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients treated during the period 1980-1994 for Paget's disease of the breast who did not present with a palpable mass or mammographic density. Through a collaborative review, 30 cases were identified. A biopsy confirming the presence of typical Paget's cells was performed on all patients. All patients received external beam radiotherapy to the breast, with a median dose of 50 gray (Gy). Ninety-seven percent received a boost to the remaining nipple or tumor bed, with a median dose to the tumor bed of 61.5 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up for surviving patients was 62 months. Three patients (10%) developed a recurrence in the breast as the only site of first failure, and 2 additional patients (7%) experienced failure in the breast as a component of first failure. The median time to local failure was 69 months. The 5- and 8-year actuarial estimates of local failure as the only site of first failure were 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-20%) and 16% (95% CI, 0-31%), respectively. Of the 5 patients with local failures, 3 were among 22 patients (14%) who underwent complete resection of the nipple or nipple-areola complex, compared with 2 failures among 6 patients (33%) after partial resection (P = 0.29). There were no failures among 2 patients who had a biopsy only. Four of 5 local failures were salvaged by mastectomy, and 3 of these patients were free of disease after a median follow-up of 52 months. The 5- and 8-year estimates of disease free survival for the overall series were both 95% (95% CI, 87-100%); cause specific overall survival was 100% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conserving therapy involving complete resection of the nipple-areola complex followed by definitive radiotherapy is a viable alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of Paget's disease. High rates of disease free and cause specific survival, in addition to adequate local control, justify consideration of a conservative approach.

Volume and dose parameters for survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the effect of tumor volume and dose factors derived from 3-D treatment planning dose distributions on survival outcome for non-small cell lung cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients diagnosed with medically inoperable or locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer planned with 3-D treatment planning between 1986 and 1992 were the subject of this retrospective study. Patient characteristics and dosimetric parameters were analyzed for influence on overall survival and local progression-free survival (LPFS) using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Nodal stage and stage were the most significant factors for overall survival and LPFS duration on both univariate and multivariate analysis. We found a wide range of primary tumor volume sizes for each stage. Patients with tumor volumes <200 cm3 had longer survival (P = 0.047). In an analysis stratifying patients into four groups by tumor volume (<200 cm3 versus >200 cm3) and nodes (negative versus positive), patients in the group with no nodal disease and <200 cm3 tumor volumes survived longer than patients in any other group (P = 0.046). No dose factors were statistically significant for longer survival. Longer LPFS was seen for (a) isocenter dose >70 Gy (P = 0.055) for the overall group of patients, (b) within a subgroup with no nodal disease and >73 Gy (P = 0.054), and (c) within a subgroup with no nodal disease and tumor volume <200 cm3 receiving >73 Gy (P = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: Several findings from the volume and dosimetric analysis in this study are noteworthy. Stage was found to be a poor predictor of primary tumor volume size. Also, tumor volume size (<200 cm3) in conjunction with nodal status (negative nodes) had an impact on survival though there was a mix of stage (I, IIIa, IIIb) in this group of patients. Finally, dose appears to influence local control (LPFS) for the overall group of patients and when tumor volumes are <200 cm3. Our data indicate that outcome following radiation may be better predicted by a staging system that takes into account tumor volume and nodal spread rather than a system that is largely based on anatomic location of disease. Dose prescription for lung cancer treatment might better be written based on tumor volume size.