[Are there benefits for catheter valves for catheter-associated quality of life? : Results of an investigation in 427 catheter wearers with life-long indication]. / Hat eine Ventilversorgung Vorteile bei der katheterassoziierten Lebensqualität? : Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung an 427 Katheterträgern in lebenslanger Indikation.

BACKGROUND: In urology, a subset of patients with lifelong urine drainage are fitted with a catheter valve. Data on catheter-related quality of life (crqol) in this subset of patients are missing. AIM: Clarification of the whether there are advantages for valve-aided catheters in comparison with continuous urine drainage in catheter wearers with a lifelong indication. METHODS: In all, 357 patients with a catheter with lifelong indication of continuous urine drainage from a previous study were compared with 70 valve-aided patients. The crqol was evaluated by a validated assessment with 25 items and five domains. RESULTS: There were statistically more patients with a suprapubic catheter than with a transurethral indwelling catheter (73.4 vs. 54.4%, p = 0.005), significantly more patients with bladder voiding dysfunction (73.5 vs. 52.6%, p = 0.003) and significantly more patients with small catheter sizes (p = 0.001). Crqol was altogether slightly impaired with a median score of 4.2 (no impairment indicated by 5 points) in valve-aided patients, but crqol was more impaired in valve-aided patients compared to patients with continuous drainage (4.4 points, n. s.). Some items demonstrated more problems dealing with urinary urge in valve-aided patients, but catheter-related pain was more often worse in patients with continuous drainage. CONCLUSION: There is no clear evidence for an advantage of a catheter valve over a continuous urine drainage system. Thus, the decision regarding a catheter-valve system must be made individually according to the indication and the preferences of the patient.

[Guidelines for consultations regarding incontinence care products]. / Leitlinie Hilfsmittelberatung bei Harninkontinenz.

An investigation of the German consumer organisation "Stiftung Warentest" in 2017 confirmed significant deficiencies in the information, advice and supply of incontinence care products received by urinary incontinence patients. The German Society of Urology (DGU) thereupon drafted and later published guidelines concerning the consultation of patients in the context of incontinence care. Important aspects of the consultation process include the determination of the type of incontinence as well as its severity, clinical examination, and advice regarding possible curative treatments. However, the advice appointment takes centre stage and should ideally be conducted by a qualified person in a separate room granting sufficient privacy and time. Furthermore, repeated supply of a selection of samples for differing degrees and types of incontinence, accommodating the patient's individual preferences and anatomical features, is crucial in order to ensure optimal incontinence care. In the case of commercial health care service providers, transparency relating to the financial implications of e.g. expensive products is key, which is what has been intended by German health insurance providers. The new guidelines concerning urinary incontinence care consultation constitute a step towards the improvement and structuring of processes in the consultation regarding, and the supply of, incontinence care products.

[Comparison of catheter-associated quality of life in external urinary diversion: nephrostomy vs. suprapubic catheter]. / Vergleich der katheterassoziierten Lebensqualität bei externen Harnableitungen: Nephrostomie vs. suprapubischer Katheter.

INTRODUCTION: A percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) affects the integrity of the patient due to the requirement of an external drainage bag and regular changes. The catheter-associated quality of life (QOL) was evaluated using a validated assessment and compared to similar patients with suprapubic bladder drainage. METHODS: A validated assessment analyzing catheter-related QOL for 5 domains and 25 individual items (first published by Mary Wilde) was completed during a catheter change appointment by patients who had their unilateral or bilateral PCN for a minimum of 3 months in life-long indication. RESULTS: In 66 patients (unilateral PCN: 42 patients), a moderate impairment of their catheter-related QOL was shown. The overall QOL score was median 4.0 on a scale of 0-5. This was rated lower-indicating a stronger impairment of QOL-than in patients with a suprapubic bladder catheter, who had a median score of 4.3. Significant differences were found related to the catheter type in the items "feeling of humiliation due to the PCN", "conflicts with the medical or nursing staff", "fear of painful catheter changes", "feeling ill", "being handicapped in activities of daily living" and "concern of not being able to do what one wants to do" and "fear of catheter leakages". The indication for the PCN due to a malignant or benign underlying disease was not associated with the catheter-related QOL. CONCLUSION: For the first time, the catheter-related QOL was found to be moderately impaired in patients with a PCN using a validated assessment. Affected individuals report feeling "ill" and "limited/disabled" in activities of daily living; thus, the surgical indication should be strict. Fear of painful catheter changes and of catheter leakages indicates the need of technically correct catheter changes.