Pharmacokinetic-Interactions of BI 425809, a Novel Glycine Transporter 1 Inhibitor, With Cytochrome P450 and P-Glycoprotein Substrates: Findings From In Vitro Analyses and an Open-Label, Single-Sequence Phase I Study.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Glycine transporter-1 inhibitors may ameliorate cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. This study evaluated potential drug-drug interactions with the glycine transporter-1 inhibitor BI 425809. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Interactions with cytochromes P450 (CYP) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) were assessed in in vitro assays using human hepatocytes and Caco-2 cells, respectively. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of probe drugs were subsequently assessed in a Phase I, open-label, single-sequence crossover study in healthy male participants. Participants received a probe-drug cocktail containing midazolam (CYP3A4), warfarin (CYP2C9), and omeprazole (CYP2C19) and a separate dose of digoxin (P-gp), alone and on a background of steady-state BI 425809 25 mg once daily in 2 treatment periods. Adverse events were monitored. FINDINGS/RESULTS: In vitro assays revealed concentration-dependent induction of CYP3A4 and inhibition of P-gp by BI 425809. In the clinical study, 12 of 13 participants completed both periods. With BI 425809, area under the plasma concentration curve from administration to the last measurement (AUC 0-tz ) and maximum plasma concentration ( Cmax ) for midazolam were lower than when administered alone. Adjusted geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) were 70.6% (63.9%-78.1%) for AUC 0-tz and 77.6% (67.3%-89.4%) for Cmax . For warfarin and digoxin, AUC 0-tz and Cmax were similar with and without BI 425809. For omeprazole, BI 425809 slightly reduced AUC 0-tz but not Cmax versus omeprazole alone. No new safety signals were identified. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate induction of CYP3A4 by once-daily BI 425809 25 mg (the assumed highest therapeutic dose) and no meaningful effects on CYP2C9, CYP2C19, or P-gp in vivo.

Switching Between Adalimumab Reference Product and BI 695501 in Patients with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (VOLTAIRE-X): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: BI 695501 is an FDA-approved biosimilar to adalimumab reference product (RP). VOLTAIRE-X was a randomized clinical trial to assess outcomes with a biosimilar monoclonal antibody in line with the FDA requirements for designation as an 'interchangeable' biosimilar. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether multiple switches between adalimumab RP and BI 695501 lead to equivalent pharmacokinetics and a similar safety and immunogenicity profile compared with continuous adalimumab RP. METHODS: We conducted a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial between July 19, 2017, and April 16, 2019. There were 49 investigational sites across Europe and North America. Of 323 screened patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, 259 were treated with adalimumab RP during the run-in period. Of these, 118 and 120 were randomized to the continuous or switching arms, respectively. Interventions consisted of a run-in period with adalimumab RP 80 mg subcutaneously (SC) on Day 1, then 40 mg SC every other week (EOW) Weeks 2-12. Patients were then randomized to receive adalimumab RP 40 mg EOW Weeks 14-48 (continuous arm) or BI 695501 40 mg Weeks 14 and 16, adalimumab RP 40 mg Weeks 18 and 20, and BI 695501 40 mg EOW Weeks 22 to 48 (switching arm); all interventions were given SC. Primary endpoints were pharmacokinetics parameters, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCτ,30-32) and maximum observed drug plasma concentration (Cmax,30-32), measured after the third switch during the Week 30-32 dosing interval. RESULTS: 238 patients (mean [standard deviation] age 44.9 [13.8]; 66.0% male) were treated in the switching (n = 118) or continuous arms (n = 120). Adjusted mean Cmax,30-32 was 7.08 and 7.00 µg/mL in the switching and continuous treatment arms, respectively; adjusted mean AUCτ,30-32 was 2025.8 and 1925.9 µg h/mL. Point estimate for mean ratio for AUCτ,30-32 was 105.2% (90.2% confidence interval [CI] 96.6-114.6), and 101.1% (90.2% CI 93.3-109.7) for Cmax,30-32. Both CIs were within a predefined bioequivalence range of 80.0-125.0%. Treatment-emergent adverse events led to discontinuation in 0.8% and 1.7% of patients in the switching and continuous treatment arms, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores were highly similar in the two arms across the entire trial period. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic equivalence was demonstrated, with highly similar efficacy and immunogenicity, and comparable safety observed in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who received either adalimumab RP continuously or who switched between adalimumab RP and BI 695501. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03210259 (registered July 2017); Eudract.ema.europa.eu: 2016-002254-20.

Effects of Cytochrome P450 3A4 Induction and Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of BI 425809, a Novel Glycine Transporter 1 Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Increased glycine availability at the synaptic cleft may enhance N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor signalling and provide a promising therapeutic strategy for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. These studies aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics of BI 425809, a potent glycine-transporter-1 inhibitor, when co-administered with a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (rifampicin). METHODS: In vitro studies using recombinant CYPs, human liver microsomes, and human hepatocytes were conducted to determine the CYP isoforms responsible for BI 425809 metabolism. In addition, two open-label, fixed-treatment period, phase I studies in healthy male volunteers are described. Period 1: participants received oral BI 425809 25 mg (single dose) on day 1; period 2: participants received multiple doses, across 10 days, of oral itraconazole or rifampicin combined with a single dose of oral BI 425809 25 mg on day 4/7 of the itraconazole/rifampicin treatment, respectively. Pharmacokinetic and safety endpoints were assessed in the absence/presence of itraconazole/rifampicin and included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the time interval 0-167 h (AUC0‒167; itraconazole), 0-168 h (AUC0‒168; rifampicin), or 0-infinity (AUC0-∞; rifampicin and itraconazole), maximum measured concentration (Cmax) of BI 425809, and adverse events. RESULTS: In vitro results suggested that CYP3A4 accounted for ≥ 90% of the metabolism of BI 425809. BI 425809 exposure (adjusted geometric mean ratio [%]) was higher in the presence of itraconazole (AUC0‒167: 265.3; AUC0-∞: 597.0; Cmax: 116.1) and lower in the presence of rifampicin (AUC0‒168: 10.3; AUC0-∞: 9.8; Cmax: 37.4) compared with BI 425809 alone. Investigational treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic exposure of BI 425809 was altered in the presence of strong CYP3A4 modulators, corroborating in vitro results that CYP3A4 mediates a major metabolic pathway for BI 425809. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02342717 (registered on 15 January 2015) and NCT03082183 (registered on 10 March 2017).

A Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD) Approach for a Low Dose of Empagliflozin in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

In clinical trials, sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) inhibitor use as adjunct to insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes (T1D) provides glucometabolic benefits while diabetic ketoacidosis risk is increased. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin was evaluated in two phase III trials: EASE-2 and EASE-3. A low, 2.5-mg dose was included in EASE-3 only. As the efficacy of higher empagliflozin doses (i.e., 10 and 25 mg) in T1D has been established in EASE-2 and EASE-3, a modeling and simulation approach was used to generate additional supportive evidence on efficacy for the 2.5-mg dose. We present the methodology behind the development and validation of two modeling and simulation frameworks: M-EASE-1, a semi-mechanistic model integrating information on insulin, glucose, and glycated hemoglobin; and M-EASE-2, a descriptive model informed by prior information. Both models were developed independently of data from EASE-3. Simulations based on these models assessed efficacy in untested clinical trial scenarios. In this manner, the models provide supportive evidence for efficacy of low-dose empagliflozin 2.5 mg in patients with T1D, illustrating how pharmacometric analyses can support efficacy assessments in the context of limited data.

Population pharmacokinetics of adalimumab biosimilar adalimumab-adbm and reference product in healthy subjects and patients with rheumatoid arthritis to assess pharmacokinetic similarity.

AIMS: Adalimumab-adbm is a monoclonal antibody developed as a biosimilar to adalimumab (Humira, AbbVie Inc.). The key objectives of this study were using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) approach to assess pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between adalimumab-adbm and Humira in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to quantify the effects of potential covariates on adalimumab PK and to assess the impact of switching treatment from Humira to adalimumab-adbm on PK. METHODS: A PPK model was firstly developed using intensive PK data from the phase-1 study in healthy subjects (NCT02045979). PPK models were developed separately for phase-3 base study (NCT02137226) and its extension study (NCT02640612) in patients with active RA. RESULTS: PPK models were developed for adalimumab from adalimumab-adbm and Humira treatment in healthy subjects and RA patients. Weight and anti-drug antibodies were found to be important predictors of adalimumab clearance. Adalimumab PK was similar between adalimumab-adbm and Humira. The estimated effect of Humira on clearance, relative to the adalimumab-adbm, was 1.02 (i.e., Humira has 0.02 greater clearance). Similarly, the effect of treatment arms (switching) on clearance was estimated to be 1.00 and 0.997 for Humira:Humira:BI and Humira:BI:BI arms, respectively, relative to the BI:BI:BI arm (BI refers to adalimumab-adbm) in the phase-3 extension study. CONCLUSION: PK similarity between adalimumab-adbm and Humira in patients with active RA was demonstrated using PPK approach. Adalimumab PK was also similar when switching treatment from Humira to adalimumab-adbm at either week 24 or 48.

Low-dose empagliflozin as adjunct-to-insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes: A valid modelling and simulation analysis to confirm efficacy.

AIM: To confirm the observed reduction in HbA1c for the 2.5 mg dose in EASE-3 by modelling and simulation analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Independent of data from EASE-3 that tested 2.5 mg, we simulated the effect of a 2.5 mg dose through patient-level, exposure-response modelling in the EASE-2 clinical study. A primary semi-mechanistic model evaluated efficacy considering clinical insulin dose adjustments made after treatment initiation that potentially limited HbA1c reductions. The model was informed by pharmacokinetic, insulin dose, mean daily glucose and HbA1c data, and was verified by comparing the simulations with the observed HbA1c change in EASE-3. One of two empagliflozin phase 3 trials in type 1 diabetes (EASE-3 but not EASE-2) included a lower 2.5 mg dose. A placebo-corrected HbA1c reduction of 0.28% was demonstrated without the increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis observed at higher doses (10 mg and 25 mg). Since only one trial included the lower dose, we aimed to confirm the observed reduction in HbA1c for the 2.5 mg dose by modelling and simulation analyses. RESULTS: The simulated 26-week mean HbA1c change was -0.41% without insulin dose adjustment and -0.29% at 26 weeks with insulin dose adjustment. A simplified (descriptive) model excluding insulin dose and mean daily glucose confirmed the -0.29% HbA1c change that would have been observed had the EASE-2 population received a 2.5 mg dose for 26/52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The HbA1c benefit of low-dose empagliflozin directly observed in the EASE-3 trial was confirmed by two modelling and simulation approaches.

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of BI 425809, a Novel GlyT1 Inhibitor: Translational Studies.

BI 425809 is a potent and selective glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1) inhibitor being developed for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease and schizophrenia. Translational studies evaluated the effects of BI 425809 on glycine levels in rat and human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Oral administration of BI 425809 in rats induced a dose-dependent increase of glycine CSF levels from 30% (0.2 mg/kg, not significant) to 78% (2 mg/kg, P < 0.01), relative to vehicle. Similarly, oral administration of BI 425809 in healthy volunteers resulted in a dose-dependent increase in glycine CSF levels at steady state, with a mean 50% increase at doses as low as 10 mg. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) of BI 425809 was achieved earlier in plasma than in CSF (tmax 3-5 vs. 5-8 hours, respectively). Generally, BI 425809 was safe and well tolerated. These data provide evidence of functional target engagement of GlyT1 by BI 425809.

Multiple Rising Doses of Oral BI 425809, a GlyT1 Inhibitor, in Young and Elderly Healthy Volunteers: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase I Study Investigating Safety and Pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease are characterised by abnormalities in glutamatergic pathways related to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction. Glycine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor co-agonist; inhibition of glycine transporter 1 may improve N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function. This phase I, randomised, two-part study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of BI 425809, a novel glycine transporter 1 inhibitor, in healthy male and female volunteers. METHODS: Part 1 evaluated BI 425809 10, 25, 50 or 75 mg once daily or 75 mg twice daily in young subjects, and 25 mg or 50 mg once daily in elderly subjects. Each dose group comprised 12 subjects who received BI 425809 (n = 9) or placebo (n = 3) for 14 days (day 1: single dose; days 4-14: multiple dosing). Part 2 compared pharmacokinetic profiles in 12 subjects who received a single dose of BI 425809 25 mg in the morning and evening. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic profiles were similarly shaped for all dose groups. Median time to maximum plasma concentration was 3.0-4.5 h with steady state being reached between days 6 and 10. Pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated dose linearity at the predicted therapeutic exposure range of BI 425809 ≤ 25 mg once daily, but increased less than dose proportionally for ≥ 50 mg once daily. All reported adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity, 51/84 (61%; part 1) subjects had one or more treatment-related adverse event, no serious adverse events occurred and no dose dependency was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic properties support both morning and evening dosing. BI 425809 was generally well tolerated at all tested doses. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02337283.

Population pharmacokinetics of nintedanib, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

PURPOSE: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed for nintedanib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic patient factors on exposure of nintedanib and its main metabolite BIBF 1202 were studied. METHODS: Data from 1191 patients with NSCLC (n = 849) or IPF (n = 342) treated with oral nintedanib (once- or twice-daily, dose range 50-250 mg) in 4 Phase II or III studies were combined. Plasma concentrations of nintedanib (n = 5611) and BIBF 1202 (n = 5376) were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of nintedanib were described by a one-compartment model with linear elimination, first-order absorption, and absorption lag time. For a typical patient, the absorption rate was 0.0827 h-1, apparent total clearance was 897 L/h, apparent volume of distribution at steady state was 465 L, and lag time was 25 min. Age, weight, smoking, and Asian race were statistically significant covariates influencing nintedanib exposure, but no individual covariate at extreme values (5th and 95th percentiles of baseline values for continuous covariates) resulted in a change of more than 33% relative to a typical patient. Pharmacokinetics and covariate effects for BIBF 1202 were similar to nintedanib. Mild or moderate renal impairment and mild hepatic impairment (classified by transaminase or bilirubin increase above the upper limit of normal) or underlying disease had no significant effects on nintedanib pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: This model adequately described the pharmacokinetic profile of nintedanib in NSCLC and IPF populations and can be used for simulations exploring covariate effects and exposure-response analyses.

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Oral BI 425809, a Glycine Transporter 1 Inhibitor, in Healthy Male Volunteers: A Partially Randomised, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, First-in-Human Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease are characterised by glutamatergic pathway abnormalities related to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor hypofunction and cognitive impairment. Glycine is an NMDA receptor co-agonist; inhibition of glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1) should improve NMDA receptor hypofunction. This study evaluated safety and pharmacokinetic properties of BI 425809-a potent and selective GlyT1 inhibitor. METHODS: In the single-rising dose (SRD) component of this study, subjects were randomised to a single dose of BI 425809 [doses (mg): 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 150], or placebo. The bioavailability/food effect (BA/FE) component investigated BI 425809 pharmacokinetics following single dosing (25-mg tablet) after overnight fasting or with a high-calorie meal or as solution (25 mg) after overnight fasting. RESULTS: Overall, 33/83 (39.8%) subjects had ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse event (AE); there were no deaths or serious AEs. Reported SRD part AEs trended towards dose dependency, occurring at the higher doses (mostly central nervous system related). BI 425809 plasma concentration-time profiles were similarly shaped across all doses and plasma exposure increased proportional to dose. In the BA/FE component, geometric mean ratios for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration and the maximum plasma concentration for tablet fasted versus solution fasted were 80.5 and 50.0%, respectively, and for tablet fed versus fasted were 125.9 and 142.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: BI 425809 was generally well-tolerated at doses expected to be clinically relevant. The AE profile suggested possible GlyT1-inhibiting effects. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT02068690.

Enhanced elimination of dabigatran: Identifying the appropriate patient for the use of continuous venovenous hemodialysis instead of intermittent hemodialysis-A simulation analysis.

There are clinical situations where rapid elimination of dabigatran is beneficial. Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) removes dabigatran effectively but is not always available and requires a hemodynamically stable patient. We therefore investigated the continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) technique for its potency in the elimination of dabigatran. Based on pharmacometric characterization of dabigatran in IHD, we simulated a broad range of dialysis settings for CVVHD and then applied the model to specific clinical situations. Dialysis of 3 hours' duration with typical clinical settings (dialysate flow rate 50 mL/min; blood flow rate 150 mL/min) reduced dabigatran plasma concentration by 14-17% in addition to the patient body clearance. Extending dialysis duration to 8 or 16 hours for patients with severe renal dysfunction resulted in additional reductions from 26% up to 40%. When comparing with IHD for different endpoints (reaching 50% of initial dabigatran concentration, or nondetectability of dabigatran by the Hemoclot test), CVVHD did not reach comparable elimination rates. CVVHD is not fast enough to prepare for urgent interventions in patients with high bleeding risks. However, in situations where less hemodynamically stressful modalities seem indicated, CVVHD might be useful in moderately to severely renally impaired patients to accelerate dabigatran elimination.

Dabigatran treatment simulation in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis.

Patients with atrial fibrillation requiring maintenance haemodialysis are at increased risk of ischaemic stroke and bleeds. Currently, vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin are predominantly used in these patients as limited data are available on the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran etexilate (dabigatran). Dabigatran is approximately 85 % renally eliminated, thus, its half-life is prolonged in renal impairment. This study simulated the doseexposure relationship of dabigatran in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Dabigatran exposure was modelled at once- and twice-daily doses of 75 mg, 110 mg and 150 mg and at variations in non-renal clearance and dialysis settings. Resultant dose exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) was compared with values simulated from typical patients in the RE-LY® trial (based on a previously characterised pharmacometric model). In this simulation, all twice-daily dosages resulted in exposures above those simulated from typical RE-LY patients (1.5- to 3.3-fold increase in AUC) and thus may not be optimal for use in haemodialysis patients. However, dabigatran doses of 75 mg or 110 mg once daily produced exposures comparable to those simulated in typical RE-LY patients (-13.3 and +4.4 %, respectively). Of patient and dialysis variables, non-renal clearance had the highest impact on exposure (≤ 30.8 % change). These data could potentially inform dose selection in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis and the findings warrant investigation in future clinical trials.

Pharmacometric characterization of dabigatran hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis has been shown to be a useful method of decreasing dabigatran plasma levels in situations that require rapid elimination of this thrombin inhibitor. However, there is currently no clinical recommendation for the accelerated/optimized elimination of dabigatran via hemodialysis (e.g., flow rates, filter type, duration of dialysis). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the present work was to characterize, via pharmacometric methods, the effects of different blood flow rates in hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran, using data from a dedicated phase I dialysis study of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. In addition, the effects of various clinically relevant hemodialysis settings were evaluated by simulation to assess their potential use in non-ESRD situations. METHODS: Seven patients with ESRD were investigated in an open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period comparison trial. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to fit the data and then used for various simulations. Data analyses were performed using NONMEM(®), Berkeley Madonna, or SAS. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of dabigatran were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time. In addition to total body clearance in ESRD subjects, a first-order dialysis clearance was implemented which was greater than zero during hemodialysis and zero during the interdialytic periods. The relationship between the dialysis clearance and the blood flow rate was best described by the Michaels function. Simulations showed that varying clinically relevant dialysis settings such as filter properties or flow rates had only minor effects. Dialysis duration had the strongest impact on dabigatran plasma concentration. The observed geometric mean redistribution effect after hemodialysis was low (<16 %). The final model was successfully evaluated through the prediction of plasma concentrations from a case report undergoing dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis allowed the influences of various hemodialysis parameters on the dabigatran plasma concentration to be predicted in detail for the first time. Dialysis duration was identified as having the strongest impact on the reduction in dabigatran plasma concentration. The model developed here can potentially serve as a tool to provide guidance when considering the use of hemodialysis in patients who have received dabigatran.

Effective elimination of dabigatran by haemodialysis. A phase I single-centre study in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Dabigatran, a specific, reversible direct thrombin inhibitor, is used to prevent ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. As with every anticoagulant, there is a need to rapidly reverse its effects in emergency situations. In an open-label, single-centre phase I study with two fixed multiple dosing periods, we investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of dabigatran before, during and after 4 hour haemodialysis sessions with either 200 or 400 ml/min targeted blood flow in seven end-stage renal disease patients without atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran was administered over three days in a regimen designed to achieve peak plasma concentrations comparable to those observed in atrial fibrillation patients receiving 150 mg b.i.d. and to attain adequate distribution of dabigatran in the central and peripheral compartments. Plasma concentration-time profiles were similar in both periods on Day 3 (Cmax: 176 and 159 ng/ml). Four hours of haemodialysis removed 48.8% and 59.3% of total dabigatran from the central compartment with 200 and 400 ml/minute targeted blood flow, respectively. The anticoagulant activity of dabigatran was linearly related to its plasma levels. There was a minor redistribution of dabigatran (<16%) after the end of the haemodialysis session. In conclusion, a 4 hour haemodialysis session can rapidly eliminate a substantial amount of dabigatran from the central compartment with a concomitant marked reduction in its anticoagulant activity. There was a clinically negligible redistribution of dabigatran after haemodialysis. These results demonstrate that haemodialysis can be a suitable approach to eliminate dabigatran in emergency situations.

Dabigatran etexilate in atrial fibrillation patients with severe renal impairment: dose identification using pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation.

Dabigatran, administered orally as the prodrug dabigatran etexilate (DE), is a direct thrombin inhibitor shown to be effective in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this analysis was to derive a modeling and simulation-based dose and dosing regimen for AF patients with severe renal failure who could potentially benefit from the use of DE. The exposure was simulated for AF patients with severe renal impairment for several combinations of doses (75, 110, 150 mg) and posologies (BID, QD, Q2D). Simulations were based on a population pharmacokinetic model derived from data from 9522 patients from the pivotal phase III study (RE-LY). Atrial fibrillation patients with a creatinine clearance (CRCL) of <30 to ≥15 mL/min treated with a dose of 75 mg DE BID have target plasma level and exposure data largely within the concentration range proven to be safe and effective in AF patients with CRCL >30 mL/min receiving 150 mg BID. This dosing algorithm was also confirmed and supported by the United States Food and Drug Administration Clinical Pharmacology Division using their model based on the data from the dedicated renal impairment study and taking into account the safety and efficacy information from RE-LY.

Population pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin hydrochloride in paediatric patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic bladder.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Tamsulosin is available on prescription as a modified release capsule in the US (Flomax), and in most European countries for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCl) have been extensively studied in adults, but no pharmacokinetic data for paediatrics have been published to date. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: A population pharmacokinetic model of tamsulosin HCl was developed in paediatric patients. Covariate analysis revealed that body weight and alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein influenced both the apparent clearance and the apparent volume of distribution. This study confirms that there is no major difference in the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin HCl between paediatrics (age range 2-16 years) and adults when the effect of body weight is taken into consideration. AIMS: The main objective of this study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin hydrochloride (HCl) in paediatric patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic bladder. A secondary objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics in paediatric patients and adults. METHODS: Tamsulosin HCl plasma concentrations in 1082 plasma samples from 189 paediatric patients (age range 2-16 years) were analyzed with NONMEM, applying a one compartment model with first-order absorption. Based on the principles of allometry, body weight was incorporated in the base model, along with fixed allometric exponents. Covariate analysis was performed by means of a stepwise forward inclusion and backward elimination procedure. Simulations based on the final model were used to compare the pharmacokinetics with those in adults. RESULTS: Beside the priori-implemented body weight, only alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein had an effect on both apparent clearance and apparent volume of distribution. No other investigated covariates, including gender, age, race, patient population and concomitant therapy with anti-cholinergics, significantly affected the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin HCl (P < 0.001). The results of simulations indicated that the exposure in 12.5 kg paediatric patients was 3.5-4.3 fold higher than that in 70.0 kg adults. After a weight-based dose administration, the exposure in paediatric patients was comparable with that in healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: A population pharmacokinetic model of tamsulosin HCl in paediatric patients was established and it described the data well. There was no major difference in the pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin HCl between paediatric patients (age range 2-16 years) and adults when the effect of body weight was taken into consideration.

Dabigatran etexilate--a novel, reversible, oral direct thrombin inhibitor: interpretation of coagulation assays and reversal of anticoagulant activity.

Dabigatran etexilate is an oral, reversible direct thrombin inhibitor that is approved in the EU and several other countries for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip and knee replacement, and is in advanced clinical development for other thromboembolic disorders. Dabigatran has a predictable pharmacokinetic profile, allowing for a fixed-dose regimen without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. In certain clinical situations such as serious bleeding into critical organs (e.g. intracerebral bleeding), potential overdose and emergency surgery, clinicians will need to make an assessment of the anticoagulant status of a patient receiving dabigatran before deciding on future management strategies. If available, thrombin clotting time (TT), ecarin clotting time (ECT) and TT determined by Hemoclot thrombin inhibitor assay are sensitive tests to evaluate the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. Prothrombin time (INR) is less sensitive than other assays and cannot be recommended. The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) can provide a useful qualitative assessment of anticoagulant activity but is less sensitive at supratherapeutic dabigatran levels. There are limited data for activated clotting time (ACT). Overall, the aPTT and TT are the most accessible qualitative methods for determining the presence or absence of anticoagulant effect. Although there is no specific antidote to antagonise the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, due to its short duration of effect drug discontinuation is usually sufficient to reverse any excessive anticoagulant activity. In case of potential overdose, the feasibility of early administration of activated charcoal and subsequent charcoal filtration are undergoing preclinical evaluation. Dabigatran can also be dialysed in patients with renal impairment. In instances of life-threatening bleeding, where conventional measures have failed or are unavailable, other non-specific prohaemostatic agents such as recombinant activated factor VII and prothrombin complex concentrates can be considered.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the new oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (BIBR 1048) in patients undergoing primary elective total hip replacement surgery.

Dabigatran etexilate (BIBR 1048) is an orally bioavailable double prodrug of the active principle dabigatran (BIBR 953 ZW), which exerts potent anticoagulant and antithrombotic activity. The objective of the analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model characterizing and quantifying the relationship between covariates and model parameters. A total of 4604 BIBR 953 ZW plasma concentrations, obtained from 287 patients after once- or twice-daily oral dosing for up to 10 days after surgery in the dose range 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 mg BIBR 1048, were available for the analysis. All the analyses were performed with NONMEN V. Pharmacokinetics of dabigatran were best described by a 2-compartment model. The data supported the estimation of different apparent first-order absorption rate constants (k(a)) and apparent plasma clearances (CL/F) for days 0 and 1 and days 2 to 10 after surgery. Parameter estimates indicated a flip-flop phenomenon. Age and serum creatinine influenced k(a), whereas gastrin and creatinine clearance, only for days 2 to 10, affected CL/F (P < .001). The typical values for CL/F for a patient with gastrin of 34.58 pmol/L and creatinine clearance of 76.16 mL/min were 70.87 and 106.2 L/h on days 0 and 1 and days 2 to 10, respectively. The differences found in the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran during the first 24 hours after surgery are most likely due to alterations in gastric motility and pH following surgery. As a consequence, the rate of absorption is reduced and interindividual variability in drug exposure increased. On the following days, the disposition in plasma of BIBR 953 ZW is less variable.

Effects of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran on ex vivo coagulation time in orthopaedic surgery patients: a population model analysis.

AIMS: To describe the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in hip replacement patients by assessing coagulation parameters activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and ecarin clotting time (ECT), interindividual variability and factors affecting PD responses. METHODS: BISTRO I patients received oral dabigatran etexilate postsurgery for 6-10 days. Dabigatran plasma concentrations and aPTT/ECT were measured on the day of surgery, on subsequent days and at steady state. PK-PD characteristics of the dabigatran-aPTT/ECT relationships were evaluated using NONMEM V. RESULTS: The dabigatran concentration-aPTT relationship was described combining a linear and an E(max) model. Mean baseline aPTT was 33.4 s and E(max) (maximum increase in aPTT contributed by the E(max) model) was 26.9 s. The dabigatran concentration needed to attain 50% of maximum effect (EC(50)) was 94.7 ng ml(-1) and the mean slope of the linear concentration-response relationship (SLOP) was 0.0509 s ng(-1) ml(-1). Baseline aPTT and E(max) were highest following surgery and declined with time. The dabigatran concentration-ECT relationship fitted a linear model. Mean baseline ECT was 28 s and decreased with time; 50% of the maximum effect was observed after 2.9 days. SLOP decreased from 0.38 to 0.27 s ng(-1) ml(-1) with a half-life of 1.1 day, indicating greater PD effects on the day of surgery. Interindividual and residual variability was low. Covariates could not explain variability of this model. CONCLUSIONS: aPTT and ECT prolongation were directly correlated with dabigatran concentrations. Blood coagulation prolongation was most pronounced following surgery. Data suggest that ECT provides a more precise description of the anticoagulant effect than aPTT.