Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Elexacaftor, Tezacaftor, and Ivacaftor in Adult People with Cystic Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI) have significantly improved lung function in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Despite exceptional improvements in most cases, treatment-related inter-subject variability and drug-drug interactions that complicate modulator therapy have been reported. METHODS: This retrospective analysis presents data on the serum concentration of ETI in our pwCF with full or reduced dosage from August 2021 to December 2023 via routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The data were compared with the maximum drug concentrations (Cmax) from the pharmaceutical company's summary of product characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 786 blood samples from 155 pwCF (41% female, 59% male) were analyzed. The examinations were divided into four groups: full dose within the given tmax (38.5% of all measurements), full dose outside the tmax (29%), reduced dose within the tmax (19.2%), and reduced dose outside the tmax (13.2%). In pwCF receiving the full dose and blood taken within the tmax, 45.3% of serum concentrations of elexacaftor, 51.1% of serum concentrations of ivacaftor, and 8.9% of serum concentrations of tezacaftor were found to be above the Cmax, respectively. For those on reduced doses within the tmax, 24.5% had a serum concentration of elexacaftor, 23.2% had a serum concentration of ivacaftor, and 2.5% had a serum concentration of tezacaftor above the Cmax, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Many pwCF under ETI therapy have Cmax values for elexacaftor and ivacaftor above the recommended range, even on reduced doses or before the tmax was reached. This highlights the value of a TDM program. Further pharmacokinetic studies are necessary.

Correlation of bilirubin and toxic bile acids in critically ill patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction and adsorber application.

Bilirubin is one of the most frequently used laboratory values to monitor critically ill patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction. Besides bilirubin, toxic bile acids (TBAs), which may cause severe organ damage, are typically elevated. A correlation between both parameters seems plausible, but data are lacking. The aim was to investigate whether there is a correlation between bilirubin and TBAs in patients' blood and whether a compareable reduction can be observed during the use of the adsorber CytoSorb (CS). As part of the Cyto-SOLVE study (NCT04913298), 16 critically ill patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction, bilirubin concentration > 10 mg/dl, continuous kidney replacement therapy and CS-application were investigated. Bilirubin and TBA concentrations were measured from arterial blood at defined time points (before start, after 6 and 12 h). Relative reduction (RR) was calculated using the formula[Formula: see text]. A moderate to high correlation between bilirubin and TBA concentration at all defined timepoints (rstart=0.64, p = 0.008; r6h = 0.85, p < 0.001, r12h = 0.72, p = 0.002) was observed. In the first six hours of CS-application, a significant elimination of TBA (median TBA: 30.8→20.1µmol/l, p < 0.001) and bilirubin (median bilirubin: 17.1→11.9 mg/dl, p < 0.001) was observed. The median RR after 6 h was 26.1% and 39.8% for bilirubin and TBA, respectively. No further reduction was observed after 12 h (RRbilirubin: - 0.6%, RRTBA: 1.8%). There was an at least moderate correlation between bilirubin and TBA in patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction. Therefore, bilirubin seems to be a suitable surrogate parameter for TBA elimination during CytoSorb application.

Predictive performance of multi-model approaches for model-informed precision dosing of piperacillin in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: Piperacillin (PIP)/tazobactam is a frequently prescribed antibiotic; however, over- or underdosing may contribute to toxicity, therapeutic failure, and development of antimicrobial resistance. An external evaluation of 24 published PIP-models demonstrated that model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can enhance target attainment. Employing various candidate models, this study aimed to assess the predictive performance of different MIPD-approaches comparing (i) a single-model approach, (ii) a model selection algorithm (MSA) and (iii) a model averaging algorithm (MAA). METHODS: Precision, accuracy and expected target attainment, considering either initial (B1) or initial and secondary (B2) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-samples per patient, were assessed in a multicentre dataset (561 patients, 11 German centres, 3654 TDM-samples). RESULTS: The results demonstrated a slight superiority in predictive performance using MAA in B1, regardless of the candidate models, compared to MSA and the best single models (MAA, MSA, best single models: inaccuracy ±3%, ±10%, ±8%; imprecision: <25%, <31%, <28%; expected target attainment >77%, >71%, >73%). The inclusion of a second TDM-sample notably improved precision and target attainment for all MIPD-approaches, particularly within the context of MSA and most of the single models. The expected target attainment is maximized (up to >90%) when the TDM-sample is integrated within 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, MAA streamlines MIPD by reducing the risk of selecting an inappropriate model for specific patients. Therefore, MIPD of PIP using MAA implicates further optimisation of antibiotic exposure in critically ill patients, by improving predictive performance with only one sample available for Bayesian forecasting, safety, and usability in clinical practice.

Serum concentrations of levosimendan and its metabolites OR-1855 and OR-1896 in cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Background: The inotropic drug levosimendan is often used as an individualized therapeutic approach perioperatively in cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Data regarding serum concentrations of levosimendan and its metabolites within this context is lacking. Methods: In this retrospective descriptive proof-of-concept study, total serum concentrations (TSC) and unbound fractions (UF) of levosimendan and its metabolites OR-1896 and OR-1855 in cardiac surgery patients with CPB were measured using LC-ESI-MS/MS. Simulation of expected levosimendan TSC was performed using Pharkin 4.0. Serum NT-proBNP was assessed with ELISA. Results: After levosimendan infusion (1.25 mg or 2.5 mg, respectively) after anaesthesia induction, a median TSC of 1.9 ng/ml and 10.4 ng/ml was determined in samples taken directly after surgery (T1). Median TSC of 7.6 ng/ml and 22.0 ng/ml, respectively, were simulated at T1. Whereas 1.1 ng/ml and 1.6 ng/ml TSC of OR-1896, respectively, was quantified the day after surgery (T2), TSC of the intermediate metabolite OR-1855 was mostly below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). The UF was 0.5% and 1.1% for levosimendan and 64.1% and 52.1% for OR-1896, respectively, with over half the samples being below LLOQ. NT-proBNP concentrations before surgery and T2 did not differ. Discussion: The low TSC, UF and unchanged NT-proBNP levels in combination with high variation of serum levels between patients suggest a need for optimized dosing regimen of levosimendan combined with therapeutic drug monitoring for such an individualized approach. In addition, the differences between the measured and estimated concentrations may suggest a possible influence of CPB on levosimendan serum concentrations.

Extracorporeal Elimination of Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Modulators by the Cytokine Adsorber CytoSorb® in Patients with Hyperinflammation: A Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in critically ill patients with sepsis leads to endothelial dysfunction resulting in cardiocirculatory insufficiency. Their extracorporeal elimination using the cytokine adsorber CytoSorb® (CS) (adsorption of especially hydrophobic molecules < 60 kDa) might be promising, but data about the adsorption capacity as well as a potential harmful adsorption of anti-inflammatory cytokines are missing so far. METHODS: The prospective Cyto-SOLVE-study included 15 patients with sepsis or other hyperinflammatory conditions (interleukin 6 > 500 pg/ml), continuous kidney replacement therapy, and the application of CS. Various cytokines and chemokines were measured pre- and post-CS as well as in patients' blood at predefined timepoints. Significant changes in the concentrations were detected with the Wilcoxon test with associated samples. Clearance of the adsorber (ml/min) was calculated with: b l o o d f l o w ∗ c o n c e n t r a t i o n p r e - p o s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n pre . RESULTS: Most of the inflammatory mediators showed a high initial extracorporeal clearance of 70-100 ml/min after CS installation, which dropped quickly to 10-30 ml/min after 6 h of treatment. No difference in clearance was observed between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Despite extracorporeal adsorption, a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the blood concentration after 6 h was only observed for the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factorα (TNF-α) (median 284 vs. 230 pg/ml), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (median 294 vs. 252 pg/ml), macrophage inflammatory protein 1a (MIP-1a) (median 11.1 vs. 9.0 pg/ml), and regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) (median 811 vs. 487 pg/ml) as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin 4 (median 9.3 vs. 6.4 pg/ml), interleukin 10 (median 88 vs. 56 pg/ml), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (median 177 vs. 104 pg/ml). A significant (p < 0.05) decrease in patients' blood after 12 h was only detected for interleukin 10. CONCLUSIONS: CS can adsorb pro- as well as anti-inflammatory mediators with no relevant difference regarding the adsorption rate. A fast saturation of the adsorber resulted in a rapid decrease of the clearance. The potential clinical benefit or harm of this unspecific cytokine adsorption needs to be evaluated in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04913298, registration date June 4, 2021.

Meropenem pharmacokinetics in cerebrospinal fluid: comparing intermittent and continuous infusion strategies in critically ill patients-a prospective cohort study.

Meropenem penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is subject to high interindividual variability resulting in uncertain target attainment in CSF. Recently, several authors recommended administering meropenem as a continuous infusion (CI) to optimize CSF exposure. This study aimed to compare the concentrations and pharmacokinetics of meropenem in CSF after intermittent infusion (II) and CI. This prospective, observational study (NCT04426383) included critically ill patients with external ventricular drains who received either II or CI of meropenem. Meropenem pharmacokinetics in plasma and CSF were characterized using population pharmacokinetic modeling (NONMEM 7.5). The developed model was used to compare the concentration-time profile and probability of target attainment (PTA) between II and CI. A total of 16 patients (8 CI, 8 II; samples: nplasma = 243, nCSF = 263) were recruited, with nine patients (5 CI, 4 II) suffering from cerebral and seven patients from extracerebral infections. A one-compartment model described the plasma concentrations adequately. Meropenem penetration into the CSF (partition coefficient (KP), cCSF/cplasma) was generally low (6.0%), exhibiting substantial between-subject variability (coefficient of variation: 84.0%). There was no correlation between the infusion mode and KP, but interleukin (IL)-6 measured in CSF showed a strong positive correlation with KP (P < 0.001). Dosing simulations revealed no relevant differences in CSF concentrations and PTA in CSF between CI and II. Our study did not demonstrate increased penetration rates or higher concentrations of meropenem in the CSF with CI compared with II. CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04426383.

Can linezolid be validly measured in endotracheal aspiration in critically ill patients? A proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-infectives such as linezolid is routinely performed in blood of intensive care unit (ICU) patients to optimize target attainment. However, the concentration at the site of infection is considered more important for a successful therapy. Until now, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the gold standard to measure intrapulmonary concentrations of anti-infective agents. However, it is an invasive method and unsuitable for regular TDM. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether it is possible to reliably determine the intrapulmonary concentration of linezolid from endotracheal aspiration (ENTA). METHODS: Intubated ICU patients receiving 600 mg intravenous linezolid twice daily were examined in steady state. First, preliminary experiments were performed in six patients to investigate which patients are suitable for linezolid measurement in ENTA. In a second step, trough and peak linezolid concentrations of plasma and ENTA were determined in nine suitable patients. RESULTS: Linezolid can validly be detected in ENTA with viscous texture and > 0.5 mL volume. The mean (SD) linezolid trough concentration was 2.02 (1.27) mg/L in plasma and 1.60 (1.36) mg/L in ENTA, resulting in a median lung penetration rate of 104%. The mean (SD) peak concentration in plasma and ENTA was 10.77 (5.93) and 4.74 (2.66) mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid can validly be determined in ENTA with an adequate texture and volume. The penetration rate is comparable to already published BAL concentrations. This method might offer a simple and non-invasive method for TDM at the site of infection "lung". Due to promising results of the feasibility study, comparison of ENTA and BAL in the same patient should be investigated in a further trial.

Does Sample Size, Sampling Strategy, or Handling of Concentrations Below the Lower Limit of Quantification Matter When Externally Evaluating Population Pharmacokinetic Models?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Precision dosing requires selecting the appropriate population pharmacokinetic model, which can be assessed through external evaluations (EEs). The lack of understanding of how different study design factors influence EE study outcomes makes it challenging to select the most suitable model for clinical use. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of sample size, sampling strategy, and handling of concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ) on the outcomes of EE for four population pharmacokinetic models using vancomycin and tobramycin as examples. METHODS: Three virtual patient populations undergoing vancomycin or tobramycin therapy were simulated with varying sample size and sampling scenarios. The three approaches used to handle BLQ data were to (1) discard them, (2) impute them as LLOQ/2, or (3) use a likelihood-based approach. EEs were performed with NONMEM and R. RESULTS: Sample size did not have an important impact on the EE results for a given scenario. Increasing the number of samples per patient did not improve predictive performance for two out of the three evaluated models. Evaluating a model developed with rich sampling did not result in better performance than those developed with regular therapeutic drug monitoring. A likelihood-based method to handle BLQ samples impacted the outcomes of the EE with lower bias for predicted troughs. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a large sample size may not be necessary for an EE study, and models selected based on TDM may be more generalizable. The study highlights the need for guidelines for EE of population pharmacokinetic models for clinical use.

Pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive agents during hemoperfusion in a sheep model.

Introduction: Hemoadsorption shows promising signals in organ preservation and post lung transplantation. However, its potential impact on the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressant drugs (ID) is still unknown. Methods: In this interventional study, CytoSorb® hemoperfusion was tested in healthy sheep (n = 5) against a sham extracorporeal circuit (n = 3). Seven different ID (tacrolimus (TAC), cyclosporin A (CYA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), everolimus (EVER), basiliximab (BAS), methylprednisolone (MP) and prednisolone (PRED)) were administered in clinically relevant doses and combinations. Their levels were measured repeatedly in blood samples from the extracorporeal circulation over 6 h following administration. Population pharmacokinetic modeling analysis (NONMEM® 7.5) was performed. Results: Negligible clearance was observed for PRED and BAS. For all other substances, a saturable adsorption sub-model with linear decrease of the adsorption effect over the adsorbed amount best described the measured concentrations. The maximum absolute adsorbed amounts (95% CI) for TAC, CYA, MMF, EVER, and MP were 0.040 (0.028-0.053), 1.15 (0.39-1.91), 4.17 (2.00-6.35), 0.0163 (0.007-0.026), and 53.4 mg (20.9-85.9), respectively, indicating an adsorption of less than 5% of the daily administered dosages for all investigated substances. Discussion: In this large animal model, CytoSorb® hemoperfusion appears to have a limited effect on the clearance of tested ID.

Extracorporeal adsorption of protective and toxic bile acids and bilirubin in patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The release of toxic bile acids (BAs) in the blood of critically ill patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction might lead to the damage of various organs. Their extracorporeal elimination using the cytokine adsorber Cytosorb® (CS) (adsorption of especially hydrophobic molecules < 60 kDa) might be promising, but data proving a potential adsorption are missing so far. METHODS: The prospective Cyto-SOVLE study (NCT04913298) included 20 intensive care patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction, continuous kidney replacement therapy, total bilirubin concentration > 10 mg/dl and the application of CS into the dialysis circuit. Bilirubin and different BAs were measured pre- and post-CS at defined timepoints (10 min, 1, 3, 6, and 12 h after initiation). Relative reduction (RR, %) was calculated with: [Formula: see text]. RESULTS: The median RR for total and conjugated bilirubin after initiation was - 31.8% and - 30.3%, respectively, and decreased to - 4.5% and - 4.8% after 6 h. A high initial RR was observed for the toxic BAs GCA (- 97.4%), TCA (- 94.9%), GCDCA (- 82.5%), and TCDCA (- 86.0%), decreasing after 6 h to - 32.9%, - 32.7%, - 12.8%, and - 14.3%, respectively. The protective hydrophilic BAs showed a comparable RR after initiation (UDCA: - 77.7%, GUDCA: - 83.0%, TUDCA: - 91.3%) dropping after 6 h to - 7.4%, - 8.5%, and - 12.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cytosorb® can adsorb bilirubin and toxic as well as protective BAs. However, a fast saturation of the adsorber resulting in a rapid decrease of the RR was observed. Furthermore, no relevant difference between hydrophobic toxic and hydrophilic protective BAs was detected regarding the adsorption amount. The clinical benefit or harm of the BA adsorption needs to be evaluated in the future.

Correlation between Bilirubin Elimination with the Cytokine Adsorber CytoSorb® and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Hyperbilirubinemia.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbilirubinemia is often the first evidence for any kind of liver disorder and over one-third of all patients in intensive care units (ICU) show elevated bilirubin concentrations. In critically ill patients, high concentrations of serum bilirubin are correlated with a poor outcome. Therapies to lower bilirubin concentrations are often just symptomatically and their effect on the patients' outcome is hardly evaluated. Therefore, this study investigates whether the extracorporeal elimination of bilirubin with the cytokine adsorber CytoSorb® (CS) reduces mortality in patients with hyperbilirubinemia. METHODS: Patients with bilirubin concentrations >10 mg/dL at the ICU were screened for evaluation from 2018 to 2020. Patients with kidney replacement therapy and older than 18 years were included. Patients with continuously decreasing bilirubin concentrations after liver transplantation or other liver support systems (i.e., Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System [MARS®], Advanced Organ Support [ADVOS]) were excluded. CS therapy was used in clinical routine and was indicated by the treating physicians. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS statistics utilizing a multivariate model. Primary outcome measure was the effect of CS on the 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Data from 82 patients (mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score [SAPS] II: 74 points, mean bilirubin: 18 mg/dL, mean lactate: 3.7 mmol/L) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in patients with and without CS treatment. The multivariate model showed no significant effect of CS therapy (p = 0.402) on the 30-day mortality. In addition, a significant effect of bilirubin concentration (p = 0.274) or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (p = 0.928) on the 30-day mortality could not be shown. In contrast, lactate concentration (p = 0.001, b = 0.044) and SAPS II (p = 0.025, b = 0.008) had significant impact on 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of CS in patients with hyperbilirubinemia did not result in a significant reduction in 30-day mortality. Randomized and controlled studies with mortality as primary outcome measure are needed in the future to justify their use.

The effect of cytosorb® application on kidney recovery in critically ill patients with severe rhabdomyolysis: a propensity score matching analysis.

Severe rhabdomyolysis frequently results in acute kidney injury (AKI) due to myoglobin accumulation with the need of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). The present study investigated whether the application of Cytosorb® (CS) led to an increased rate of kidney recovery in patients with KRT due to severe rhabdomyolysis. Adult patients with a myoglobin-concentration >10,000 ng/ml and KRT were included from 2014 to 2021. Exclusion criteria were chronic kidney disease and CS-treatment before study inclusion. Groups 1 and 2 were defined as KRT with and without CS, respectively. The primary outcome parameter was independence from KRT after 30 days. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed (predictors: myoglobin, SAPS-II, and age), and the chi2-test was used. 35 pairings could be matched (mean age: 57 vs. 56 years; mean myoglobin: 27,218 vs. 26,872 ng/ml; mean SAPS-II: 77 vs. 76). The probability of kidney recovery was significantly (p = .04) higher in group 1 (31.4 vs. 11.4%, mean difference: 20.0%, odds ratio (OR): 3.6). Considering patients who survived 30 days, kidney recovery was also significantly (p = .03) higher in patients treated with CS (61.1 vs. 23.5%, mean difference: 37.6%, OR: 5.1). In conclusion, the use of CS might positively affect renal recovery in patients with severe rhabdomyolysis. A prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm this hypothesis.

[Hemoperfusion in anesthesia and intensive care medicine: benefits, risks, and evidence for different systems]. / Hämoperfusion in Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin: Chancen, Risiken und Evidenz verschiedener Systeme.

BACKGROUND: Hemoperfusion is a technique for the extracorporeal elimination of endogenous and exogenous toxins and harmful mediators by adsorption. It can be used as a stand-alone device, as part of a heart-lung machine or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or, as is currently the case, integrated into a kidney replacement procedure. In the meantime, various suppliers offer devices with different technologies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the benefits, risks and evidence of the different systems, how they work and for which indications they are approved in Germany. METHOD: To achieve this goal, a narrative assessment of the existing literature and guidelines for different indications was performed. The focus was on in vivo studies. RESULTS: In principle, a distinction must be made in adsorption techniques between pure adsorption and the combination as adsorption and kidney replacement therapy. The adsorbers available in Germany include Cytosorb®, HA-330, Seraph®-100 and Toraymyxin. Combined procedures (adsorption and kidney replacement) are offered with coupled plasma filtration and adsorption (CPFA) and oXiris®. Most adsorbers have been developed for cytokine and endotoxin removal in patients with sepsis; however, to date, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has demonstrated a survival benefit when using hemoperfusion. Therefore, the S3 guidelines for treatment of sepsis and the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines advise against its routine use. When the corona pandemic began, hemoperfusion was considered as a promising therapeutic approach. Cytosorb®, Seraph®-100, and oXiris® received emergency approval by the FDA to be used in critically ill patients with COVID-19, so questions arose about the appropriateness and importance of its use; however, the data generated did not show positive results, so its use cannot be recommended routinely either. In addition, they are not mentioned as a treatment option in the current guidelines. The use of adsorption procedures in patients with liver failure and rhabdomyolysis has only been rudimentarily studied, so any evidence is currently lacking. The only adsorber that has CE approval in Germany for both applications is Cytosorb®. In the next few years, studies will have to follow that investigate the efficacy and thus either justify or refute the use in clinical routine. Hemoperfusion procedures are used in the heart-lung machine as part of cardiac surgery for either cytokine or anticoagulant adsorption. No congruent data are available to support the use for the elimination of cytokines. If emergency cardiac surgery is required in a patient with pre-existing anticoagulation, hemoperfusion procedures can be used to prevent bleeding complications. Cytosorb® has CE approval for this indication. All available techniques are nonselective adsorption processes, so that adsorption of known and unknown substances can occur. Unintentional adsorption of drugs, such as various anti-infective agents is a relevant risk, especially when used in patients with sepsis. DISCUSSION: Various adsorption systems can eliminate different known and unknown substances. Currently, there is a lack of evidence for all indications and systems to justify their routine use except in clinical trials. Future clinical trials should evaluate the potential benefits but also dangers, so that in the meantime the routine use can be justified or a recommendation against the use can be given.

Towards model-informed precision dosing of piperacillin: multicenter systematic external evaluation of pharmacokinetic models in critically ill adults with a focus on Bayesian forecasting.

PURPOSE: Inadequate piperacillin (PIP) exposure in intensive care unit (ICU) patients threatens therapeutic success. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) might be promising to individualize dosing; however, the transferability of published models to external populations is uncertain. This study aimed to externally evaluate the available PIP population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models. METHODS: A multicenter dataset of 561 ICU patients (11 centers/3654 concentrations) was used for the evaluation of 24 identified models. Model performance was investigated for a priori (A) predictions, i.e., considering dosing records and patient characteristics only, and for Bayesian forecasting, i.e., additionally including the first (B1) or first and second (B2) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) samples per patient. Median relative prediction error (MPE) [%] and median absolute relative prediction error (MAPE) [%] were calculated to quantify accuracy and precision. RESULTS: The evaluation revealed a large inter-model variability (A: MPE - 135.6-78.3% and MAPE 35.7-135.6%). Integration of TDM data improved all model predictions (B1/B2 relative improvement vs. A: |MPE|median_all_models 45.1/67.5%; MAPEmedian_all_models 29/39%). The model by Kim et al. was identified to be most appropriate for the total dataset (A/B1/B2: MPE - 9.8/- 5.9/- 0.9%; MAPE 37/27.3/23.7%), Udy et al. performed best in patients receiving intermittent infusion, and Klastrup et al. best predicted patients receiving continuous infusion. Additional evaluations stratified by sex and renal replacement therapy revealed further promising models. CONCLUSION: The predictive performance of published PIP models in ICU patients varied considerably, highlighting the relevance of appropriate model selection for MIPD. Our differentiated external evaluation identified specific models suitable for clinical use, especially in combination with TDM.

Software- and TDM-Guided Dosing of Meropenem Promises High Rates of Target Attainment in Critically Ill Patients.

Various studies have reported insufficient beta-lactam concentrations in critically ill patients. The optimal dosing strategy for beta-lactams in critically ill patients, particularly in septic patients, is an ongoing matter of discussion. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the success of software-guided empiric meropenem dosing (CADDy, Calculator to Approximate Drug-Dosing in Dialysis) with subsequent routine meropenem measurements and expert clinical pharmacological interpretations. Adequate therapeutic drug exposure was defined as concentrations of 8-16 mg/L, whereas concentrations of 16-24 mg/L were defined as moderately high and concentrations >24 mg/L as potentially harmful. A total of 91 patients received meropenem as a continuous infusion (229 serum concentrations), of whom 60% achieved 8-16 mg/L, 23% achieved 16-24 mg/L, and 10% achieved unnecessarily high and potentially harmful meropenem concentrations >24 mg/L in the first 48 h using the dosing software. No patient showed concentrations <2 mg/L using the dosing software in the first 48 h. With a subsequent TDM-guided dose adjustment, therapeutic drug exposure was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) enhanced to 70%. No patient had meropenem concentrations >24 mg/L with TDM-guided dose adjustments. The combined use of dosing software and consecutive TDM promised a high rate of adequate therapeutic drug exposures of meropenem in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics, Antibacterial Target Attainment, and Estimated Probability of Neurotoxicity in Critically Ill Patients.

Cefepime has been reported to cause concentration-related neurotoxicity, especially in critically ill patients with renal failure. This evaluation aimed to identify a dosing regimen providing a sufficient probability of target attainment (PTA) and the lowest justifiable risk of neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on plasma concentrations over four consecutive days obtained from 14 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The patients received a median dose of 2,000 mg cefepime by 30-min intravenous infusions with dosing intervals of every 8 h (q8h) to q24h. A time that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC over the dosing interval (fT>MIC) of 65% and an fT>2×MIC of 100% were defined as treatment targets. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to identify a dosing regimen for a PTA of 90% and a probability of neurotoxicity not exceeding 20%. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data. Estimated creatinine clearance was significantly related to the clearance of cefepime in nondialysis patients. Interoccasion variability on clearance improved the model, reflecting dynamic clearance changes. The evaluations suggested combining thrice-daily administration as an appropriate choice. In patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance, 120 mL/min), for the pharmacodynamics target of 100% fT>2×MIC and a PTA of 90%, a dose of 1,333 mg q8h was found to be related to a probability of neurotoxicity of ≤20% and to cover MICs up to 2 mg/L. Continuous infusion appears to be superior to other dosing regimens by providing higher efficacy and a low risk of neurotoxicity. The model makes it possible to improve the predicted balance between cefepime efficacy and neurotoxicity in critically ill patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01793012).

Systematic Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Models for Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

The altered pharmacokinetics of renally cleared drugs such as meropenem in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) might impact target attainment. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is applied to individualize meropenem dosing. However, most population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models developed to date have not yet been evaluated for MIPD. Eight PopPK models based on adult CRRT patients were identified in a systematic literature research and encoded in NONMEM 7.4. A data set of 73 CRRT patients from two different study centers was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the models using simulation and prediction-based diagnostics for i) a priori dosing based on patient characteristics only and ii) Bayesian dosing by including the first measured trough concentration. Median prediction error (MPE) for accuracy within |20%| (95% confidence intervals including zero) and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) for precision ≤ 30% were considered clinically acceptable. For a priori dosing, most models (n = 5) showed accuracy and precision MPE within |20%| and MAPE <35%. The integration of the first measured meropenem concentration improved the predictive performance of all models (median MAPE decreased from 35.4 to 25.0%; median MPE decreased from 21.8 to 4.6%). The best predictive performance for intermittent infusion was observed for the O'Jeanson model, including residual diuresis as covariate (a priori and Bayesian dosing MPE within |2%|, MAPE <30%). Our study revealed the O'Jeanson model as the best-predicting model for intermittent infusion. However, most of the selected PopPK models are suitable for MIPD in CRRT patients when one therapeutic drug monitoring sample is available.

Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Patients with External Ventricular Drain.

Vancomycin is a commonly used antibacterial agent in patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) infection. This study aims to examine predictors of vancomycin penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with external ventricular drainage and the feasibility of CSF sampling from the distal drainage port for therapeutic drug monitoring. Fourteen adult patients (9 with primary CNS infection) were treated with vancomycin intravenously. The vancomycin concentrations in blood and CSF (from proximal [CSF_P] and distal [CSF_D] drainage ports) were evaluated by population pharmacokinetics. Model-based simulations were conducted to compare various infusion modes. A three-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the vancomycin data. Estimated parameters included clearance (CL, 4.53 L/h), central compartment volume (Vc, 24.0 L), apparent CSF compartment volume (VCSF, 0.445 L), and clearance between central and CSF compartments (QCSF, 0.00322 L/h and 0.00135 L/h for patients with and without primary CNS infection, respectively). Creatinine clearance was a significant covariate on vancomycin CL. CSF protein was the primary covariate to explain the variability of QCSF. There was no detectable difference between the data for sampling from the proximal and the distal port. Intermittent infusion and continuous infusion with a loading dose reached the CSF target concentration faster than continuous infusion only. All infusion schedules reached similar CSF trough concentrations. Beyond adjusting doses according to renal function, starting treatment with a loading dose in patients with primary CSF infection is recommended. Occasionally, very high and possibly toxic doses would be required to achieve adequate CSF concentrations, which calls for more investigation of direct intraventricular administration of vancomycin. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04426383).