Participation and autonomy, independence in activities of daily living and upper extremity functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Improvements in care and rehabilitation have resulted in a higher proportion of people living with spinal cord injury (SCI), which calls for an increased focus on participation and autonomy. This observational cross-sectional study investigated the impact of SCI on autonomy and how it correlates to activity performance and upper extremity functioning. A total of 25 adults (mean age 58 years) with chronic cervical or thoracic SCI were included. Self-perceived autonomy was measured with Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire, independence in activities of daily living (ADL) with Spinal Cord Independence Measure, upper extremity functioning with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and kinematic measures of the drinking task. The results showed that most participants perceived injury-related restrictions in outdoor autonomy (80%), family role (76%), and in indoor autonomy (72%). Independence in self-care (r = 0.72), mobility (r = 0.59) and upper extremity kinematics of movement time (r = 0.63) and smoothness (r = 0.49) were correlated to indoors autonomy. Social life autonomy was correlated to self-care (r = 0.50) and ARAT (r = 0.41). In conclusion, autonomy was perceived restricted after SCI in several major life areas and correlated with independence in ADL and upper extremity functioning. The aspects of autonomy should be considered more in goal setting and clinical decision-making.

Independence and upper extremity functioning after spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study.

Upper extremity functioning is important for achieving independence in activities of daily living (ADL). A better understanding of relationships between different aspects of independence in ADL after spinal cord injury (SCI) and upper extremity functioning is required to guide rehabilitation practices. To determine which aspects of independence in ADL are correlated with upper extremity functioning in individuals with cervical or thoracic SCI. A total of 25 adults (mean age 58.4 years, 72% men) with established cervical or thoracic SCI were recruited. Independence in ADL was assessed by Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III) and upper extremity functioning by kinematic measures (movement time, smoothness, and wrist angle during drinking task), grip strength, Upper Extremity Motor and Sensory Score, Box and Block Test (BBT), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Upper Extremity Basic Data Set (ISCI-Hand and ISCI-Shoulder). Spearman correlation coefficients were used for data analyses. The SCIM-self-care subscale, particularly the feeding and dressing items, correlated moderately (r ≥ 0.5) with movement time and smoothness, grip strength, ARAT, BBT, and ISCI-Hand. The SCIM-respiration/sphincter subscale and the SCIM-mobility showed very low and low correlations with upper extremity assessments. However, at item level, respiration and bed/wheelchair mobility showed moderate correlations. Independence in self-care as domain and feeding/dressing, respiration and bed/wheelchair mobility as separate items were dependent on upper extremity functioning in individuals with cervical or thoracic SCI. Movement time and smoothness along with BBT, grip strength, ARAT, and ISCI-Hand can be used as indicators of independence in ADL. These findings can provide guidance to clinical practice in selection of upper extremity assessments in the context for ADL in individuals with SCI.

Quantifying an Upper Extremity Everyday Task With 3D Kinematic Analysis in People With Spinal Cord Injury and Non-disabled Controls.

Objectives: Upper extremity function after spinal cord injury (SCI) is an important factor for performance of activities of daily living. An objective assessment of upper extremity function preferably in purposeful daily tasks is essential in understanding its impact on real-life activities. This study aimed to identify which movement parameters of upper extremity, measured by kinematic analysis during a purposeful daily task, are impaired in people with cervical or thoracic SCI. Materials and Methods: The study included 29 adults (mean 59.5 years, 9 women and 20 men) with cervical (n = 19) or thoracic (n = 10) established complete (n = 15) or incomplete (n = 14) SCI, and 54 non-disabled controls with commensurable age and sex (mean 59 years, 15 women, 39 men). The 3D kinematic data were captured with a five-camera system during a standardized unilateral daily task (drinking from a glass). In SCI, the upper extremity functioning of each arm was assessed with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Having a full score in ARAT indicated full functioning; a score of <57 points indicated limited functioning. Kinematic data from full functioning arms (n = 27) and limited functioning arms (n = 30) in SCI were compared with the non-dominant arms (n = 54) in controls. Results: In the limited upper extremity functioning group, movement time, smoothness, arm abduction, wrist angle, trunk displacement, and inter-joint coordination, but not peak velocity of the hand, angular velocity of elbow, and relative time to peak velocity, all differed from controls. In the full upper extremity functioning group, arm abduction alone was significantly different from controls. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that apart from measures of peak velocity, kinematic measures of movement quality including movement time, smoothness, trunk displacement, and joint angles are impaired in people with limited upper extremity functioning after SCI. The study provides robust results applicable to a representative population of individuals with established cervical or thoracic SCI. The results suggest that kinematic analysis might be useful for those with limited functioning in order to get a better understanding of the specific movement impairments in daily tasks after SCI.

Associations between upper extremity functioning and kinematics in people with spinal cord injury.

INTRODUCTION: More knowledge of the relationships between kinematic measures and clinical assessments is required to guide clinical decision making and future research. OBJECTIVES: To determine which kinematic variables obtained during a drinking task were associated with clinical assessments of upper extremity functioning in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: In total, 25 individuals with chronic cervical (n = 17) or thoracic (n = 8) complete (n = 14) or motor incomplete (n = 11) SCI (mean age 58.4, SD 13.8) were included. Kinematic data, including movement time, smoothness and joint angles was captured with a 5-camera optoelectronic system during a unimanual drinking task. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHFT) and basic hand classification of the Upper Extremity Data Set (ISCI-Hand) were used as clinical assessments. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify kinematic variables associated with clinical assessments after controlling for potential confounding factors, such as, age, severity of SCI, sensory function, and hand surgery. RESULTS: Movement time, smoothness and movement pattern kinematics including trunk displacement, elbow and wrist joint angles were correlated (p < 0.05) with all three clinical scales while the velocity-related kinematics and inter-joint coordination showed low correlations. Multiple regression analysis revealed that wrist angle combined with movement time or smoothness explained 82% and 77% of the total variance in ARAT and SHFT, respectively. Wrist angle alone explained 59% of the variance in ISCI-Hand. The proprioception of the hand increased the explanatory power in the models of ARAT and SHFT. Associations between kinematics and clinical assessments in the subgroup with cervical SCI were equivalent to the whole group analyses. The number of participants in the subgroup with thoracic SCI was small and only allowed limited analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Wrist angle, movement time, movement smoothness are the most important kinematic variables associated with upper extremity clinical assessments in people with SCI. The results are most valid for individuals with cervical SCI. All three assessments are appropriate for SCI. Further research with larger representative sample of thoracic SCI needed.